Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I can just imagine the first time someone thought, “I think I’ll record my face during orgasm”. The premise of Beautiful Agony was born that day.
It is as realistic and genuine as a site can be.
You’re going to get some of the best scenes you’ve ever seen, but as is the nature of amateur self-submitted, some are not worth even watching.
It's one of the only sites I have been a member of that makes me feel like nothing really matters except the performance.
Sometimes I think, the thoughts going through my mind when watching these scenes, would make some great porn scenes!
It's a great alternative to the overproduced hardcore, overacted “story” porn.
Cons:
Just about all the pros could be reversed into cons. This is truly a site that is it what it is.
There could always be improvements in amateur sites, but at least for me, that’s a big part of the charm of a site like this.
Bottom Line:
Try imagining an attractive woman telling you she’s going to masturbate and record her face during it. Would that intrigue or interest you? Does it excite you? Does it sound too tame? All those questions are ones someone joining Beautiful Agony, should ask themselves before joining. I do believe this is a site that has a core audience sticking with them for months, even years. It’s a very specific niche and that makes it a narrow-niche site.
I tell myself that and wonder just how much or how many people are really just into the moment of the climax? I would think those into female solo videos would be into this niche. I don’t know if someone into hardcore or even porn with a plot would even like this niche a little. The plot of every scene is the same. The woman is going to masturbate, writhe on the bed or whatever surface she’s on, moan, but there’s a good chance you’re not going to see the explicit penetration or stroking. I say all that like hardcore porn and porn with a plot doesn’t eventually lead to an ending with climaxes.
This pulls together the strongest points of Beautiful Agony. If a scene doesn’t seem as good as others, it’s likely the model just didn’t time her expressions right, which tells us how real it is. I remember hearing about one female pornstar who didn’t like the camera to show her face during orgasm. It was on a hardcore site. She said she made some of the weirdest, strangest faces during orgasm.
Beautiful Agony has a dichotomy for a name. And their content lives up or even down to the title. There’s no airbrushing or editing. It might not be as hot and sexy as an overproduced site, but it’s real and there’s no way to fake it.
They have around 15,000 videos of various lengths and some of the videos are very short. As I mentioned earlier, I’m not for sure the technical quality really matters with this style of porn. If you cleaned up some of the videos, had better camerawork, better sound and lighting, it very well could take away from the “in the moment” style of porn they are going for.
I do think this site is relatively easy to recommend to others, but only because it hits on some rather underfilled niches like voyeurism, not produced or scripted and it’s all amateur models. A lot of people like each of those niches. Beautiful Agony gives you a little bit of each of them.
It's a very good join, especially if you’re new to it, and they update enough for me to come back and join every year. I guess you could say you wish they would include their other sites, I Shot Myself and I Feel Myself, but I believe that would be too much to offer. The sites are close to one of a kind.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Real people having real orgasms. User-submitted.
+ All sexual orientations and genders.
+ Couple updates per week
+ Older videos are remastered.
+ Voyeuristic even if not an explicit scene, the sounds could be enough for some people.
+ Large catalog of nearly 14,000 videos, but most are short.
Cons:
- Most of the scenes do not show nudity.
- Bigger deal when it’s a male and you can’t see his orgasm.
Bottom Line:
This was the first porn site I joined nearly 10 years ago. It’s not a regular porn site. The focus is on watching the faces of people having orgasms. There are straight men and straight women. Gay men and lesbians. Transsexuals and non-Binary. The scenes are truly good if you’re into voyeurism. You may not see much if any nudity, but usually a voyeur relies on imagination and self-deception to make the voyeuristic moment more believable. I just like watching for the ones that slip and let some nudity show.
There are no real stories or plots. There are no reasons to follow any of the action other than to see the person orgasm. If you think about it that is what a lot of porn is. It’s just on Beautiful Agony you get closeups of the person’s face and get to hear and see their orgasmic ecstasy.
The site has nearly 14,000 videos with most being under 10 minutes long. They add an average of 2 new videos per week. I do think the different genders make it interesting since maybe you’re curious about how people the same gender as you look during orgasm. On the negative side there are no photos.
The videos are not looking to arouse you with action. I am thinking the goal is to catch the videoed person right in the moment of orgasm to cause the viewer to try and orgasm at the same time. Some of the females are very vocal while most of the men don’t say much or make many noises. It’s definitely different in a good way. I would like to see scenes of a man and woman mutually masturbating while showing their faces and how much they look at each other,
The site is very easy to join and cancel via CCBill. The site has been around for 15+ years and the older videos have been remastered to higher quality videos. I believe this site falls heavily into a niche category. The one thing you are guaranteed to see in every scene is a person having an orgasm. Nudity, dirty talk, are not guaranteed.
