| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
I spot checked and am seeing the same price ($17.95) you are. I've notified the TBP Editors, they should have the listing updated shortly.
Thx for the heads up.
|
06-02-12 08:08am
|
Reply
152
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Claypaws:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you, gaypornlover.
|
05-28-12 04:05pm
|
Reply
153
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
Thanks for the info but I would take the warning with a pinch of salt. When I used to use Firefox it would pop up warnings about sites being bad yet those sites were ones I have used for years and trust. Kind of hard to believe warnings when you see so many false positives.
|
05-28-12 01:14am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Toadsith:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
GGG is otherwise known as German Goo Girls. John Thompson is a German porn producer/director who specializes in extreme porn - bukkake, gang bangs, pissing, et cetera. His work has this surreal edge to it with performers often wearing masks and using unusual props or settings. He is probably the single biggest influence in how the World perceives bukkake, despite its Japanese name and origins.
|
05-27-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Toadsith:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
That's interesting. I guess it is more of an obsession in the hetero market. I know there is a DVD series focused on what is called Female Bukkake, where women ejaculate on another woman - or occasionally a man. I sort of assumed that the Bukkake fetish had quickly transitioned into the gay market as well. Maybe guys are more willing to tell a director "no".
|
05-26-12 08:45pm
|
Reply
156
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Sounds a little dodgy. I've had that sort of thing happen a few times in the past on a few sites. Sometimes it is the browser or anti spyware or anti virus kicking in - for instance in the past AVG warned of viruses for a time, when I tried to login to Pirate Bay. That appeared to be AVG acting as a censor, but I never know how seriously to take these sort of warnings. I'm always wary of sites offering special offers from live chat. I suppose I am cautious and don't blame you giving that particular site a miss.
|
05-25-12 07:34pm
|
Reply
157
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Hi, GPL, I would not be too quick to turn my back on Epoch. I've had many dealings with them over the years and they've always been A1! Sometimes emails get lost in the cracks (read spam filters). I am sure that if I had sent them another one someone would have responded. I trust CCBill and Epoch above all others and actually prefer Epoch because they don't add on as many extra charges as CCBill.
|
05-25-12 06:28pm
|
Reply
158
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the compliment!
|
05-22-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
159
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LatexRyan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I think that the owners understand the latex fetish to an extent, but not to the extent that someone who was serious about latex and latex fetishism. However they haven't really thought some of the decisions through carefully enough and that has resulted in a lack of creativity which is killing the site.
They've chosen to rely on pretty much a single designer and one with a rather limited selection of products, rather than looking around to find a variety of different outfits from a variety of different suppliers/designers.
When it comes to latex fetishism one of the first things people think of is of a catsuit. Whilst I appreciate that people want to showcase that there is a fashion side to latex, to focus completely on that to the detriment of more traditional fetish style outfits.
I have yet to see any negative or constructive feedback on any of the site's social networking pages, I don't know whether this is as a result of admins removing negative comments from the page or simply because no one has spoken up yet.
|
05-19-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from graymane:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks, GP, for your kind thoughts.... And believe me, if I were of the Gay persuasion, I would'nt hesitate for a minute to take you up on your worthy offer.
But jus' between us allies of porn, I did sorta over-do the "pity me" message about my hands....... they do perform adequately when they have to.
(and they have to very often)
|
05-09-12 02:00pm
|
Reply
161
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ergo Proxy:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I put some paragraphs into it. I hope it's easier to read now.
|
05-07-12 11:42pm
|
Reply
162
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thankfully their selection is not your typical porn music but they could take it out and I don't think it would be a problem for anyone.
|
05-07-12 05:39pm
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
gaypornolover Said: "Have you tried something like a fleshjack?"
Is it possible that you mean Fleshlight?
|
05-07-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
164
|
Straight Hell
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from tangub:
Good to hear that you got your money refunded without any hassle. I've declined one or two sites before when Verotel came up as the biller as I wasn't too sure about using them.
|
05-01-12 10:56am
|
Reply
165
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from My 2 cents:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the positive comments.
Yes, I believe the pixelating is a legal requirement. Something to do with maintaining the actresses dignity or something like that. Never mind the amount of Japanese porn that involves violence and humiliation, so long as it is pixelated it must be OK! That censorship is a sure way to ruin a good video.
There does seem to be an increasing amount of uncensored material coming out though, which has got to be a good thing.
|
04-16-12 02:12am
|
Reply
166
|
Dirty Masseur
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for that. Likewise on the trust thing, also fixed :)
|
04-15-12 02:08am
|
Reply
167
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes, totally. It's a good example of joining the site for the MODEL, not for the CONTENT. I think Carmen looks incredible, but it's definitely a site to join once and then never again. I would have given another 5 points had it not had claims that it was being updated weekly with HD videos.
|
04-14-12 02:12pm
|
Reply
168
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I'm glad they keep the site available even if it isn't updating, but I do wish that they'd be very clear about that and reduce the price accordingly.
|
04-05-12 08:45am
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from otoh:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
gpl - although as noted I'm growing a bit disenfranchised with Apple, it's a bit unfair to complain about the price of Mac OS! Granted we pay a hefty premium to use it in the first place in the form of expensive hardware, but that's the choice we make. Thereafter, OS upgrades have always been cheaper than Windows, and the latest, Lion, is about £20.
A shame you had problems with porn, though - thus far I've had no issues on Mac OS... but glad you are still enjoying smut on Windows :)
|
04-03-12 01:39am
|
Reply
170
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Yes it seems the option to join for $20 per month is no longer available. I've joined plenty of sites before that are no longer active or updating so it seems a crazy policy to me to remove the monthly join option.
|
03-18-12 11:55pm
|
Reply
171
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the comments. Public nudity is obviously a genre that has the same allure if your straight or gay. But biggest compliant about the genre (but not about Public Disgrace) is that a lot of site somehow manage to make it seem cold and clinical. You'd think that they'd have to work to remove the heat from any porn, but a lot of sites featuring public nudity seem to manage to do it easliy.
|
03-16-12 05:26pm
|
Reply
172
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the comments! I'd like to think that maybe at some point enough people will complain about automatic streaming that websites will drop it. I can't imagine what it actually contributes to the site.
|
03-10-12 12:09pm
|
Reply
173
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
This stype of stuff is actually quite old because Ed Power or Pierre Woodman was doing this years before this site existed and doing significantly better.
The fact that the girls are all amateurs isn't the problem. It's because the guy responsible for shooting the videos is an idiot. You'd think that a guy who has been doing this type of content for nearly 2 years would have gotten better but he isn't. At least he is not getting worse but that's not necessarily a compliment.
The first big mistake I can see is that they make sure that none of the shots include the face of the male performers. This limits the possible angles you can shoot from to the point where you might as well be doing POV or tripod only videos.
I didn't use the cost of the site in my review because I would still think the videos suck at 20$ but it would be easier to tell someone to give it a try if is wasn't 30$.
|
03-09-12 06:24pm
|
Reply
174
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nickisthename:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks.
|
02-14-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
175
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MisterMark:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for your input.
|
02-14-12 05:16pm
|
