| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from redcham:
Not just new scene section, 404 if you right click and open in a new tab or window for videos in recommended, legendary, upcoming. 404 even for model page.
You can see on their members homepage the URL code for links is a function call
https://site-ma.brazzers.com/scene/:releaseId/([%5E/]+)
While if you click on a model page that lists videos of the model hover your mouse over and you see the actual link instead of the function call, for example,
https://site-ma.brazzers.com/scene/9202481/gaming-at-my-friends-house
Never used the right click option so it doesn't affect me.
|
09-01-23 12:39am
|
Reply
2
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from SavvySatisfied:
Yep - 404
|
08-27-23 11:15pm
|
Reply
3
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from LKLK:
My problem with the model listing is that I'm too easily distracted.
When I find a cute model, I click on her thumbnail, and look to see what her content is.
So I can't just go through the listings, to see who's there.
Also, I have limited patience.
Too many models to look through.
I wish they would create a list of the best cute models.
But that's just me.
I just tried going through the model listing alphabetically.
But with Firefox browser, I don't seem to have your problem.
"B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J, and K" are on different pages.
Although I do agree that the letter "A" seems to be the most common letter for a first name.
Could it be that your browser stored images of the broken model listing, and that is causing your problem about the model listing?
I'm not tech minded, so that's just a wild guess.
I have complained in the past that Adult Time has so much content, that the navigation can be messed up.
That's both good and bad: good, because there's so much to look through.
Bad, because I a have a problem finding some content that I'm looking for.
|
12-12-20 08:12am
|
Reply
4
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Trump2020:
(snickelb's Reply)
Porn is just going downhill fast. The tube sites have ruined it. Everybody wants 2nd rate ripped of porn free from a tube site and all these studios aren't making any money. I feel like in 10 or so years that there will be like 3 main mega sites out there, similar to Pornhub or Adulttime, and that's it. I only started getting into porn online a few years ago, and back then it was mostly around about 30 dollars for a month to most sites with downloads included. Now most sites charge that for streaming, add about 15 dollars/month for downloads, and I see a lot of them are doing away with the monthly subscriptions now, trying to force 3/6/12 month subscriptions on us. My personal favorite site(s) was Greg Lansky's network of Vixen sites (Blacked/Tushy/Vixen/Deeper/Blackedraw/Tushyraw), but he has left and even those sites now are getting shady, its such a shame what is happening.
|
08-24-20 04:45pm
|
Reply
5
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from malikstarks:
Thanks for info. Though it appears the deceptive streaming-only stuff is not exclusive to the porn portal and more indicative of all the newer sites from Mind Geek. Regardless of how you join.
|
08-29-19 06:28pm
|
Reply
6
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I haven't been a member there in about three weeks but I've had no problem with the names. Maybe it's a temporary thing or maybe it has something to do with your download manager.
But... now that I think of it, they changed their file naming away from numbers maybe 18 months ago. Prior to that it was all meaningless numbers. It may be that you are downloaded files that pre-dated the new naming protocol. Try a recent file and see if that fixes the problem.
|
05-10-18 02:50pm
|
Reply
7
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(snickelb's Reply)
I always use Epoch live chat to contact them instead of email and they have always been really good and helpful.
|
06-04-16 01:31am
|
Reply
8
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from 21sextury1:
Hey "snikelb" I work with 21st Sextury and first off I want to apologize for your experience with our products.
The promotional offer you were trying to claim that came from a mailer, had a error that advertised the yearly discounted pricepoint but was actually charging for the trial. It was an error on our part completely that has since been corrected but shouldn't have happened in the first place.
I totally understand your frustration and would just like to take this time to apologize once again as we value being transparent and trying to provide the best customer experience. I understand you were not able to take advantage of the $69 yearly offer so instead I have a created a promo code if you so choose that will give you the yearly price at $62.95. The promo code is "69sorry" and once again sorry. Please feel free to contact us if there is anything else , webmaster at 21sextury.com .
21Sextury Team
|
06-03-16 06:37am
|
Reply
9
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from lk2fireone:
You should cancel the trial subscription immediately, before it converts to the $40/month fee.
I'm guessing that the sign-up page you were directed to was for a trial offer.
So in spite of un-checking the pre-checked cross-sale to some site, you were still agreeing to a trial offer to 21Sextury.
I doubt that Epoch will be able to refund your $3 trial membership fee (or whatever it was).
Epoch is a professional organization with a fine reputation. But paysites love to hold on to trial membership fees.
If you let the 3-day trial membership convert to the $40/month membership, you can probably kiss the $40 good-bye.
So contact Epoch immediately, to cancel your membership.
Cancelling through Epoch is easy. And they should send you a confirming email of that cancellation (which is done automatically).
|
06-02-16 01:44am
|
Reply
10
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from xonkd:
Well almost 2 years after your comment- the navigation is still terrible with the same problems you have listed. The reviewers on this site must mainly be paid shills. No one could tolerate the filtering, back-buttoning and search functions in such a large site.
|
04-23-16 03:41pm
|
Reply
11
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from Roberto281:
They did away with the preview pics for upcoming sets - bummer.
