| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
I'm still seeing the Reviewer's Special price we list on the join page. You may try clearing your cache (and any related cookies) and revisiting from one of our links.
|
11-29-09 05:16am
|
Reply
677
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
Better than Evil Angel's own site - with them posting lots of web-only stuff on some sites and HD stuff on Buttman - I don't know about that, but I'm hot enough for their stuff that I am enjoying having access to both.
|
07-22-09 09:16pm
|
Reply
678
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lurifax:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, I don't agree with you about the Japanese videos in general as the 'hairsuite' is not to my liking.
But do I agree with you about the male fuckers in American porn videos.
I could not for my life call them 'performers' as they obvioulsy - not beleiving their luck - fuck for pleasure. And to add to their disgrace, some of them seem to have obtained an ego larger than Rhode Island.
Where does the business get all these disgusting freaks/creepes from?
I really feel sorry for the girls who have to put up with it...
If that is the power of the 'mighty'$, I am immensely thankful to my parents: that I was not born or bred in the $ zone.
|
08-02-08 08:14pm
|
Reply
679
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from wiild1:
(jd1961's Reply)
Totally agree with you JD. Videobox has some great scenes from a couple of years back, but the best material is nowadays found elsewhere.
Videobox is like going to Marshalls or TK Maxx shopping...if you spend many hours you might find something decent at a very low price, but you get tired of browsing through so much low quality shit and if you buy that cheap shirt you will wear it a couple of times and then throw it away. If you really like fashion & clothes you go elsewhere - If you really like porn you don't go to videobox.
|
05-01-08 07:11am
|
Reply
680
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Glad you feel that way about tattoos, jd. Misery loves company and if enough people voice their dislike maybe they'll stop tattooing. As for the fake body parts, I started to look at a set featuring one gorgeous lady and was tempted to download it until she revealed those artificially rigid cones on her chest. What made it worse were the scars under both her breasts. I have nothing against scars, ladies can have operations and still be beautiful but WHY enhanced breasts. Who is the boyfriend, husband who wants to fondle a bag of silicone? Those plastic surgeons and tattoo artists must be having a lucrative field day with all this silliness. I WANT NATURAL WOMAN!!! If she sags a bit, fine. If she's an A cup or DD cup, fine. If she's a bit plump or skinny, fine too.
|
03-13-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
681
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Guess your right about US-porn - and it's too bad, because US-porn was the pioneer - when no one else did the job - the french, the germans - and yes, us danes came around later - but it was only a copy of US-porn.
Things sure have changed since - not that euro-porn in general is so great, but the most US-porn is getting boring and sterotype/static (I may not have the right english words, but anyway)
JD is right, quote:
"I think the quality of American porn is at its lowest point ever."
|
03-13-08 09:45am
|
Reply
682
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(jd1961's Reply)
I know - it's a cliché and I absolutely hate clichés - but I guess there are times when there's no other way to say it. Is there really such a thing as too much porn?
|
03-12-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
683
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Thaeral:
(jd1961's Reply)
Personally, it's variety, for me, that keeps me subscribed. It also functions like a porn IMDB database for me because sometimes I see a girl on another site that I really liked. I can look her up on VideoBox generally get a full page of scenes for that girl.
|
03-07-08 08:58pm
|
Reply
684
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes. Sorry about that. It was only the second review I wrote. I am still getting the hang of this.
|
03-02-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
685
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Thaeral:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thank you. I figured that since I'd been a member of the site for so long that it was about time I said something about it.
|
01-13-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
686
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey jd1961
Guess, you're right. But I still do not regard that a low price is enough for a high score in general. You're one of the "old timers" here and know the value of our money "for what we get". I admit, there's a huge amount of good, average and bad videos at VideoBox, but are you not getting a bit fed up with all the old and bad quality videos at this site?
|
09-10-07 07:55am
|
Reply
687
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, something like that. I think you get my drift, jd1961 - and maybe agree
- about the discount-thing.......
|
08-16-07 08:13am
|
Reply
688
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from videobox:
(jd1961's Reply)
Not sure where the impression that we keep adding midget videos comes from. Because of its large user base with a wide range of interests Videobox tries to offer content that will appeal to everyone. That Being said, we don't focus on oddity content. Here is a list of our last few uploads.
