I got one here several years ago for $99 and have been very happy with it. They are offering it now for $129. It's not offered all the time, and I have no idea if they will have a lower price any time in the future.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low priced membership. Can often find a first month membership for $5.
Lifetime memberships are sometimes offered for $100 during the year.
-Mr Skin is probably the easiest, best site for looking up brief sex scenes of your favorite movie stars and celebrities.
-They list lots of discounted memberships to other porn sites.
-Downloading and streaming is included in the membership. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
-Clips are available in 360p through 1080p.
-You can play clips in .25 through 1.5 speed. Seems like a gimmick to me, except you can slow down the speed to watch "good parts" more slowly.
-Search is excellent. You can search by name, or title of the movie or tv show.
Cons:
-Clips are mainly short, 3 minutes or less.
-The quality of the clips is just OK, not really excellent. Which is surprising, since they take the clips from commercial movies and tv shows.
Bottom Line:
The site advertisies:
300,000+ pictures and videos
20,000+ sexy celebrities
30,000+ movies and TV shows
New updates daily
Detailed reviews and ratings
They frequently advertise a first month's price of $5, rebilling at $20/month.
Or a yearly price of $60/year.
They also advertise a special price of $100 for a lifetime membership every once in a while.
I joined the site for $100 for a lifetime membership.
Which is fine, except that I rarely use the site.
I think a better idea is to join for $5 for one month, explore the site, and see if it's worth joining for a longer period.
If you think it's worth joining for a longer period, wait for the $100 lifetime offer.
That makes more sense than joining for $60 for a year, even though that is a cheap price.
The positives about the site:
It might satisfy the itch if you want to see scraps about the celebrites/movie stars who have done nudity in movies.
I say "scraps", because most of the scenes are very brief, a few minutes or less. So you might see some nudity, but the scenes at Mr Skin lack most of the impact that the scenes from the movies have.
Their motto is: Fast-forwarding to the good parts, since 1999!
That's good, which is what most guys (and girls) want to see.
Except that, the good parts lack the impact and value without the buildup that gives the scene meaning.
And the quality of the videos can often be lacking.
Which I don't understand.
If you're going to copy from a commercial movie, shouldn't the quality be excellent?
But the clips often disappoint, in how brief they are (3 minutes or less average run-time), and the quality of the images can be poor.
Having said that, it's still worthwhile to explore the site, to see for yourself what the site offers.
For a very low price, you can re-visit briefly some of the scenes from memorable movies that you saw years ago, and stuck in your memory for years afterward. Personally, I've found that tastes can change over the years. But there are some instances where the scenes are good, but not as great as they should be.
For example:
The scenes from Fast Times at Ridgemont High with Phoebe Cates and Jennifer Jason Leigh are classic.
Both girls are lovely.
And the scenes are good, but not as great as they should have been.
You can watch those scenes in definition from 360p through 1080p, but it doesn't seem like 1080p when you're watching them.
The images are definitely not as crisp as 1080p images should look like.
And maybe the colors aren't as vivid as they should be.
So the site best serves to satisify your curiousity about some movie stars. But the clips lack the power that the source movies have.
They advertise detailed reviews and ratings. I've been a member of the site for serveral years now (I bought a lifetime membership years ago for $100), and the only reviews I've read at the site are very brief snippets of reviews.
I don't spend a lot of time at the site, so I don't know where they are hiding the "detailed" reviews..
Expectations:
Don't join the site expecting to see a lot of hot clips of nudity or sex.
Instead, the site serves mainly to satisfy some of your curiosity about semi-nudity or nudity of movie actors (and other celebrities).
When I try to load the Mr Skin site, I get a popup page that says:
Mr Skin
Sorry, you have been blocked.
This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. You performed an action that triggered the service and blocked your request.
--------
Not sure how to access the site.
I assume the block is temporary, but I don't know what, if anything, I did to trigger the block.
Using the Mr Skin link from PU also leads to the block.
