| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from otoh:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with pat362 on this - most sites I've joined use CCbill, but there have been a few others and I've yet to have any trouble cancelling. So I guess rarely; although with a different biller I'll check cancellation procedures beforehand and skip it if anything seems fishy.
|
07-17-11 12:24am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Jesus, it's like I'm turning into pat362's mini-me! But... as I've said a thousand times, I agree with pat.
I remember years and years ago when I had a roommate who suffered from manic depression. His moods were all over the place. Once his meds were regulated he complained to me that he hated it because everything seemed so 'flat.' I had to point out that 'flat' was how a lot of us lived. No big emotional highs or lows.
For me, watching porn is more linked to how horny I am than my mood.
|
04-07-11 07:22pm
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Sad but true. There aren't any directors like those early ones. Narcissism rules the industry now.
|
04-05-11 04:20am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Good point on the POV issue. But I think the underlying issue is a change in attitude. These younger guys who make gonzo porn now are just too self-centred. Maybe they should try making shitty music instead and leave porn to the professionals.
|
04-04-11 04:14am
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree. While there are some good gonzo directors around today most of them are pretty bad at it. I think the worst kind are those guys who make the porn about THEM, not about the girl. Guys in porn should realize that they are just part of the set. And another advantage in early gonzo was that it was rare that the women were degraded. And they had this quaint thing called cunnilingus. That seems almost strange now in some of the gonzo today.
Maybe I should go into business offering oral sex to young ladies who don't get it often because their boyfriends don't see it in porn.
|
04-03-11 10:44am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
My reasons are a bit different. I like the types of movies that you describe, and I do actively look for those, but my preference is for titles that aren't that old. I prefer finding titles from the early days of gonzo when it was fresh and different. If you started watching gonzo back when it first started you'll remember how different it was from plot-based movies. And you'll also know how different older gonzo is from current gonzo. Some of my all-time favourites are from people like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. I know a lot of people don't like the original Shane's World and a lot of stuff from Seymore Butts, but I like the playful feel that all those titles have.
One problem you must encounter more that I do is that those old titles on film must be very hard to find. The titles I look for are much more readily available.
|
04-03-11 07:18am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Once again, pat hits the nail on the head. I should just wait until he weighs in on a topic and then just agree. Much of my porn hunting is for older material too.
|
04-02-11 11:53am
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
pat took the words right out of my mouth.
|
03-29-11 10:14pm
|
Reply
159
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with pat on this one, I can't think of many times where I came across watermarks that were so bad they ruined the material. For the most part I am able to ignore them...
|
02-07-11 08:56pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Do you ever wonder why so many people seem to find human breast milk weird or gross but cow milk and cheese (most likely from a cow you'll never even meet!) as perfectly normal?
Though come to think of it I haven't met a woman who likes being milked--go figure. Damn, is it really this hard to just get some calcium in my diet?! : - (
|
01-26-11 09:44pm
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from jberryl69:
(pat362's Reply)
Which hole we talking about?
|
01-22-11 08:28am
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jberryl69:
(pat362's Reply)
Don't you find though they tend to collect stinky lent?
|
01-20-11 07:15pm
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from PinkPanther:
(pat362's Reply)
A few examples
Sandy Summers started off as a tease babe, did one hard-core boy/girl scene for Vince Voyeur several years ago - Who's That Girl was the name of the DVD, decided she didn't want to do that, but she has done a lot of solo masturbation and girl/girl for her latest site, Sandy-Summers.com. She also did great material for ALS Scan/ALS Angels under the name Sandy Waldrick
Peachez was originally a very young non-nude model, Real Peachez - her newest site has numerous bj scenes and a lot of masturbation material. Peachez also has AMAZING material at ALS Scan - some of my fave stuff on the whole site.
Jana Jordan is another girl that started as a very shy non-nude model, got more risque through a succession of sites/names. She is one of the wildest, craziest girls on ALS Scan and has lots of girl/girl material on Sandy-Summers.com and ClubJanaJordan. She was also an exclusive performer for NinnWorkx for a short period of time, did a bunch of solo and girl/girl for him.
Dawn Avril was originally a fairly shy goth tease babe, now at Dawn-Avril.com, there's plenty of boy-girl action - not much in the way of pussy shots but lots of full nudity.
|
01-12-11 11:43pm
|
Reply
164
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from PinkPanther:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, let me clue you in - many non-nude models started going mid-core and/or hardcore several years ago. The non-nude model thing is fairly moribund these days - there are some non-nude models, but nothing like it was during the hey-day of Tiffany Teen, Next Door Nikki, etc.
