| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup:
Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc. |
| Cons: |
-Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault.
-There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites.
-The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models.
-At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates.
-I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer.
-The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers.
Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates.
Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week.
Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles.
Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189
The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty.
The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184.
Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0
(Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.)
The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart.
So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart.
Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second.
Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership.
So for $1 a month, I'm still a member. |
|
02-09-21 05:45am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Erotic Beauty is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect the following:
-Excellent customer service. Fast and responsive and helpful for most questions and problems. However, this is an email service, so expect a delay of several hours or days before you get a respone. A live chat line would be much faster.
-A catalog of attractive to beautiful women. Ranging in age from late teens to about 30 years old. Mainly white. Mainly from Eastern Europe.
-High quality glamour photography. The models are not dressed up in fancy costumes, or made to look glamourous, but these are attractive women and the photos are designed to showcase their beauty.
-Site structure is designed for simple navigation: Photos can be viewed in 3 different
definitions: can also be downloaded in 3 different definitions in zip files.
-No streaming or download limits. (The streaming refers to viewing photo slide shows. The site has no videos. This is a photo only site.)
-PU discount of $19.99/month recurring. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Login and member pages are https.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, which offer sites with high standards: simple navigation, high quality photography, excellent (responsive) customer service.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They used to update with 1 new photoset daily. But starting in 2019, they update with 2 new photosets per week. See bottom line section why this is probably the main knock against the site. They are charging full price, but giving poor service on the updates.
-Site has no videos. But truthfully, most softcore videos are boring anyway. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic beauty is softcore nudity. It's a photo only site (no videos).
The bottom line: There are many fine softcore nude sites. Erotic Beauty is a good site, but the competition is fierce. MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, to name some of my favorite softcore sites, offer more bang for your porn dollars than Erotic Beauty.
MetArt is the outstanding value, with its massive catalog:
-Photosets------19,839
-Videos---------1,600 (Almost all softcore videos are boring, and a waste of time and effort.
MetArt has a genius for photographing beautiful naked women and making you wonder why they bothered. Except that recently MetArt is improving, and trying to make the videos slightly more erotic, and allowing the models to touch themselves, so there is starting to be a sexual element in the videos.
-Models---------3,622
-Updates--------4 updates per day, except the first of each month, 6 updates.
Compare that to Erotic Beauty:
-Photosets----------5,066
-Videos-------------0 (none)
-Models-------------2,130
-Updates------------2 per week
What's amazing is that the membership price for MetArt and Erotic Beauty is the same.
(And roughly, the same price for Femjoy and MPL Studios).
MetArt blows the competition away in terms of quantity of photosets, models, updates.
And the quality of the photosets and attractiveness of the models is outstanding.
So if you are into softcore nudity, my advice is:
First, join MetArt.
Then join either MPL Studios or Femjoy. Both are outstanding sites, with gorgeous girls, high grade photography.
As I wrote, there are many good to excellent softcore erotic sites out there:
But in my opinion, MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios are best in class.
Erotic Beauty is good, but it's a second-class offering compared to the leaders in softcore nudes.
I'm giving the site a score of 80: the exact score is very subjective, but in simple comparisons, I think you get far more value for your porn dollars with MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios.
Note: If you didn't have sites like MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios, Erotic Beauty would be a wonderful site. But since we live in the real world, where the average person wants the best return on his money, Erotic Beauty falls by the wayside. Yes, it has lots of attractive to beautiful models, and yes, there many outstanding photosets of these lovelies, but the competition has even more attractive models, more photosets, and a faster update rate.
On the other hand, I do recommend joining the site for a month, at $19.99 (or a lower price if you can find one during a holiday special), and downloading like mad all of your favorite models. Because the site has lots of lovely models featured in sets that are worth keeping. |
|
05-16-19 01:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
4701 Photo Sets, 1979 Models, 186 Artists – there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called “pretty” than “gorgeous”. But then, “A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody”, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if she’s naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes.” And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like “page01” at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. |
|
01-31-18 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
PROS
-NETWORK CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANY OF THE CONTENT AT AN OUTSIDE SITE.
