| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
pat and justme, thanks for your thoughts on softcore eroticism. :)
|
09-16-10 09:50am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I would agree that masturbation could easily be classified as midcore.
I Feel Myself has some hot masturbation videos.
If done right, a softcore or midcore video can be erotic. But most softcore videos are boring. Take a look at the Metart videos, which can feature lovely teens, and their videos are almost all a waste of time. While photosets of the same models can be strongly erotic. I wish someone would explain the reasons for that in a simple way.
|
09-14-10 08:43pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
A good point about corporations; they should have some moral obligation but that doesn't mean they ever will. They priority of any corporation is money--to make a profit--all else is secondary really. If sex sells, then that will be marketed. If celibacy sells, then that will marketed instead. This doesn't just apply to sex, there are far worse things businesses are doing; pollution, ill treatment and underpayment of workers, unsafe products, support of tyrannical governments, etc. I'm just saying you can't expect much from corporate powers.
|
09-12-10 08:38pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
It might not be a question of "too much sexuality at a very young age" but really the nature and the context of the messages themselves. If you have two competing extremes of anti-sex/anti-nudity versus the sex-saturated culture then that can make for some very mixed messages to the young and impressionable. I doubt the corporate-born images of sex and nudity would be much different if we had healthier views on sex but they would very likely be easier for kids to comprehend and interpret.
If we adults are unwilling, indifferent, or simply too embarrassed to teach children anything of value on the subject then they are going to teach themselves and then we won't have anyone to blame but ourselves.
|
09-12-10 06:24pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Agree with pat, I think the "star" part is a bit overused, but I am always in for more hardcore performers - provided they don't have stupid tats or ridiculous fake parts...
|
09-09-10 12:30am
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat wrote:
" I'd rather they increased their price and dumped what I consider filler sites from their network and concentrate on only those that are still updating."
This certainly would have been to my advantage because I would never have subscribed in the first place. This must hold true for many subscribers who hung on for the loyalty bonuses only to find out that once they got the site in their particular niche it hadn't updated in two years. It is an excellent site (with some technical problems) for those who like young glamor, because those sites are updated regularly, for everyone else my advice would be stay away.
|
06-23-10 09:06am
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, you get all forty sites right away, Pat. In the meantime they have added some more but we, as long term subscribers, don't get to see those. 21Sextury and American Vice taught me a lesson I will never forget .. no more yearly subscriptions. One went out of business, the other didn't give me what I was looking for - mature - because three sites out of the four I was interested in had stopped updating some time ago .. and this happened to be the reason all along for me wanting all sites now. Therefore for the next 9 - 10 months I'll be looking forward to one weekly update by the remaining mature site and that's it. No more after this. It is monthly from now on!
As a PS, to add insult to injury the latest update was more MILF territory than "mature" so I can't even count on good updates any longer.
|
06-21-10 07:12pm
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
21Sextury is one of the sites I was talking about when I said I regretted almost immediately making a long term commitment. I was primarily interested in their more unusual niches, because glamorous teenies don't do it for me, but found that after a couple of days I was already finished with downloading all the material that was of interest to me.
It didn't help, of course, that I had previously subscribed to "Lusty Grandmas" and "Zoliboy," and that most of the MILF sites of interest, that I got as a bonus for the long term subscription,were dead! :-(
|
06-20-10 10:24am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, you would get a folder / file browser that you can use to select the file you want to play. The media player will come with a remote control so controlling the playback is the same as with a DVD player.
Also most of them support usb hard drives so if you dont want to run cables everywhere, just copy what you want to play to the hard disk and them plug it into the media player.
|
05-19-10 12:12am
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
Without moving your PC next to your TV, your best bet would be to get a media player like a Popcorn Hour. Run a network cable between that and your PC and then you will be able to stream and play anything you have on your PC on your TV.
|
05-18-10 07:29am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
"Not too mention that the quality of the video has improved greatly over the years but the content has gotten worse. A crappy porn scene that is technologically better looking is still a crappy scene".
Wow, what a way to put it - and this user most certainly agree...
Great lines, pat!
|
04-25-10 08:24am
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I've yet to hear the story that pot increases your reflexes, but then again driving drunk isn't legal even if the alcohol itself is. I'm not picking on you, it's just that this argument always comes up and people seem to confuse use and misuse.
I agree that there should at least be decriminalized since so many Americans tax dollars are going to pay to imprison people for possession, that is simply having it them, not even using it. The old joke is that the most dangerous effect of marijuana is being caught with it, not any of its effects on the body. And if the possession of pot is illegal than what is stopping someone from doing something worse, such as driving under the influence? If someone wishes to use marijuana, and it is close to 100% illegal in the U.S., than how are we to expect them to care about any other norms as well?
Remember: zero tolerance is zero thinking.
|
04-10-10 10:34pm
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from RagingBuddhist:
(pat362's Reply)
I had that same concern once. I decided I'd drive my laptop to a hot spot somewhere if need be. Either that or use a public computer, at a library or a school. Even with blocked out sites and domains, I think you could still get to a billing company site.
|
03-24-10 03:35pm
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Eh, well I'm the only one that picked booze. So I don't sound too great either... I could probably manage building a raft on my own, but I'd need some beers! My favorite star might be fun, but I'd think you'd need a mountain of blow to keep most pornstars happy...
|
03-22-10 08:17pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly - stop the filming and get hold of the scene before shooting again....
|
03-03-10 06:42am
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
It's not called the 'girlfriend experience' for nothing; people want as much 'service' as their money can get them, though I am not sure what Ashley Dupree-type rates get you beyond a job resignation.