A lot of the pic sets do NOT have zip downloads. Take V for Vicky, an incredible new vid with gorgeous pics - but there are no zips so you have to download one pic at a time. The site is very slow at times, something I never noticed before and the back button is dreadfully slow. I think the volume of material may have declined a bit and there are even some reposts of old videos with new names, something I never noticed before. This was one of the best sites on the internet, if not the very best but not now. I wish they would go back to the old website.
|
09-24-14 04:24pm
|
Reply
12
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from martinlongbow:
I have been a member of evil angel for over a year now and yes I agree the recent website update is just bad. it is slower and difficult to navigate. lack of search function is also unbelievable. content is good though in my opinion rivaled by only brazzers.
I can live with the current design if only they went back and updated the old content to hd level. That would be really great.
|
08-21-14 02:22am
|
Reply
13
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from qvtta:
Hilarious seeing only complaining about the site and no praising, eventhough the pictureviewing is now pretty much best possible forexample. You have picture's properly scaled to your browser size and you have easy navigation of all the pictures plus easy to use zoom an un-zoom functions. I have yet to see a better picturetools in other sites. This is a huge PLUS for Evil Angel which you guys can't just blatantly leave out from an review.
|
08-20-14 08:18am
|
Reply
14
|
Hard X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from HardXJ:
(snickelb's Reply)
You are totally right. We are building more content to have 2 updates per week instead of one.
|
07-29-14 08:18am
|
Reply
15
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from Roberto281:
What a catastrophe! Before they updated the site, the only beef I had was the back button (using FireFox) was really slow. Now there are all kinds of problems, the most noticeable one being that most of the viewing area is cluttered up and the site seems slower now. I hope they get it fixed because the content is so good.
|
07-23-14 11:22pm
|
Reply
16
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from ghosty:
Pretty much all sites run by Fame Dollars have piss-poor navigation. I can live with the useless favorites. The most annoying thing is still the lack of a proper search function.
I've complained about the poor navigation month ago. Instead of improving the site they are making it worse. Great...
If they didn't have all those $5 promos, I wouldn't subscribe to any of their sites anymore.
|
07-22-14 03:19am
|
Reply
17
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from pat362:
I don't call it redesign as much as fucking with your customers. The only improvements is that you can now see their upcoming updates but you lost 1/5 of the viewing screen because it's taken up by a list of their directors and a list of their most popular girls but that last one is a complete mess and you can now see which DVD a director has as opposed to only the scenes from those DVd's.
You know what would have been the best improvement possible? If they had actually uploaded every Evil Angel movie that each director has done.
|
07-19-14 10:18am
|
Reply
18
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from rawx:
Beware of the $5.00 or $10.00 Fame network/Evil Angel memberships as they do not include all of the Evil Angel videos. Some directors with their own websites apart from Evil Angel are omitted such as Belladonna.
Also these subset website groups do not get all of the Evil Angel updates by the directors as they are posted to the main Evil Angel site. Thus, right now the latest updates by MIke Adriano and Jonni Darkko don't appear at the bargain sites but only at the main Evil Angel site.
On the other hand, it was a means for me to obtain content from LeWood on other labels before she and Mark joined EA in a higher resolution than was available for example on the VideoBox and VideoSz sites which made the $5 one time charge worth it for me.
|
12-11-13 11:49am
|
Reply
19
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Agree with the above two. I get tons of emails from them but at a fiver a throw I'm happy to get the emails because it means very substantial discounts. There is a link at the bottom of the emails to unsubscribe.
|
12-05-13 02:23pm
|
Reply
20
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I agree with pat. I've joined EA through TBP / PU several times and I'm also on their mailing list. There are times when I can have 10 or more emails from them with the same offer. While it can be a bit annoying, some of the offers are unbeatable (like the seven days for $5) so I just delete the duplicates.
You can probably get deleted from their mailing list but that would also end the offers. They (along with many other Fame Network sites) are constantly making decent offers.
|
12-05-13 01:14pm
|
Reply
21
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from pat362:
I suspect that the company administering the sites you named is the same one and that's why you keep getting those offers. I'm a current long term member of Evil Angel and I still get offers to join them as well as a bunch of other sites. I don't mind the offers because they are usually hard to beat and I know which sites to join and more importantly which ones to avoid.
|
12-05-13 10:34am
|
Reply
22
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
from Ozark:
I'm not sure if it tells you or not. Don't quote me but i would think since its a dvd site it may not alert you per favorite star newly updated scene. When i was a member (2012) i used favorites to keep track of what i had already downloaded and a reference point to return to later.
|
05-16-13 07:17pm
|
Reply
23
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(snickelb's Reply)
Hi snickelb. If you are talking about HD mp4s I could not really complain because most were nice and crisp. My problem was with the ordinary DVD quaiity (640x480) videos which I found a bit less sharp than the ones offered on Videosz.
But having said that, there are, no doubt, some HD videos that don't quite make it into "highest quality." The same is true of all video sites. Some updates are better in quality than others. Is it the remastering? Is it poor material to work with? I don't know.
|
11-27-12 10:33am
|
