| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from baddaddie:
(jd1961's Reply)
I don't really care what any of you think on my review, when I joined Twisty I was happy, it was what I was looking for, so much so I had a long stay with them.
If another person was looking for that material I sure they would be very happy but as we have pointed out after some mount of time you would get bored.
If you don't like what I think, fine, I am sure there are reviews you have made on other site that I would disagree with; maybe I should team up with a few members and mock your views and comments.
If it not you thing, fine I still thought it was a very good site and still do, but like the Simpson I grew tired of it.
|
03-26-08 08:15am
|
Reply
302
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from heff:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks! :-)
I'll try to give my best.
|
03-26-08 05:23am
|
Reply
303
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
They really hate it when people have their eyes open and brain in gear. Nice heads up!
|
03-25-08 04:15pm
|
Reply
304
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks. It looks that the whole industry goes downhill. "We're not cheating anymore" is now considered a good advertisement :-(.
|
03-25-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
JD, there will be another announcement when the forum launches. I was just letting those (like yourself) who are following the subject know that, it's on track and that you can start getting your avatar ready.
No-doubt, some will miss the heads up but it doesn't really warrant a full on announcement.
|
03-25-08 05:20am
|
Reply
306
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks jd1961, I am going to try it out when my "glamour" month comes up in May. I did go to a TGP site and found some samples that looked pretty good and promising.
|
03-23-08 10:38pm
|
Reply
307
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Agree with JD - keep it listed - that way we'll all know what site/pass to skip.....
|
03-21-08 09:41am
|
Reply
308
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
500 megs a day might as well wipe my ass with my $20 bills. This download limit might have been appropriate 15 years ago whe a large site was 10 GB and that was huge. Any more it pisses me off when a single video is less than 500 megs. Thanks for the warning on this RB
|
03-20-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
309
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Understandable, it is pretty easy to mix them up if you read through quickly. Besides, I was looking for an excuse to let that out because I know there are people who do not know the difference but do not want to be the person to ask. You know what they say about assumptions though!! :)
I certainly wish I could get those kind of speeds. It would make porn browsing much easier, but I dont think webmasters would approve of people being able to download their content in a matter of minutes, I have made enough of them mad the way it is!
The problem with standards is that not everyone uses the same standards, liters and gallons for example. So I find it best just to not be lazy and type the whole thing out. Just like "lol" means laugh out load to many people, but I might say lol thinking lesbians on lust. Okay, maybe that is stretching it, but you get the point.
|
03-20-08 08:55pm
|
Reply
310
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Read carefully everyone! It was 70 Mbit/s and I always spell it out for exactly this reason, not to pick on you JD1961. Perhaps you know this already, but for anyone who does not: there is a ratio of 8:1 between the two, so just under 10 MBytes/s if you prefer to see it that way. And yes that number is correct, I always run a program called Bandwidth Monitor at continuously displays the bandwidth in and out. Although, now the site is running at 60 MBit/s
I am always wondering if people get the too mixed up. I understand that many people do not know the relation between a bit and a byte. The simple way to put is that 1 byte equals 8 bits for almost any application. So the new videos people are talking about being shot in 8 MBit video is equal to 1 MByte/s
If someone tells you 70 MBytes/s they are more than likely stupid! My fastest hard drive can sustain writing 77 MByte/s using SATA 2. So a website outputting that much to one user would be insane!
I truly believe that people should not abbreviate Mbps and MBs, because it gets mixed up alot. It should be spelled out to avoid the mess.
|
03-20-08 10:00am
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Ah yes! You got a computer and realized it only has one true function, the downloading of porn is mass quantities. After all the trading scans of nudy pictures was the first use of the internet. I know that sounds cool and all, but it is actually the truth! So when we are downloading porn we are actually using the internet for its true intention :)
|
03-19-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Then what happened? You a pretty high in the standings here, so you must have heard your calling!
|
03-18-08 08:04pm
|
Reply
313
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
Indeed that is what I said: Being that the free stuff wasn't worth the time required to find anything of interest and I couldn't afford what I would be interested in, I didn't partake in porn for that period.
|
03-18-08 11:01am
|
Reply
314
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
I think your review was great and thorough, jd. Very well done and not misleading in any way. They deserve the rating you gave it. The mistake was mine. I should have taken a closer look at the word "Glamor," turned my back and looked for "Amateur" or "Housewives" or "Mature" instead.