Downloaded just over 2 gigabytes of clips after signing up. Now downloads have been disabled and every video just says "Your account has been flagged for abuse" and tells me to contact customer service.
I contact customer service and they tell me,
"You have triggered an excessive use alert, which has temporarily disabled your viewing capabilities. We have put these limitations in place along with other measure to combat piracy and excessive strain on our systems.
The streaming feature will reappear as soon as the algorithm allows."
A few things to note here...
1. This is worded vaguely and there is no indication when I will be able to access any videos again. So far, I still cannot do anything and has it been 3 days.
2. I asked what the limits were so I could stay under them and they ignored the question completely.
3. 2 gigabytes of downloading will never put "excessive strain" on their system even if I had downloaded it all at once. This is the equivalent of 1 hour of HD video.
4. They reply says STREAMING will return but may indicate that downloading is permanently disabled.
The content is good but collectors should opt for other websites. Downloading and streaming are not unlimited, not even close.
Apparently, the site blocked me and claimed I was doing something questionable. I had a couple open tabs and that's it. Most sites you can have a bunch of open tabs and there isn't an issue. I wasn't using a downloader or any other app that might cause issues... It's still locked out for me and if I'm permanently locked out how do I cancel membership? It freaked me out getting that message. What did I do wrong? View too many pages? I hope it clears up on its own, but if it doesn't I don't know what to do. To cancel you have to go on their website.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies.
An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content.
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site.
-The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip".
-A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100.
-Excellent search engine.
Cons:
-The tags describing a clip can be misleading:
A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them.
Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts.
-The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience.
An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips.
-The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition.
Bottom Line:
The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity.
The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up.
As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function.
But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content.
If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites.
Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value.
Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice.
Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity.
There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site:
"I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido".
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job.
I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact.
As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing.
Got an email from Mr. Skin yesterday.
Email advertises free lifetime membership to LickHer.com, a teen lesbian site.
Click on the hot link in the email, and page opens at LickHer.com, with thumbnails of cute teen lesbians.
Click on the hot link on the page to join, it asks for your email and password on a new page.
Fill in your email and password, hit the enter button, and a new page pops up, asking for your credit card details, your real name.
Turns out the free is a free 2-day trial, that renews at $39.95.
ADDITIONAL OFFER DETAILS:
(**) Your free 2 day trial to LickHer renews at the same calendar day at a fixed $39.95 after the trial ends unless cancelled. To avoid being charged, simply cancel your membership before the trial period ends.
Any charges made to your card will appear under 'biluhard.com'.
So the offer of a free lifetime membership to the site seems misleading.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Responsive customer service I got an answer in less than an hour, although it was a Sunday.
-Great ways to search. Maybe the best search on the internet.
-Feedback/support link on the bottom of every page
-Can create a playlist of favorites
-Lots of discounts available for other sites
-29, 458 celebrity models.
-Updates several times a day.
Cons:
-Computer generated username and password. Combination of random letters and numbers.
-Biller is supportsk. Sk entertainment owns the site.
--Not all clips are downloadable, mostly older ones are not
-Lots are non nude, but are clearly labeled as such -”sexy”.
-Many clips are so short that they are not terribly erotic
Bottom Line:
On Pornusers this site has had many reviews over the years. It has been around since 1999 and I believe is unique in focusing on sexy scenes from movies and television shows. Most recently lk2fireone rated this as an 80, and Marcdc 92. TBP rated this as 92 and Rabbits an 86. They must be doing something right to get such favorable reviews. I agree it is a good site, but I feel that it has a serious weakness in its content.
As a site this is definitely done exceptionally well. The price is extremely inexpensive and PU has an additional discount. The site updates several times a day and the archive is simply huge. I could not find an easy place to get a current handle on the volume of content, but they say they have an impressive
29, 458 celebrity models.
