| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto.
The only exception is when I have a problem of some kind and contact the support function. Don't know whether the response comes from the webmaster or a support person...if there is a response.
|
09-27-14 11:07am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto.
Much more stuff for much less $$$. The old video rentals were great at 3 tapes/ 3 days / $7 but with an average of 5 scenes per video that meant about 50 cents per scene. VideoBox offers 150+/- scenes per month at about 10 cents a scene.
Best part is storage. Tapes took up a tom of space and trying to locate a favorite scene required a precise indexing system.
|
09-01-14 12:56pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with Pat. My answer is I review both TBP and PU before considering a site as suitable. If the write-ups are good, then I'll check out the site and take the dive if appropriate.
Incidentally, I do the same when I'm returning to a previously subscribed to site.
|
08-04-14 03:20pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(pat362's Reply)
It's dishonest when that happens, but I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff, bring it up to modern quality, and clearly label it as remastered.
|
07-21-14 08:16pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Don't forget razor burn, pat362! ;-)
In fact pubic shaving in general can show all kinds of flaws when presented in HD: the redness, bumps, and those annoying missed spots. I'll gladly volunteer myself for select--highly select--shaving of female performers if pussy and ass depilation is too delicate a task to be done alone. And even if you deplore the bush-free look do you honestly also want a fully forested ass?
|
05-01-14 05:44pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.
I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.
|
04-21-14 03:12pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!
Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.
|
04-14-14 06:58pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)
|
04-10-14 08:52pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto pat362.
|
02-01-14 11:19am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
You can easily get bad lighting outside on a sunny day because natural lighting is a single, super strong source--the sun, which no artificial light can truly replicate, and certainly not on a shoestring porn budget. The problem is that this can create really harsh shadows depending on the season and time of day. So performers are squinting, unevenly lit, and the setting becomes less than picturesque.
Shooting inside near a window as you mentioned brings up other problems. The light sources are different color temperatures and the picture will be white balanced for the indoor source (or on auto balance, which will adjust to the inside), probably a warmer tungsten or incandescent light. The light coming from the window will look blue and kind of weird, but not exactly out of place for a porn video.
|
12-03-13 09:11am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Agreed. But I still can't imagine a world without facials!
|
10-31-13 11:04am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Speaking of cum play ....... Your answer is right on the money.
BTW ..........
Do'ya suppose the aforementioned phrase "right on the money" has anything to do with how "the money shot" got its name?
Anyway, your poll answer reminded me of a clip I have of an older man that , like the usual pussy-starved loser who, striking out more times with women than the whole Yankee roster does in a major league season against opposing pitchers, seized on the idea to effortlessly have his pussy-cup never more to run dry.
All it took was an ad for aspiring models who wanted to get into films, apply for additions at his home, hereafter called Hollywood gateway studio.
Later, with apps and pictures stacked almost to the ceiling, his next step was hiring a competent cameraman, and at the same time tap his hefty monetary resources for State-of-the-art equipment to embellish his new Sodom and Gomorra acquiescence.
The clip I was referring to was one of his sessions wherein this woman taught the old man some new tricks, the more memorable of which she'd collect his semen in a cocktail glass and gulp it down. ....
you've been around the block a few times collecting your keen knowledge and observance into the mecca of porn ........got any thing to add or top concerning the weird behavior of porn-related cum antics?
About all I know is the nutritional value of a cocktail glass of the stuff.
|
10-29-13 12:11am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
That surprises me about you. You and I have a lot of the same interests so I just assumed that you were into facials and cum play too. I learned something new...
|
10-28-13 04:48pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jberryl69:
(pat362's Reply)
Wow Pat, If I'd read the question correctly I would have picked no also, but alas, I failed, both with my pick and my comment. Shamed.
I changed my vote but my comment cannot be fixed.
Perhaps "known" could be considered the connection between eyes and hand.
|
09-27-13 05:49am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks, Pat, for providing the link. It gives one of the more comprehensive reports that I've come across.
Of course these reports can be found all over the place.
Among others you have Google, youtube, or any browser will point you to a slew of choices to get information on porn actor's and actress deaths.
|
09-24-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I voted Face because that's more significant by a narrow margin over the other choices.
|
08-27-13 08:18pm
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat, it's more than just a cultural thing, it's the law, or at least how the law is most widely interpreted, as they worry that showing the genitals, or even pubic hair, is legally considered obscene. It does seem crazy in 2013 and in a modern, socially liberal country at that, but the U.S. has plenty of equally crazy morals-and-decency type laws on the books at the local and state levels that most likely wouldn't pass the smell test with the 1st Amendment if seriously challenged in court.
The odd thing is the genitals are a legal no-no but the ass apparently isn't...so there are some weird looking anal videos out there where the lady's vagina is either pixelated or covered with what look likes a giant Band-Aid (which I think is way more disturbing, but it's probably a fetish at this point) and her backdoor is uncensored in all it's glory.
|
08-23-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree completely. I really don't have any interest in the stunt cock one way or the other; just the babe and h.ger assets. The fucking is part of the fantasy but the condom tells me that the fantasy will not cause severe health complications for the participants.
|
08-07-13 09:19am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
I wouldn't count reading PU as viewing porn, kind of like I don't count reading film reviews as watching a film. I interpreted 'viewing' as enjoying videos/pictures/content, or browsing porn sites.
|
07-20-13 02:31pm
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
I think we're quite different to be honest as I don't understand why I 'must' want more than non-nude. I think Ella, Sandra and Virginia were a lot more exciting, sensual and sexual than a lot of nude models I follow.
|
07-16-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I have tried not to repeat myself in the Bottom Line as well, and then I'm also trying to sound different from previous reviewers.
|
07-10-13 08:31pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from qvtta:
(pat362's Reply)
I would just like to give you an opinion, of why i forexample happen to like Bukkake/multiple facials.
Because the lady is horny to be wanting soo many cumshots on her face and that if something is simply hot. Just watch Evil Angel's "F For Francesca" (Francesca Lé's bukkake scene) she really enjoys it or atleast gives a really good impression of enjoying it.
|
06-22-13 07:20am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I've reached that point, Pat, and it is frustrating, to say the least. :-(
|
06-17-13 10:26am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Capn:
(pat362's Reply)
Me too, but currently I have run out of those too!
Cap'n. :0(
|
06-16-13 10:31pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, the tech is there at this point, it's just that no one has fully put it all together, and then there's the price factor.
|
04-08-13 04:30pm
|
