I guess you previewed the thumbs of the content, which a visitor can do as far back as July 2007 right now, and figured there would be enough hardcore.
There was some discussion at PU some time last year with the webmaster Bela at DDF Productions about how this and the other sites would change. One idea was that 1byday would be less hardcore. There's still their site HandsOnHardcore, though I've never been a member myself.
LOL Ok I'm Cybertoad and I am a perv, and I was one of those pervs that liked the site, the solo's are pretty hard core more then I see elsewhere, but if you are refferring to 1 on 1 , I agree there isnt too much boy-girl, but lots of girl girl and solo. I actually prefer that. VideoBox is good site ypu may like and has allot of HardCore and not so much solo. I didnt like that about Videobox but sounds like this would be right what you are looking for. There was so much hardcore there I downloaded from videobox I had to delete some.
http://www.online4love.com is the primary way my husband and I meet likeminded "friends with benefits." There's no uncomfortable wondering if you ought to approach someone, you already know upfront when you meet them, and it is definitely worth the extra cost of becoming silver/gold imo, so you can exchange notes or pics before meeting and make sure its a good fit.
My hubby is str8 and I am bi and we have had no problem finding partners on online4love.com. We've had fun sex with lots of single men, single women and full swap couples that we met on O4L. And yes, I'm real, and no, I don't work for O4L or think they're perfect (they can be pricey and they goober up email sometimes,) but I think they're the best thing going by far for meeting other people who just want to have sex without strings!
For those complaining about the cost—ok, I agree, but I think you get what you pay for. I pretty much don't write people unless I can see what they look like and all, not because I'm shallow or a snob but because I want to know THEY'RE for real too and don't trust blank profiles...can you blame me? Also, it can be risky to contact people to swing with! Are they my boss? My brother? Twice my age? You get my drift. I’d like to know who I’m initiating a conversation with! The extra cost put into a good profile helps narrow down those you want to meet. How long do you pause on a profile that does not show a picture? (Faces can always be “smudged” until you know each other better to avoid embarrassing compromises.) And, although we are admittedly "just after recreational sex", part of having fun is that we have to LIKE our bedpartners too, so we look for things like a sense of humor and easygoing fun nature and a “click”. (And more expensive memberships include more matching criteria and stuff, too to help the odds of getting that “click” without too much searching.) So I guess I'm saying that if you don't cough up the extra cash for a full membership, don't expect overwhelming responses. There are lots of people who post their pictures and info, so when looking for people it's easy to breeze by the ones that don't. We may miss out on meeting some great people because of it...but we meet lots of great people too.
I agree there’s a high ratio of men to women, but I don’t know why that surprises anyone. Seems expected to me—although many women love sex, there do seem to be a lot more guys that are ok with swinging or casual sex than girls, for whatever reasons, and that’s not specific to O4L.
I definitely vote that it is worth the time and the money! We've had many a fun night of frolic thanks to connections we made on O4L. :)
What a joke! I'm not even sure where to start! They shouldn't have the right to call them self an adult site for many reasons. i had almost been there for a week when i got an email for them rejecting a picture of my penis, i was told more than one story of why it was rejected. First it was well you can have it but it can't be 50% of the picture, then i was told you can have it but it can't be hard, well which is it? and if it's an Adult site as you claim why would it matter either way? As i contiued to investigate i came to the conclusion that there does and don't only pretain to MEN. You have women on there showing what ever anyway you can think and they have no problem with that! I saw women with cum in there mouth, dripping down there mouth, penises in there mouth and every where else, but that's fine, i have women in my black book where 50% if not all of the picture is either tits or ass, but that is fine. Seems to be the only problem is if a man post a picture of a erect penis, not sure how that applies to a woman as of yet? I'm not sure how many men work there but everyone i spoke to was a women including the supervisor, who couldn't answer one question i had, just if i don't like it leave! I asked why did the rules only seem to deny men she said can a women get hard? my thing was once a man pulls his pants down your picture will be rejected we don't have tits so what else can i show? and why on earth would a woman what to only see a penis if it's not erect? And the women they are protecting are only there well over 50% of them are only there to steal there customers and drag them to there own personal site, as the someone already said if you get an email back it's likely to be a girl asking you to join them in there private room. It's not an adult site and it's not for men! AssHoles
Which all is all correct from Diggler.Waste of time and your cash. Yes, also add that they tend to get you on messenger - your email and then no reponse comes out of it or they try to lead you on with money scams. How they get ya is you sign up as free and then "you want to join", as to looking at the message etc they left for ya and "blam" got ya! Then you wasted your money on this site. Most all is one sentence bs and on profile "Tell you later" all the way down. Mainly get age,gender,from on there. At the top you get there preferences on top what they looking for. They snag up - others profiles from other sites and add any race,sexual preference and spice it up.New members or paid for members "They will get a fake person to do a profile locally for you." Try to reply to them, they mess with ya or don't respond. As I got from this is trash and scam.