- $19.99/MONTH WITH PU DISCOUNT (LIST PRICE IS $29.99/MONTH).
-LARGE PHOTO SITE WITH A SOFTCORE GLAMOUR-STYLE FOCUS.
-ABOUT 1,900 MODELS, MOST OF THEM ATTRACTIVE TO LOVELY.
-OVER 4,400 PHOTO SETS. HIGH GRADE PHOTOGRAPY, BY MANY OF THE WORLD'S BEST SOFTCORE PHOTOGAPHERS.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-DOWNLOAD MANAGERS ACCEPTED.
-THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE, WITH THE SLIDESHOW PROGRAM.
-THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE DOWNLOADED IN LOW, MEDIUM, OR HIGH DEFINITION.
-UPDATES WITH 1 NEW PHOTOSET PER DAY. |
| Cons: |
-NO VIDEOS. THIS IS A PHOTO ONLY SITE. HOWEVER, I'VE FOUND VERY FEW SOFTCORE VIDEOS THAT ARE WORTH WATCHING, FROM ANY SITE I'VE EVER JOINED.
-EXPANDING ON MY BELIEF THAT SOFTCORE VIDEOS OF EROTIC WOMEN ARE USUALLY NOT EROTIC: THIS IS A PERSONAL REACTION. MANY SOFTCORE SITES (METART, MPL STUDIOS, FEMJOY, ETC.) DO MAKE SOFTCORE VIDEOS, SO THERE MUST BE AN AUDIENCE THAT FINDS THEM TO BE EROTIC.
HOWEVER, SEVERAL PU MEMBERS OVER TIME HAVE COMMENTED THAT VIDEOS AT METART AND OTHER SOFTCORE SITES ARE MAINLY BORING.
-EROTIC BEAUTY IS A STAND-ALONE SITE. IT'S PART OF THE METART NETWORK, BUT MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS SPECIFIC TO THAT SITE.
THERE IS A MEMBERSHIP OPTION WHERE YOU CAN PAY $50/MONTH FOR ACCESS TO 9 OF THE METART SITES (OR $350/YEAR), BUT THIS GETS EXPENSIVE.
-ECHST.NET IS THE DEFAULT BILLING SERVICE. EROTIC BEAUTY IS ALSO SERVICED BY CCBILL AND EPOCH. I RECOMMEND USING CCBILL OR EPOCH AS THE BILLING SERVICE TO USE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. |
| Bottom Line: |
-EROTIC BEAUTY IS PART OF THE METART NETWORK. THE STRUCTURE IS SIMILAR TO METART, WHERE YOU
HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES IN HOW YOU VIEW THE SITE:
-YOU CAN SELECT:
-RESOLUTION OF PHOTOS VIEWED ONLINE (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH)
-# OF THUMBNAILS PER PAGE
-OPEN IMAGES IN SAME WINDOW OR NEW WINDOW
-LIST VIEW GRID OR DETAILED
-COMMENTS SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-NAVIGATION SIMPLE OR ENHANCED
-THUMBNAIL SIZE FULL OR SQUARE
-TAGS SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-DESCRIPTION SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-MEASUREMENTS IMPERIAL OR METRIC
-SLIDESHOW INTERVAL: CHOOSE NUMBER OF SECONDS FOR EACH IMAGE TO BE SHOWN
EROTIC BEAUTY IS A SITE THAT COMPETES WITH MANY FINE SOFTCORE SITES:
DOMAI, ERROTICA ARCHIVES, FEMJOY, GODDESS NUDES, HEGRE, THE LIFE EROTIC, METART, MPL STUDIOS, ETC.
I'VE BEEN A PAST MEMBER OF ALL OF THESE, AND OTHERS BESIDES.
I THINK ALL OF THESE SITES I LISTED ARE WORTH JOINING, AT LEAST ONCE, TO SAMPLE THEIR CONTENTS.
HOWEVER, MOST OF US HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF MONEY, SO WE HAVE TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHICH SITES TO JOIN CURRENTLY.
