| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from LKLK:
Maybe I should add that Pure Taboo (one of the Adult Time channels) is probably my favorite story-based porn.
Some of the stories can be interesting. Even though they often border on the un-believable or strange, the stories can add meaning to the sex, and the sex can be hot. It also helps that the models can be attractive.
So I don't mind if a scene spends a lot of time on the set-up, if the set-up is done well.
|
04-10-20 08:42am
|
Reply
27
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from LKLK:
Excellent review, as usual.
But I don't agree with with one of your cons.
"The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes."
This is not a criticism of the review or your ideas.
But I personally find that sex scenes that go over 15 minutes start to get boring or repetitious for me.
I like the idea that there is a setup to the sex scene to give the sex more meaning than 2 or more bodies slapping together.
But when the sex goes on too long (and I think 15 minutes is plenty long for a sex scene) then I start to lose interest. Maybe it's my mind just doesn't appreciate all the details of sex, but I don't usually consider sex an endurance contest, and, while I can admire some of these models for their stamina, I personally prefer a much shorter version where the models start slow, then build up to a climax. A sex scene that goes 15 to 30 minutes usually indicates multiple orgasms for the female, which doesn't turn me on. Get the model hot, get her off, then cuddle or show appreciation, or don't show appreciation, whatever fits the scene.
That's just me.
Other people can have different ideas or appreciations.
|
04-10-20 08:28am
|
Reply
28
|
Private Society
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from UMBA8:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat - in that case please accept my apology. Questioning my review being believable threw me off....but with your reply I understand the point you're making, and will keep in mind for future reviews.
Tube sites is an interesting one. Of course there's no excuse for their poor marketing of what membership actually gets you....but I bet in this day and age, far more people have stumbled across private society by accident by finding one of their clips on a tube site, than finding it via some review site, or their Twitter feed, or any other way for that matter. Membership site enthusiasts are a dying breed
|
04-09-20 02:40pm
|
Reply
29
|
Private Society
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from UMBA8:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat - with respect, you are spot on - I am entitled to my opinion.
To me, as a video collector, content always wins, and I have very particular tastes (always favouring amateur style). Perhaps I got a tad carried away with the score, but I was very clear on why this was the case, while also using a large chunk of my review to criticise the website, which indeed is a chore to trawl through - so whether you agree with my score or not, please don't make out I'm trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.
Being honest - I wasn't even aware of the preview situation on the site. They have a fair bit of preview content on pornhub, which is what's always drawn me in to purchasing.
To answer your questions as best as I can:-
Videos - 33 pages in members area, 12 per page, a few less on very last page, so roughly 540 vids
Dated - yep. Last update on 8th April, and they consistently deliver 1 or 2 a week
Models - it's a drop down list so hard to say without counting. Definitely over 100, possibly just under 200
Search - can only be done by model, location, or a few tags (action/type of girl). Their search options are poor in my view
Resolution - only 1 download option for each, the majority seem to be 1280 x 720. Might be lower for older content. Certainly nothing in the way of 4k etc.
|
04-09-20 09:36am
|
Reply
30
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Wraith0711:
(pat362's Reply)
I appreciate the concern sir, It's been longer than December, I said the last review was in December. ATK Girlfriends is an awesome site too, I just ended a membership there.
I've noticed the sites I'm a member of now are slowing way down on updates too. Xempire and the PassionHD webring are getting few and far between.
|
04-06-20 05:08am
|
Reply
31
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wraith0711:
(pat362's Reply)
Might join again whether their updating or not, they have a few of my favorite models added after my last membership. I'm a member of several review sites and always do my homework before joining a new site or an unfamiliar one. I can say very easily Porn users is a treasure trove of information. I would much rather here from joe lunch pail than an employee paid to do a review based on about 10 minutes of wandering through a site.
|
04-05-20 12:44pm
|
Reply
32
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(pat362's Reply)
I am fully aware that this site is owned and operated by nubiles. I love the nubile webring and have joined them all multiple times throughout the years. Sometimes the splash pages aren't updated and with all this covid 19 crap going on sites are either updating less frequently or shutting down production. I checked the last review date and the tbp facts updated date (both were late last year) which is why I obviously did the only thing left to me short of joining the site myself and reached out to my peers and asked for a current member for info. Thank you for your reply.
|
04-05-20 10:36am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Loki:
(pat362's Reply)
I like a full bush because that's what I associate with a sexually mature woman. Probably comes of looking at Playboy and Penthouse magazines in the 80s.
|
04-02-20 08:50am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Loki:
(pat362's Reply)
Glad to see I'm not the only one who still loves the full bush look. Still, I'm glad there's variety in pubic hair in porn. Variety is the spice of life after all.
|
04-02-20 01:34am
|
Reply
35
|
Zishy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat, I probably should of explained it better, not meaning anything to do with the sexual content here, I meant purely the look of the models, they are dressed in everyday outfits and not caked up in makeup, more like most women you meet in real life, most porn producers these days think models need plastering in makeup and dressed up in lingerie or tarty pornstar garments to be attractive.
|
02-26-20 05:23am
|
Reply
36
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah... I suspect he's got a pretty good life!
|
12-10-19 03:24pm
|
Reply
37
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm assuming that it was a simple oversight on his part. he must be pretty busy as his site is mostly a one-man show and he's got a huge following.
|
12-09-19 08:06am
|
Reply
38
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
^^^ Well said.
|
07-27-19 09:34am
|
Reply
39
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree. While I think the concept has a lot of potential the implementation is really off.
