MetArtNetwork really needs to add Actresses Names to their filenames for media files (movies).
Cataloging is Horrendous if I Have to create a sub folder myself for each actress because the website does not include actress names in their file names.
I glance at this site every once in a while to see if they have any hot new girls. Their latest update is a tall beauty named Roxanna. I googled Roxanna FTV Girls to see if they had any mini-promo sets of her up. I found more than I was expecting and the date on them was 2016. So apparently FTV Girls is recycling 7 year old content and putting it on their site as though it's new. Good to know.
Hi I noticed that they no longer go to ccbill when signing up and must be their own biller, anyone been a member recently and can vouch its an OK biller to cancel and trust.
Just here to comment that I didn't realize this website is still living in the early 90's with zero options to download ZIP or use automation to download images.
If you want to comfortably view the content on your computer your own way, don't bother it will be a complete waste of money.
Looking at the public preview pages, it seems the update rate really slowed in 2021.
The last updates appear to be in September 2021.
This was once a great site: lovely models, great videos and photosets.
Check out the update rate before joining.
Hate to see people wasting their money.
But the back catalog is worth a short term join.
I've seen an ad for Metart for $5 for the first month. Metart is probably the premier softcore photo site on the internet.
1000s of lovely models, first rate photography, a huge collection of photosets going back to around 1999.
If you've never been a member, or if you haven't joined recently, this is a fine chance to join for the lowest price of the year, to see these girls.
I believe that the sub includes unlimited downloading, but you have to check that out, since I'm a member already, and can't view the offer (I hit the offer link, and am automatically logged into the site, without being able to view the offer details).
Stunning 18 is using a large amount of old content to post as new content.
Stunning 18 is part of the MetArt network.
The site has been using a lot of content shot years ago to post as new content.
Probably a result of the Covid epidemic, but it's a shame a first-class photo site has to use old content for updates.
I was hoping to join with Epoch or ccbill as it states on subscription pages these two are used cause they are safe and reliable but kept getting this Fame Digital or Gamma Entertainment join page, I'm always a bit wary these days in signing up to some sites that have a payment provider other than the two mentioned, Is Gamma Entertainment a safe one anyone know.
Wish I knew how to get it to the epoch join page as they still list it.
I feel this site could be amazing If each set started with more clothes, kinda like OnlyTease does. As it is now every set starts with them already in lingerie. Which starts to make each set look the same and gets repetitive.
Also the videos could use some work. They have finally started uploading a few in what they call 4K. Before that it was just HD. Which I felt was kinda lacking for 2021 standards.
Done trying to leave reviews here. So from now on I’ll just leave comments.
This used to be my gold standard of adult sites. Beautiful photos, beautiful models and awesome videos with tons of public nudity.
Unfortunately the site is now just your average adult site. Guessing it has a new owner or atleast new person creating the content. You can have white balance issues from photo to photo and as mentioned in other another comment, the videos as well. Can also have horrible shadows due to improper lighting. Both those are not something I’d expect from a professional photographer or a professional site.
There is very little public nudity anymore. Yes I realize we’ve had a pandemic past 2 years but it seems to go back farther then that. Heard they got in trouble once, so maybe that but the end to it. Now most photos seem to be taken in same pool/house setting. The public nudity is what set the site apart from the getgo.
Overall it’s a decent site to visit every 3-5 years. But it’s no longer the multi month membership it used to be.
I've tried for over 1 hour to load the MetArt site in my Firefox browser.
All I get is a blank page.
Is the site under construction, maintenance, or under cyber attack?
I don't know if this has been discussed in other reviews but I do feel the need, having recently joined the site, to point out that video quality is generally subpar. Surprisingly little if any attention is paid to proper exposure and white balance. Many videos have a color cast due to this, or are under exposed or have other flaws. This isn't a matter of the past: relatively recent shoots are flawed by this.
I joined this site and the content looks great. The problem I have been having is that most of the videos are choppy when I play them back. I have that problem with other sites on the 4K videos but never on the HD videos. I wonder what could be different about this site?