The sheer size of the archive would create an unwieldy mess if this were an average porn site. It is not. To their credit the search capabilities here are possibly the best I have ever seen on any site. You can search by the celebrities‘ name, television shows, movies, clips or pictures by using trending, most recent or user rating as well as by name of actress alphabetically or by a very long list of tags. These tags let you know exactly what you will see, degree of nudity, as well as the type of action or activity.
There are links to Anatomy Awards, top 10 nude scenes of 2018, top 150 nude scenes of all time, top 100 nude celebrities of all time, and top 10 naked hotties on horseback. If that is not enough you also get a way to search the most followed celebrities on Instagram.
Many of the actresses are not very well known, but the number of big names is impressive. This site may not have every nude or non nude sexy scene in every movie or television show ever made, foreign as well as domestic, but they must be close. I them an A+ for trying.
The signup was through a propriety biller, not CCBill, Epoch or any other name you may have heard of. The blller is supportsk, Sk entertainment owns the site. While I did not have any problems with them, I was expecting some. I never got a confirmation email, but did get one from the site. The username was a computer generated random combination of letters and numbers. At least they did not use a captcha for log in.
Few recent updates are true full HD at 1920x1080. Most recent specs are for lower quality HD 720x1280.
The site is standalone, but there is a live cam site. They charge only if you access premium content.
The same management has another site, Naked News and offers a nice discount to join it.
The clips range from a mere few seconds to a few minutes. Now I get to why this site is not that great.
It is very difficult to get excited by the content. For example if you see a 20 second clip of breasts, how well does that work for you? I saw one of Salma Hayek that showed a very small amount of her butt for maybe two seconds and the clip was only twenty five seconds. It is not really fair to even call this soft core. Some clips and photos are non nude and not very hot at all. The only way to make these videos work for you is to make them favorites and then see them consecutively. The site is what it is. You get a well run inexpensive site but not one to sign up for to get off. If you are just curious to see the stars, you may find it interesting. On the other hand, if you are a fan of a particular star, you probably already saw the scenes that are here. Now you can own that 20 second clip.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership fee with PU discount. $9.95/month, or $79/year.
However, the site sometimes offers a lifetime membership for $99.
And with the lifetime offer for $99, they usually add a 1-month membership to the Playboy site or the Naked News site.
PU lists a lifetime membership for $1,000. That is a ridiculous price.
If you want a lifetime membership, wait for a holiday, and they might offer the $99 lifetime membership. But great sites like MetArt and Hegre offer lifetime memberships that are far cheaper, especially during holiday discounts, than the $1,000 membership offer from Mr.Skin.
-The easiest way to search for nudity by actresses.
Just put the name of the actress in the search box, and you get her clips at Mr.Skin.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of the clips. However, the clips only download in one definition.
Cons:
-Almost all clips are either softcore or non-nude. No hardcore clips.
-Most clips are short: two minutes or less. I guess the idea is to skip to the good parts, but what happens is you get a peek at a breast, and wonder: is that all?
I have some fond memories of nude scenes in films, but even the clips that supposedly feature those movies are disappointing: there is no build-up to the scene, quality of the clip is usually poor, and the impact of the clip is: so what? So instead of re-living the excitement of the original scene, you're watching a shortened, unsatisfying, poor quality version of a snippet that has lost most meaning.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
The theme of Mr.Skin is "Fast-Forwarding to the Good Parts, Since 1999!"
However, there are problems with this approach:
-The main problem is that you drop the set-up which gives most of the meaning to the scene. The clip is either non-nude, or a very brief glimpse of the actresses breasts.
Or you might see the actress' ass.
So it doesn't have the impact or meaning of the original scene.
Also, the quality of the clip is often poor. The clips, I assume are from the original DVD or movie, but the crispness and color and image-quality if often degraded from the orginal, which detracts from the impact.
If you are a fan of nude celebs, this is probably the easiest way to search for their nude content.
Although the internet has made it possible to search for nude content of celbrities (mainly actors), Mr.Skin makes it easy to find most of their nude appearances. However, there are two problems with Mr.Skin.