I wonder if girls can demand higher rates in porn when the guy is wearing a condom? Probably not though as condom-ed sex in porn would risk a smaller audience than the typical bareback-and-free style.
|
02-08-10 11:30pm
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from David19:
(pat362's Reply)
And yet 18 year olds are asked to make long term career decisions regarding other careers when they go away to college and must choose a major--careers where the decision could actually be more easily postponed.
|
01-13-10 08:13pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
"Normal as possible" might make for a very short scene for many of us, plus like others have said here try surprising a girl by cumming on her face without her getting upset.
|
01-04-10 09:40pm
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
"I want the cum shot to be near where the penis is located"? Where else is the cum coming from? Is there teleportation involved? I thought that only occurred in photo shoots where in one photo the girl is clean and pretty and the in next her face has been completely desecrated. ;)
Yeah sorry, I know what you're talking about though. So many scenes are ruined when the couple is going at it good and strong only to suddenly break rhythm and have them change positions for the grand finale. If the girl's lucky she has time to pull her hair out of the line of fire and the guy is still somewhat spontaneous. Other times we are not so lucky and she keeps opening one eye waiting for the guy to finish until we are finally treated to an awkward jump cut with a bored girl and a guy who's about to sprain his wrist.
|
01-03-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Went through the same thing trying to cancel without calling. And you may well be right about the embarrassment factor.
And the "your call will be answered by the next available representative" factor.
|
12-28-09 07:47am
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Same here with cancelling Playboy, having to make that phone call. Somehow, I just don't like having to do that, being in a situation where I must speak with someone. The woman on the other end tried to soft-pedal keeping the subscription, but she didn't persist when I said that I only called to cancel and not to maintain the subscription even if they were offering a lower rate.
Seems to me that they are well-trained and qualified at what they do, as it wasn't the first time for me. Maybe the people in charge think that the toll-free number and speaking to a real person gives things a nice "personal touch."
But I'd still rather just quit using an online cancellation form. Speaking to that woman, even though she was very professional, I felt embarrassed, like there was this unspoken dimension to the conversation that went something like, "You must be a lecherous sleazeball."
"I must confess that it is true."
|
12-28-09 07:16am
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
If we're speaking about the sites which say about "real people", I can agree it's (arguable) a kind of fantasy. But if we're speaking about the sites who promise their members a chance to get into shoot (which I think was the whole question of this poll), and using boyfriends of models instead, I tend to qualify it as an OUTRIGHT CHEATING; don't you agree?
|
11-13-09 10:15pm
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> Now what's the likelyhood that any of these so called real people having sex with pornstars sites are real??
Personally I will believe it only when I see a genuine report from PU member who's made it. BTW, have anybody tried to do it with BigSister? (and BTW, THERE it COULD even be legal, even if it IS prostitution).
|
11-12-09 09:53pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from GCode:
(pat362's Reply)
You may be right but my experience in real life is that many watch these kinds of scenes. The reason I say this, at least from what I can gather, is when porn does get brought up amongst my friends one of the first sites that is mentioned is sites by BangBros. These sites usually feature these types of BJ's (the aggressive, gagging, slurping, etc). Even with people I do not know well (random parties, gatherings, so on) when porn is brought up after a few drinks, all the sites that feature these types of bj's are brought up. So, maybe I am just in the minority but if these sites keep being brought up, obviously these folks like the sites since they are watching these scenes (either paying or not, but whatever) and I have not heard many complaints on these models being extremely slutty aggressive as a turn off.
Now don't get me wrong, I think many enjoy the bj's that we seem to like but I think here at PU, the majority of the viewers are a bit more sophisticated in their porn opinions and views due to watching a lot more than the average viewer. Plus, I have to disagree with you a bit on the fact the porn producers are overlooking the consumer completely by featuring these types of BJ's. Honestly, if there were enough complaints I do think most mainstream sites would change their outlook on model behavior when it comes to extreme bj's. Of course, there are always exceptions but I just can't see the huge mainstream sites just doing whatever they think the viewer wants (even with an extremely large number of complaints), even if this is not what they want, and just saying screw them; they can watch or not. Just my 2 cents...
|
11-09-09 07:05pm
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from GCode:
(pat362's Reply)
I have to agree, the blowjob in porn these days have become this overacted and savage throatjob. In my experience when a women attempts this, I am all for the 'plz relax' notion against this type of bj. However, these days in porn, the dominating bj you describe appears to be the standard and most appealing for the viewers (at least the vast majority) because this is all I see these days (mostly). I just think that most hardcore scenes attempt to showcase the model as extremely slutty and an extremely aggressive bj is what portrays this behavior the best while a small minority would like a bj how its supposed to done; sensual and slow, but joyful at the same time.
|
11-08-09 07:59pm
|
