"We all know that there are generally no good looking women at nudist camps anyways." Jeepers, that's a broad statement for someone who probably hasn't attended. The gals at the three I've visited minic the US population. But the resorts are nearly all family-run, family-oriented, so babe spotting is an unwanted behaviour.
I am not trying to advertise the site, I have no affiliation with the site. This is a subjective opinion - but how could it be any other? I am sure you will not be disappointed to hear that I will keep my opinions to myself in future.
In hindsight, I should have scored it 95, and added the following cons:-
Navigation needs improving.
Site looks dated and probably needs a re-vamp.
If you don't like this particular genre of pornography then you will probably not like the site.
Depends...for all sites. (On a side, I only deal with WMV. I mever download MP4, MPG or AVI if WMV is available)
With VideoBox, if they are adding some old movie from the 1980's, then it doesnt matter what bitrate they use, it is going to look like junk. Just ask George Lucas.
With newer movies from DVD's the quality looks ok, although my view of the quality is a bit on the low side because I really dont go with the 640x480 resolution, it is just too big for how much I download and how much space I have - I stick with the 480x352 resolution.
The HD movies on VideoBox are a travesty with anything lower than the 480p resolution. The 480p is widescreen, 720x480, which is 16:9, but everything lower is widescreen squeezed into standard def, so it looks terrible. Without a program like VLC, which can force 16:9 aspect ratio, you are stuck with watching squeezed video.
Brazzers is good. All 640x480. I dont think they put out HD video yet. Reality Kings are good too. 1k and 2k bitrates are 720x540 which is definitely better than stretching 640x480 to 720x480. Not sure if the real resolution is 640x480 which was stretched to 720x540, or if the real resolution is 720x540. I'm leaning towards the former (because the video appears to have that pixelated effect to it) but it looks good none the less. The 512 bitrate vids are 480x360, which are the ones I download.
When a site offers different qualities I usually go with the medium one, problem is that NA keeps the medium resolution at the same as the high, just varying the bitrate, so the file size is still rather large, so I go with the low res 480x360 (which is what I would otherwise consider as "medium". I consider "low" to be 320x240).
As long as the videos don't look downright BLURRY or are only available in sub 360p resolutions then I'm happy.
Hi, when I compare the movies I have from Braz and NA, they look about the same IMO, at least NA's don't look worse. NA's best are in 2K 720x540 and the ones from Braz I have are 1.3K 640x480, can't remember if Braz offer higher bit-rates than that.
When you talk about "quality" what are you talking about?
Video quality (e.g. resolution, bitrate, sound quality)?
Acting quality (i.e. believable acting which makes the scene hot)?
Production quality (e.g. good location, good wardrobe, good makeup, etc.)?
Sex acts (e.g. type of sex, too much of one type of action or lack thereof, etc.)?
On another note, before I decided upon the "100" rating, I went through every previous review and read all the cons from everyone to make sure that a) i didn't miss something negative about the site, and b) the cons from other people were not legitimate things that would detract from enjoyment of the site. Seeing as I found neither, I went ahead with the "100" rating.
I review sites based on the appeal to a generic user...i.e. "[Some person] has $25 in [his/her] hand, and [he/she] wants to buy access to a porn site for a month. What is the site that will give the person the most porn enjoyment for the money?"
When I ask that question to myself, I answer that Naughty America will do a better job for some old joe who knows no better, who just wants appealing porn.
VideoBox is sure to bring enjoyment to a lot of people, but it is just not great for making porn appealing to average joes.
When I speak to people about porn (in the real life and on the net), all they know about is BangBros, Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Naughty America (more weighted towards to the first and second named). Nobody ever mentions VideoBox or VideosZ. This is because VB and VZ, while awesome sites themselves, dont make their porn all that appealing to average joes - they are awesome sites which seem to be more for the more porn-technical users who are a little more, shall we say, invested (cant think of a better word) in porn. NA, Braz, RK, BB are these more "fun" sites that make their material appealing.
The best comparison I can give you is IMDB and Yahoo! Movies. Yahoo! Movies makes the movies and the content very appealing, it is a very fun site to use. But IMDB is more of a brute way to the movie database sites that does everything right when handling movie information. IMDB is a better site overall for what I need, but for the average joe Yahoo! Movies is better.
Its the same way I feel about VB/VZ vs NA/Braz/RK/BB. VB and VZ are better sites for what I need, but for generic ol' joes, who make up more than 90% of the porn members, NA/Braz/RK/BB are generally better options.
What makes NA better than Brazzers and Reality Kings and Bang Bros is rather simple:
1) no ads on the MEMBERS page (i point this out because Braz has ads on their members page)
2) better site search (as commented on in my review. this is the best site search on a porn site ive ever seen, hands down)
3) better layout (when compared to RK at least)
4) better variety (when compared to Braz at least)
5) I find NA's site easier and more fun to use than RK (by a lot), BB (by a lot), and Braz (only marginally).
When compared to say, VideoBox where does NA excel?
1) site search, as mentioned above
2) they make the updates more appealing (when I am being turned on by the updates with 40+ females the site must be doing something right. This point also applies to Brazzers, RK and BB as well)
3) No tranny updates (videobox has a gay site, yet they continue to post guy-on-tranny movies on the straight site)
4) No JAV or asian updates (NA/Braz/RK/BB are strictly american girls. Asian is nice from time to time, but not the asian crap that I occasionally see on videobox)
5) No hentai (only a few vids, but they are there)
6) No stupid 480x352 resolution. 480x360 PLEASE!
7) NA/Braz/RK/BB NEVER get actress names wrong, where as VideoBox routinely does.