-The clips at Mr. Skin are very short, many of them are less than 1 or 2 minutes in runtime. So you might see a nude breast, but a lot of the clips don't feature nudity, just what Mr. Skin considers a sexy appearance.
-Many of the clips are low quality: I'm suprised at the poor quality of the clips. Since many of the clips are probably from DVDs or from an actual commercial movie, the clips should be much higher quality than they are.
And with lower quality, you lose much of the impact of the scene.
Not only do you lose the build-up to the scene, but the poor image quality reduces the value of the scene.
So, even though you have a convenient access to the nude scenes of actors, the site does not impress me very much.
There are some actresses who have done some erotic scenes, but I don't feel that the scenes shown on Mr. Skin are very erotic, because the scenes are too short or poor visual quality.
Also, almost all scenes shown on Mr. Skin are either non-nude or softcore. I certainly haven't seen all the clips at Mr. Skin, but there would be very few or no hardcore clips.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
Many other PU members have given the site a score higher than 80.
So the value of the site is really based on personal preference:
I guess the site satisfies the element of curiousity: has this actress done a nude or semi-nude scene?
But the scene in the original movie would be far more erotic.
I bought a lifetime membership to Mr Skin for $99 about 2 years ago. The site is an easy way to check if an actress has done nudity: but for me, the clips are disappointing: they just lack impact.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Over 200,000 pictures and clips
- Over 20,000 actresses featured
- CORRECTION: downloading available (thanks lk2fireone for helping me!)
- Easy navigation and even categories to keep things easy and user-friendly.
- Vast. I kept trying to stump the system and couldn't everything I could think of was here.
- Very reasonable price
- soooooooo many actresses including foreign films.
- nude and non-nude content (maybe you just want to see a beautiful address 1/2 dressed? They have you covered)
- "you might also like" feature works really well. I got lost in a few rabbit holes
Cons:
- Mostly softcore (obviously?)
- Older movies at lower resolutions
- not much for cons. They deliver what they say they will.
Bottom Line:
I was sceptical about joining - but seeing all the reviews on PU I thought I'd give it a try. I'm glad I did! I chalked this site up as unnecessary since you could search for the content in google and probably find a hit that's just as good, but that misses the point. The advantage of this site is curation. They put everything together so you don't have to. I found a bunch of stars that did hot scenes that I didn't realize ever had.
Mr. Skin is that rare website that does what it says it's gonna do. I appreciate all the hard work that must go into categorizing this effort. I thought I'd drop a couple of books and maybe find a winner or two I was wrong this site was a lot of fun. I may look at a long-term membership.
It certainly has the downside of being softcore (mostly). But if you've ever been curious about what your favorite star looks like in the buff (or nearly), you can probably find her here.
With the relatively low price and the breadth of content, I give this a good buy rating.
Hi,
I just renewed my Mr. Skin membership and logged on today to find that I could no longer download the clips. (I had done so yesterday). I contacted support and they said "downloads are not currently offered on Mr. Skin".
Just wanted to give everyone a heads-up, I had seen many comments/reviews about the download option and certainly won't be renewing if they took it away. (If anyone else can still download I'd be interested to hear!)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The ultimate reference for every naked actress scene in every A/B and foreign movie ever made.
Good site navigation and search functions.
Auto-login
Montages by topic (steam rooms, GOT, tiny girls, best boobs, year in review, etc.)
Some scenes are slowed down and enhanced for lighting, etc.
Cons:
Not really a porn site, per se, but still...
Videos are streaming only
A few current scene examples have blurred bits.
A few scenes a not on the site.
Older movie scenes, of course, are lower resolution.
Still images are, of course, video caps.
If you are looking for nude actors, this is not the site you are looking for. None here.
