| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from RustyJ:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I've been a member multiple times and never had any issues with them. My experiences are not all that recent though.
|
11-28-12 09:10am
|
Reply
127
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from tangub:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
That's exactly why I used a prepaid card on this one Squirrel. When I went to cancel I got an email offering me a discount to stay and I had to reply to say if I wanted to take them up on the offer or proceed with the cancellation request. I've replied to say proceed with the cancellation but have recieved no acknowledgement they recieved that email or any kind of confirmation the subscription has actually been cancelled. It just seems like hassle compared to using CCBill or Epoch.
|
11-27-12 09:02am
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
"...followed by four minutes of sex. Too much like reality."
What? You mean there are people who can keep going for as long as four minutes? Surely not. ;-)
|
11-14-12 10:51am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
And my sincerest thanks to Cybertoad for the poll. I hope many of our members will participate in this one so I'll finally find out who is causing the present drought when it comes to clothes and teasing.
|
11-14-12 10:26am
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Cybertoad:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Too much like reality LOLOLOL
That was funny, true but funny :-)
|
11-14-12 09:53am
|
Reply
131
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I never add the pre-checked cross-sells as a negative but I should. There is nothing positive about them, that's for sure. I have no problem with an offer that I actually have to accept, but I do wish that sites would realize how negatively they're perceived by active buyers. I've been burned a few times too...
|
11-07-12 01:34pm
|
Reply
132
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from bestimmt:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks for the welcome. This seems to be a friendly community. You are right about the condoms. I find that mildly annoying , but its not a deal-breaker for me. But it is something someone considering joining should know. Good point.
|
10-30-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
133
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Happy to hear from you again. Messages from the regulars, esp. our noteably venerable ones such as you, are always welcome ....
Correction: add the suffix combination "treasures."
If you don't already practice this, here's a tip to hang on to your work while composing:
Just periodocally hightlight your text, hit your Ctrl+C keys and save what you've already done. So if you're wiped out, just press the Ctrl+V keys and volia.... you're back in.
You can also first put it on a Word's word-processor and transfer it onto your review -- or wherever.
The only problem I have with reviews is not knowing the technical stuff pertaining to the family of image and video performance ... I mean like the number of sets, quantities of pics, resolutions and the like. I just make up for it by discribing just what I see.
And like you, I almost bleed over the time and effort I put into putting together a comprehensive review.
PS...
I suppose you're just one of a very few who read this review ... judging, that is, from the absence of replies.
|
10-14-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
134
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks, squirrel for those kind words.
I earlier typed out a lengthy reply detailing my appreciation and some additional comments relating our combination of thoughts about the review, as well as more on this site.
Unfortunately, the half-ass method by which to transfer messages via this feature seemingly wasn't working, thus evidentaly pushing everything I wrote off into a black-hole somewhere, leaving me in a position wherein I couldn't get it back.
For all of PU's many sterling qualities, the difficulties of simple matters finding where to do reviews and getting messages like this moved from point A to Point B really does a number on me.
But many thanks anyway. Your reply means a lot.
|
10-11-12 03:15pm
|
Reply
135
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from AngelLiwetUK:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Well i am not FIGHTING to get my money back as i went for the TRAIL and cancelled and then got offered a reduced rate of 6.95 so i toook it and they took £25.95
|
10-10-12 04:46am
|
Reply
136
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
If Porn Pros sticks to this niche on a couple of their sites, I would recommend it since they are coming from the typical hardcore, even sometimes extreme hardcore genre, but there's no telling with them since they just kind of sprung the softer hardcore on members with no warning. I'm guessing they will stop shooting it without warning too or start a separate site that requires a separate membership to access.
I've heard the most good about X-Art, but as I've told the others, their models hold them back for me since I still don't care for the tiny, slim models as my only option.
|
10-08-12 02:09pm
|
Reply
137
|
Czech AV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks Squirrel.
|
10-04-12 09:41pm
|
Reply
138
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from lk2fireone:
Glad you found a network that has some content to your liking, even with the negative aspects.
Also glad you were able to get a discounted price through Amour Babes, and pointed that out for anyone else wanting to join the network.
There are some Eastern European teens at the network that are found at a lot of other porn networks/sites. But it seems like there are too many problems for the network to interest me.
Lately, I've been so spoiled by wanting my porn sites to be well designed, easy to use, with lots of good to great content.
At one time, I could search for hours through a lot of poor or just-OK material, hoping to find the good stuff. But not anymore. Now I want the good stuff on easy display. I just don't have the patience any more that I used to have.