In addition to the points, you made the fact that in many of the scenes the girl never seems to consent puts this site more on the icky side.
|
07-26-19 04:49am
|
Reply
40
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BoyWithaProblem:
(pat362's Reply)
Couldn't agree more with pat362. When the action finally starts, after 20 long minutes, I want the fly-on-the-wall camera angle to give way to something up close and detailed. Shoplyter have done this for the BJ scenes, which look good as the original reviewer rightly said. So why am I watching most of the penetration from far away?
Shoplyter need to remember that the best porn is closely filmed in HD. The mock spycam needs to vanish once the action finally starts. Take a look at gyno-x.com for how this should be filmed.
ENF/CMNF is a really underserved niche; strip/cavity search would be such a winner if Shoplyter could just make a few minor changes. The E is for embarrassed, and the undressing and searching needs to be made slow and intimate and detailed. Split/inset screen showing the model's face whilst her lower regions are examined (as in the slow anal penetration of Backroom Casting Couch) could transform this site from a frustrating letdown into something special.
|
06-24-18 01:14am
|
Reply
41
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from fiou:
(pat362's Reply)
You have to be a member to know what you're talking about loser. The site is still updated. You don't know it because you never paid for it.
|
04-08-18 04:31am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Maybe you could sell it on Ebay as a Stormy Daniels sex toy?
That might be worth some coin.
|
04-07-18 02:07pm
|
Reply
43
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat,
Thanks for the reply, I wasn't aware of her current status but was well aware that most of the content here would have been at least 10 years old, infact her appearance here she looks the same as she did in her 2006 photo sets from ATK Galleria that I have in my collection.
The other site Only Cuties still appears to be adding content daily but not exactly sure how exclusive or new it is, for example today's update was a photo set of Zafira, I have no idea if she is still active but she seems to have been around almost as long as I have been joining adult sites. There is a lot of non exclusive licenced content within the site that I have seen before though. Will put up a new review of Only Cuties in a couple of weeks when I've had time to properly go through what I've downloaded.
|
03-12-18 06:24am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Onyx:
(pat362's Reply)
I think you may misunderstand the appeal of VR porn. The appeal isn't that you can look around the room. The appeal is that when done right, it feels like you are there in the room, with this person right in front or on top of you.
It produces a sense of presence like you get when you are in front of an actual person. Consequently you get a sense of what it is like to be right in front of these porn stars in a way you simply can't through any other medium other than real life.
|
02-14-18 06:45pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Onyx:
(pat362's Reply)
So you are basically correct, but don't have the hands on experience to really understand what that all feels like in practice. I've tried VR gaming and porn quite a bit. And gaming is significantly behind porn in terms of user experience right now. It's actually fairly disappointing to me right now. The best experience in VR gaming is maybe a space shooter. Most other things will likely make you sick or bore you to death. But even the best games are really hurt by the current resolution.
Porn works much better because everything can happen much closer. You don't need to see 30 meters out. It also doesn't require the processing power to render. It's true, you don't move in a VR video (Just look around) but this is not so limiting as you might think. You really need to try it to understand. Maybe think of a lap dance, or having sex. You don't really need to be walking around to do those things. Being able to look around is fine. I can 99% promise that anyone who tries a decent VR Porn scene will be very impressed. It's not an experience you can really convey in words. But as an example, you know the feeling of when someone is in your personal space? A VR video can give you that feeling. Regular video simply can't.
I believe the "Oculus GO" will be out early 2018 as a standalone unit for $199. Hopefully that will allow some more people to try for themselves.
|
02-14-18 12:09pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Onyx:
(pat362's Reply)
Wow, that's interesting. Why is that do you think?
|
02-12-18 05:48pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
"... trying to help." LOL! I'm sure you'd agree that most women wouldn't see it that way. :-)
|
02-07-18 01:17pm
|
Reply
48
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree that the story needs to be fleshed out and focused on. Your ideas sound like an improvement over standard porn.
The question that I have is about the economics of spending that much time and money on a scene. Will producers feel that improved storylines are worth the effort?
|
01-28-18 05:28am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from merc77:
(pat362's Reply)
I didn't know porn came in 16mm film formats (pun intended). 16mm would have cost a lot more money and 8mm (super 8) projectors were common at the time.
I also remember sneaking into the adult part of a bookstore my mother went to and saw 8mm reels as well as projectors for sale.
PS: Yea, this could be a question of age but I was thinking formats of the past, skippy. I was born early 1960s and remember the '70s quite well when it came to porn.
|
01-26-18 09:32am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
For me I think I like watersports as D/s play. My preference is for scenes with M-on-F peeing and I like those even more when they are part of D/s play. Squirting isn't usually associated with D/s unless it is within girl/girl play.
|
12-05-17 01:29pm
|