|
03-15-08 06:18pm
|
Reply
315
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, I did, jd! Trouble is my mind was made up, mainly because I had been looking and looking for a site that would really suit me and I figured with all those models (not to forget the good deal we get) surely there must be something there for me. There honestly wasn't. The models, as becomes a glamour site, are too slick and perfect for me. Maybe during the coming weeks, as my subscription runs its course, I'll find SOMETHING flawed! Maybe the odd saggy breast, or pimple, or wrinkle. :-) I'm kidding, of course, mainly because I didn't lose too much on the deal so I can treat the subject with humour.
|
03-15-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
316
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
To tell the truth, jd, if he were to make a special category for me I don't think he'd come up with much. Yesterday I wrote that I liked the site but today I must say that I've never been more disappointed with a site. It's a swamp of American models with fake breasts. Even the European models look like American models! I took a long, long look and see nothing but women who could be posing for Playboy or Penthouse. I won't blame the site for it, and most would consider that a plus, after all it is a glamour site but there is a horrible, artificial sameness to it all. If you like individual porn stars, there's a great opportunity to download everything pertaining to them but I'm not hot on porn stars, I prefer the girl next door. Didn't we have this discussion before? :-) In any case, every single picture set I looked at lacked definition, had flesh tones that were way too warm and unnatural, and was mostly in portrait format rather than landscape. These are all personal preferences and I won't blame the site for it. Just wish I had taken a better look first before I leaped. So, I'll be canceling today, one day after subscribing. Must be my quickest one ever. I should have stuck with hi-def pro-ams (women who are pretty without being glamorous.)
|
03-15-08 09:03am
|
Reply
317
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from roseman:
Awesome review.
|
03-15-08 07:35am
|
Reply
318
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from hakan:
Hallo!
What about the videos, size, bitrate? Are ther any HD movies?
Hakan in Sweden
|
03-15-08 01:48am
|
Reply
319
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(jd1961's Reply)
Lame. Ridiculous. Sinful. Preposterous. Ludicrous. Unbelievable. Sneaky. Devious. Underhanded. Trickery. Shifty. Unfair. Insidious. Foul. Con. Scam. Racket. Shady. Deceptive. Swindling. Hustle. Thievery. Unprincipled. Unconscionable. Unscrupulous. Subterfuge.
IMO.
|
03-14-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
320
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review from jd1961:
I ran out of space and wanted to add that not all the content is exclusive, but with so much content, it is really not a factor.
|
03-14-08 05:47am
|
Reply
321
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#30
from Pinche Kankun:
(jd1961's Reply)
I'll make absolute sure I don't encounter that movie!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:36pm
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Pinche Kankun:
(jd1961's Reply)
FUCKING ME NEITHER!!!
I am probably the main person in this website with an issue about this shit!!! Tits and tummy, or the ass and spinal cord... NOT THE FACE!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:05pm
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It does seem oddly regressive for the male to suddenly start twangin' away instead of finishing the fucking with the partner who's right there with him.
It's weird how the porn industry is like Hollywood in that way: they go with the same tired formulas again and again.
You certainly don't see the woman suddenly pulling off the guy and rubbing her pussy to orgasm at the end of a porn scene.
|
03-13-08 12:54pm
|
Reply
324
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Glad you feel that way about tattoos, jd. Misery loves company and if enough people voice their dislike maybe they'll stop tattooing. As for the fake body parts, I started to look at a set featuring one gorgeous lady and was tempted to download it until she revealed those artificially rigid cones on her chest. What made it worse were the scars under both her breasts. I have nothing against scars, ladies can have operations and still be beautiful but WHY enhanced breasts. Who is the boyfriend, husband who wants to fondle a bag of silicone? Those plastic surgeons and tattoo artists must be having a lucrative field day with all this silliness. I WANT NATURAL WOMAN!!! If she sags a bit, fine. If she's an A cup or DD cup, fine. If she's a bit plump or skinny, fine too.
|
03-13-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
325
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Guess your right about US-porn - and it's too bad, because US-porn was the pioneer - when no one else did the job - the french, the germans - and yes, us danes came around later - but it was only a copy of US-porn.
Things sure have changed since - not that euro-porn in general is so great, but the most US-porn is getting boring and sterotype/static (I may not have the right english words, but anyway)
JD is right, quote:
"I think the quality of American porn is at its lowest point ever."
|
03-13-08 09:45am
|