EROTIC BEAUTY OFFERS HIGH-GRADE PHOTOS, BUT SO DO THE OTHER SITES I'VE MENTIONED. ALL THE SITES FEATURE ATTRACTIVE TO STUNNING TO ABSOLUTELY LOVELY MODELS.
ACTUALLY, ALL THE SITES I'VE MENTIONED SHARE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS: IF A MODEL IS AT EROTIC BEAUTY, YOU CAN OFTEN FIND AT LEAST ONE OR MORE APPEARANCES BY HER AT A COMPETING SITE I'VE LISTED.
SO WHICH SITES DO YOU JOIN?
I'M ASSUMING YOU ARE A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN.
IF YOU'RE NOT A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN, THEN EROTIC BEAUTY AND THE OTHER SITES LISTED ARE NOT WORTH JOINING.
I WOULD JOIN METART FIRST, OUT OF ALL THE SITES I'VE LISTED:
METART IS THE LARGEST, FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO COLLECTION OF MODELS ON THE INTERNET:
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS:
METART HAS 17,100+ PHOTO SETS.
METART HAS 1,400+ VIDEOS.
METART HAS 3,300+ MODELS.
METART UPDATES WITH 4 NEW PHOTOSETS/VIDEOS PER DAY, EXCEPT ON THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, WHEN IT UPDATES WITH 6 NEW UPDATES.
METART BLOWS AWAY THE OTHER SOFTCORE SITES, IN TERMS OF AMOUNT OF CONTENT, NUMBER OF MODELS, AND RATE OF UPDATES.
AND THE PRICE IS EXCELLENT: $19.99/MONTH, WITH PU DISCOUNT.
EROTIC BEAUTY IS A FINE SITE. BUT METART IS A MUCH BETTER VALUE.
I'M GIVING EROTIC BEAUTY A SCORE OF 85. IF METART AND SOME OF THE OTHER FINE SOFTCORE SITES DID NOT EXIST, I WOULD GIVE EROTIC BEAUTY A HIGHER SCORE. BUT SOFTCORE EROTIC SITES ARE WELL SERVED, AND EROTIC BEAUTY, ALTHOUGH WORTH JOINING, WOULD BE A SECONDARY CHOICE AMONG THE SITES I'VE LISTED. |
|
06-27-17 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Easy login.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection.
-Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents.
-Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like.
-Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition.
-This is a high grade photo site.
-Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity.
-Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. |
| Cons: |
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful.
-Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites.
-Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete
set without a lot of mouse clicks. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites.
I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two
years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive.
I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years.
Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models.
It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site.
Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty.
If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money:
As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness.
Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa.
The main advantage MetArt has over Erotic Beauty is the massive backlog of photo sets.
Erotic Beauty has over 3,700 photo sets.
MetArt has over 16,300 photo sets. A massive number that dwarfs the Erotic Beauty backlog.
Erotic Beauty has over 1,700 models.
MetArt has over 3,100 models.
Erotic Beauty updates with one photo set per day.
MetArt updates with aproximately 4 photo sets per day.
So the the MetArt content will grow even faster than the Erotic Beauty content.
Both sites have the same membership fee: $19.99/month with a PU discount
Erotic Beauty has no videos.
MetArt has over 1,300 videos.
In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and
interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time.
That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are.
The value of MetArt (and Erotic Beauty) comes from their photo sets.
Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content.
Both sites share the same basic structure.
Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition.
Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model.
But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty.
Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the
advantage obviously belongs to MetArt.
I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value. |
|
02-05-16 01:27am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
6
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
09-23-14 06:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
7
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
03-29-14 05:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
8
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
08-23-13 08:56am
Replies (3)
|
Review
9
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Access to live cams.
-Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec.
-Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like.
-Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here.
-If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option.
-Content is exclusive.
-No watermark on their photos.
-You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are
all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach.
-The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing. |
| Cons: |
-Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site.
-No videos. Photosets only.
-A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them.
-The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of.
-You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details.
-Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has
been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt
updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 0
Number of models: hundreds+
The dimensions of the recently posted photosets:
low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels
medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels
high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels
This is part of the Met Art Money network. That includes:
Met Art
Erotic Beauty
Sex Art
The Life Erotic
Met Cams
Rylsky Art
You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup.
Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value.
Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt:
MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site.
MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude).
Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has.
If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty.
Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field. |
|
11-27-12 12:00pm
Replies (6)
|
Comment
10
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
10-04-12 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic Beauty, formerly MetModels, leans a little more toward old-style softcore nude photos in natural settings. The models are generally not mainstream, so you find a few that are very interesting and different. The site is billed as "Naturally Beautiful amatuer nudes" which probably says it better than I can. |
| Cons: |
Hmm. Can't quite put my finger on it.... a little slow, maybe. Nothing major wrong. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a really good amatuer nude site. It is good because the photography is good, the models are generally attractive and typically squeeky clean (can't tell if they are photoshopped..), and there is a tremendous quantity of stuff going back to 2005. And remember, this USED to be the site where the Met-Art network put its most beautiful models so even the old stuff is pretty good. (The new stuff is good, too!) Many of the sets are outside.
Navigation is average or a little better than average. You can search by model, most popular, date, etc. Images do not open in a new window, so you have to remember that if you are used to some of the other sites like this.
There is a HUGE variety of models here, all apparently european. They are also all natural. I don't recall a single enhancement. And the models mostly seemed to be enjoying themselves, or at least comfortable with the set and the photographer.
I got into the site this time on a $12.50 special because I was already a member of Met-Art.
Absolutely worth a visit, especially if you like natural nude photography. |
|
09-23-12 05:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
12
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
02-16-12 11:19am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
13
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
01-26-12 12:29am
Replies (3)
|
Rating
14
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
12-11-11 04:03pm
|
Comment
15
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
12-11-11 02:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Rating
16
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
85.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:33pm
|
Review
17
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Only $14.99 per month with TBP/PU discount
Large collection of beautiful models
Exclusive content
Updated with a new photo set 7 days a week
No watermarks on photos or videos
Photos in 3 size options with a full zip download for each set
4 download options for videos in Divx, Quicktime, MPEG and WMV
No download limits
Download speeds as fast as my connection would allow (around 800KB)
Responsive customer support |
| Cons: |
Regional pricing with CCBill
Small video collection
No video updates since June 2008
No model directory
No model info or bios provided |
| Bottom Line: |
Met Models is the smaller sister site of Met Art with the main focus here being on the softcore teen glamour and nude art style photography they are well known for. With an archive dating back to May 2005 and daily updates you’ll find a good sized collection to get through here with over 1,000 models to choose from and just over 2,000 photo sets from 95 contributing photographers. Photos come in 3 sizes, Lo-rez 797 x 1200px, mid-rez 1360 x 2048px and Hi-rez 2848 x 4288px sometimes going up to 3744 x 5616px and for the most part look very professional with sharp, colourful, well lit images and plenty of variation in styles from simple plain nude shoots to plenty of glamour style shoots often featuring the models in nice lingerie or stockings. It’s all very softcore here and never goes beyond nude posing, I’ve not seen any masturbation or toy play in the sets I’ve viewed so far.
The site layout and navigation is fairly basic here with the main way of browsing the photo collection being via the year and month menu bar. It’s quite disappointing that a site with this much content does not have an A-Z model directory with a nice thumbnail of the model so you can easily find at a glance those that interest you. Also there are no model bios or even any basic info such as age or where they are from but I would say the vast majority appear to be Russian/Eastern European. You can set your browse options such as default picture resolution, slideshow time, number of thumbnails per page etc. and there is a fairly basic search engine which allows you to search for photosets or models by hair colour, eye colour, location, shaved/trimmed, photographer and model name. Some more options such as clothing or types of location such as beach, meadow etc instead of just indoor/outdoors would be helpful as a basic search for a brown hair, brown eye, shaved model indoors still produced 176 results to search through.. You can also rate the models and photographers and add those you like to your personal favourites.
