| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(elephant's Reply)
You're welcome, elephant! I wouldn't stick around for three months either just to get the whole package, or pay a big amount up front to get them now. But let me emphasize at the same time that I don't find the price of subscription for the two sites one gets now unreasonable, it just seemed strange that everyone's (or just about everyone's) review seemed to indicate there were more than two sites included. Something I didn't get. Thanks for the reply.
|
06-09-12 10:40am
|
Reply
402
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Capn:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=3000
I'll add it to the list.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-04-12 04:24pm
|
Reply
403
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Shakermaker:
Yes, I have experience this at many sites. At it's not just pron sites that do it, many other business have started this policy aswell. I have actually been thinking writing to the EU to put a focus on this problem as it can't be in our common interest this way.
|
06-02-12 02:29pm
|
Reply
404
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from gaypornolover:
Arrgh this drives me nuts! Why the hell do we have to pay an extra $5 all the time? I can't see any justification for it at all on the internet with zero shipping costs, no difference in sales taxes etc. The currency conversation takes care of any cost there so the starting US dollar price should be the same. I really am going to have start boycotting sites that do this.
|
06-02-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
405
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
I wish I could tell you that you will like the quality but I can't be certain because I'm really not that picky myself. 640x480 is more than an acceptable resolution for me.
|
05-27-12 05:47pm
|
Reply
406
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(elephant's Reply)
I don't think she's retired. The last update at lollyhardcore was 2010-08-20, but since then, she's had sets at zemani and vikanymph and other sites.
|
05-27-12 02:44am
|
Reply
407
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(elephant's Reply)
Yes, occasionally a girl looks so different on different sites that you need to study tattoos or moles or some unique body mark to confirm she is the same girl.
|
05-22-12 04:08pm
|
Reply
408
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
It's hard to tell if you would like the bulk of their content. If you aren't dead set on HD then you might go ahead but you should definetely avoid if you need HD. There is simply not enough HD on the entire network to warrant the join price.
|
05-22-12 10:20am
|
Reply
409
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Gazette Risque:
It's great site but the content gets "bland" quite fast.
And, like many other have said before me, it's often a mistake to join a website for 1 model.
Though, if the content is special enough it might turn out well.
|
05-22-12 05:14am
|
Reply
410
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Capn:
As has been said earlier, I think it is a mistake to join a site based only on the content of one or two models.
That often leads to a feeling of lack of value from a susbscription, once the limited content you joined for has been downloaded.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-21-12 10:24am
|
Reply
411
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Claypaws:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for commenting, elephant. That is a good clarification.
My original comment might not have been entirely to Dieselman's liking, but the discussion has, I think, been very useful as it has helped to clarify the strengths and weaknesses of the network. Anyone reading all of it would get a very good idea of them.
It seems that video enthusiasts would find the network exceptionally good whereas photo enthusiasts would find it disappointing.
You are quite right that very few, if any, sites or networks are excellent in both media types.
|
05-21-12 04:09am
|
Reply
412
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Claypaws:
As hodathink says, her name of Riley Reid will find you lots. indexxx.com indexes pretty well everything she has done. Ones that come to my mind are atk, karupsha and nubiles. In atk, she is on galleria, premium and petites. The site split of those by photoset/video is atkgalleria 43/9, atkpremium 11/6, atkpetites 10/6. petites will give you access to everything she has done on all three sites, which is 64 photo sets and 21 videos. You should note that atkpetites does not give access to the whole network for all models, but only for models who are "petite" and Riley is a petite little cutie!
karupsha has 5 photo sets and 3 videos and they call her Paige Riley.
nubiles has 4 photo sets and 4 videos.
nubiles frequently promote FTV and I have had at least one email promo from them (as a former and regular nubiles repeat member) offering FTV free with nubiles membership.
Riley is pretty enough that I could live with the tattoo. She clearly gets a lot of enjoyment from shooting and looks like she would be great fun to know.
I have indicated the split between photos and videos because I know you are primarily interested in movies.
Her indexxx.com entry also lists the many sites on which she has only done hardcore, though they are of no interest to me.
|
05-21-12 03:55am
|
Reply
413
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from hodayathink:
If you ever want to find her at other places, her full name is Riley Reid.
|
05-20-12 09:52pm
|
Reply
414
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from pat362:
I've made a couple of mistakes lately in joining sites based solely on a couple of models and that was a mistake because I can't say that I really liked their content and sadly didn't much like the rest of the content either. The back tattoo would be a turn off for me so as much as a girl might be amazing from the front. I would know that she has the back tattoo and even if i could overlook it then sooner or later they would shoot her from an angle where it's impossible to miss and I'd be right back at square one.
I tried FTV once but their type of porn does little for me because it's mostly all solo stuff and frankly it's almost all midcore style porn.
|
05-20-12 12:28pm
|
Reply
415
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from dieselman:
Good day guys!
I am sorry it took me so long to reply on your concerns and thank you our attentive members, who came in and covered my absence :)
Yes - WowGirls is coming from us, it is 100% exclusive, apart 22 scenes, which we took from Diesel sites to give a bit more feeling for the girls where we missed the wow content.