Few sites will show you the subjectivity of looks like this one does. There were some males and females I didn’t find attractive, but the comments showed that others do. These are all amateur and user-submitted so there is no standard in looks. It’s an enjoyable site at a good price ($14.95), but probably should only be joined once or maybe twice per year. There’s just not enough variety in the scenes to make it a site you regularly allow to recur. It Is worth it for those into orgasms.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see.
Cons:
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males.
Bottom Line:
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex.
Cons:
-The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of the network of sites around PornPros.com. You can join Spy Fam as a single site or you can look for a great deal to join PornPros.com, and then pay a single price for access to the network for as long as you're a member of PornPros.com. The scenes are very well filmed with a nice mixture of POV and distance shots. If it's a hot babe - and there are many on this site - the scenes are really good. They're usually in the 30-40 minute range. Thematically, of course, this is all about step-sister, step-daughter sex fantasies, which is as good an excuse as any to make porn. The site's been around for a while and currently has 169 scenes.
Cons:
COVID-19 has greatly impacted rate of updates. Before the pandemic, updates were coming at about 1 per week, about right for an active network site. These days updates are 1 every 3 weeks. If I were considering joining as a stand-alone site, that's pretty scanty for updates. Photo sets could be larger and the photos could be larger. While videos are offered in multiple options from 480p to 4K, there is one size for photo sets. Photos are 1500 x 1000, which is not terribly large and there are about 50 photos in a photo set. There are also screencaps, but those are much smaller and can only be scrolled through on the site and downloaded 1 at a time - no zips. Their performer search function is incoherent and wrong. For instance, if I go to "Girls" and look under "H", I see 2 performers listed, with Hime Marie not there even though I was just downloading a scene with her from the site. You need to go to the "All Girls" list to be able to possibly see a full list.
Bottom Line:
As part of a network, this is a fun site to have access to. There are a lot of hot girls on the site, mainly in the nubile category, but there are also 2 Adriana Chechik scenes and the latest scene features Skye Blue, who is more busty than many of the performers here. Hopefully, when COVID-19 is in the past, this site will step up their updates and increase the value even more.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Highly recommended site for female viewers and males too.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
280 scenes with a new update each week.
Includes access to the excellent Pure CFNM network.
Newer scenes have the females being more involved. Is more like Jerk Off Encouragement now.
CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.
Cons:
Older scenes were trying too hard to complete the Lady Voyeurs title with the females being in the distance or background.
Not for sure I agree with the females staying clothed. They do not in all scenes and the scenes with nude females are the best to me.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of Pure CFNM in the past. I thought the overall content of the network was excellent, but my favorite content was on the Pure CFNM site. Lady Voyeurs would seem like the perfect site for me. One of my favorite parts of porn is watching the man masturbate. That is what Lady Voyeurs is. I do not know if their producers limited how much the females could do, but it was rare to see a female even look more than interested in the nude male masturbating. The newer scenes have the females teasing the male, some even taking all their clothes off and touching themselves while they watch.
It is probably the most untapped market in porn. Even with the improvements to Lady Voyeurs they could make subtle changes to it to improve it. I even think they could let the female give the guy a few strokes to get him going and maybe even let her offer more if he performs well. It does not have to go into degradation or humiliation. I even prefer the word, encouragement. Like she so excited she cannot stop herself from wanting to see him cum.
The scenes are short and it makes me wonder if that is because some of the females are better at the teasing and showing more to the guy. I do not know how exciting or arousing it would be for a guy to know a woman in the dark was watching him masturbate compared to one in the light, taking her clothes off and asking for his cum. It seems like that would work better. I would estimate the average video is only 10-12 minutes. The women’s reaction to the cum is an arousal point. Those reactions seem very genuine.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not think trailers are very useful for this site since you have to watch the whole scene to see how involved the female becomes.
The network as a whole has 1,457 scenes and I would not be surprised if a fan of CFNM downloaded at least half of those scenes. I am scoring Lady Voyeurs for their noticeable improvement and believe the network itself is at least a 95.
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes.
Cons:
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site
Bottom Line:
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Stepfamily porn with a twist or maybe not.