The video collection here is hardly worth mentioning as it’s very small with only 34 videos and as many people have said many times over the years MET videos are simply boring. With no new videos added in nearly 3 years clearly they are now only focusing on what they are good at, the photos.
Finally I must compliment MET customer support staff on responding to my complaint about their regional pricing by providing me with a link to join at the dollar price without which I would probably have passed this site by like all the others with regional pricing. Overall highly recommended for lovers of softcore photography with the only real negative for me being the lack of a decent model index. |
|
03-09-11 06:18am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
18
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
12-03-10 11:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
19
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Extension of Met-Art
-Good quality photography
-Attractive models
-Download manager support, fast speeds
-Large sets zipped 100-150 photos per set (low, med, high)
-Popular models and artists
-Timely updates |
| Cons: |
-Database poor condition
-Mistakes in new updates
-Model name changes etc
-Very few videos (pro for some) |
| Bottom Line: |
Met-Models is possibly best thought of as an extension of Met-Art. Although it only offers one update per day it fits nicely in with Met-Art featuring a similar level of quality in both models and photographers. As a big fan of Met-Art I was often quite impressed by many of the sets from Met-Models, some of the better models also made their appearance on Met-Models first. The other good thing is that many of the models on MA will have photosets on MM, so as a collector you’ll want to check MM out.
Unfortunately the database holding all this beauty is substandard. Returning models may have different names, some name changes are minor others completely different. Many different models may be listed under the exact same name making voting useless (e.g. ALENA). I have seen some new sets with typos or mistakes on the cover sheet, naming a different photographer than the set indicates. If you want to search the archives you’ll be in for hell because of this poor database. They need some people to go through and sort it all out into correct model names and remove the duplicates. Not having model information also doesn’t help and is a bit disappointing. Another annoyance is the reluctance to use the Model’s name from MM or MA on either site if the model has been seen their first, this is possibly due to the backlog of updates. I’d like to see consistency across the sister sites so you don’t need to know what the model’s aliases are. I’ve tried contacting the website support with a list of duplicated models but they have not done anything or replied.
But the set quality is very good; navigation on the site is near identical to MA even though their non-member page looks very different. Main difference is models don’t have brief model bio. Works with download managers (Flashget), fast speeds, sets are zipped up and range from a few hundred MB to 900+ MB for high res sets depending on artist. Available in low/med/high res where low - 800x1200, med - 1365x2048, high – 8 megapixels+. Sets are quite large, typically 100-150 photos, similar size in comparison to Met-Art again. Videos are few and far between (35 total – and only 5 since start of 2007), good thing possibly for some. Leocont, Ingret, Nudero, Rylsky, Morenko, Rigin are recent popular artists who regularly post content on the site.
It’s really the ideal choice for fans of MA wanting more of either the models or the quality of photography with the biggest issue being the state of the database and lack of model info. If they fixed this up and added another update per day I’d be very impressed because at times I think the average quality of sets is probably better than MA in recent times. |
|
06-06-09 03:25am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
20
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
01-09-09 03:47pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
21
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
11-15-08 10:32am
Replies (1)
|
Review
22
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-has some nice girls
-pretty much like MET-ART lite
-has more of some models that MET-ART dosent use much |
| Cons: |
-pretty much MET-ART lite
-poorly up set model search
-some sets seem "average"
-not worth getting alone as sister site MET-ART is a better site only for MET-ARt mega fans really |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a tricky site to review. In some ways it seems that MET-Models is like a "farm" site for MET-ART. Sort of like they use sets that they werent sure would do well on MET-ART I guess.Some models have more sets on MEt Models than they do on MET-ART. And some artists have more sets on MET Models.That being said one of the issues I have is model search as it will list all models with that same first name rather than only the model with the exact name. I guess ultimatly I'd suggest this site if you really like MET-ART and want some more or if you you are signing up for one of MET-ARTs combo deals that let you get Errotcia Archives and MET Models all together.But if you are not a member of MET-ART and are thinking of joining only MET-ART or MET Models then dont even waste your time with MET Models get MET-ART. This is the reason that I gave an 80 MEt Models is a Cessna when MET-ART is an Airbus. |
|
11-13-08 08:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
23
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful High-Res Photography
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Video
- Very Attractive Models
- Webcam - Decent Price (Nowadays) |
| Cons: |
- Frankly, A Money Grab
- Old Met-Art Sets Snuck In
- Few Videos
- The Losers Who Chat With The Webcam Girls!