No - It was not created for money grabbing. Watching this site, I don't get how do you come up with it, really. If you could only knew how much care and funds we threw in this new brand.... but I hate to talk about money with our clients. Money can't buy us love! :)
WowGirls.com was created for members seeking an exceptional filming quality and wow - they got it ) It is our new brand!
Our wow girls and the films they are featuring in, are of the finest class. This is no "point and shoot" filming, but completely a new approach in creation of cinematic and very arousing films.
The site is new, was just released few weeks ago and up today we got our first 7,000 members which are fixed on this site everyday.
We release new wow scene daily and have strict selection so only the most captivating scenes go online and only the most beautiful girls, based on our taste of course. Our taste and sensory perceptions are dramatically effected by our aesthetic views of sex and emotional state. This is what makes this content so arousing, but don't think we lost hardcore there, in the opposite, we redefined hardcore porn with WowGirls. It is very hot!
Films are shot with the best available cinematic cameras and when you download full HD format, the quality is really shocking. It feels like you are there, inside of the film.
The main challenge was to keep sex real and not too artsy. I think we succeeded in it very well. One thing worth to mention - with the new cameras we have managed to film zoom shots so cool, damn, it looks so amazing, I have never seen such zoom shots in adult filming. You will learn a lot of new things about pussies, anal hardcore and how the girls pee and squirt :). I saw a lot of pussies in my life but with our new cameras and lenses I learned so much new things myself! Crazy!
Please consider joining this site and I will be glad to read your comments and reviews!
Take care!
|
05-18-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
416
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from otoh:
I agree with your assessment - on one hand it's not a bad deal, but on the other, that's a huge amount of smut to get through in a month!
|
05-14-12 12:22am
|
Reply
417
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(elephant's Reply)
True, but at least it is free, you can watch the trailers if that helps you pick the best ;) There might be some that are worth less than 300 credits, I didn't really look around too much.
|
05-14-12 12:10am
|
Reply
418
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
Remember to log in to the old site and then use that one instead of the new one. You'll save yourself some headaches.
|
05-13-12 09:51am
|
Reply
419
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
They probably won't but that has less to do with the company itself and more to do with them being primarily European and they are about a decade behind when it comes to plastic surgery and implants.
The content might be great but I don't like the preview section(s) and that means that I will pass on the site because of that.
|
05-06-12 08:53am
|
Reply
420
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
At LOL Lesbians they use the expression "Real Teen Lesbian Girlfriends Shooting Hot Sex Tapes At Home And Submitting Them For Cash". This surely sounds better than "Messing around with dumb porn users for selling professionals as amateurs who shoot their lesbian experiences at home". Anyway, providing just one 2 min. preview clip is not enough to keep me hooked.
|
05-06-12 03:09am
|
Reply
421
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
The preview clip is kind of nice, but if these are really professionals faking to be amateurs the site wouldn't be so interesting anymore.
|
05-06-12 01:00am
|
Reply
422
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know if anyone will care but these girls are not amateurs. They appear to all be professional porn performers. The funny thing is that the video is of US perfromers but most if not all the pics are of European ones. Maybe the webmaster can tell us the breakdown so that interested parties can decide if they want dialogue or not.
|
05-05-12 09:58am
|
Reply
423
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from gleem:
I think we did an excellent job of gathering and buying the hottest at home scenes. The camera work is shaky at times because we don't use cameramen, and let the girls do all the filming which is the only way to keep it authentic.
|
05-05-12 07:35am
|
Reply
424
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment from elephant:
Yeah sure looks like a Diesel offspring and my guess is they are sampling on its own and seeing if they can make extra money that way. As a member I'd like to see it as part of the network of course. Maybe a webmaster will come along and confirm it is one of their sites. It does have all the lioness content software which I love from Diesel and lots of the same babes are here.
I agree with Rearadmiral it does look great to have the devine Gloria getting down and dirty with a harder lesbian movie, I like all the softcore stuff but when you get a softcore model doing something more dirty it makes it all the more special in my eyes, I'll for sure keep an eye on this site.
|
05-01-12 05:02am
|
Reply
425
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Fuck, fuck, fuck. That's it! I'm thinking of quitting here at PornUsers until I can get caught up with all the sites that I've added to my 'must get' list. Just when I think I'm working through it you come along and mention Wow Girls. I've had a Diesel Access membership before (and definitely will again), and I think the aptly named "Wow Girls" has moved to the head of the list. I know their models may not be to everyone's liking, but they are perfect in my opinion.
I also noticed that Gloria appears in a true girl/girl video. That's new. When I was last at Diesel she was solo but for one or two very soft g/g scenes. I emailed the crew there to ask if any b/g or g/g was in her future and the answer was yes to g/g and likely not for b/g.
God I love the Diesel lasses. Thanks to both you and Denner for pointing this site out.
I hope someone here does a review soon. But if that doesn't happen I'm sure I won't wait.
|
04-30-12 01:51pm
|