I Dig 'Em In Pigtails #3 - Studio: Acid Rain - Niche: Gonzo
I Love 'Em Natural #4 - Studio: Acid Rain - Niche: Gonzo
Honey And MILF #1 - Studio: Demolition - Niche: MILF
Ass Takers #1 - Studio: Fusxion - Niche: Anal
Voluptuous #4 - Studio: Metro - Niche:Gonzo
Just Sex - JKP - Studio:Niche - Niche:onzo
Culito Crammers - Studio: Damaged - Niche: anal, latinas
Smokin' Crack #3 -Studio: Mayhem - Niche: anal
Teen Idol #1 - Studio: Smash Pictures - Niche: Teens
A Different Point of View - Studio: NXT LeVL Productions - Niche POV
Not 1 midget , in fact I went back through the last and couldn't find one midget or what I would consider a'oddity title
|
07-16-07 10:09am
|
Reply
689
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Pornjackker:
I had to laugh at your comment about some of the
videos being truly bad. It's like they just add
any video they can get a license to post. Worst
is you really can't tell by the sample frames how
bad the scene is until you download it.
|
06-13-07 12:21pm
|
Reply
690
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from anyonebutme:
(jd1961's Reply)
For a site with as much traffic as videoz, they are making use of cloud computing, having their site spread amongst many data centers. Most services don't advertise prices, Amazon's cloud services do:
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
Do the math with their numbers. And question if other services are going to give cheaper or more expensive rates to porn sites? All you have proven is that Action Jav has other subscribers who are not maxing out the bandwidth 24/7 for the full month.
|
11-20-11 10:31pm
|
Reply
691
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Exactly - on this I quite agree. And one item I miss (just a bit, though) at VideosZ is the possibility to download parts of a video at Videobox - which I find is good video-preiew...before downloading the whole clip..
|
06-24-09 08:21am
|
Reply
692
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
> When the so-called "gonzo" genre began, there was a lot of creative stuff going on really. But now it's more liekly to be a schmoe with a camera copping a cheap feel off the hired actress.
Well, this is a natural process: when somebody is successful in "gonzo" (or whatever else) genre, immediately lots of guys begin to think "oh, gonzo is the way to make money", and obviously AVERAGE quality goes downhill. But the same natural way they will understand pretty soon that there is NO "easy money" in that genre anymore, and really creative guys will be able to make decent money again (I just hope they didn't leave industry during those difficult for them times).
|
05-21-09 12:28am
|
Reply
693
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
> but I doubt they really care about the product they put out.
I think THIS is the primary reason for the sad state of US porn, but I hope it will be cured rather quickly (in a matter of a few years) when profits from poor porn will drop to zero, and only the creative and unique DVDs and sites will be able to survive (up to now anybody who wanted to shoot porn, was able to make money, now it's about to change).
|
05-20-09 01:34am
|
Reply
694
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I did a month join a few days ago. I'm unimpressed. I thought that the vids downloaded at Videobox looked better - that ought to be the only reason needed for being unimpressed.
But I'll go on:
Download speeds aren't all that for me - I'm getting slower d/l speeds than I did at VideoBox, which I had tried for a month.
They don't have the "make your own clip" feature, which was rather fun to play with at VideoBox - especially if you had a great scene of Jenavieve Jolie walking away from the camera and you could find other ass clips of her - mmmmm!!
They don't have the reviews as VideoBox does, which are entertaining - sometimes annoying - sometimes helpful.
They don't have as large a selection as VideoBox, though with over 5,000 DVD's, there's no doubt that there is more than you can gather in a single month.
|
05-05-09 06:07pm
|
Reply
695
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey jd1961, sorry about the delayed response, was very busy this past week. As long as you download the DIVX/XVID versions, I haven't found any DRM in those. The only DRM I found was in an older one that I accidentally downloaded in WMV format. Their DIVX format looks very good too. I've had varying results with DIVX, but I believe they must put a lot of work in the compression.
|
08-05-07 04:01pm
|
Reply
696
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Stew:
Join site and has an amazing amount of material. I prefer to download and watch later but it seems that the downloads are not as long and the streams (if that is the correct was to describe) and the most important shot (literally) is the section of video missing. Has anyone else noticed this and is fixable.
|
09-24-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
697
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
One question - How bad is the watermark?
|
12-26-09 03:28pm
|
Reply
698
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Capn:
Not much decent in the way of photos, then?
Cap'n :0/
|
12-26-09 02:36pm
|
Reply
699
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Monahan:
Just curious whether this site has any stuff by Candy Barr (1950's era), Virginia Bell (1950's & 60's), Nancy Suiter (1970's) and/or Traci Lords (1980's & 90's)
Also, one of my favorites is the porn musical version of Alice in Wonderland.
I'm thinking about signing up for the 3day trial but thought I'd ask first.
Thanks.
|
12-24-09 02:43pm
|
Reply
700
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from heff:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks! :-)
I'll try to give my best.
|
03-26-08 05:23am
|
