| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Clement:
Hey,
Just a quick update to say it took longer than expected to fix all of the older DRM videos, since we're also fixing screenshots, meta data (pornstar info) and the DVD covers at the same time. We're 60% done with this but the videos have been re-encoded and they're available now in Full DVD resolution.
It's not our intention to do any false advertising, a server broke down and we had to get rid of DRM so some videos were unavailable for a few weeks (about 100 DVDs out of 7,300).
As always though, thanks for your comments, we appreciate any feedback, good or bad, this helps us improve our site.
|
04-20-10 08:31am
|
Reply
2
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from jd1961:
This site (of which I was once a member) keeps sending me email offers that state that for me,here is a special offer for $9.95. But what they fail to mention is that to get that deal, you must sign up for a year.
|
02-24-10 12:00pm
|
Reply
3
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from james4096:
They did get you with a bait and switch, and that always stinks.
I haven't been a member for a while, but even with half the content they had when I was there and the blurry videos IMHO it still better than a 50. I think the lowest score needs more detailed negatives.
But you were were right to point this out to us publicly.
|
02-23-10 04:31am
|
Reply
4
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Jeffrey99:
While I'm currently not a member, it's actually on my list of upcoming sites to try, I have to agree with others on the score. IMHO nothing in your review leads to a 50 score.
On top of that, what do you consider "good quality" & what do you consider "poor quality. Even at the high quality"? Which the last part doesn't even really make sense. LOL
Could stand to tell us what those specs are. Meaning, what resolution? What KBPS?
In my opinion, after looking back at your reviews, it'd be nice to know what the technical specs of the videos or photos are, not just "high quality" or "low quality", which can be different for everyone.
|
02-22-10 04:27pm
|
Reply
5
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from messmer:
I am currently a member and have always found all the videos I was looking for. If some are blurrier than others it`s the original material that`s at fault. The one thing I would accuse them of is the boring material they have offered recently,(something that holds true for Video Box and American Vice as well), but according to their support they are going to cater a bit more to those of us who are a bit tired of gonzo style porn in the future. I really believe your score is a bit harsh.
|
02-22-10 11:28am
|
Reply
6
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Denner:
Have not been a member for almost half a year - and those serious accusations in this review, I've not noticed as a member, earlier..
When a member I found the site better than VideoBox - but, ok - with some of the same flaws - like the completely inefficient category search.
Still - as I remember the site - a 50 in score is not my experience - a lot of fine videos here - by all means - a lot with bad viewing quality, too.
Still: a 50? - it certainly must have gone down the drain in the last months?
|
02-22-10 08:08am
|
Reply
7
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Clement:
Hey,
The videos marked "coming soon" are actually being re-encoded because they were in DRM before, they'll be back in about 2 weeks.
The blurry DVDs are blurry because the original DVDs are blurry. If you check the newest DVDs from new studios, they're clear.
Please email me at clement@videosz.com so I can refund your membership, since you were not happy. We've not been around for this much time by being crooks.
If you have any other comments, feel free to let me know, we're always improving the site with new features so any request is welcomed!
|
02-22-10 05:11am
|
Reply
8
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Jay G:
Thanks for the warning. Unfortunately "bate & switch" happens in other places (I noted it at Lupus which lures one in with particular movies one would like to have, but then it's not yet available). Thanks!
|
02-22-10 04:52am
|
Reply
9
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from dracken:
Some people find it funny, it's definetly different from regular porn,if nothing else the ridiculousness of it all makes it funny... I for one enjoy this site BUT I agree the cock's used are fake and if that is something you don't like don't sign up for this network.
|
09-16-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
10
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from TrashMan:
There is also a download quota, passing which limits you to streaming videos only.
|
01-14-09 08:48am
|
Reply
11
|
Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from wiild1:
Thanks for the review Diggler!
Looking at the previews this and the sister-sites att allreality seems like something I could enjoy: very hot girls, fake-reality type of story lines, well-endowed male talent.....
