| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from GCode:
(badandy400's Reply)
I hear ya man. I have had similar things happen last month and I know the frustrations that you are going through. I just said this because the site that did it to me was a network and it seems that I might have found another earlier because I saw another network site that looked very similar in layout that did this to me last month. I was just saying this from poking around here and looking at comments/reviews and the legit screw overs seem to be network sites in general But yes, you are probably right about the fact that network sites probably have more users which equals more chances for people to get screwed.
I hope you get everything back and taken care of, I know what it's like dealing with credit cards companies and how they love to tell you that you yourself somehow 'authorized' the charges. It's a damn shame that this even happens in the first place, I wonder how much damn money these scam artists reel in doing this from people who do not have experience in this realm or don't catch it in time :(
Best regards for your situation and I hope everything works out.
|
05-07-09 10:09pm
|
Reply
127
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from GCode:
Has anyone noticed that it seems to be a trend that NETWORK sites are the ones doing this type of stuff. I dunno if it's just me, but it seems individual sites are rarely in these 'screwed over' categories :(
|
05-07-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
128
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from mbaya:
Sorry I did not ask sooner. Is the problem resolved yet? I hate dishonesty.
|
05-07-09 02:27am
|
Reply
129
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Pornjackker:
I've been scammed by too many of these sites in the past and now I
refuse to pay for porn online if I can help it.
|
05-05-09 07:50pm
|
Reply
130
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from james4096:
(badandy400's Reply)
Nah, you don't sound mad at all. ;)
You're right I should go back and check my statements and emails. All those charges can get lost in the mix. That's what happens to us porn hounds. I've let subscriptions go for almost a year on sites I forgot about, and I've forgot to visit sites I just joined because I joined another a few days later.
|
05-05-09 05:36am
|
Reply
131
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from james4096:
Another victim.
I was a member a while ago and I don't remember having any problems, and I was thinking of joining again, but I know I won't now.
What ever happened to making money in internet porn the old fashioned way? They give us content, we give them money, and when we feel like it we cancel and they stop billing. No scams or tricks.
|
05-04-09 11:31pm
|
Reply
132
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment from badandy400:
Oh My God!
I can not believe these people. Do not go to any of those sites listed in these two comments. I will just tell you want happens. They all take you to the same site which is similar to epoch or ccbill. The differences is they will load you with malware!
Right after going through all this stuff I open EI because I wanted to go somewhere without having my firefox cookies messing with it. Guess was, EI does not work now. First time opening it pops up with "trustinsearch" crap. Something I had issues with on a different computer years ago and went through a lot of trouble to get ride of. Now it takes me to the homepage and that all the farther it goes. Plus, it uses a ridiculous amount of RAM to run the page. MSN should not take over 100 MB!
So here is my thought thus far. They screw you over secretly. Then assuming you find it they know the screwing of the screwing of the credit card will end, but that is not good enough for them. They want to continue to get you so they have the webpage listed on the credit card "loaded" with malware that is a pain in the ass.
Damn it has not been a good night!
|
05-04-09 10:58pm
|
Reply
133
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree with you the quality could use an upgrade even if it is amateur in nature. Also I hate bw caps but they do tell you upfront that its there. I guess with their price point they gotta cut corners somewhere I suppose. Must not do enough volume or something to compete with sites like videobox.
But with the price I paid from paysitediscounts for Matts, I was more than happy last month when I joined even with the cap.
|
05-03-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
134
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(badandy400's Reply)
Lietuvagirls has videos that simply are not worth watching. The quantity of videos that are worth keeping is miniscule. The photos are just barely ok. Nudesportvideos is a site with a lot more quantity of videos that are of much higher quality. On originality alone it is a significantly better site. The hotness factor of the two cannot be compared. No way could I ever rate the two sites with nearly identical scores. Anyone is free to disagree with me or my ratings, but one site I rate as 90 and the other as generously 70. My major gripe is that NSV was not rated at least an 80 after praising it in his review. I probably would have said nothing if he had not, or had found fault with it. If you like a site, give it an appropriate score.
|
05-01-09 01:13am
|
Reply
135
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yep, no disputing taste! I like natural and, with some exceptions like Anilos, usually shun glamor sites like the plague.
|
04-30-09 10:16am
|
Reply
136
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from drummstikk:
(badandy400's Reply)
Well, I wouldn't call it a lake of experience, but I've seen a few sites. Maybe a puddle of experience, or a small pond. I guess if you've been through dozens of sites, you probably do need a good review, or a girlfriend. The video quality on Abbywinters is as good as the videos on Sapphic Erotica or LittleMutt, but I haven't joined any other sites. I don't know what to tell you, man. Life is full of risks. Porn is a small one.
|
04-29-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
137
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from drummstikk:
(badandy400's Reply)
Good point. Maybe the reviews for Abbywinters.com are unnecessary. I certainly didn't read a review before I decided to become a member.
|
04-29-09 04:56pm
|
Reply
138
|
Babes With Glasses
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(badandy400's Reply)
Very good suggestion. This is an area that I never thought of. If I pass Exotics, fine, if I don't that is fine too. I try not to be competitive if I can avoid it. I know I have passed some excellent reviewers, but nothing personal.
|
04-27-09 03:29am
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from monty2222:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah, I agree that crew (and other people not in the scene) comments are something that wouldn't be missed if they went the way of the dodo. Some of the early WeLiveTogether scenes are just about the only time I can remember where the cameraman's chatting with the girls added something that made the scenes a little better.
|
04-26-09 12:35pm
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from monty2222:
(badandy400's Reply)
"So it seems thus far that encoding sound into porn is a pointless endeavor"
Oh, I'm not too sure about that. The poll is at present about 50/50 sound on/off, that would be pissing off a lot of people if the sound was to be removed. ;-)
I agree with the rest of your post, it's not the overexcited screaming when a scene has barely started that I'm a fan of.
|
04-25-09 12:31am
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Ditto. After all, it ain't the phony screeching I care about. But when there's a quiet scene so you can hear the slurping of the pussy as the dick (toy, finger, tongue) is doing its thing is quiet, but erotic as hell.
