| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
I've never tried Opera for porn. I do have it on my PC and use it for some sites. I will have to try it out and see how it does. My one big complaint with using Firefox is that when downloading, if you are typing while a file downloads, when it hits 100% finished, it stops you from typing. Not a big deal to most, but I usually type from notes, so I'm not looking at the screen. After five minutes, I look up to see that the last 4 paragraphs I thought I had typed were not typed!
|
07-10-07 11:24pm
|
Reply
252
|
Fartin Tart
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
LOL, that has got to be one of the most unbelievable things I have ever seen. hahahaha. I love how when you click to enter the site, there are all these big borders saying "My farts stink!" Truly beyond description.
|
03-03-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
253
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks jd1961, I am going to try it out when my "glamour" month comes up in May. I did go to a TGP site and found some samples that looked pretty good and promising.
|
03-23-08 10:38pm
|
Reply
254
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Always good advice to unzip before you quit. It can happen with zips from any site. (From one who has lived and learned on this point.)
|
03-01-08 02:56am
|
Reply
255
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks for the info. And, no, I'm not that enamored of clothing that I'd add it artificially .. I just think a bit of teasing wouldn't hurt. And after your review and comments I am sorely tempted to subscribe to the site to give it a try .. clothing or not!
|
02-22-08 10:39am
|
Reply
256
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for the review, jd. I'm on a 1-yr membership that started in May and I think it along with MetArt are probably the two best sofcore sites around.
They've also added links to zips from within the gallery pages just recently; it's a convenience I appreciate.
As for the recent price hike, it might be due to the dollar falling 20% against the Euro in the past two years, but I'm not sure. Next time I'll make up for that difference just by staying away long enough.
|
11-25-07 05:03am
|
Reply
257
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Khan:
I've passed the apparent price increase to the TBP Editors. The listing should be changed shortly.
And yes, imo it's a very good site.
|
11-12-07 04:39am
|
Reply
258
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey JD,
If you're looking for fresh nude photography, you might check out TorridArt. I did a review and although the update rate is comparable to FigureBaby, they had enough in archives to keep me busy for about 4 hours.
One caveat: the server is unreliable, as in I've been trying to access it today and haven't been able to get in.
So it's a pale recommendation for that reason, but I liked what was there.
|
02-02-08 02:51am
|
Reply
259
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Pinche Kankun:
Damn, that's how long it takes for this site to update... 6 months?!!!
>:(
|
02-01-08 11:34pm
|
Reply
260
|
First Class POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from David92220:
I did google "DRM Protection in Porn" and came across several articles. But none of them answered the question if it means we are not allowed to download the videos?
|
03-19-20 01:15pm
|
Reply
261
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Jeeeezz, where did you find that?
At their "Term and Condition" - Never read that stuff
Well, whatever.
What I download, I keep untill the day I might what to clean up. I guess we all do it that way, no matter what.. and that's the way it should be. No DRM, as I see it.
But anyway, jd1961 - the content here (video-wise) sure looks swell!!!What exclusive russian/easteuropean dolls here.... (have not had time to dig into the photo-sections yet).
|
10-03-07 08:44am
|
Reply
262
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hej jd1961
Like 12 videos and the same amount of photo-sets. And state ment, that aproxx 6 videos would be updated - but never got them.
Well - I just joined the new site - be back with a review.....
|
10-03-07 07:29am
|
Reply
263
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
That's what I think, too. Sometimes I'll read a review at TBP but visit the site by just typing in the address outside of TBP. It's gotten to that point.
|
12-27-07 07:25am
|
Reply
264
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah and the bad part for me, my membership either runs out tomorrow or the next day. The update is tomorrow. I'm going to try and get on that download as soon as possible. It says the update has over 5 GB of video just of Eufrat. It will be my luck, I will download it and my computer won't play it, then my membership will be out and I won't be able to go back and get the lower quality versions ha ha.