Bottom Line:
The site slogan, "Fast forward to the good bits" is totally accurate. Every actress you've ever been enamored by is here in the most naked scene she is in. Alexandra Daddario? Check. Margot Robbie? Check. Turns out very, very few popular actresses have NOT done some kind of nude scene at one point or another. Now, there are a few teases here. A few actresses have had doubles or have been filmed in a way that doesn't really show much, but a lot of the fun is in watching the little montages that they put together and going "Wow, SHE did a nude scene?" And, of course, the best use of the site is when you spot a particularly attractive actress and wonder "Hmmm. I wonder what she looks like naked?" Whoever she is, if she has ever been naked in a film, chances are excellent that Mr. Skin has the clip that answers your question.
To be clear, this is not a site where you will get completely off on watching nude scenes of popular actresses...well...most of the time, it is more like a collection of reasons to go Hmm, Ah, or wow and fully appreciate how awesome many of these actresses are.
It is worth noting that this site catalogs actresses only. No actors. For example the reference for Movie Wild Things shows about 6 scenes of the actresses but the full frontal scene of Kevin Bacon in the shower is absent. (I suppose there is a Mrs. Skin?)
There are also a few nude scenes that are somewhat disturbing, or at least mood ruining. Scenes from horror movies or those odd cinematic cases where they move between a love scene and a bloody war scene, for example.
Can you find many of these scenes elsewhere on the Internet for free? Well, maybe, but they won't be as good quality, as easily found or cross referenced like they are here.
Bottom line: They are offering lifetime subscriptions for $99. I bought one.
The $99 lifetime membership is being offered again - not sure when the offer will expire. It also includes one month of Naked News and Playboy Plus - so pretty good deal if you are interested.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The best celeb oriented site I have ever found
If an actress has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, her nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Weekly reportage of where to find nudity in newly released movies, TV shows, or DVDs
Occasionally offers lifetime memberships for $99.99 a super deal
Once youve joined, they offer some pretty good discounts to some other sites for example, they offer an annual subscription to Met Art or Sex Art for $72 Ive never seen it less than $99 any place else
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality)
Cons:
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, theyll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay. (But if its the only nip-slip of your favorite actress in existence, youll be glad for this feature).
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Bottom Line:
Mr Skin has been around for a long time, and may have been one of the first porn sites I ever joined. Its not the kind of site where you will spend hours there but it is nice to check in a few times a week and get a glance at a favorite actress boobies. Or breaking news about an upcoming appearance of said boobies.
No doubt you have some scenes of nude actresses burned in your mind, especially from your youth well you almost certainly will find those scenes here and you can watch them as many times as you want. (Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places yum).
Their About Us statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer: MrSkin.com is the world's foremost authority on celebrity nudity, and MrSkin.com is the web's #1 go-to destination for the complete skinny on Hollywood starlets at their hottest. Since 1999, MrSkin.com has grown exponentially, now attracting more than 10 million unique visitors every month who come to experience the site's vast library of sexy celebrity content, including more than 20,000 actress bios, 30,000 movie and TV show reviews and over 200,000 pictures and videos.
Navigation is quite good especially if you can recall the actress name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown bush (the most important criterion IMHO), breast size, hair color, ethnicity, along with a count of how many fit that category. So for breast size, we get 4,792 small, 16,248 medium, 4,417 large, 253 X-large.
Downloads are fast helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
They have been offering lifetime memberships for $99.99 occasionally most recently in December 2016. I have no idea what kind of pattern they have or when to expect them to do so again (if ever), but I would recommend signing up for their emails if you are interested in such an offer. Annual memberships are also offered at $48 per year (when on sale), so definitely look for deals for this site. When not on sale, prices are $15 monthly and $79 annual. The PU discounted price is $9.95 per month not bad.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A huge number of clips of nude women in movies and tv shows.
-You can do searches in a number of ways. But I am not a fan of their search, or the site structure. See my cons.
-Low membership price with PU discount: $9.95/month.
