| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from skippy:
(pat362's Reply)
Same here. When I see a new or interesting model, most of the time I just look on the site to see what else she has done, but once in a while there will be somebody I just have to get more of so I go out to one of the directory sites. Without those sites and the related name cross-references, I sometimes would not know that a model I like is on another site I subscribe to under a different name.
|
11-09-15 08:38pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
As always, the sheer fortune finding myself the benefactor of a reply from you resoundingly gets my attention. Unarguably PU's encyclopedia on Porn, it follows that anything Pat expounds upon covering the subject can be taken as irrefutable ......buck the guy and you're destine to come out of the fray subjectively depleted.
Having come out of this exchange as a much wiser man on this subject. I must, however, attempt to make my message clearer by conveying the 18 year old factor paramount in getting out my message ..... I think summing up the essence of my idea can be better discerned by relating my recent sojourn into browsing a number of indexed sites featuring girls seemingly doing it all who anyone would swear is nowhere near the age of 18.
True, the magical art of makeup can alter the looks of almost any girl. Such is the trickery developing that'll fool our brain receptors into almost anything porn-related you want to believe.
Winner and still champion ----- PU's indispensable professor covering our world of porn: So Give it up ,all, for PU's premier of porn ......."PAT" He'da man!
|
11-05-15 10:05pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with Pat. I find that I now have access to more great content on the sites I'm on than I can possibly look at.
With unlimited funds, I might add a few sites, especially single model sites, but not much more than that.
|
10-12-15 11:02am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
No shortage of that pat362, but I'm not complaining.
|
09-23-15 08:25pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
As usual I agree with Pat. If a site is loaded with great content, too much good stuff to download in a month, and it has a great discount for multi-month memberships, I will sign up after the first month.
Quality matters most and volume is second.
|
08-30-15 05:10pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto that. It's boring as hell watching fixed camera position cam shows.
|
07-30-15 11:00am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Everything you guys say rings so true. Younger guys might take cheap porn for granted. It was not at all true just a few decades ago.
One more trip down memory lane: remember the first Internet porn pictures & videos that were postage stamp size and not very clear? Things have come a long way.
|
07-09-15 11:04am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
100% agree.
Not only the rental fees, but also having to schlepp to the video store twice, no opportunity to preview the material and relying on the box cover to be accurate, having to fast forward through crap to find the babe(s) that prompted the rental, etc.
And, holy shiite, Batman, the quality is so much better today than back in the day.
Today's web based access is far superior as is The Best Porn, which I call the Consumer Reports of porn. There was nothing similar bak in the day; just caveat emptor.
|
07-08-15 10:54am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
A nice close-up is like eye candy to me. More detail just "turns up the volume" on the erotic effect.
|
05-21-15 04:31pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
2 weeks old. Just upgraded to an HP X360 with an SSD and an Intel core i7 processor. The SSD makes all the difference in response time.
My past PC was an HP Pavillion dv7 that lasted me for almost 7 years. Awesome PC, it actually used the same Intel core i7 processor that is still in the high end PC's like the X360 today. The focus has shifted very much from power to efficiency.
|
05-11-15 05:38pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with messmer and with pat362.
|
05-08-15 01:47pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
I know a guy who specializes in pre-1995 and vintage, VHS, mags, reels, whatever, so hit me up if you are interested.
|
02-08-15 06:59pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Totally agree about being picky.... I already have more porn that I will probably ever view..... now am looking for new & different, interesting and creative.....always looking for that special item that makes the heart race with excitement like it did when I first saw porn so many years ago.
Kind of like mining for gold.... have to look through a lot of mud, clay, and rock to find those glittering objects.
|
02-08-15 05:04pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.
|
01-27-15 08:20pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.
|
01-26-15 07:01pm
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.
|
01-25-15 06:06pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
Dude, I wouldn't touch that stuff with a 10 foot pole, and if I could delete it all with a keystroke right now I would.
Off the top of my head, here's some of the legal stuff that's been censored:
PornstarPunishment.com
This has been beat to death on other forums. Posts supposedly from a Brazzers.com employee have implicated it to VISA, of course, you can take that with a grain of salt. This same poster, who is supposedly charged with reviewing Brazzers content, wrote about some the other criteria for removal which include models in pigtails, because it is too suggestive of underage, and models drinking alcohol on the set.
SickPuppy.com
They constantly posted about all the pressure from credit card processors, now almost all of their content is removed.
WatersportsSluts.com (Hard Glam Network)
Owner wrote in an article on XBiz.com how he was forced to close when his payment processor cut him off. This actually wasn't because the content was too extreme, but he was a UK operator, and he failed to comply with ATVOD. Rather that allow him to work it out, his payment processor just terminated his account, and rather than try to find another processor, he just closed up shop.
Along this note, sites forced to close or remove content by ATVOD could be added to the list, and there are many of those.
YellowDiscipline.com
It is relatively common knowledge that F2M peeing may be permissible in small quantities on US sites, but M2F peeing is off limits. This is one of many US sites that specialized in M2F peeing that have closed over the years. Do I like M2F peeing - not at all - but it still proves my point. Some people do enjoy it though, and these sites shouldn't have had to close.
There's another huge group of sites totaling in the 100's that have categorically been censored by the credit card processors. Sites that featured #2, which I am not into, but also had tons of other content that was legit. I won't list them all, because these sites pushed the limits too much for mention here. I will just mention one.
Veronica-Moser.com
This is the best example, because if you go to her new page on Hightide (ask me if you want the link, but be warned), she explains in detail how credit card processors forced her to take down her site. She did lots of straight up peeing shoots that were legit, but they went down with the ship. We have talked about her peeing content, although not about this idea, but she is an example of someone who might be open to this distribution model.
|
01-25-15 11:43am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
Bringing back the older stuff owned by people that left the industry is a long shot as you say, because those people are checked out and unreachable.
My other idea was licensing stuff that was censored by the payment processors though, and that may be an interesting discussion, so I am moving it to the forum.
|
01-24-15 07:37am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
I think that you, me, and lots of people feel this way. There are so many posts on all the porn forums looking for this or that video that someone saw 10 years ago that they can't for the life of them find anymore. For lots of porn fans, it seems that these old videos are actually the most sought out content.
It gets me thinking, if only there were a way to purchase the older stuff together with the rights and necessary documents for distribution, or license it, and bring more of it back. Or, for the older stuff that went down due to payment processor restrictions, to find alternative methods of monetizing its distribution. There could be huge potential here, if anyone could figure this one out.
|
01-23-15 08:49pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto. No interest at all.
|
12-17-14 09:21pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from host2626:
(pat362's Reply)
"All the time. Thank God I have it because I would stop watching porn right now if I had to watch the bulk of what gets made these days."
^ THIS! :)
|
11-04-14 11:36pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.
Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.
I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).
|
10-31-14 05:22pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Soft-core for me always covers everything that is sexy but not explicit. The clips I've downloaded from 21st sextury and several other sites, for example, have several minutes of girls walking sexily, slowly disrobing, etc, before the male walks in.
When the male arrives there are often a few minutes of foreplay that I would also consider softcore until there is an actual hard dick or explicit sexual act. Kissing and fondling before explicit acts I would also consider "soft-core" but may be seen by others as borderline hard-core when the mouth gets near the genitals.
An interesting discussion, at any rate.
|
10-25-14 05:43am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
No LOL
|
10-04-14 04:59pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
Women after 40 tend to be more horny then those in there 20's not sure about that as men tend to lose interest in there later years and fish and hunt but will not pass up a BJ. LOL
|
10-03-14 04:16pm
|