I'm surprised she doesn't have her own site, unless she doesn't think she can produce enough content.
|
12-04-07 07:15am
|
Reply
265
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from nygiants03:
Hmm. I dont agree but everyone has an opinion, i cant really think of many better sites then ftv girls. Every site gets boring eventually which is why we join new ones. FTV girls is not hardcore, but i everything but. There are many erotic scenes i think, good quality, hot girls, natural environment, cant get to much better for me. Also it gives me the real orgasms many sites fail to deliver.
|
10-01-07 01:32pm
|
Reply
266
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Robare:
You know, I just don't get people dinging a site for being what the site advertises itself to be. A site that advertises itself as presenting certain content, then fails to present that type, quantity, or quality of content, should get dinged. But, on the first tour page of FTVGirls is a collection of 161 update cover pages. In none of them is a male featured. In fact, nowhere on the site is heterosexual activity advertised. In none of the reviews of that site on this site is there a statement affirming heterosexual activity being presented on that site. It seems to me any reviewer dinging a site, for not being what it never said it would be, is being just as stupid as a person who goes out and buys a carton of milk and then complains that the milk isn't orange juice. It seems that one claiming to be jaded might have accrued adequate experience to distinguish the nature of the content of a website prior to purchasing. That would seem to be particularly so when the website has done a very comprehensive job of representing it's content on it's tour pages. And, it seems that one, having availed themselves of such information, would be well positioned to avoid disappointing themselves. But, then again, perhaps all is not what it seems...
|
10-01-07 12:20pm
|
Reply
267
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Now that is good. Our friends outside the USA might not be able to grasp it (lucky them!), but that's a phrase that will no doubt come in handy again. Probably soon, too.
Thanks. I had a great laugh. Still laughing!
|
09-30-07 04:42pm
|
Reply
268
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Denner:
Well, jd1961 - I think you're absolutly right about this site. A lot of photos and videos of young girls, but it never get's really exiting.
Been a member twice (last time in December 2006), but have not had the urge to go back again.
I was tempted with new previews, but saw some of these videos in full elsewhere (usernet) - and I still hang on to that same feeling: It's generally boring stuff - and the video-scenes are all in the same style...
Thanks for that update-review.....
|
09-30-07 07:43am
|
Reply
269
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
I haven't been to FTV since June '06 myself for the same basic reason you gave: lack of excitement. It's also a strange mixture of very lightcore stuff and then sudden frenzies of phallus maxiumus.
I also hate the way they break shoots into different galleries. Which pics should go where? I don't join sites for the pleasure of solving such puzzles.
And anyway, I've seen too many galleries of women just looking around, looking away, looking "dead" ... Why join for that a lack of eroticism? I think some sites have some pretty half-baked ideas about what their own content is supposed to communicate. It's not always true of FTV, but it's still too often the case. I don't understand why some people like it so much, but at least they're happy with it.
|
09-30-07 04:58am
|
Reply
270
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from roseman:
Agreed, that would be cool.
|
09-15-07 03:07pm
|
Reply
271
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
It doesn't really matter. My point is that I'm not a lawyer and I definitely don't want to hire one because of this issue :-), so I tend to trust that major US companies do their legal research themselves (and kink.com IS a major US company without much doubt). After all, it will be them who prosecution will come after.
|
11-02-07 04:46am
|
Reply
272
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
> I was under the impression that bondage with intercourse on video was illegal in the US? Maybe this has changed without me looking.
I looks that site producers were under such impression too :-). There weren't such such sites in US until about the time when kink.com made their SexAndSubmission (about 2005). As kink.com is an US company, and pretty solid one, I don't think they're playing games with law, so most likely they've got legal opinion on it, which says it's ok. And as long as there wasn't any case law (which seems most likely), legal opinion is the best thing you can get to see if it is legal or not.
So I would rely on ability of kink.com to analyze it properly (at least until I'll try to shoot such a thing myself :-)). Just speculation on my part though.
|
11-01-07 01:26pm
|
Reply
273
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(jd1961's Reply)
I did not mean for free. It is very common for websites to describe first timers as amateurs. They even use amateurs to mean non porn stars. I know that is not what you are thinking. Sorry for any confusion.
|
10-28-09 02:16pm
|
Reply
274
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(jd1961's Reply)
but as i know, at that site aren`t unprotected videos. so my hope is that they will one day get rid off the drm and make them free :)...then i will retrun as a member ;)
|
03-12-08 01:45am
|
Reply
275
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
The DRM license on your computer will expire after awhile and it will ask you for the username/pass again - it usually happened to me about once a week - sometimes 2 weeks.
|
03-11-08 01:55pm
|
