Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OUMarcus:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
I realize that VIP Crew may have been around for a while, I merely wanted to reflect the change since the last time I had been a member.
Thanks,
OUMarcus
|
12-06-07 08:21pm
|
Reply
27
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Clement:
DigglerFL,
I'm sorry you had a bad experience with our site but I wanna thank you for the comments since it's really helping us.
We changed our authentication's method and you don't have to enter your user/pass over and over now. The problem you had with your access was probably because of our auth method too, we're seeing a lot less people that can't access our site. We also hired more customer support staff.
As for the formats, we've chosen those because the quality of the xvid files are better, it's also 100% compliant with Mac, not sure why you were not able to view them. Flash is also a good format since our users can view our movies right away, fast forward and everything. We also just installed a brand new flash player where people can browse through the scene with screenshots.
if you have any other comments, let me know, we're always looking for new ways to improve our site. We've made a lot of changes recently to enhance our users' experience.
PM me with your old access to I can give you a free month, this way you can see the improvments we've made :)
|
12-03-07 06:25am
|
Reply
28
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mediafan:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
I really have not had problems with the MILF Hunters sites, At least this site allows you to download pics and movies in the full form. If you think I'm not up and up on the ratings, think again. Some sites that I joined that were rated high, were over rated by the user/poster....up dates once a week, or small videos, no pics to download. I have been with this site for over 9 months and it has improved giving now full videos compaired to clips. I don't know where you got or who gave you the idea this site gave me so much problems. As for the rating it it is my opinion.
|
11-20-07 05:38pm
|
Reply
29
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
Well, DigglerFL - I'm with you all the way.
And your word here is: Integrity.
I hope your point of view is heard by our hosts!
|
09-22-07 12:55pm
|
Reply
30
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
The word I used was "republish," by which I did not mean blowing up 1024s to larger sizes. (Of course that would look like crap.) What I meant was redoing the masters for online pics in larger sizes, and that's assuming that the masters would be at least 1600 if not larger.
1024s were more of the norm, I think, for awhile because sites were perhaps concerned about bandwidth, even though photo equipment was already capable of larger sizes than 1024. Thankfully, bandwidth is less of an issue now.
Some sites have done such republishing of some of their older content. Digital Desire and Mindy Vega are two I can think of off hand.
So this is a misunderstanding based on a particular interpretation of that word "republish." It's been awhile since I wrote that comment, but I did intentionally avoid using the word "resize," or, even worse, "enlarge." I didn't go into detail as I have now. I was just trying to economize on words.
And you made an assumption about what I know and don't know about digital photographs, but now I think you have a better understanding.
|
09-22-07 10:46am
|
Reply
31
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
First of all, not all of them are blurry and pixelated, although you're right that some of them are, and I think we'd both agree that too many are.
I've already read your review of Matts, and it really came down hard on the negative aspects of the site, which I agree with, especially the poor quality photography and videos. And I've also wondered why he hasn't learned more about it than even his recent stuff shows. His claim of being the "King of Anti-Glam" sounds to me like a cop-out on quality.
But I differ with you about the models, at least to an extent. Some of them are not very good-looking, but he's had a lot that are very hot and who have appeared on many other sites for that reason.
I'm glad you wrote that review. I think the site is overrated and needs a wakeup call.
Anyway, to answer your question, no, I don't want blurry and pilexated photos. Surprised?
|
09-22-07 09:42am
|
Reply
32
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from gene2112:
I have to say that I've been a member of Ox Pass twice over the past year and a half and they kept true to their promises in the "lure" advertisements. I can recommend that site to anyone who enjoys that kind of Reality Porn
|
08-27-07 09:15am
|
Reply
33
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from uscue:
I joined one individual site - Bang Bus - and have access to 15 different sites: big mouthfuls, bang bus, monsters of cock, ballhoneys, milflesson, assparade, blowjob ninjas, bang bros clips, big tits round asses, spring break, tugjobs, moms anal adventure, bang bros worldwide, boobsquad and mr. cameltoe.
I don't know what happened in your situation...did you e-mail them and tell them the problem? When I first joined my user and pass didn't work for the first day, but then I e-mailed and got my access and the 15 sites (some great, some can do without) are worth the price.
|
08-09-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
34
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from nygiants03:
You can join the ox pass and get the bang brothers material for a very fair 23.95. The quality of the sites from the bang brothers has really improved through the years, and they continue to put up nice content.
|
08-08-07 08:48pm
|
Reply
35
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from apoctom:
Thanks for the enlightening review. I just cancelled my VideoBox membership and was looking to join a new DVD site, including VideosZ. After your bad experience, I will probably try a different site. Thanks.
|
08-08-07 09:05am
|
Reply
36
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from Woodruff:
You said it bro. My only hope is that they switch from that stupid dildo to a straight interracial site.
|
07-21-07 01:20pm
|
Reply
37
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from jd1961:
Yes the midgets! Always the midgets! I love reading the comments from people waiting for the new update and it's yet another midget video! I'd rather pay more money for more quality.
|
07-15-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
38
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
from uscue:
Agreed. I hate the concept/execution of this site.
|
07-13-07 07:52pm
|
Reply
39
|
Vivid
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(DigglerFL's Reply)
Well, it's clear that the quality of the videos is no good, and that you can't download them into your PC. However, for the price it costs, (only $10 for Pornusers) I have had hours and hours of movies, and good Vivid movies too. I haven't found any other site that offers this much, and with Jenna, Brianna Banks, Jenteal, Devon... I only have to say that I am still a member of this site...
|
06-27-07 01:42am
|
Reply
40
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from PinkPanther:
I totally agree - and at the time I was a member - a year or more ago - you weren't even able to save pics. That's a complete deal-killer to me - and the pics available through Freeones are better quality than the pics on Vivid's site. I don't get it! I truly don't get it!
|
06-06-07 11:11pm
|
Reply
41
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from Drooler:
I agree. And having a full-screen view is like asking us: "Would you like to see it as a larger, completely mottled mess?"
Plus they're full-length movies, streaming only. You can't foward in search of scenes. Try that and it just breaks down. They could have at least offered separate scenes.
I joined because I just had to see the Monique Alexander content, of which there's lots, and she is a sight to behold, but I can't sit around doing busywork waiting for a sex scene in a movie, only to view it in either that tiny window or "full blown."
They don't even bother to zip their pic files, either. Grrrrr.
Hey, maybe now I'll buy some of their DVDs!
Naaaah.
|
06-06-07 03:43pm
|
Reply
42
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
from sinner:
Which all is all correct from Diggler.Waste of time and your cash. Yes, also add that they tend to get you on messenger - your email and then no reponse comes out of it or they try to lead you on with money scams. How they get ya is you sign up as free and then "you want to join", as to looking at the message etc they left for ya and "blam" got ya! Then you wasted your money on this site. Most all is one sentence bs and on profile "Tell you later" all the way down. Mainly get age,gender,from on there. At the top you get there preferences on top what they looking for. They snag up - others profiles from other sites and add any race,sexual preference and spice it up.New members or paid for members "They will get a fake person to do a profile locally for you." Try to reply to them, they mess with ya or don't respond. As I got from this is trash and scam.
If you like cam sex to chatting, you are better off getting a free site on one of the engines like yahoo etc.Trying for a hook up do the same also look else where.You will kick yourself in the butt if you join.
|
04-15-07 11:20am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
