| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from PinkPanther:
I have tried this site repeatedly because of the TBP discount. I like it more than Twisty's for a few reasons
While they have their own photoshop addiction, they don't mangle the models as Twisty's has at times, such as with their Andi Valentino photo sets
I like the fun campiness of their satirical vids
I like the low-key personality-filled event vids.
The downside - for a site that has so much video, they don't have a lot of vids that are high on sexual heat.
Twisty's vids are better strip vids, in my opinion
Brazzers does much hotter campy vids, in my opinion
|
04-25-08 06:44am
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, the MILF idea sounds like Oedipus Legit -- outwardly craving someone else's mother while secretly thinking naughty thoughts about one's own.
I'd never go for a woman just because she's someone's mom. And all of the poll options are non-sequitur in my case, so I my party affiliation doesn't allow me to vote on this one.
|
04-25-08 01:48am
|
Reply
278
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from wally:
I agree with just about everything you say about the right way to do POV. Problem is, I haven't really found a website yet that does it (Dreamstash comes close - it probably violates your rules a bit since the operator uses a second tripod mounted camera for some non-POV angles, but at least he knows enough to stay quiet and anonymous). What website would you recommend?
|
04-24-08 09:21pm
|
Reply
279
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from zachvenice:
(jd1961's Reply)
Our DRM is removed! Wah-la!
|
04-23-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
280
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from zachvenice:
We do have bandwidth governing in place but its set so high, most people will never notice it. Basically, the max speed is set to somewhere between 500 and 750KB/s which is really fast. Please let me know what kind of speeds you were getting.
|
04-23-08 03:10pm
|
Reply
281
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from zachvenice:
As noted in our other replies, our speed has since increased 50% above what you experienced. We estimate anywhere between 500-750KB/s when user-bandwidth allows it. We also have tons of models with natural boobs. We invite you all to take a look at our tour and judge for yourselves.
|
04-23-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, a TBP score of 87.6 for the Harris site is definitely putting the ratings into inflationary territory. The PU average score of 76.3 is closer to a real market correction. My experience there -- and I've been enough of a doof to join more than once -- kept bringing to mind the work "hack."
The PU reviews tend to reflect that, to which I may add or echo difficult navigation, broken links, hot babes but meager photo selections, and even the photography; though it qualifies as "glam," doesn't make it since there's blurriness, poor lighting, stupid crop jobs, and cookie-cutter aesthetics. No one in "Ron Land" seems to give a shit about making sure that their site is user friendly and free of obvious mistakes that rip off subscribers. The money's gonna come in, anyway, right?
Some folks do seem to like it, though. They probably eat out of microwaves.
|
04-23-08 12:25pm
|
Reply
283
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It seems that my "invention" has been propagating its way downstream through the market. Could I have trademarked it? Nah, 'cause I'm not a content provider anyway, and a "real" content provider has snatched it up. Definitely downstream.
Well, it's there for the linking and the reading. Caveat emptor and all that.
|
04-23-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Now JD, that dont hold too good here! :) Seriously, people need to say everything they know about a site here. Holding back things that are less favorable only leaves the rest of us open to disappointment. If someone rates a site they should give a little reasoning to back there rating. Say everything nice or not....I guess I should write a review for the one rating I did with no review!
|
04-12-08 06:38pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I don't usually use them to join sites, either. If I find a new one, I check the review sites first for info. But I have stuck my neck out a few times and had the site listed at TBP/PU, joined (usually regetted it), and usually wrote a review. Bad little habit, that. Making a mental note to break that one.
I'd say it's time to let someone else be the "pioneer." I'm all covered in trail dust.
|
04-10-08 11:48am
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, that's always a good idea. Just a speck of inconvenience for that "payback moment."
|
04-10-08 11:43am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It can include redirects. By "referred" I mean that the portal (erohtica being one example), links to sites that visitors may go to, however the links may work (direct links in same window, in a new window, etc.).
The point is that these portals make money from visitor's clicks. I think they should be held accountable for some baseline of quality standards of the sites that they refer to. I think the referrals should be viewed as implicit recommendations.
If the portals are going to gain financially, then they do have a reciprocal responsibility. They shouldn't just be able to "plead ignorance" and claim that they have no control over it.
|
04-09-08 03:00am
|
Reply
288
|
JJ1 Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi jd,
The jumping-jack thing is extremely misleading and might be a reason why this site has gotten zero notice here. There are one or two flash animations of each model doing jumping jacks (usually one from the front, and one from the rear, that's it), but there are anywhere from thirty to a hundred animations for each model doing a variety of other things, so the jumping jacks is a tiny percentage of the total material on offer. I admit the premise sounds a bit silly, but I really like a lot of these animations. They're sort of like a gif, only much larger (screen-size wise) and with a longer range of movement that plays in a loop. I think of them as a picture with frills. I can't think of another site which offers these things, at least in this kind of quantity. It's unique, as far as I know.
