Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Homegirl:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I like that you come to PU and get involved. It shows a good attitude and respect for your customers.
I will review this site after I join. Not today though.
|
05-18-20 04:38pm
|
Reply
2
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from kiwijoe:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Thanks for your reply. It's good to know the quoted no. of shoots are accurate, and thanks for setting me straight on a few things.
Not sure what was up with the search function before, but it does work now for me.
The 'models don't look at the camera' point was a pro, I get it.
Cheers
|
03-03-20 03:11am
|
Reply
3
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jaharthur:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Similar values, but Abby Winters has declined since moving to Europe. It's much more a professional porn actress site now. IFM remains authentic.
|
07-24-17 10:39am
|
Reply
4
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from nickN:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Thanks for the belated offer of 'tests' Feck, but I'm way past caring. I was disenchanted when I wrote my review, hence the title.
|
05-18-11 02:00pm
|
Reply
5
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from nickN:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I won’t recite my previous comments in the face of your further posts Feck, they are there for all to see despite the veil you are now attempting to draw over them.
But, for accuracy, I don't recall saying 'the customer is always right' - you are putting words in my mouth again!
And, I’d just like to pick up on these comments of yours:
“We have well connected servers in the USA and NL running way under capacity ... “ and “... high speeds, good customer service and 100% uptime.”
If this is true, I’m left wondering why I’m having problems, and why you have recently imposed a download limit on your subscribers (as another reviewer here has mentioned ). I would normally have accepted your point about the lower quality of ‘tube’ sites – and would have said so had you not been so offensive - but I’ve just watched a half hour soap opera (in brilliant quality) on ITV Player, for free, without any problem and I can jump about that footage at the click of the mouse. Again, if ITV can do it brilliantly for free, why can't Ifm do it adequately for a hefty subscription?
|
05-17-11 03:17pm
|
Reply
6
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I won't argue that the fruits of your labor hasn't paid off. Indeed, despite how much it pains me to say so, I have to agree with the merits you so proudly give this site. The proof of that lies in the the number of times I've returned myself as a member.
Thanks to your taking the time, This recent reply has scored on two fronts: 1) You've convincively reaffirmed your dedication and hard work at making IFM the best of it's genre....certainly a commendable value and worthy of the popularity it's gained.
2) You've made it clear that you don't give a rat's ass about what people think nor what their issues might be. You've got a caustic approach to critism and you let it be known.
I don't doubt your business is thriving, but make no mistake, the stuff I'm getting about your irascibility is inexorably biting into your volume.
Oh, and about those "self-appointed experts"... if you're referring to our member-reviews....then let me give you some good advice: don't sell them short, lest it comes back and bites you in the ass.
|
05-16-11 04:54pm
|
Reply
7
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nickN:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Please don't put words in my mouth Feck.
You are certainly right in your statement that you are no diplomat, and some of us might think that you are not much of a pornographer either - they usually consider their customers needs.
I find your denigration of my considered personal opinion and knowledge very offensive.
I am sure that ability will ensure your success in not being liked.
And in my experience an inability to see anyone else's opinion as valid, even when you disagree with it, usually brings a good deal of unhappiness.
Enjoy your self delusion while it lasts!
|
05-16-11 07:51am
|
Reply
8
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nickN:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I wasn't expecting your response, but, sadly, it's about what I would have expected had I done so. I can't think why.
I'm not surprised you have no ongoing complaints about speed, I imagine that your dissatisfied customers resolve them, as I will, by taking our money elsewhere.
I'm always less than impressed when I comment about goods or services and am told by the supplier that it's someone else's fault; followed by an assertion that I should have done something different to what I have chosen to do. I have few problems with downloads from other sites so see no reason to suspect my ISP is at fault - they are one of the highest rated in the UK.
My remark about 'repetitiveness' was a comment about me and human nature rather than your content. So I don't need your assumptions about what my diet of porn may be like thank you very much, you don't know and it's not your business.
But again, you suggest that my assumed criticism arises from my faults and those of your contributors! I suppose Ifm's contributors decide amongst themselves that they are all young, slim, educated, middle-class white Australians? (Far be it from me to suggest any hint of racism here) And I expect they insist on identical studio set ups, camera positions, lighting etc. too. And that a subcommittee of them edit the footage from the shoots and select what content goes on your server.
Hmmm.
|
05-16-11 07:39am
|
Reply
9
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I gotta hand it to you, Feck. Your unswerving loyality and steadfast determination to protect IFM from negative reviews and comments are indeed commendable. Your bosses should be proud.
Having said that, might I suggest a few classes in diplomacy, which, having myself recently perched on the receiving end of one of your combative rebuttals, might serve to improve your attitude.
Whether you know it or not, your somewhat history of grating replies and counter-productive attitude is getting attention amongst the crowd here at PU.
I went to great lengths to rewrite and post another review to patch up some things you disliked and remarked unfavorably on ... even giving IFM a respectable rise in my score.
Considering your initial energetic display of discord over my review, one would think the sweetened overhaul I gave it would at least get me a "thank you."......the silence is deafening.
|
05-15-11 11:12pm
|
Reply
10
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I want you to know I have revamped my review to reflect some of the issues you've bought to my attention.
I have focused mostly on those things that I feel you're concerned about upon which I might have overreacted or exaggerated.... and I sincerily hope this will patch any ugly holes I may have left in that initial posting.
I've made every effort here to reconstruct this review in a manner as to remain honest to myself and especially to IFM.
