| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
That's what I heard too.
I recently read Ashley Blue's memoir Girlvert" and was surprised to learn that she was using MASSIVE amounts of cocaine through most of her career. What's interesting is that Ashley's drug use didn't seem to affect her looks or ability to do scenes whereas Tanner's drug use had profoundly negative effects. But I guess that's attributable to the differences between cocaine and meth.
|
05-29-17 02:37pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
That's sad to hear. She looked really messed up at the end of her career.
|
05-28-17 10:26am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I find that I enjoy talking about sex with folk. I like CHATURBATE because it includes not just women, but also men and couples. For just nakedness and sex regular porn is effective, but on a personal level it's also fun to meet real people online and talk to them. I agree that just watching masturbation bores me, but talking to people fascinates me.
|
05-02-17 06:13pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
True, men seem to enjoy visual stimulation more than many women. But a lot of women I've known enjoy satisfying their curiosity with porn. And notice my answer said "many".... not all.
Unless, of course, they've been trained to find it "disgusting." But usually it's just training and expectations that cause that reaction. Human curiosity is powerful in both sexes, I believe.
|
04-09-17 04:13pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
True, the computer has changed everything, especially through its ability to copy, communicate, and sort more information than any human could have only a few decades ago.
|
03-06-17 02:08pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from skippy:
(pat362's Reply)
Cloud service providers have no rights to any of the data you store. They have a fiduciary responsibility to keep it safe just like your bank, credit card companies and merchants have a fiduciary responsibility to keep your money and credit card information safe. Huge lawsuits have resulted from breach of that fiduciary responsibility when people hack into their systems or employees walk away with data. That said, many consumer-level cloud operations limit their liability for LOSS of data. So although they are liable for ensuring nobody else gets your data, they try not to be liable if they accidentally lose it. Only commercial B to B cloud operations are legally obligated to both secure and protect the data (to a very high degree thanks to SOX compliance laws). So if, as a consumer, you use cloud based storage and your stuff gets lost, tough. Thanks but no thanks.
|
03-03-17 08:56pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Interesting thoughts. Probably depends on that long online agreement we all click on without reading. In law there is, however, a long history of someone holding your property in storage (think safe deposit box, hotel safe, rented storage unit).
Possession is only 9/10 of the law because fighting a legal battle for you possessions is too costly to be worth the trouble. You would win in most cases, but your legal fees don't make it worth the trouble unless you are an attorney.
|
03-03-17 03:02am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Totally agree about the cloud. Weren't celebrity photos already hacked from such sources? They can't hack it if it's not attached to the internet.
|
03-01-17 11:13pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Same as Pat.... all of the above
|
01-31-17 04:18am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Best laugh of the week.
Also a warning, that amputated Padawans might switch to the Dark Side for revenge.
|
01-29-17 03:21am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I totally agree with Pat on this one. I've seen so much porn by now that great photography is an essential for me to be interested. I love the "Wake Up and Fuck" Woodman Photography and also enjoy lots of what's available at Legal Porno (Pornbox).
Things I used to enjoy like Rocco are now diminished for me because of the faults in the quality of the photography. I'm spoiled now and need crisp, clear, multiple-angle shoots. My huge collection of what I now consider less quality stuff sits unwatched on hard drives.
|
01-23-17 05:32am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks, Pat. Since I do exactly the same as you I won't have to write it up. Great minds think alike.
|
12-04-16 06:36am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
Let's hope they listen to the die-hard fans and do just that!
|
11-06-16 01:35pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree that Skyfall was truly atrocious. The only positive was killing off Judi Dench's M because she had been really mailing it in for the past few movies. The movie was just very long and wasted so much talent (I mostly mean Albert Finney — Javier Bardem is mostly overrated in my opinion.)
It also never ended, 143 minutes was about 53 minutes too long.
Spectre is 148 minutes, because apparently Sam Mendes felt 143 was really cramping his style. I've yet to see it either.
Daniel Craig keeps hedging his bets on if he'll do another one or not. I'd rather he don't but I wouldn't be shocked if he turns around and signs up for Bond 25. He's currently listed as the Odds-On Favorite by the strange folks betting on the casting for Bond 25. We shall see.
Regarding Brosnan: Apparently he was all set to do a fifth Bond film, was told they'd be starting pre-production soon and all that, and then got a call from the producers saying they were going in a different direction. Word is was that they got scared by the Bourne Identity (Budget of $60m) with it's June 2002 release to a $27m opening and a $121m final gross after 5 months. The odd thing is that November 2002's Die Another Day (Budget $142m) had a $47m opening and grossed $161m in only 4 months. Sure Bourne's profit margin was much higher, but Bond was pulling in a ton of money none-the-less.
They are such different films and when they retooled Bond to be younger, leaner, and meaner — they didn't save any money. Casino Royale (2006) cost $150m and grossed $167m, and it's opening was smaller than Die Another Day at $40m.