And I don't give a damn when she had her first fuck, who it was with and how good it was.
|
04-24-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from james4096:
(badandy400's Reply)
I hate that type of guy in porn. I hate hearing them interview the girls. Shut up already!
I turn the sound off normally, but there are some scenes that later I discovered are enhanced by sound.
|
04-24-09 07:29am
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from asmith12:
(badandy400's Reply)
My humble understanding of it is that NTFS normally reserves 10% of the file size for the future file growth. It helps to reduce fragmentation in the beginning, but on the flip side it means as soon as disk usage reaches 90%, there is no contiguous space left, as all free space is contained in those "reserved" chunks. As soon as this point is reached, NTFS starts to use all that micro-chunks as a space for further files, which obviously makes fragmentation of these new files sky-rocket, which in turn leads to the system being slowed down A LOT.
Disclaimer: this is just my understanding, if somebody KNOWS how it really works, please don't hit me too hard :-).
|
04-19-09 11:00pm
|
Reply
144
|
Sweet Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree about the hunt for solo model content and how it can become a real pain when the model has been on many sites. Even though I join a lot of sites, for a very long time, I would not join a site unless they had some Eve Angel content. As of right now, I would estimate that I have 99% of her content. The few exceptions are a really strange set on House of Taboo.
The new site as of right now is a big question for me. The link at the new site is eveangelofficial.com and they have a coming soon page up. It has a form you can fill out to get new info on the site and to my surprise, it is a DDF site. Which is where the concern comes in. The majority of DDF's sites are $34.95/month. It also is supposedly going to be the only site Eve appears on in the future. I believe Sandra Shine has the same rule now with her Sandra Shine Live site. Being a DDF site the quality of Eve's new site should be top level, but there will be a lot of questions pertaining to update schedule if it is $35. Of course, I'll join it though ha ha!
|
04-15-09 08:56pm
|
Reply
145
|
Sweet Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hey badandy,
I'm running out of Eve content! The good thing, from what I know she has a new site coming soon. A few of the sites have her listed as Eva instead of Eve, like on Twistys she is Eva Shine and even stranger, some of her older content she is listed as Cassie, Katie and Sapphic Erotica, In Focus have her listed as Daphne. Her real name is Eva. I would imagine her new site won't be able to use the Eve Angel domain, so I will have to keep my eyes open for that one.
|
04-13-09 07:37pm
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree.
The eBay method lets me know the quality of the buyer/seller over time as well as over the last 12 months. A person who had some rough stuff at the start but has improved a lot in the recent past can be measured differently than an outstanding buyer/seller over history who has either been very quiet lately or has recently slipped a bit in eBay's ratings.
On PU, I would like both; a score since joining and a score for the last, say, 12 months or 2 years. That way a newer member can be recognized for his current contributions and the old timers can be recognized for their longevity.
As for badges, if it isn't broken, why fix it?
As for the weekly draw, same thing. Stay with what seems to work well.
|
04-12-09 08:20am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm not in the business, so I don't really know.
But my impression is that for most of the single model sites, the model herself does not own the site, and I kinda doubt she gets any fixed percentage of the site revenues. The model probably gets paid for any photo shoots (pix, vids) that she does, and that's it. The site owners are the ones that get whatever money the site generates. So if a girl stops modeling for that site, that's the end of her income from that site. And the site owners would collect whatever money the site gets in the future.
I've read that some models had a site dedicated to them, then there was a second site dedicated to them, and then maybe even a third site dedicated to them, after the model had stopped participation (modeling) for the first and second site.
It would be smart of the model to get a percentage of any site revenues. But I don't know how much leverage these models have.
|
04-09-09 12:20pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
This has been a great poll question. The results are quite at odds with the plethora of single model sites that keep showing up in the new listings at TBP.
|
04-09-09 02:54am
|
Reply
149
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree, I really like this site and the network. On a related note, Microsoft lists this exact Trojan as the #1 threat right now, even over the Conficker, so I guess there is a chance that somehow it has infected their site without them noticing it. I don't know a lot about tech talk, but do know that the JS in the Trojan name means it has something to do with the Java Script. I'm hoping they get it fixed soon.
|
03-31-09 11:18pm
|
Reply
150
|
Change Room Hunters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Xororos:
(badandy400's Reply)
With the HD videos, you have the option of 256, 512, and 1024k. The bit rate varies from clip to clip. For the top quality videos, the range is usually between 900k and 3mb.
Basically, the HD videos are crystal clear. The other videos are deliberately lo-fidelity.
|
03-31-09 02:30pm
|