I understand that videoquality is bad but I can live with that if they have downoadable pictures/zips... At Brazzers and realitykings I mostly downloaded the pic.
Did you download pictures or notice if they had pictures from all sets?
Thanks
|
01-01-09 08:46am
|
Reply
12
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from TheRizzo:
Totally agree with Amy Reid! I love that girl.
|
10-10-08 11:36am
|
Reply
13
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from badandy400:
I had not noticed that the screwy word thing on the log in page did not work. This makes my life a little easier.
|
10-07-08 02:19pm
|
Reply
14
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
I guess you previewed the thumbs of the content, which a visitor can do as far back as July 2007 right now, and figured there would be enough hardcore.
|
10-05-08 08:24am
|
Reply
15
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Drooler:
There was some discussion at PU some time last year with the webmaster Bela at DDF Productions about how this and the other sites would change. One idea was that 1byday would be less hardcore. There's still their site HandsOnHardcore, though I've never been a member myself.
|
10-04-08 01:08pm
|
Reply
16
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Cybertoad:
Hi Digger,
LOL Ok I'm Cybertoad and I am a perv, and I was one of those pervs that liked the site, the solo's are pretty hard core more then I see elsewhere, but if you are refferring to 1 on 1 , I agree there isnt too much boy-girl, but lots of girl girl and solo. I actually prefer that. VideoBox is good site ypu may like and has allot of HardCore and not so much solo. I didnt like that about Videobox but sounds like this would be right what you are looking for. There was so much hardcore there I downloaded from videobox I had to delete some.
|
10-04-08 09:27am
|
Reply
17
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Andreas:
Hi DigglerFL,
we're sorry you haven't been able to download images on selection but it's definetly possible to do so.
All galleries offer a red arrowed button per size to open the desired image in a popup window. This way you can easily download the images and store them anywhere on your harddrive.
The disappointing model quality seem to be a personal thing but the past has showed that MCN discover and feature some of the most addictive woman online:
Example:
Gabrielle: http://www.mc-nudes.com/modeldetails/166
Vivian: http://www.mc-nudes.com/modeldetails/147
Nancy: http://www.mc-nudes.com/modeldetails/100
the list goes on ...
Kind regards
Andreas
|
06-18-08 09:57am
|
Reply
18
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Mayvary:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
I would really like to see how professional you're. Show us some reference images of yours and I might ask for forgiveness.
On the other hand I can't imagine you're that professional because instead of sleeping with your cam you should spend some time with the right button of your mouse in search for the "save file"-feature ...
Don't think to be professional - be professional.
|
06-04-08 01:49am
|
Reply
19
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Mayvary:
- Can't download just the photos you like
Incompetence is no excuse for a wrong statement!
|
05-29-08 07:40am
|
Reply
20
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Mayvary:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
Hi Diggler,
I was on vacation so sorry for the late answer. I do not intent to start a discussion about taste but what I saw on MCN justified my score!
Thanks for your time
may
|
05-29-08 07:35am
|
Reply
21
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Mayvary:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
Hey Diggler it's hard to discuss with someone about taste but MCN are definetly 97! worthly points on my side because of the following facts:
Site:
+ Great design and easy to navigate website.
+ well sorted contents, fast browsing speed, great compatiblity
+ nice features like the model of the year, voting, search and so on ...
Content:
+ great and partially exclusive girls (don't saw them elsewhere yet)
+ great images in large scales
+ awesome videos (2 a week in real hdv)
+ nice variance in contents
Custom:
+ always improving the site to make it more comfortable for visitors like me
+ friendly and fast support
And just because I am sick and tired of the babe-abuse-porn-crap I really appriciate the existance of a site like MCN! Thats why I gave them 97 ...
|
05-05-08 04:37am
|
Reply
22
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from stargazinc:
http://www.online4love.com is the primary way my husband and I meet likeminded "friends with benefits." There's no uncomfortable wondering if you ought to approach someone, you already know upfront when you meet them, and it is definitely worth the extra cost of becoming silver/gold imo, so you can exchange notes or pics before meeting and make sure its a good fit.