To make up for the fact that she still doesn't want to show much, Nikki "fleshes out" her site with licensed material of other full-nude models and partners with a variety of models, including hard-core models for her website network and cam show network.
|
01-12-11 05:54pm
|
Reply
165
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
I suppose, but even when she was younger it was more about acting than singing. Either way she's got a nice backside...
|
01-04-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
I'd definitely go with Tina Turner, or maybe Beyonce or Lopez (although I don't know that Lopez really counts as being in the music business).
|
01-04-11 09:41am
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Same for me.
|
12-26-10 07:53am
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I honestly can't decide between Julia Ann and India Summer. And Michelle Lay's pretty high up there, too.
|
10-28-10 10:13pm
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, I go along with Rayveness. One of my favorites!
|
10-28-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you for taking the time to look up the word "spiteful."
You're absolutely right in your finding.
Allow, if you will, the creator of this faux pas to correct and rephrase the question:
How about: "Your GF or wife lovingly, and with profound regret, cuts you off only temporarily."
Better?
|
10-20-10 09:55pm
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I am assuming that the average woman would have a larger vagina as well. Wouldn't make sense for guys to have relatively large penises (compared to body size) but for women not to have evolved too.
If you want to make your penis look bigger than lose some weight--preferably around your mid section--and it will appear larger even though it's still the same size. Shaving might help as well but that makes it obvious that you really care about its looks.
But if we're simply talking about size then a large bank account gets more women fired up than any pill or any genetic luck of the draw. Look at all the bullshit men spend way too much money on that isn't lurking in their shorts: cars, cologne, clothes, gym memberships, the list is endless. All of it designed to impress the opposite sex or at least impress upon them that we have money.
|
10-16-10 04:39pm
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from graymane:
(pat362's Reply)
Spoken like a social genius. A genuinely sensible approach in any language.
|
10-06-10 07:31pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from mbaya:
(pat362's Reply)
That is a shame. I want to see you reach 100 points. Your reviews are always a good read.
|
10-03-10 07:10pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Just trying to help...
|
09-28-10 03:43pm
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
"Are all of you that voted no, telling me that you believe that seeing a beautiful naked woman in a magazine or on a website is not sexual?"
You are focusing on an extremely narrow segment of nudity. The poll simply asked: "Do you equate nudity with sexuality?" Nude, aside from the legal meaning, is commonly defined as "devoid of a natural or conventional covering; especially : not covered by clothing or a drape" So when the pollster used the term nudity alone without any situational descriptors he/she/it opened up this poll to addressing a very broad definition. While physical nudity is generally associated with humans, the common definition makes it easily applicable to sheered sheep. While some Kiwis might argue with the generalization, most people would probably agree that a sheered sheep does not bring sexuality to mind.
Perhaps we should define sexuality as well. This word has a more precise definition than nudity, though there is still a good amount of wiggle room. Sexuality is commonly defined as "the quality or state of being sexual: the condition of having sex; sexual activity; expression of sexual receptivity or interest especially when excessive"
While the common definition's secondary examples (listed after the colon) clearly intend to associate the word with reproductive activity, we could interpret it as addressing anything relating to sexes. This widened definition would probably allow most people to then include the sheered sheep with things associated with sexuality.
In regards to the examples of Playboy: This publication is clearly aiming for the common usage of sexuality and indeed most people would probably argue it fits it quite well. The women are depicted as females of reproductive age and are usually excessively expressing sexual receptivity in the form of good eye contact, prominent display of genitalia, et cetera.
However, the argument for nudity not equating sexuality boils down to this: Playboy is a good example of nudity but not representative of the definition as a whole. Nude beaches, public baths, locker room showers, hospitals, police stations after being picked up for loitering when you just wanted some breakfast and a bit of respect for having just gotten back from service in 'Nam. These are all places that have copious amounts of nudity that most people would probably not describe as sexual.
Looking at it another way, your argument is argument by example. The question that must be asked: "Is the example representative?" Just because it is valid, does not mean it is true. Notice the similarity:
Playboy has nudity. Playboy has sexuality. Therefore: Nudity is sexuality.
Cobras are snakes. Cobras are poisonous. Therefore: Snakes are poisonous.
The arguments are valid, but the examples aren't representative.
|
09-27-10 02:35pm
|