- Model Reference All Messed Up |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a member in both Met sites, and I think what they do is remove some sets from the Mother site and include them here. That's not to say that Models doesn't have it's own material, it does. And it's great Met material. But this site is a redundancy. Met-Money it should be called. It's less expensive than the Mother site, so you may just want to join this, but they have very few videos (30 as of this review) and haven't updated since July of last year. The newer vids are 720x580. The photos are typical Met style, hi-res and high quality, updated daily. Over 4000px for the latest, downloadable in zips of 2 sizes. The girls are mostly very pretty, the photography 1st class. But when you click the model info link, you may get 7 different models by the name of Katya, and if you vote pretty Katya a "10", plain Katya gets a "10" also! In the Mother site, they alphabetize the Katyas! This site also has a webcam, if you're into that, and it is high quality. I can't stand the guys who chat there. One guy asked a model if she liked older men, and she wrote a big red NO! LOL! I will review the Mother site later, but I wish they came up with a better idea for a 2nd money grab site. Like Met-Hardcore would have been a better idea. Or maybe one day they will open Met-Classic, with all those Lolita sets they have long ago pulled from the Mother site...maybe not! Join one or the other unless you are obsessed with the Met-Empire. |
|
12-03-07 03:48am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
24
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
09-21-07 07:14am
Replies (6)
|
Review
25
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Very large, exclusive collection
+Professional photography
+Many beautiful models: Evelyn Lory, Jana Horokova (as Lisen), etc.
+Photosets usually 100-200 pics each
+two zip options (“hi” 3-4000 px, or “low” 1200)
+Daily photo updates from May 2005 (1 set per day)
+easy, straightforward navigation
+vids in DivX, WMV, QT264, mpeg (formats available vary by the vid)
+can rate both the model and the photographer on a 1-10 scale |
| Cons: |
-sometimes delays updates for a day or two
-max pic sizes vary greatly early in site history (1024px to 40xx 5/05-5/06, but most are 1500 or higher); nearly always 3-4000+ pixel size from 6/06.
-a few unappealing models
-sometimes too little light, too much shadow, blurriness
-a couple of photographers I don’t care for (esp. “Magoo,” who goes too far with the “artistic” effects)
-only 30 vids (the last in July ’06); transition effects sometimes overdone; some vids only 570px long |
| Bottom Line: |
Have been a member off/on since Nov. 2005; currently on a one-year membership.
This is a softcore nude photography site, mostly solo (but no toys), with a smattering of girl/girl lite. The vids obviously amount to just a little “extra” -- like sprinkles on ice cream.
For a softcore photo nut like me, it’s pretty close to the right formula. And there’s plenty of delectable ass to be found in the archives. Per diem, it beats 1byDay, W4B, and even Nubiles in the tushy quality/quantity index.
You might think of it as Met-Art’s kid brother or sister, as it costs the same but only offers 1 photoset per day (vs. Met-Art’s typical 3-5 per day). But it does give an option to join for $6.99 for 2 days, and with a good broadband connection, plenty of time, and enough piping hot caffeine, you could certainly make a killing here.
I’d do the same, but I don’t have that kind of self-discipline.
And I actually like the design and navigation here better than at Met-Art. It’s cleaner and less cluttered.
But on the other hand, Met-Art now offers three pic sizes in zips, and their 1024s do just fine and use less space than the 1200’s offered here. But that’s not much of a complaint.
Be sure to check out the browser options in the top right corner (default pic sizes; "enhanced" to show previous and next galleries; slideshow timing). |
|
06-17-07 12:01pm
Replies (8)
|
|
