Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Drooler:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
Amen to that!
|
04-17-09 02:26pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
You are aware that past poll questions can still be voted on and that you can even change your past vote, right?
Not trying to shade your opinion, just making sure you're aware that poll questions never really die.
|
01-10-09 06:44am
|
Reply
3
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Comment
from jd1961:
So they still haven't figured out their own models' names yet?
|
01-10-09 01:47am
|
Reply
4
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
Looks really nice, think I will give it a try.
|
01-10-09 07:55am
|
Reply
5
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Pornjackker:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
Thanks for the heads up about Real Celebrity Hunters.
|
01-02-09 06:35pm
|
Reply
6
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
A handy tip for future reference ...
When you're dealing with a daily download limit, just create a temporary directory and download everything that day into the temp directory. Then it's a simply matter of looking in the file mgr to see what your total for that day is.
It's a pain to have to move it but I've found it's much easier than trying to keep a running total of what I've downloaded.
|
05-12-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
7
|
Jack's Teen America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
This should be all fixed now.
Thx for the heads up
|
02-03-09 11:10am
|
Reply
8
|
Jack's Teen America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
TalonIcefire, sorry but both me and a TBP Editor have looked and we can't find what you're referring to. If you care to drop us a line saying *specifically* what you're having problems with, we'll be happy to look into this further.
|
02-01-09 09:08am
|
Reply
9
|
Nasty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Review
from ramscrota:
I thoroughly agree, TalonIcefire. I would add "Nasty Angels - nasty site - as in cheap and nasty"
The site is acompletely misnamed. The girls are not nasty, and they are not angels.
I found it tacky, disorganized, poor quality, and not worth the price.
Glad to see someone has given it the treatment it deserves.
|
12-30-08 06:45pm
|
Reply
10
|
Real Celeb Hunters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from alexmedia:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
thank you.
I think it's not the best deal in celebrity niche.
|
09-18-09 04:26am
|
Reply
11
|
Real Celeb Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Review
from alexmedia:
Do they have any pics content?
|
09-18-09 12:17am
|
Reply
12
|
Redneck Confessions
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Review
from mbaya:
Your review is short, but has a lot of useful information. Sometimes we need to know what sites to stay away from, as well as those we should check out. Thanks.
|
01-11-09 09:11am
|
Reply
13
|
Redneck Confessions
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Review
from Pornjackker:
Your review is spot on! It's also worth mentioning that after
joining, I received no email confirmation from them even though
I sent them an email requesting one. I will be looking at
my billing statement closely to make sure I was properly billed.
|
01-10-09 05:43pm
|
Reply
14
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from otoh:
(TalonIcefire's Reply)
'In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models.'
I have a shelf of racy books in my study, but you, sir, show true dedication :)
|
01-29-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
15
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Comment
from Drooler:
I agree, and I've never understood what all of the fuss about Ron Harris' work is. The photo galleries are Warholesque in their similitude and, as you say, the updating is unreliable. Besides, the photos don't look very natural; those who dislike "shopped" pics probably wouldn't care much for it.
I've been a member 2-3 times, and I've always kind of regretted it. It's not all bad, but it's definitely overrated.
One more thing: That watermark. Awful.
|
01-28-12 03:08am
|
Reply
16
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Comment
from tangub:
I'm glad i'm not the only one that thinks that. Most of the recent updates i find less explicit than much of what you find at Met Art.
|
01-22-12 12:59pm
|