Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jd1961 (0)  

Feedback:   All (1121)  |   Reviews (65)  |   Comments (126)  |   Replies (930)

Other:   Replies Received (733)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 276-300 of 733 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
276
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Their support page goes over potential problems users may experience with auto-resizing and auto-logins, but there's nothing about .rar files.

They have all of six updates for the month of June. The July list in their previous updates stops at the middle of the month. Seems like a slow site in more than one way (the other being server response).


08-20-07  03:48am

Reply
277
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Thanks for the tip. One never knows when another site that uses .rar files might pop up. I think there's some kind of advantage about them that I read about -- better compression?

But until SpiceLab is a sure thing with larger scale pics and a decent server ...


08-19-07  04:49am

Reply
278
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from apoctom: (jd1961's Reply)

I would recommend 7zip over WinRAR. It opens just about any compressed file format.

08-18-07  09:10pm

Reply
279
Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Well, I did find out a tidbit that would interest you, and it's to your credit that I did find out: The site is Downloadthemall-friendly (Firefox).

The big IF, though, is whether the clowns finally got those 11 or so missing sets linked and aren't fucking it up with the even newer ones.

My last paying visit, as documented here, really was a letdown, so I'll chime it with my famous "negativity" to say that if they're that much in hype and that little in the way of competence, they can just take the proverbially long walk off the time-saving short plank.


01-24-09  06:52am

Reply
280
Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

I wonder if it would work with a download manager. Can't say I tried it myself. (Tried with one once and the software was little too primitive for me and just gave up.) Anwyay, no excuse for coming into the world zipless.

I just took my time and cherry picked one set every few days or so.


01-03-08  09:57am

Reply
281
Visit Glam Deluxe

Glam Deluxe
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Yes, indeed. No zips? Eh? Can I get a discount coupon for physical therapy sessions?

Anymore, a site without zips has, ironically enough, sealed its fate as 2nd rate.


01-03-08  09:49am

Reply
282
Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad

Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from ace of aces: (jd1961's Reply)

therfore you agree with me?

12-12-07  04:35am

Reply
283
Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad

Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from ace of aces:

what else then pornstars are glamour models for you? i understood under glamour=pornstars (real stars no wannabes)

12-12-07  04:11am

Reply
284
Visit Gloryhole.com

Gloryhole.com
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from james4096: (jd1961's Reply)

I know that's what I was thinking. I understand that 2 years ago they didn't have that many vids, but now they have much more and offer bonus access to the network including another gloryhole site.

06-23-09  12:48am

Reply
285
Visit Gloryhole.com

Gloryhole.com
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Review from mbaya:

A similar site that I liked was gloryholegirlz.com. The mostly if not all amateur girls are of different races and so are the guys. Further, the site has many examples of multiple guys with the same girl, some as many as 21 in one scene.

06-22-09  06:41am

Reply
286
Visit Glossy Angels

Glossy Angels
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Yes, indeed.

I've been a W4B member a few times and have scoured the entire site. Everything I see in the preview/visitor's pages of the site looks just like what I've seen at W4B.


08-16-07  03:20am

Reply
287
Visit Gods Girls

Gods Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from asmith12: (jd1961's Reply)

> I guess the TBP plan was a success.
You mean not counting newbies ratings? Yes, I agree, it was definitely a success (easily visible even now).


11-02-07  06:48am

Reply
288
Visit Gods Girls

Gods Girls
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from Khan:

Yes, we do have plans for something that should negate the shill effect. However, we aren't ready to release the details just yet. Hopefully we'll have something added w/in the next 30 days or so.

07-16-07  04:41am

Reply
289
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from WeeWillyWinky: (jd1961's Reply)

Okay, thanks, jd.

11-14-09  09:08pm

Reply
290
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from WeeWillyWinky:

Hi jd,

Thanks for the heads up, as this site is the next one I will sign up with, and probably soon. The headshots alone show me the girls are drop-dead gorgeous here. For me, the face is of prime importance.

TBP site facts state a higher rez for video, but I realize they list the highest offered. I can't watch 1280 vids because my PC can't handle them. Is each vid offered in multiple formats, or is it just that some are larger, some smaller? I will be happy if enough vids are offered at 640x480.

I'm not too crazy about their point system, but I'm sure it's not as bad as one particular site I joined where they rotated content and kept only a tiny amount of material available per month (we're talking about twenty pic sets and a handful of videos, and for 40 USD a month, no less).


11-08-09  02:26pm

Reply
291
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

Do the pics and video have the mosaic like I've seen on the TGP's?

11-08-09  08:17am

Reply
292
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from mr smut: (jd1961's Reply)

Thanks! I guess that I'll put that site on my list of must see pleasure providers.

11-08-09  04:05am

Reply
293
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from mr smut: (jd1961's Reply)

I just took a quick look at the models on the preview pages and I'm mighty impressed to see that all of them are real beauties! As I'm a pic dude I'd like to know about the resolution of pictures in the member's area and it would be of interest to know if they offer ZIP files for the whole series :-)

Thanks in advance!

Cheers,
Smut


11-08-09  03:57am

Reply
294
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from mr smut:

Thanks for bringing this site to my attention. I'd really like to read a full review on Graphis as the sheer amount of content offered alone seems to be worth a try!
And I didn't even speak about the fact that those models on the tour pages look very nice :-)


11-08-09  03:42am

Reply
295
Visit Hall Of Fame Stars

Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from SnowDude: (jd1961's Reply)

That's pretty cool about the automatic linking! Thanks for the comment dude! ;)

10-30-07  03:30pm

Reply
296
Visit Hand Domination

Hand Domination
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Review from Drooler:

Great review, JD. Really got a good idea about the site. (Some reviews leave me wondering about as much as before I've read them.)

12-14-07  09:30am

Reply
297
Visit Hand Domination

Hand Domination
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Review from nygiants03:

By looking at the preview page it seems almost all the girls have big natural tits. That should be a pro, should it not?

12-14-07  08:00am

Reply
298
Visit Handjob Spectacles

Handjob Spectacles
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from pissedatporn: (jd1961's Reply)

My previous username?

01-11-09  09:21am

Reply
299
Visit Handjob Spectacles

Handjob Spectacles
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from pissedatporn: (jd1961's Reply)

I had ran across it once or twice. I turned a blind eye to it because of the over saturation of facials. The review also said that the same glasses were used in almost all scenes. I just dont prefer over produced material like this. I like to see unpredictable material, models not acting, the occasional pre-ejaculation, out of the norm stuff not scripted I guess.

Its a very hard niche to find Im learning


01-11-09  09:10am

Reply
300
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from largeun: (jd1961's Reply)

Really?

Who owns it now because I was pondering joining again but the damn slow updates keeps putting me off?


06-03-09  07:59am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 276-300 of 733 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.03 seconds.