| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Marcus's Reply)
That's what gets me, Marcus .. the "I suspect it was such or such," because they leave you dangling, wondering what you did wrong in their eyes. And the suspicion of foul play increases when the link provided for an explanation does not work!
|
05-25-12 10:23am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Marcus's Reply)
I agree with Marcus. A solo model site with an update once or twice a week is fine, but most sites should post an update at least once a day (or 6 times a week) to boast having "frequent updates."
|
05-16-12 10:53pm
|
Reply
153
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(Marcus's Reply)
I appreciate your interest in my review, Marcus. And please, let me direct you to the comments I gave the other gentleman who, like you, so thoughtfully expressed their thoughts.
|
05-13-12 06:49am
|
Reply
154
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
It's true that the vast majority of trials are pitiful at best and that's why I love TBP because they are upfront about what the trial offers. I don't know if you have ever tried TBP's advanced search option but it's possible to see all the sites that offer full trials.
I don't know how many of them are in the 2$ range but there are plenty of them in the 10$ or less. The only important thing in those cases is the number of days you get. I'm pretty picky about my porn so I can often download most of what I want from a site in less than 3 days so some trials are great but unless the join price is very high then I may still get the monthly membership in support of the site.
|
05-12-12 06:39am
|
Reply
155
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
You could be right because the post is a little unclear. Mine was mostly as a warning to others anyway since it was already too late for omberman to do anything about it. What I said still makes sense in that regard because the best you can hope for is to stream three videos and look at 3 photosets. The site doesn't have a great preview section but then again the trailer pretty much tells you what you'll get since the content doesn't vary from video to video.
|
05-11-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Monahan:
(Marcus's Reply)
I agree with Marcus...except in one aspect. Many ads are now disguised as part of a site's content so clicking on the link and expecting to see something created by the site instead gets you redirected to another site and a sales pitch. That's an intrusive pain in the ass that I don't need and, if it continues, would make me change my vote to "I hate them."
|
05-11-12 10:08am
|
Reply
157
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from hodayathink:
Good review. I pretty much felt the same way when I was a member 6 months ago, especially with the doing more than BJs a little more often. Occasionally, I wonder what she'd do given the resources and contacts to make a full-on porn movie with other actors.
|
05-03-12 06:24pm
|
Reply
158
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Great review!
The claims about updating every week with HD videos lured me in as well a while ago.
Forgot to write a review back then.
However, the model was/is very appealing to me. So it wasn't a complete waste.
|
04-15-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
159
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from gaypornolover:
Sounds like one to avoid unless you really like the model and are forwarned by reviews like yours what you're getting. That's what makes PU so useful, and this such an excellent review - thank you.
|
04-14-12 01:37pm
|
Reply
160
|
GiGi Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review. I enjoyed reading it. I was a member at this network a while ago and agree with everything you wrote.
|
01-11-12 01:47pm
|
Reply
161
|
GiGi Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Denner:
Splendid review there, Marcus!
This even makes me consider yet another join of one of the site from Pacino...
Bottom line: A really fine review for latina fans...
And got to say this:
Marcus is new here, it seems - December 2011 - and guess some newer PUs could learn from this guy about serious, well founded and thorough reviews...
Welcome to PU - and keep it up - there's a lot of mutual help here.
|
01-11-12 07:12am
|
Reply
162
|
Television X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from falsup:
(Marcus's Reply)
y/w marcus, I was so pissed at not only this unethical practice, but there arrogant attitude, that i felt I had to warn others. Porn sites need to either stop trying to trick us into paying more than we should, or go out of business.
|
01-11-12 06:06am
|
Reply
163
|
GiGi Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tangub:
A comprehensive well written review Marcus, I think you've probably covered everything.
|
01-11-12 03:46am
|
Reply
164
|
Tia Ling
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tialing:
(Marcus's Reply)
Yep....all back to downloadable now babe :) tia
|
01-01-12 11:11am
|
Reply
165
|
Tia Ling
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Marcus's Reply)
Thanks for clearing that up.
BTW, welcome to PornUsers
|
01-01-12 11:01am
|
Reply
166
|
Tia Ling
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Khan:
You mention you couldn't download content "when I was a member". May we know how long ago that was?
|
01-01-12 10:54am
|
Reply
167
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tangub:
I've been meaning to join some of these Latin Spice websites for a long time but they are quite pricey so keep getting bumped down my list by other sites with special offers.
|
01-01-12 03:15am
|
Reply
168
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tangub:
It's quite amazing that a paying customer should be called a thief, I would suggest it's the website who are thieves if they took your 28 bucks then booted you off the site. The terms of service seem a bit ambiguous to me especially the section under "downloading" where they talk about average daily quotos across the membership database. How the hell is anyone supposed to know what other members are downloading and what an average daily quota is. Also the daily download lmit does not make it clear if its per site or for the network. It does look like a nice network of sites that might interest me but being a photo freak myself the lack of zip files means i'm unlikely to ever join.
|
01-01-12 03:06am
|
Reply
169
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tboy:
Wow that's a new low, thanks for the warning.
|
12-31-11 11:23am
|
Reply
170
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from BellaNetwork:
10 or so videos does not get you banned Marcus. Why is it when someone breaks the terms of service and the server removes them for abuse, they can never man up and admit they were in the wrong? Before you join the terms of service are listed. You agree to these *before you join*. It clearly lists the limits (10gig per day) and if you perform or attempt a site rip, the server removes you. Of course you say otherwise, granted, but if you were a good member, you'd be on the inside still wouldn't you be? The server took action against you, sorry it felt it needed to.
My advice to you is to read terms of service before joining a site and do your best to follow those terms. We have many members that have been with us for three years straight now without issue. They don't try and download the site in one afternoon. :)
|
12-31-11 10:55am
|
Reply
171
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from pat362:
Are you sure that she's still active? I was under the impression that her content is dated since she stopped shooting porn a while ago.
|
12-31-11 09:38am
|
Reply
172
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from rearadmiral:
Good God! If I had spent $25 to get NOTHING I think I'd be less polite than you! Wow! Thanks for the warning.
|
12-31-11 09:03am
|
