| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(xexbot's Reply)
I hope that you like it. Either way, I would like to know. Maybe you will write a review?
|
07-12-12 09:57am
|
Reply
27
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from blaine:
Excellent and candid review. I am a big fan of Ryanne as well, and was contemplating joining the site, Think I will go in for a month as I've seen most of her Southern Charms content already. Is this site strictly a solo site? Or part of a network?
Thanks xexbot
|
07-08-12 02:26pm
|
Reply
28
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Denner:
Fine warning and sincere review.....
|
06-26-12 09:51am
|
Reply
29
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Just a quick question; When looking at the preview area, they mention "Full length movies" of about 70-75 minutes.
Surely these must be better quality than what you have mentioned in your review? They seem pretty new.
I'm not questioning your review, don't get me wrong, it just seems like false advertising if the above stated is true.
|
06-26-12 08:28am
|
Reply
30
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review as always, but I found this one particularly well-written and interesting as you've really managed to give me a flavour of the site.
I have been a member of a kink.com site and I agree with you about the cross-promotions. The prices they charge are fair for the quality and they do offer discounts and 2-for-1 deals but even so, I could never afford to join all of their sites so the indexing to them all is a bit frustrating.
This is actually one of the "straight" sites I could enjoy as I like femdom stuff - I guess because the focus is on the male, unusual for straight porn, and I love domination and BDSM - and if a woman is doing it, it has a slightly different dynamic and of course the men are convincingly heterosexual - often claimed but rarely true on a gay sites!
|
06-25-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
31
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Wow sounds an awful site! I do think a lot of sites are stuck in the 1990s - wake up and smell the coffee folks! Most people have a half-decent broadband connection now and those that don't probably aren't going to pay to download porn anyway - it just isn't worth it at the speeds you get on dial-up.
|
06-25-12 11:14am
|
Reply
32
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks xexbot. Now I understand what you're saying. I didn't think I was describing a problem though, unless you mean that links timing out is the problem.
I don't think they actually move the files around. I think the file stays where it is and they generate an alias for it which depends on only-they-know-what and is unique to you. It includes a 32 byte hash key if you look at the URL. Then they make that alias expire after a certain time. Certainly does prevent site raping. Evas Garden's links expire after about two minutes. Preventing browsing while downloading is a mean trick. It's a long time since I've seen that one.
I think that links expiring after a few hours is reasonable though. Or were you saying that your ATK links do not expire for days?
|
06-22-12 11:50am
|
Reply
33
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(xexbot's Reply)
Is that just screencaps then?
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-22-12 06:36am
|
Reply
34
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
xexbot - I do not understand this comment about videos and new days and stuff. I have no idea what you are referring to. It does not appear to relate to my reply #1, about download managers. Please enlighten me :-)
|
06-21-12 04:51pm
|
Reply
35
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thank you xexbot. I had to look up Taekwondo, not being a follower of any sport at all. I see what you mean about a dyslexic, or reversed, KTA. I bet ATK did not realise it.
The repeat modelling is a distinct feature and they do take it to extremes. Marie McCray has 96 photo sets and 20 videos at Galleria and also very many sets at Hairy, Petites, Premium and Archives - they have been shooting her for 7 years.
Some sites have one or two models with a lot of sets - Anya on MPLStudios, for example, with 165 photo sets and 13 videos but I know of no other site that does it for so many models. If ATK had a search that allowed me to identify all models with more than 20 sets, I would give the statistic - but it hasn't. I think that their own statistics, which I quoted, for number of models and number of photosets, must include the models whose videos stay on Galleria but whose photosets are moved off to Archives, giving them zero photosets at Galleria. For 2500 models and 25000 photosets can only give a lot of models more than 10 sets each if some have none. Hmmm. I do not feel like going manually through every model counting up her sets.
You mention Sativa Verde.I also participated in an ATKHairy cam show from Ely Dean. She was pretty effusive about how much fun it is modelling for them and she has at least one series on Hairy as a photographer too. And Alicia S runs a photo studio and also models for them.
This is not the only site or company that has happy models, of course. But I always think that it is nice to have some examples one could show to porn persecutors who think that porn consists entirely of miserable women forced to do things against their will.
|
06-21-12 04:47pm
|
Reply
36
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Capn:
This lady is one of my few favourites.
Is there any decent photoset material there, please?