Thanks for responding in the way you did, maintaining diplomacy and presentation of a clear message sent in the professsional manner one would expect from a site of this magnitude.
|
01-03-11 10:50pm
|
Reply
11
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I'm sorry if you think I'm being unfair in my review, but I call'm like I see'm. If there is any consolation, for what its worth, your score was among the highest I've given...and overall, dispite the barbs, I think I left a more than a favorable impression on those who might be interested in becoming your members.
Let me try and address your issues, if I may:
I didn't read your "about" section because if I weren't already sold on joining your site ( from other sources) I would be $29.95 richer by now.
Call me technically challenged, but I do know, and expect operational features to be basic enough that one with normal ability isn't left spinning his wheels trying to figure out those things I pointed out in the review. To your credit, however, through simple rote, as one continues to use this site, he does ultimately learn to master those obstacles.
I won't belabor the "discount" issue except to say yours is the only site to which I've paid full membership -- a perk for Being a member of Porn Users. BTW, I did make it clear the price was right, right?
Join for 90 days? Not hardly.
And about the girls: 1) Personally, my inner-feelings are by far more important to me, as it has to do with the charater and what's in the heart of this gender. 2) But through some inborn chemical genetics, I have a lust and an unyeilding and strong limited sexual interest in the female physical and external endowments.
And it is only the latter which comes into play when porn is introduced, or is at the forefront. It wants only those ingrediences that turn me on. Unfortunately, in this case, for me and you, when one weighs the option of "plain Jane"..."the girl next door" "real people" etc., WELL, compared to a choice (if you will) "glamor" "sexually appealing" "erotic" or simply extraordinarly beautiful, then excuse me if I join my fellow porn users in choosing the latter. (with due adulation for the former, of course)
In closing, If I were able to do so, I'd raise your score four points just for your outspoken and objective critique defending your site.
|
01-02-11 12:52pm
|
Reply
12
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
For my money, I wish almost all the scenes were shot of the subjects on their backs. It's much more erotic, natural, more comfortable for the girls, and offers better camera angles.
Something I don't like are those sites that have their subjects change positions so much. It's distracting and it breaks the continunity of the whole clip. IFM isn't guilty of that and that's why I've been a frequent visitor to their site.
|
05-15-10 12:33am
|
Reply
13
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Here I go again. Another webmaster who doesn't agree with me so, once again, I'm incorrect and my logic must be flawed.
The issue with your saying that it was "none of your business" was a question of timing and tact, not the statement itself. As I'd said earlier on here, the emails I'd sent the site about missing videos and my silently removed forum post about those videos went unanswered. I got the response I was looking for on here, at Pornusers. And "none of your business" is about as tactless a response as I could've imagined without being overtly cussed out. A simple response to my first email with something to the effect of "the videos were removed for personal reasons" or "at the model's request" would've sufficed and put an end to the matter. I wouldn't have felt the need to post on your forum asking about them and it never would've been mentioned here at Pornusers.
But now you've even topped that. Someone downloading more than 8 videos a day should be put up for scientific study? Do you not see that there's something wrong in telling your customers and potential customers something like that? Your files average somewhere in the 7 minute range. It's not like they're full length movies. And, before you hit me with another claim of be illogical, I'm not saying there's no need for a limit. I can fully understand the need to guard against someone downloading the site in one shot then cancelling. Again, it's your responses that concern me. I'm old enough to remember when the customer was always right and you had to smile in their face even when you wanted to wring their neck. It was called "tact" or "diplomacy" All you're doing is showing me another example of how business ethics today don't seem to see the need for any of that.
Yeah - it's a very nice site with unique material. So my love/hate relationship will probably continue and you'll get $30 from me every once in a while. You're welcome.
|
09-07-09 11:46pm
|
Reply
14
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
A bit after the fact but where do I find the file sizes without being a member? I took the tour but can't see them listed anywhere. I'm sure I looked in the wrong place, so I would appreciate if you gave me a hint. As I just mentioned in another place, 3 Gigs are not a hell of a lot of data when it comes to HD mp4 files so with your present download limit knowledge of the size of the average file has become doubly important. Thanks.
|
09-04-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
15
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ChuckW:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I'm just saying that you guys could pick some different poses, or maybe suggest it to your wonderful models. I'm sure many of them would take the suggestion and go with it. I'm not asking for any "wacky setups". I just like seeing girls get off sitting down or standing up. Come on, the "Pretty in PJs" #1 and #2 are the hands down sexiest things you have ever put on your site. I know they are tremendously popular too. Don't slap me down for asking for more like that. There are other people who don't really enjoy seeing every girl on her back. And there are many girls who like masturbating standing up, judging by the popularity of those removeable showerheads.
|
08-13-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
16
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
I can certainly appreciate the realism of the site. But I didn't miss the point any more than I've gotten tired of seeing the same commercials on televsion every day. Repetitive is repetitive.
And, even though I think you could've worded it differently, the none of your business response you just gave me would've been more appreciated at the time I emailed the site to ask about the missing videos - not months later.
The higher resolution is a welcome addition to the site and probably what will bring me back from time to time - but I'll just have to keep in mind that it's a business and that customer concerns may or may not be answered. I live in the US, so I'm used to that kind of thing.
|
08-13-09 06:02am
|
Reply
17
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Xororos:
(FeckAdmin's Reply)
Yes, it's an invitation to 'model for us', but it is an invitation to submit content to the site. I think what I originally meant by that comment was that the models come to you, rather than you going out and hiring them from professional agencies. Either way, it speaks to your authenticity.
Thanks for the reply. You've got a really unique and high-quality site.
|
08-12-09 10:00am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