The site is pretty much oriented towards the breast-man. And they're some of the best breasts going.
|
04-08-08 10:54am
|
Reply
289
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Denner:
Hey, once again, brother
I also just saw the huge debate about censored/uncensored - I'm quite with you there.
But about J Sex Network can you give an estimate procentage on how many with and without the mosaic???
|
04-05-08 02:23pm
|
Reply
290
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
There definitely seems to be a back-and-forth conversation between Japanese and US-porn. My fave US-porn guys, like Jules Jordan, have definitely shown signs for years of being influenced by Japanese porn, and watching some of the more hard-edged rough and kinky stuff being produced by DAS and Attackers, it seems that they are repaying the favor by picking up on some of Jules' ideas - since in both cases, they're picking up tips from the best rather than the most mediocre people working, it's a really good thing, in my view.
|
04-05-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
291
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Wow, JD...
Thanks for that reply - great hints there.
And, man - I did'nt catch on to your own review till now (sometimes you don't find them all) - but that review helped even more.
I'll go for it...and look forward to some new ways...
Thanks again!!!
|
04-05-08 01:45pm
|
Reply
292
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey JD
Well, you're right there.
And BTW: You got any knowledge of this site? - it looks somewhat new concerning japanese porn. And the preview-thing - man, I just can't get a real idea about it - it just looks a bit messy to me.
And I think you're more the expert here. So, if you got a hint about this site for the other fans at PU of good asian porn - this user included.....?
|
04-05-08 01:08pm
|
Reply
293
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It tends to vary, but with some of those large photosets, it's a pain to have to put a post-it on your computer or something to remind yourself of where to re-attempt downloading. Not that I'm complaining about the sizes of the photosets. I suppose for the video fans it's a real pain in the butt.
They'll next update on Monday. That's probably when the next stampede will be.
Hope there's more Karlie Montana on the way.
|
04-05-08 02:48am
|
Reply
294
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Pay $10,000 a year!
|
04-04-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
295
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from JBDICK:
Spot On jd1961, I agree with you.
Read my review if you wish. I feel totally ripped off having joined the site, and you are right, after finding some DVDs that looked interesting, I clicked on them only to find that I was redirected to their shop where I could spend more money on their merchandise if I'm stupid enough. The sad reality is that they do have the best girls on the Net, I guess their Boardroom & share holders have stopped loving Porn and are only interested in fleecing their members. I can't believe I'm reading rave reviews for the quality of their site content.
|
04-04-08 11:48am
|
Reply
296
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks, Bro - this site is the only one with spped-troubles in the preview-area.....but no big deal - don't think I'll join anyway - with all the DRM...
|
04-03-08 07:01am
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Kevin:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi jd,
Did the page actually seem to load all the way to the bottom, but the hourglass still stays for a bit? That's the issue we were having, so we removed a 3rd party stat tracking script which seemed to take ages to load.
As far as PornUsers.com and TheBestPorn.com, if you ever notice that certain pages often take longer than they should, hang half-way through, or even hang before they start loading then please send an e-mail to us, as detailed as you can, describing the issues. I'll personally look into every request.
|
03-28-08 12:52pm
|
Reply
298
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
I was just checking in at Crush (Twyla aka Adel Sharp has me entralled) and noticed that there are no new updates since March 11th. There's a note on the update page that says, "Upon securing of additional capital, Crush will resume regular update schedule."
Whew, my last day was March 10th, so I'm lucky with that at least! ;)
And as for that notice, I guess there's a first time for everything. I'd think that KEEPING the regular update schedule might actually be a little less discouraging for the old cash flow, but hey ... whatever!
|
03-28-08 10:24am
|
Reply
299
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I joined yesterday. Hoping the server problem will be fixed soon, but I'm not going to wait too long before I post a review.
The way I see it, once a site is online and collecting subscription money, and for that matter getting referrals (this one was referred by erohtica), business is business. Any site with the shop door open is subject to review as it is, whatever warts there may be.
I think some people disagree with what I've just said and would say that we should give the site a chance to fix its problems first.
I've gone middle-of-the-road this time by posting the comment about the server speed, as a warning to other PornUsers. It was me that asked TBP and PU to list the site, once I'd found it through ehrotica, so I feel kind of responsible, though certainly not culpable.
All I wanted was a nice batch of quality content. What a pain in the ass this thing is!
|
03-27-08 08:18pm
|
Reply
300
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, jd, it's a blip that keeps fading into oblivion. I've had the site open most of today. I had a brief run of just OK performance a few hours ago, but most of the time the server just keeps crappin' out.
Also have a partial early draft of a review in the works, but I'll give you some inside skinny by saying that while there are no zips (a big minus, but of course!) all of the material looks exclusive/different from what Mr. Rigin has on other sites like MetArt and MetModels.
I did manage to finally send a message to them, and I got a prompt answer from Mr. Rigin himself. Apparently, they have some new programmers that have "altered" the site. Maybe it's just a co-incidence of bad timing! I hope it doesn't involve asteroids. ;)
Will have more to say once new developments appear sustainable.
|
03-27-08 03:14pm
|