Well for MY needs, I prefer VideoBox over all other sites. I'm interested in collecting content (old, new, etc.) from my favorite girls, and that ain't gonna cut it with reality-100%-exclusive sites like Naughty America or Brazzers.
But when I rate sites, I look at it for some person who doesn't really give a crap about finding girls they want, rather for a person who is looking to sign up for a porn site, find some shit they like, and have no problem enjoying it and have no problem finding it because of a bad site. Both NA and Brazzers fit the model, with the only major difference are the 5 i mentioned in the "Bottom Line" (no ads, better search, etc.).
This is not to say that people will have trouble finding good stuff on VideoBox, just its so much more fun on Naughty America. VideoBox, when compared to these reality sites, seems like this brute listing of DVD's where as NA and Braz make everything so appealing, which is something that generic users will prefer. And this is the reason that I rate NA 100, Braz 98 and VideoBox 95.
When I read the question my first thought was, "badandy400 has to be the one that asked this" ha ha!
I personally don't download everything. I have a list of models that I like and am pretty damn snobby about this list! I only download content from these models to keep. I do occasionally stray from the list to look at some new models, but I rarely find a new model that I want to collect. There are exceptions, the little British model Sasha on Babelicious is really close to jumping on the list. Not for sure if it is her petite but curvy body or her dirty British mouth, but I wasn't expecting either from her from her innocent looking profile picture. Then I watch a video and she is making Eddie Murphy blush! You know a girl is a good solo performer when she says, "You want me to cum for you again?" and precedes to nearly tear her innards out doing it. Gives a whole new meaning to us American PUs with the saying "The British are coming"!
I will also keep a folder just for the content that I am curious about and for DVDs that I download from the DVD sites. I've always liked the Combat Zone videos and will usually download the full DVD of those and keep them. A few more hardcore stars that I usually keep would be Tiffany Taylor and Eva Angelina. But all in all, it mostly all about those 10-12 models on the list. I'm telling you all, check out little Sasha on the Babelicious preview, now does she look anything but innocent? Watch one of her videos sometime, I was ready to drink her bath water!
Well, I never save the DVD quality. With the amount of porn I store, I can't afford to store DVD quality considering that DVD quality is around 3.5 times as large as the "High" quailty. I guess I could go and buy a 2TB hard drive from WD, but that is $300, a little to pricey at the moment (be aware that when the 250GB, 300GB, 400GB, 500GB and 1TB hard drives came out they were all $300, and eventually dropped to more affordable prices around $100).
I definitely have downloads from their site which are widescreen and have the bars. So it seems isolated.
It seems, though, that I missed the fact that the DVD res is 720x480. I viewed the stream of the DVD quality and as I'm sure you are aware, the flash viewer is only 4:3 so I saw it squeezed, not realizing the source is actually 16:9 (as opposed to 4:3).
Videos do work fine. And you can use download managers to download both the videos and the zips, it's just that you can't pause/resume or zips. So you'll have to download 3 zips at a time.
Since 1/1/8 Facialabuse alone has had 44 updates.Ghettogaggers has had 28, latinaabuse has had 18. Spermsuckers has had 39 and ebonycumdumps has added 21. They are still not once a week but not bad. They have added about a dozen small websites as well.
I also really like Sunny. The problems you describe sound a lot like thise on just about every solo site. Attractive girls, horrible sites. I generally stay away from solo sites.
I was really PO'd. You'd have to read all of my posts and the replies from "In-Denial Marcus the Bullshitter" to sense the buildup.
But I do agree that it is entertaining. It can be fun to play the "who's conning whom?" game with the shills until it's time to just kick 'em in the arse.
Not me 100 or less KB. It takes over an hour to download a new update that is HD. It has to be a problem on their end. They are know for fast downloads. I have Comcast boost cable and get top scores on Speakeasy. I'm equipped for downloading in the hardware department and Internet connection. I email them for help.
Don't worry. With the caliber of people being nominated for the new Cabinet and senior Administration positions, just a bit of porn can't be damaging.
After all the Secretary of the Treasury (and in charge of teh IRS) is an admitted tax cheat, the Chair of the Senate Finance Committee accepted serious money and gifts from the companies he regulates, a Governor who tried to sell a Senate seat is still Governor, a Louisiana Congressman stashes $93,000 in cash from bribes in his freezer, a National Security Adviser steals and destroys papers from the National Archives the night before he testifies before the Senate, a senior Congressman who is Chair of several important committees runs a gay prostitution operation; it seems to me that watching legal porn on the web is almost a laughably silly transgression.
Oops. That is unless you are a Republican. Then watching legal porn is a hanging offense and will, at a minimum, force you out of politics.
There was a news article a few weeks back about some teens that were legal to have sex (over 16) but when passing nude photos to each other they got in trouble as you must be over 18 for that. (UK anyway)
------------------
In regards to the poll question
I once happened across a girl who I had dated profile on an adult personals site. Only face picture though and not really updated, still strange.
Yeah, depending on where you live the cops can be pretty harsh when it comes to pursuing child porn cases against against kids who post their "boobie" shots. Always a great way to start off your career ... get convicted of child porn, can't expunge your record because the DA probably prosecuted you as an adult even though you were under 18 and then you might also have to register as a sex offender for years to come. I don't think enough parents give their kids a hard sit down talk, if that even matters, about that kind of stuff.
As for the myspace and other community sites? My only presence on the web is pretty much here. No nosey employers looking at me here ... I hope.
So is there anything you would like to know about this site badandy400?
I have been an off and on member for over 5 plus years now.A great site is a great site,what else can you say??
01-22-0902:24pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
