Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review - this site seems deservedly popular. I agree with you about Kink.com - I wish they had more flexibility in moving between sites within your membership.
|
03-27-12 03:24pm
|
Reply
52
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! I was interested to read this as soon as I saw it posted because this is one of my favourite sites on the 'net.
I agree with most of what you say, but I strongly agree with your wish that Kink offered some kind of membership that allowed access to multiple sites. My suspicion is that they don't do this because the sites appear to be stand-alone and run by a different crew for each. That might make sharing membership fees a little more difficult, but certainly not impossible.
You probably know these things, but, just in case some other readers aren't aware:
1) when you're a Kink member at one site you get discounts to other Kink sites,
2) make sure to register your email with them. They sometimes offer great deals to email subscribers, and
3) Videobox has a Kink channel with a blend of a lot of stuff from most Kink sites. The bad news is that to even see what the channel has to offer you need to be a VB member. The good news is that the monthly fee for the Kink channel is pro-rated for the month of your VB membership. If you join the Kink channel in week three of the VB membership you'll only pay for the one week provided you cancel VB after the month.
|
03-27-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
53
|
Subby Hubby
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review from xexbot:
5gb/day download limit.
|
03-27-12 12:57am
|
Reply
54
|
Cuckold Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Uh-oh - the second I hear of the slightest problem with cancellation that's enough to put me off a site, so reviews like this are especially helpful. Sites have to be 100% hot on cancellations in a business like this where trust is low!
|
02-13-12 08:12pm
|
Reply
55
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(xexbot's Reply)
You are blessed, xexbot, to have been granted a disposition like that. The logos drove me batty. I didn't keep a single video because of them. You are so fortunate that it's only a minor nuisance to you!
Oh, yeah, I already mentioned that, didn't I? :-)
|
02-12-12 06:38pm
|
Reply
56
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from graymane:
Commendable, and certainly a colorful review, vexbot. Twas One of those that did its job well without a lot of technical jargon.
Can't say, however, even with your towering score, whether it's swaying me in either direction; and maybe that's because I joined this site a long time ago and it had pretty much then of what you've cleverly described in this review.
It may be enough, though, to tilt my decision toward another shot.
Good job!
|
02-12-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
57
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from messmer:
How did you feel about the huge watermarks, xexbot? I just got finished with four of Ferro's sites and found them (the logos) so offensive that I deleted everything I had downloaded only yesterday. Just wondering if they are really that big of a deal to others. Good review, though, while technical details are sparse you did sum up nicely what Ferro is all about.
|
02-10-12 10:10am
|
Reply
58
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from messmer:
Since reviews cannot be but subjective, here are my reasons for rating WAH higher than ATK:
Less emphasis on extreme hairiness (legs, arms, anus, belly etc.), something I dislike heartily, especially hairy legs.
ATK has become increasingly more extreme over the years.
No hardcore! Many of us prefer softcore solo models.
Material is better in quality because they only started a couple of years ago so most is in HD or, the few very earliest updates, in near HD quality.
Number of updates approaching those of ATK but of better quality, especially the pictures. Custom zip available.
Site makes it easy to browse.
Friendly and very responsive webmaster!
You on the other hand come at the judgment of the sites from a different angle. Every update containing hardcore always got the lowest marks from me in ATK while you bemoan the fact that WAH does not give you any hardcore. Nothing wrong with your preferences except when it comes to comparing the two sites. Just like apples and oranges, in my opinion.
In any case, welcome to Porn Users, xexbot, I don`t think I`ve seen your name before.
|
01-30-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
59
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I'll second Basil's attentiveness as a factor. As for WAH not running to "XXX", I think you should consider that not all porn is hardcore and that there are fans of the softer side of things. If the site's not your thing, it's just not your thing.
|
01-30-12 12:44pm
|
Reply
60
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from Capn:
Functionality is superior at WAH & the Webmanager is very responsive.
ATK is a much bigger outfit & therefore more ponderous in getting improvements implemented.
ATKNH have shedloads more content, WAH has only been going a couple of years.
Models & content is a very personal thing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-30-12 12:32pm
|
Reply
61
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from BradlyH:
Another nice review, I find that a site with a lot of content better be Organized, if not it is one hell of a navigating nightmare !
You should elaborate a little bit more in your Bottom line section, maybe put things in there that you think other members would be interested in knowing with out actually visiting the site, such as: Pricing, the billing company, What players run the videos, How often is it updated, file sizes ect...
|
01-08-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
62
|
Cum Eating Cuckolds
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from BradlyH:
I can't say this is something that would be my niche but i saw your review on the front page and was curious to what this is all about. Great review by the way, I have been reading a lot of reviews mentioning bad navigation lately.
|
01-08-12 05:57pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