MetArt will soon offer personal video message from models.
Don't know when it will happen.
But if you're a MetArt member, you can expect personal video messages from their models.
Don't know if that is free, or will cost.
But if the video is delivered in person by the model, that would be great.
Especially if you can choose the models you want.
In my dreams.
LOL.
X-Art and SuperHot seem to be marketed as two sites for one.
$99.95/6 months subscription to both sites, recurring every 6 months.
There's probably a way to subscribe to X-Art by itself.
There's also a simpler way to subscribe to SuperHot by itself, for $49.95/year.
And if you are a creator, model, or photographer, you can get a free account to SuperHot, and get paid for your content, mesages, contests, etc.
Exactly what SuperHot is, I'm not sure.
And the public preview page shows almost nothing.
But $99.95/6 months for X-Art, even if it comes with the unknown SuperHot, seems very expensive.
I'm wondering how many subscribers are paying those prices, especially since the updates for X-Art seem to be very slow.
Maybe one new update per week, or less. X-Art had a lot of gorgeous models in the past, and the videos and photosets were high quality glamour, but they seem to have priced themself way too high to join.
The Best Porn states there is a new review of X-Art "completed on May 22, 2020 and will be released in less than a week."
It's now June 02, 2020, and the last review posted was released Oct 2, 2019.
October to May is about 7 months, so the latest posted review is only 7 months old.
I'm surprised they did a re-review so soon, even if they have not released it yet.
RabbitsReviews shows a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.
But the link connects to the X-Art site, and when you hit the join page link, it shows a join price of $99.95/6 months for a sub to X-Art and SuperHot, recurring at $99.95/6 months, and a $40/month sub to X-Art and SuperHot.
I went to the CCBill website to cancel my sub to My Naked Dolls.
After entering my email address and subscription number, the site told me my subscription # was invalid.
I tried entering the same sub # and email address a few times, and got the same response: invalid subscription #.
(I was pasting the number from the original confirmation email from CCBill).
Luckily, CCBill has a live chat, 24/7.
I used the chat, an agent came on almost immediately, he asked for my home address, and quickly found my account information at My Naked Dolls.
And cancelled the sub, without trying to argue me into extending the sub, which is something many sites try to do.
So I am happy with CCBill, and think they are an excellent service to deal with.
When you click on the PU link to X-Art, and then click on the join link, the price you see is:
$99.95/6 months, recurring.
This is for a membership to X-Art and SUPERHOT.
I'm not sure what SUPERHOT is.
Is it a new porn site, or what?
Anyway, the price used to be around $100/year recurring for X-Art.
If they doubled the price, it seems very high to me, and I would not be joining any time soon.
The update to the MetArt site was supposed to make the site faster and more responsive.
A new interface sometimes takes getting used to.
I can't find the older features that I liked.
So I'm not impressed with the update. It makes it harder for me to use the site, not easier.
In my opinion, the level of attractiveness of the models is going down.
So my enjoyment of the site has dropped.
I joined this site a year ago and won't ever again. I simply wanted to pay my respects to a favorite model that I had found out passed away and commented RIP sweetie on a set of JC Taylor's pictures. The comment was deleted and my membership canceled with no warning or explanation. The billing company reset everything and and I finished out my 30 days and canceled. How messed up is that?! I never thought to redo my review to reflect this.
Got an email yesterday that said ccBill accounts were being transferred because of the sale of Femjoy to Gamma. My annual subscription immediately stopped working. A chat with support didn't help other than they said the issue should be resolved in a day or two. I truly hope this isn't the beginning of the end for Femjoy.
"Sorry, you have submitted too many search requests in a short period of time. Please try again in a few moments."
That the message I get when searching for models' content.
Guess that MetArt is trying to reduce the load on their servers.
Or maybe trying to reduce their electric bill (joke).
MetArt, you used to be best in class.
What the heck happened to you?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
