| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from t9chome:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Your welcome. If you're using 64 bit windows, it's a little harder to find a working ver, but I can tell you where to get it. It is modified to work on Win7 64 or Vista 64. The original is 32bit and doesn't work in the 64bit environment.
Denner: Yes, totally free.
|
03-23-11 09:22am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Maybe they think it's evil, or at least they use it as a chip in their game of attempting to exert power and control over others.
|
03-13-11 07:48am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
to be fair lk2 a lot of people have a lot of things on their harddrives they don't "collect", I have a bunch of TV shows and movies on there, but I don't really consider it "collecting". Same could be said for music, even though it is a collection of sorts, I consider the definition of collector a bit more stringent - a collector makes it into a hobby of sorts.
that said, i'd have to consider myself a collector, even though like pat362 I don't look back through my collection often, it certainly takes up enough of my time that I would consider it a hobby.
|
03-10-11 07:57pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yep, that's my view as well. Hundreds would be better but your thousands would be the ones with the power. A sample of 30 to 40 people taking part in a poll is not very accurate and would not cause any webmaster to change his plans. The polls are fun though and a nice daily distraction.
|
03-03-11 12:44pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
LOL
|
03-02-11 05:46am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Since Windows 7 came, I've really had no issues with Microsoft anymore. Same as you, I cannot go with the "It's so easy to use" crowd as Windows is so familiar to me that nothing could be as simple without extra learning.
Besides, what about Windows Media files that are all around? I guess there's some wmv player for Mac though...
|
02-25-11 12:28am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Oh no....
I am still on with it.
Another 3 years dedicated effort should sort it! ;0)
Provided I stop downloading any more..
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-11 10:38am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I only was using that shot at Nubiles as an example of her navel.
|
01-21-11 08:37am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from jberryl69:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Name it what you like but I think it's part of her appeal
|
01-20-11 07:14pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Don't forget to ask about the regional pricing ... ;)
|
12-31-10 07:41am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
One of the funniest lines in Woody Allen's film "Everything you Always Wanted to Know About Sex But Were Afriad to Ask" was in the "Killer Boob" segment where he defeats the killer boob and then notes "these things usually travel in pairs." That always makes me laugh.
|
12-16-10 10:57am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I assume that women designed the sizing system for bras. Looking for logic or reasoning is futile! Of course, if men designed the system it would be measured in handfuls or mouthfuls. So maybe the women's system is better.
|
12-15-10 07:07am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Natural means natural..you know, like when you piss when the urge hits you.
|
12-15-10 03:12am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Next time I have to put a smiley face in my messages when I'm joking. I like small breasts, but I realize that there probably isn't a size smaller than A. And if there was, I'd like to think that I'd know about it! ;-)
|
12-14-10 05:02pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'm sure for some that's the criterion. Most Playboy centerfolds could be considered fully nude even the photos are not explicit (and as long as jewelry doesn't count).
I believe R-rated films can show 100% naked fully nude but not "good parts" fully nude--no boners, no pink, no stink--and I'm sure the vast majority of directors don't even think of challenging that.
And it's also the difference between the artsy nude sites that so many like here at PU and the harder girls-only "good parts" ones.
|
12-01-10 11:54am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hey, it's only self-abuse if it's done properly! ; - )
And in my view it's wrong if women don't masturbate. I mean how can you look at a beautiful woman and not think "She's just gotta touch that body--it's a temple!"
Of course I would also argue that if a person thinks masturbation or homosexuality--or simply "being" a certain sexual orientation--is abnormal or abusive then they are the ones with the mental disease. In fact both masturbation and homosexuality are found throughout the animal kingdom, and I'm not talking just primates either. Probably makes living life as an animal a little easier to stand--and all with no parent or religious figure to castigate them for it.
Plus, if there's a god, why would he (or she) frown upon masturbation when he made it so easy for so many humans to do? Not to mention why did he let humans create so much porn and sex toys to assist in said sin?
|
11-30-10 04:00pm
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from graymane:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'll give you Amen on that, big guy.....You'da man.
And due appreciation for introducing me to a new word..(acolyte).
Putting me in the league with Men-of-the-cloth is an honor I'll truly cherish.
|
11-13-10 11:29am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from graymane:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
My, my.....that's a whole lotta' talk for having said nothing.
|
11-13-10 12:59am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Your reply makes me wonder about my first "mainstream theatre" flick, Russ Meyers' The Immoral Mr. Teas, that displayed a nice smorgasbord of mammary flesh. But I wouldn't call that a porn flick because it was more a slapstick comedy with bare boobs; no eroticism or pussy shots, let alone penetration.
|
11-07-10 10:13am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah, it has always been around I suppose, it doesn't seem as though it happened as often on my old XP machine...
|
11-06-10 11:34pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree with you on that one otherwise I wouldn't be collecting porn!
:-)
|
10-23-10 06:56pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
There is no real truth in advertising law that is enforced.
Just think about the obvious lies in political ads. You can sue for fraud if an ad misrepresents a product and you buy it, and sometimes an attorney general in a state will sue fraudulent advertising claims to get publicity for a political run, but generally don't count on the government to force advertisers to tell the truth.
(An exception would be products that fall under the Food and Drug Administration's authority, especially prescription drugs).
|
10-17-10 07:49am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree with you completely. When it comes to marketing and, there will always be a small minority of people who are perfectly logical and make well-planned purchases.
I'm neither, though. As I get older I make fewer impulse buys, but I admit I have bought the more expensive brands simply because of a good "feeling" about them (probably from subliminal advertising).
Anyhow, I love the subject and just thought I'd add my two cents again. And, no, I won't be buying a penus-pump anytime soon. :)
|
10-16-10 01:52pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, there's the Federal Trade Commission Act, which is supposed to protect us from false and deceptive advertising. Advertisers must be able to substantiate the claims that they make with evidence. And ...
The FTC seems have as much in the "balls" department as does the FDA.
|
10-16-10 02:12am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from RustyJ:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Could work for me. Especially when cancelling a subscription, I DL this and that and afterwards look at my collection and wonder what the hell was I thinking when I wasted my time with all this junk ;)
|
10-15-10 09:25am
|