When you write that: "First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible."
I would have been so turned off by that experience, I would have tried getting a refund.
|
10-03-12 06:47pm
|
Reply
139
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from Cybertoad:
Amazing review, talk about giving details that was awesome.
well done.
|
10-03-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
140
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
There was no room to lay out the sequence of events for my first 24 hours of membership. Above is an abbreviated version. Here is the long unedited one. Incidentally since that first day, I have had no trouble accessing material.
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. I mailed Epoch who said to try a different browser. I had already tried that, however the next day the sites were functioning properly.
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was supposed to apply to them to reset my password, but given their lack of any customer support, thought this would be impossible. I complained to Epoch, who said it wasn't their concern. I said it was their concern as they were supposed to be a reputable billing agent dealing with reputable websites. After a while with me talking about complaining to my credit card company, the Epoch person said they may refund me if I didn't hear in 24 hours from the network. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Customer Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed, and that if I wanted my money back to contact Epoch and they would refund. They also sent me a new password. My reply was "Customer support on your network seems awful, but the material although for the most part not updating, seems very good. As long as the network continues to function I am satisfied enough not to ask for my money back. The network happened to go down the very first night I was a member, and there is no customer support, so that is not a good impression if the site isn't merely laying down and dying, and scraping out a few last memberships - which is what it gives the impression of doing."
|
10-03-12 02:39pm
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Guess most video-collectors have and use externals...I have around 4,5 Tb all together in older and newer externals (five of them)....and still need/want more space...mostly want.
|
10-03-12 08:53am
|
Reply
142
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks very much. Oh I know it pains me sometimes to see them cause some girls you are like oh wow, she looks amazing and then she strips off and she has opted to deface her gorgeous body with this ink, I find it so odd why you would want to contemplate doing this, but they must have someone saying they look awesome with them cause they don't stop getting more after they start usually.
On this site, there is some good stuff but it takes some searching, there is lots of fake boobies which in American porn is something of the norm it would seem, I think you are right in the 7 out of 10, seems about right that.
|
09-18-12 02:28pm
|
Reply
143
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from merrell:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
ok the squirrel, i believe you have right on the point, but in this case i have never seen that: only one hour and already reject permanently, it's insane, i'm being duped.It seem i'm not alone in this case. All the more as, the content do not as terrific as i've believed.
|
09-14-12 02:33pm
|
Reply
144
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from Capn:
Highly commended! ;0)
It is a shame that more agressive action isn't taken against scammers like these & those who use regional pricing.
As ever it is the underhand principle of this that really annoys.
It tars the whole industry and should be addressed.
Cap'n. :0E
|
09-06-12 11:33pm
|
Reply
145
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gaypornolover:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
That is absolutely shocking Squirrel but well done for highlighting it. We porn consumers need to take a stand against this kind of unethical business and show we're consumers like everyone else and we deserve respect. Together we'll do it - thankfully we have a great forum here to do so.
|
09-06-12 12:17pm
|
Reply
146
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Like I said in my review of this site, there are lots of yummy models. Skinny white teens, very little variation in body types.
But the site navigation is poor. The girls are not presented attractively in the videos or photosets. The same models can be found at many other sites, where they appear much more attractive.
You get bonus sites with a membership to any site in this network. But most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
And it's hard to believe, but the navigation at some of the other sites in this network are even worse than at this site.
My recommendation is to save your money for a site or network you might like.
This network was a real disappointment for me.
|
09-06-12 12:01pm
|
Reply
147
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I am nominating you for an honorary PU badge for Leading the Charge for Fair Porn Practices.
Seriously, your warnings do help the rest of us in saving our porn dollars from attempted fraudulent practices.
And maybe Khan should consider awarding you an extra badge, whether honorary or real.
|
09-06-12 01:49am
|
Reply
148
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I was really tempted to match your score but I gave them a couple of extra points because what annoys me about the site may be more of a personal nature. I do agree that quality vs quantity would be a much better approach. There is way too much repetition. Mind you I can appreciate their budget restraints because I don't think they charge enough. It's strabge to think that a site I scored in the high 90's a few years ago has dropped to barely above 80.
|
09-03-12 10:19am
|
Reply
149
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks for the reply - didn't mean to lean so heavily on the regional pricing issue! As tangub and denner have noted, although they state £20, they do not seem to be following through on the CCBill page - so it's definitely worth a join.
|
09-02-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
150
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from Capn:
Something wrong with their pricing structure there then.
You would have thought it would be relatively simple job to keep a handle on their pricing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-02-12 08:12am
|