The simply need to go back to what made the Connery, Lazenby, and Brosnan films fun and get rid of the idea of James Bond being a brash, barely-harnessed, thug. Bond is the secret agent with a sparkle in his eye and a one-liner always ready-at-hand.
|
11-04-16 08:18pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
I 100% agree with your second paragraph. Daniel Craig's Bond reboot never sat well with me. It was like they tried to turn Bond into a humourless Jason Bourne — we didn't need that. Bond can have badass action and a sense of humour, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
I must say that Connery is an awesome Bond, but I'm one of those crazy Lazenby fans. He's my favorite. I just wish George wasn't an asshat and had instead agreed to do another movie. Instead he worried about being type-cast.
I personally feel like Idris Elba would be a fantastic choice. He has the elegance, he is comfortable with humour and he has that size and tough-guy power that would make him for a formidable Bond. As for the age, Roger Moore was 46 when he started as Bond. Timothy Dalton was 43. Pierce Brosnan was 42. Only Connery (32), Lazenby (30), and Craig (38) were in their 30s. Dye Elba's hair black and you've got an easy 15 years out of him.
An unknown could be nice, but with the money behind the current Bond films, I don't see it happening.
|
11-03-16 07:09pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
So what are you using the other hand for pat??? :-)
|
10-19-16 11:56am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from skippy:
(pat362's Reply)
That's a good point. There is something oddly nostalgic and somewhat comforting about going back to your old material. I tossed nearly all of my magazines and will probably never see those 1980's models again.
|
10-08-16 06:54pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Actually pat, New Sensations has been big into this kind of porn for a while. When they first started they did it really well and created some intensely hot scenes. What I've seen lately isn't as hot but it is still good porn and a good value.
I'd also recommend Desperate Pleasures. This is a more amateurish site but if you like stepfather/stepdaughter porn and even (acted) father/daughter porn this is a great site.
|
09-13-16 01:26pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto.
Jana Foxy (aka Jana Jordan) has done virtually everything except BJ and hardcore, to the best of my knowledge. That has kept her very high in my interest level.
Andy Valentino held out as well until very late in her career. Her later hard stuff was really not particularly appealing just because she did such a great job on the soft stuff. The hard stuff was the standard slam-bam stuff with nothing very creative.
Jennifer Avalon did all kinds of great stuff including BJ's and participated in BGG stuff but never did full penetration stuff, again, until very late in her career where she did a little hardcore.
Sydney Moon, to my knowledge, never did much more than solo stuff. I don't even think she ever did anything like dildo work. She didn't have that big a career.
In other words, the babes that hold out, who are young and gorgeous, increase their stature substantially by doing so.
|
08-03-16 05:18pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from careylowell:
(pat362's Reply)
At the time of purchase I saw no 'Wall-E has trashed better drives' comments. One or two star reviews referred only to the price vs the competitors.
|
06-12-16 04:15pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey Pat, good to hear from you.
I think calling is much better. We don't have too much trouble with the zombie texting. There can be as many as seven people living in our house. We don't allow texting (unless emergency) in any of our rooms except bedrooms. My 78 year old uncle came to visit a few months ago and my two nephews sat there texting the whole time. If not for my wife, their cellphones would have been destroyed.
It's hard to believe, but there really are some good uses for cellphones. I even believe texting was originally intended to be used in work environments that made calling/talking/hearing too hard (Construction comes to mind). As those first cellphones with texting ability were always the rugged, hard body, good grip phones.
I use texting in a side project I work on. Since I gave up on Psychology (probably more like on people lol), I fell back on my past engineering experience. We live in an urban city, but are right beside the Appalachian Mountains. Along with two other engineers, we have developed electronically-controlled harnesses for bridges. The bridges in the Appalachians are often 50+ years old, terrible erosion if over a creek, lake or even worse the Nolichucky River. These bridges are used by farmers, fresh produce trucks and the random lost trucker. The local cities/counties won't fund the repair or replacement of these bridges. Once we have a harness in place all we have to do is go to the bridge, prior to an expected rain and measure the erosion, foundation shifting, we then text the measurements back to our office. It makes the necessary changes in real-time, by tightening, loosening, tilting, the harness. Calling would be just as good, but there's no phone reception back in the mountains. However, the iPhone can send texts as iMessages to any other iPhone or i product (Pod, Pad, Mac), these get delivered about 95% of the time even with no reception. That's what people should be using them for.
But mine are usually my two nephews. Goes like this.
Them: Need ride
Me: Just call me
If I haven't replied or read their text after 5 minutes I get this one.
Them: u busy?
It's annoying.
|
06-02-16 10:20pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I know, and doesn't that drive me crazy! It is still my constant complaint that the tease factor is gone. It's getting bizzare when it comes to videos. Rather than start from the beginning they will show a preview of all the hottest action to come. That really takes all the anticipation out of the picture and leaves the field to those who will always fast forward to the "good" parts!
|
05-11-16 04:14pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
What ruins a shower scene for me is the fact that the model is naked already. For a lingerie fetishist that is a deal breaker! :-)
|
05-09-16 05:52pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I think all of us agree.......
|
02-18-16 01:20am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from qvtta:
(pat362's Reply)
How about Jessica Rabbit? That erotic red dress, huge tits and red hair with cute face are very hot.
|
02-08-16 05:10pm
|