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-21-12 12:58pm
|
Reply
37
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Ergo Proxy:
You have so much criticism and cons that I was surprised to see a 79 which is just one point below "very good". Some points you mention would be a real turn off for me, for example the basic set of fat, middle aged men (I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same as in ClubDom.com), the non networking and searchability and the mixed bag of models. Good review though because I will avoid this site now.
|
06-21-12 11:13am
|
Reply
38
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from otoh:
This is a network I've been tempted by, since I'm quite keen on nylons - but it is, as pat362 mentioned, very expensive. It also looks a bit samey, perhaps? I like something a bit different - perhaps something a bit artsy... but not at the expense of explicitness.
|
06-12-12 11:17am
|
Reply
39
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(xexbot's Reply)
I can take creepy porn or I can leave it but possibly illegal stuff is a very different thing. I'd hate to be one of those guys caught with stuff that I assumed was legal but is in fact illegal.
|
06-11-12 06:53am
|
Reply
40
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from pat362:
The site is by far the most expensive on the net. They do update with a lot of content on a monthly basis but it's spread out among all their different sites so unless you love everything they offer then you aren't necessarily getting all that much for you 90$.
Some of their content is for the gay market so there aren't too many hetero guys interested in those updates, it's very common for the same performers to have multiple scenes with similar content on their sites and I notice that a bunch of their sites don't update very often ir at all. I guess there is still a market for their brand of porn because they are still in business but their price has put them out of my pocket book. Not to mention that I don't think I kept a single video from when I last joined.
I'm glad you enjoy their network because they still hire girls to shoot porn and that's good for the porn economy.
|
06-10-12 12:54pm
|
Reply
41
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from pat362:
If you assessement of the situation in regards to possible underage models should make anyone weary of joining this site. I'd hate to be one of the people who unknowignly saved a video of an underage girl. Of course that preculdes that this can be done. My knowledge of cam sites is very limited.
|
06-10-12 12:34pm
|
Reply
42
|
College Fuck Parties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks for the comments. I think it is supposed to look like amateurs doing a porn home movie for fun. Trouble is, it does. But even on the supposedly professional sites in the network, they often have horrible lighting.
When it's good it is worth viewing, but it takes so long to find the worthy stuff that I gave up just over half way through my membership. There is undoubtedly great stuff on that network, and a lot that I have missed because I couldn't be bothered to wade through it all. It could do with some professional edtiting, lighting and camerawork, then it could be something worth recommending.
|
05-20-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
43
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LatexRyan:
(xexbot's Reply)
I've actually found that most Latex/Fetish sites are actually quite competitively priced and often you don't pay much more than you would for a standard porn site.
I think that part of the reason for the high prices at Latex Lair are due in part to the fact that Bianca is one of the most well known fetish models. Whilst it's a very good site and the production values are fantastic, I think that paying nearly $40 as an initial price is a bit steep, but I can understand as to why they would put it so high.
As I've said in the review, there are often periods where membership prices are reduced and that it's far better value for money when you join during these periods.
I will admit that it can be rather hard to be subjective when you really enjoy a site or really like a model but of course sometimes it's by not being subjective that we learn the most about a site.
|
05-20-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
44
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Khan:
Are you sure this is the site you meant to review? I ask because some of your remarks sound like thsy might apply better to Nikki's Playmates
|
05-20-12 02:27pm
|
Reply
45
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(xexbot's Reply)
I believe that they were and still are a primarily video only site and the pics are there simply to help members know what kind of action is inside. The reason I say that is that the quality of the photos have been the same since day one. The only thing that has really changed is the quantity and by default you get a variety of angles in the shots.
|
05-07-12 11:00am
|
Reply
46
|
VCA XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(xexbot's Reply)
I can't figure out why this market hasn't been tapped. The production costs are long gone so all it would take is digitizing them. It would be great if a site like Videobox would create a 'classics' channel to give these older titles what they deserve.
|
05-06-12 11:58am
|
Reply
47
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Ergo Proxy:
Thanks for the review. I can follow your score after the points mentioned. Said that I would not even give Abby Winters more than 70 points.
|
04-21-12 04:53am
|
Reply
48
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(xexbot's Reply)
No problem, thats why we are all here right?
|
04-20-12 11:37pm
|
Reply
49
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from International M:
Thanks for the positive review. I am glad to hear that you like the network so much!
The coming weeks we have some crazy parties scheduled, so stay tuned!
|
04-20-12 07:23am
|
Reply
50
|
Cum Eating Cuckolds
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Sounds like an interesting site which could hold some appeal for me... excellent review, thank you.
|
04-14-12 11:09am
|