-This is a very brief tag to describe each scene: Sexy; Sexy, underwear; Sexy, thong; Sexy, bikini; Nude, breasts;
The tags are basically helpful, except sometimes they aren't. For example, some tags state "Nude, breasts", but the clip just shows a breast that is covered by a bra. I don't consider that nude. Just like I don't consider a woman wearing a bikini or underwear as nude, which is what some "nude" tagged clips are.
-You can do search by many different factors:
Actress name. title. keyword(age, nationality, hair color, etc.)
-Automatic login to site (if cookies are enabled).
Don't need to enter username and password.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Navigation is poor.
I don't know why more people haven't complained about the site structure, which was designed by an idiot.
-The quality/definition of the clips varies. Some clips are high definition, other clips are standard definition. A lot of the value of a nude clip depends on how well you can view the images, and the colorization (and degradation) from the original source).
-This is a personal opinion. But even though some of the clips show nudity, they often lose the impact and potency of the original scene. Maybe it's because the clips are too short: They lose the build-up to the scene.
There is no automatic notice that you are logged in to the site.
Most sites have some indicator (in the address bar or someplace else) that tells you you are logged in to the site.
I was searching for the log-in link a couple of times, before I realized I was already in the site itself.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site was not designed for members ease of use.
One example:
There is a blog. One blog entry is "Top Ten Nude Debuts of 2016".
To show you the top ten nude debuts of 2016, the site does not give you a list of the actresses/models.
Instead, it gives you a slideshow of screencaps of the actresses. That you have to click through.
The name of each actress is in tiny letters at the bottom of the screencap, that is difficult to read.
One member comment on this blog entry:
"How about you make the name and titles big enough to read. Doesn't help me if I don't know where to look."
If you fiddle around, you can enlarge each screen cap (with a few mouse-clicks), to be able to read the name of the actress, and the movie she appears nude in.
But why not make it easy for members to read the actress name and movie, without the mouse clicks?
And without additional clicks to find the next actress on the list?
-There is a learning curve to using this site. I am getting old. So it's irritating if the site navigation is not simple and easy to use. If I have problems searching the site contents, I enjoy the site less than otherwise. And this site was created by someone who knew the foibles of the site structure, and figured the members would figure out the foibles by themselves.
-Many of the photos are screencaps.
-Most clips are very short. Two or three minutes runtime. Many clips are 30 seconds or shorter.
-Most of content is softcore.
BOTTOM LINE:
The Mr. Skin clips are both good and bad: Good, to give you a slight taste of the nude appearances of these celebreties/actresses, but not enough to fill your appetite if you remember the original movies in any detail.
-Cons: the quality in some the clips is just OK. The clips are not high definition, even when taken from a standard commercial movie. Either the copying is done poorly, or some other factor controls the poor image quality. Todays porn consumers are accustomed to the high quality or ultra high quality available at many porn sites.
For example, the Two Moon Junction (1988) clips seem poor definition.
Two Moon Junction (1988) was directed and written by Zalman King, who also did 9 Weeks (1986), Wild Orchid (1989), and the Red Shoe Diary series (1990s) on cable.
Part of the appeal of Zalman King's work was the high definition (for the time), vivid images, strong colors, erotic content, along with main-stream actors/actresses and plot structure.
The Zalman King clips should be one of the site highlights. But they are disappointing.
-The site will appeal mainly to fans of celebrity nudity.
The problem is:
For a softcore site, the site does not offer high-grade photos or clips that we want.
There is probably no hardcore sex offered for hardcore fans.
So bottom line: this is mainly for celebrity softcore fans, who want to see their idols in brief nude scenes.
I doubt that many PU members would remain a member for more than one month.
This site would have much more value if this were not the internet age: where the internet will give you many of these same images and clips for free.
Yahoo now allows nudity in its clips and movies.