If you like cam sex to chatting, you are better off getting a free site on one of the engines like yahoo etc.Trying for a hook up do the same also look else where.You will kick yourself in the butt if you join.
Some people find it funny, it's definetly different from regular porn,if nothing else the ridiculousness of it all makes it funny... I for one enjoy this site BUT I agree the cock's used are fake and if that is something you don't like don't sign up for this network.
The word I used was "republish," by which I did not mean blowing up 1024s to larger sizes. (Of course that would look like crap.) What I meant was redoing the masters for online pics in larger sizes, and that's assuming that the masters would be at least 1600 if not larger.
1024s were more of the norm, I think, for awhile because sites were perhaps concerned about bandwidth, even though photo equipment was already capable of larger sizes than 1024. Thankfully, bandwidth is less of an issue now.
Some sites have done such republishing of some of their older content. Digital Desire and Mindy Vega are two I can think of off hand.
So this is a misunderstanding based on a particular interpretation of that word "republish." It's been awhile since I wrote that comment, but I did intentionally avoid using the word "resize," or, even worse, "enlarge." I didn't go into detail as I have now. I was just trying to economize on words.
And you made an assumption about what I know and don't know about digital photographs, but now I think you have a better understanding.
First of all, not all of them are blurry and pixelated, although you're right that some of them are, and I think we'd both agree that too many are.
I've already read your review of Matts, and it really came down hard on the negative aspects of the site, which I agree with, especially the poor quality photography and videos. And I've also wondered why he hasn't learned more about it than even his recent stuff shows. His claim of being the "King of Anti-Glam" sounds to me like a cop-out on quality.
But I differ with you about the models, at least to an extent. Some of them are not very good-looking, but he's had a lot that are very hot and who have appeared on many other sites for that reason.
I'm glad you wrote that review. I think the site is overrated and needs a wakeup call.
Anyway, to answer your question, no, I don't want blurry and pilexated photos. Surprised?
Hi DigglerFL,
we're sorry you haven't been able to download images on selection but it's definetly possible to do so.
All galleries offer a red arrowed button per size to open the desired image in a popup window. This way you can easily download the images and store them anywhere on your harddrive.
The disappointing model quality seem to be a personal thing but the past has showed that MCN discover and feature some of the most addictive woman online:
I would really like to see how professional you're. Show us some reference images of yours and I might ask for forgiveness.
On the other hand I can't imagine you're that professional because instead of sleeping with your cam you should spend some time with the right button of your mouse in search for the "save file"-feature ...
Hi Diggler,
I was on vacation so sorry for the late answer. I do not intent to start a discussion about taste but what I saw on MCN justified my score!
Hey Diggler it's hard to discuss with someone about taste but MCN are definetly 97! worthly points on my side because of the following facts:
Site:
+ Great design and easy to navigate website.
+ well sorted contents, fast browsing speed, great compatiblity
+ nice features like the model of the year, voting, search and so on ...
Content:
+ great and partially exclusive girls (don't saw them elsewhere yet)
+ great images in large scales
+ awesome videos (2 a week in real hdv)
+ nice variance in contents
Custom:
+ always improving the site to make it more comfortable for visitors like me
+ friendly and fast support
And just because I am sick and tired of the babe-abuse-porn-crap I really appriciate the existance of a site like MCN! Thats why I gave them 97 ...
I really have not had problems with the MILF Hunters sites, At least this site allows you to download pics and movies in the full form. If you think I'm not up and up on the ratings, think again. Some sites that I joined that were rated high, were over rated by the user/poster....up dates once a week, or small videos, no pics to download. I have been with this site for over 9 months and it has improved giving now full videos compaired to clips. I don't know where you got or who gave you the idea this site gave me so much problems. As for the rating it it is my opinion.
I have to say that I've been a member of Ox Pass twice over the past year and a half and they kept true to their promises in the "lure" advertisements. I can recommend that site to anyone who enjoys that kind of Reality Porn
I joined one individual site - Bang Bus - and have access to 15 different sites: big mouthfuls, bang bus, monsters of cock, ballhoneys, milflesson, assparade, blowjob ninjas, bang bros clips, big tits round asses, spring break, tugjobs, moms anal adventure, bang bros worldwide, boobsquad and mr. cameltoe.
I don't know what happened in your situation...did you e-mail them and tell them the problem? When I first joined my user and pass didn't work for the first day, but then I e-mailed and got my access and the 15 sites (some great, some can do without) are worth the price.
You can join the ox pass and get the bang brothers material for a very fair 23.95. The quality of the sites from the bang brothers has really improved through the years, and they continue to put up nice content.
08-08-0708:48pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