My hubby is str8 and I am bi and we have had no problem finding partners on online4love.com. We've had fun sex with lots of single men, single women and full swap couples that we met on O4L. And yes, I'm real, and no, I don't work for O4L or think they're perfect (they can be pricey and they goober up email sometimes,) but I think they're the best thing going by far for meeting other people who just want to have sex without strings!
For those complaining about the cost—ok, I agree, but I think you get what you pay for. I pretty much don't write people unless I can see what they look like and all, not because I'm shallow or a snob but because I want to know THEY'RE for real too and don't trust blank profiles...can you blame me? Also, it can be risky to contact people to swing with! Are they my boss? My brother? Twice my age? You get my drift. I’d like to know who I’m initiating a conversation with! The extra cost put into a good profile helps narrow down those you want to meet. How long do you pause on a profile that does not show a picture? (Faces can always be “smudged” until you know each other better to avoid embarrassing compromises.) And, although we are admittedly "just after recreational sex", part of having fun is that we have to LIKE our bedpartners too, so we look for things like a sense of humor and easygoing fun nature and a “click”. (And more expensive memberships include more matching criteria and stuff, too to help the odds of getting that “click” without too much searching.) So I guess I'm saying that if you don't cough up the extra cash for a full membership, don't expect overwhelming responses. There are lots of people who post their pictures and info, so when looking for people it's easy to breeze by the ones that don't. We may miss out on meeting some great people because of it...but we meet lots of great people too.
I agree there’s a high ratio of men to women, but I don’t know why that surprises anyone. Seems expected to me—although many women love sex, there do seem to be a lot more guys that are ok with swinging or casual sex than girls, for whatever reasons, and that’s not specific to O4L.
I definitely vote that it is worth the time and the money! We've had many a fun night of frolic thanks to connections we made on O4L. :)
|
03-12-08 06:19pm
|
Reply
23
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I couldn't get the discount to show on Firefox - even after clearing my cache. Opened the dreaded IE, got the discount to show, but IE crashed when I tried to complete the signup. This sucks.
|
02-22-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
24
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from dakwon:
What a joke! I'm not even sure where to start! They shouldn't have the right to call them self an adult site for many reasons. i had almost been there for a week when i got an email for them rejecting a picture of my penis, i was told more than one story of why it was rejected. First it was well you can have it but it can't be 50% of the picture, then i was told you can have it but it can't be hard, well which is it? and if it's an Adult site as you claim why would it matter either way? As i contiued to investigate i came to the conclusion that there does and don't only pretain to MEN. You have women on there showing what ever anyway you can think and they have no problem with that! I saw women with cum in there mouth, dripping down there mouth, penises in there mouth and every where else, but that's fine, i have women in my black book where 50% if not all of the picture is either tits or ass, but that is fine. Seems to be the only problem is if a man post a picture of a erect penis, not sure how that applies to a woman as of yet? I'm not sure how many men work there but everyone i spoke to was a women including the supervisor, who couldn't answer one question i had, just if i don't like it leave! I asked why did the rules only seem to deny men she said can a women get hard? my thing was once a man pulls his pants down your picture will be rejected we don't have tits so what else can i show? and why on earth would a woman what to only see a penis if it's not erect? And the women they are protecting are only there well over 50% of them are only there to steal there customers and drag them to there own personal site, as the someone already said if you get an email back it's likely to be a girl asking you to join them in there private room. It's not an adult site and it's not for men! AssHoles
|
02-16-08 04:53am
|
Reply
25
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from Khan:
I'm still showing the discount. Are you sure you emptied your cache and visited directly from a PornUser/RBP link?
|
12-25-07 02:55pm
|