But for a simple way to access brief celebrity nudity, the site will have its fans.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good for what it offers (categorizes video and photo by what you want to see, whether it's boobs, butt, bush or hardcore--or as Mr. Skin calls it: backburger)
- Save a shipload of money on buying/renting movies fast-forwarding to the good parts yourself
- Every now and again, a porn star will really make your eyes pop, but, there's nothing like seeing a female celebrity making seven figures get naked or almost naked
- Dirt cheap!
- The Mr. Skin minute is a nice way to keep up with the site content
- They keep you posted via e-mail with very sexy updates
Cons:
- Cross-subscribing new subscribers to other sites is annoying; you need to look for the e-mail that subscribes you to the other site and unsubscribe (unless you really want to stay subscribed)
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that seems like it'd be a waste of time but you cannot beat the price. The beauty here is they only have to cut the videos, not make them. So their production costs are so low that they don't have to charge much--just enough to cover their bandwidth, hosting, labor plus a little more for profit. Meanwhile, you get the benefit of Seeing videos from films--some of which had budgets into the millions of dollars, resulting in high quality video featuring some of the most beautiful actresses in the World. And then you don't have to watch an entire movie to see the action. They even throw in their own extras like "Skinvision" instant replay, where the good parts that went by too fast at normal speed gets played back again, much slower. It's good stuff.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-tons of movies clips. barely even touched the surface of what they got
-downloadable clips, new ones in 720p HD!
-screen grabs as well
-fun site design
-tons of searching and sorting options
-each clip clearly labeled what is in the clip, ie sexy, boobs, ass, bush
Cons:
-not all HD clips
-some movies have frame grabs but not movie clips
Bottom Line:
what a great site. i can be watching netflix and see a boob and go right over to mr.skin and usually its there.
site design is fun. they have "best of" type compilations, polls, playlists. the search feature is great. you can search for a title or celeb, or filter movies by just about everything you can think of.
newer movies have 720p HD clips, older ones have SD. mp4 and wmv are there for download
my only negative other then some titles not being there, is sometimes they have screen grabs of a scene but not a clip
Can anyone confirm if the site has started to allow downloads of their videos? I'm getting some info that you can and I'd rather be sure before making an investment.
I don't understand why spend $18/month for content I could get with a bing search? With categories like bikini and underwear - I'd probably find that on youtube.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first of few things I can say good about this site is the price.
I got an offer in my mailbox for just $7.00 per month. Skeptical, I emailed them asking if I'd get all and full features for that little price. They responded I would. Well, if what I have is the same as higher paying subscribers are getting then they're paying too much.
I must admit they have a bunch of stuff..but in little pieces. Many, many Clips, although worthwhile are artfully butchered.
There are so many stars, one is almost bound to find his or her favorite.
Cons:
I completely failed to find anything to justify the previous accolades I'm seeing from other reviews and comments.
I found very little on each celebrity I checked out. In fact, I've gotten more from non-celebrity sites.
The scenes were so short they were over almost before they began.
Video quality was relatively poor, as well as many scenes being so dark the figures were hard to make out.
Sometimes I was confused as to whether I was logged in or out... because while logged in I was still seemingly getting the promotional page.
Most aggravating is the scenes labeled "nude" under which tits, bush, or ass were so fleeting one has to go back and freeze the frame. Those shown under the label "sexy" weren't any more bold than a TV commerical.
Bottom Line:
Even at $7.00 a month I wouldn't say I'm getting my money's worth. Of course, that's just me. Most, I'd presume, may think they're getting a steal.
The site may be living up to it's reputation for it's volume and other glowing indorsements, but it's not showing it to me.
Maybe Mr. Skin actually isn't giving me the same thing for $7.00 others are paying the full price for, I simply dunno.
Maybe the email I answered was from a hacker claiming to be the popular Mr. Skin and has me roped into a scam.
Apart from that, I have to be honest, it's rather hard to complain at only $7.00....and for that it's recommendable.
Didn't want to post a full review, just wanted to say this is a pretty good site. Some of the older video content is a bit iffy, but the newer HD content is quite good.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.