- The Spy twist is kind of hokey but it does lend to the imagination of these scenes being possible.
- Segpay is the biller.
- Still updating but only one update per month.
- Total of 161 scenes as of 6/8/2020.
- All scenes have up to 4K download option.
- Good download speeds (around 80% of my max).
Cons:
- I think the stepfamily niche is starting to become stale and overdone.
- I will explain this one further in the bottom line but trying to stick to the "spy" part causes the camera to sometimes not be in the best position.
- Site works fine but there are broken thumbnails.
Bottom Line:
The majority of these scenes start with either the stepbrother or stepsister catching their stepbrother or stepsister masturbating. Some of the scenes have it like one of stepsiblings has set up a security camera to spy on the other stepsibling.
The con I mentioned would be for example, stepbrother sets a security camera up on one side of the room. Stepsister comes in from partying, lays down on the couch and starts masturbating. The stepbrother, of course, walks in while she's masturbating and they start having sex. The camera is still on the other side of the room. If they stuck with that it would add something of a voyeur twist but they don't stick with it. Somehow, the camera gets up and moves close-up about halfway through the scene! Must be their ghost stepsibling.
This niche is stale unless you do something really creative with it and I think they're trying with the spy part. If you've ever watched CFNM scenes where the sister and her friends catch the brother masturbating, that's similar to what you see here.
The action is good overall but is plagued with the same problem a lot of newer porn has. It's like they forgot what the niche was once the scene gets going. It turns into a standard hardcore sex scene.
They do a good job of adding the build up at the beginning, building at least a little story and the scene lengths show that with many lasting over 40 minutes.
Something I really liked about the site is some of these newer models are pretty good actresses. You don't get the shock face when stepbrother shows that he has a dick.
That's not a lot of variety in the scenes. There is one orgy. Most of it perverted stepbrother spying on stepsister.
The site has no faults when it comes to technical quality. Every scene has 480p to 4K download options on the videos. There are decent photo sets to download and every model is attractive. I don't keep up with the newer porn models but I'm positive these are almost all top-level pro models. Which is where the acting comes in. Some of these ladies are very convincing in being surprised, appalled and make the scenes at least humorous to watch.
I wouldn't put it on the same level as Family Strokes but think it's really close to being the second best "stepfamily" site behind Family Strokes. It's a good site on its own and even better if you join the platinum package that gives you access to more than 10 other high quality, niche sites.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Part of Fetish Network
Many maybe mostly Latinas
Sexy legs, short skirts and pantyhose
PU has a discount
Cons:
No longer updating since 2014
Too much male oriented, for you guys that is a plus.
Too many scenes with opaque pantyhose
Only 44 videos
Bottom Line:
I joined a few months ago and liked the videos. It is part of the Fetish Network of a lot of sites, but to me the count is not clear unless you have access to the member’s area. PU says there are 31 sites, but I think it was a lot more.
The scenes are filmed in Miami as you see signs like the name of a college. The models look fresh to me and I did not know any. Since it is in Miami, you get a lot of women that are Latina. You can see that in their names.
The focus is on sexy legs, short skirts and pantyhose. Yummy, how can this go wrong?
The beginning of each scene shows a young lady, maybe 20 something, sitting, walking, on the phone or just chilling out. The scenes are shot from a bit too far, sometimes with a zoom lens. This adds to the touch of realism, despite being staged. It made me feel I was being a voyeur watching something that in real life would turn anyone on, but are afraid to do. You can’t stare up a woman’s skirt in public without being very brave.
The models never wear panties and often you see them parting their legs. All I can say is wow.
The cameraman invites them to his studio for a shoot. They refuse sex with him, but will put on a show for him instead. They strip nicely, but there is more than I want of emphasis on the feet and pantyhose. I like to see short skirts and hose in public, but not so much if that is all they are wearing. It hides the goods and also many wear that opaque type that does nothing for me. Eventually they strip to nude and masturbate. There is a lot of Jerk Off Instruction, great for the guys, but I find it boring and distracting.
The site is not updating and has not since 2014. It is stuck at 44 quite good videos. It comes with a lot of other sites in the network, but not many that appeal to me though.
For me the content is about 90, but I have to take off for the site being small and no longer updating. I suspect you guys would like the JOI parts more than I did. There are a lot of unusual fetish sites in the network you might like too.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Everybody loves CCBill
Lots of curvy English women with a great body.
As of today more than 13,000 short video clips.
Delicious Kayla Louise has 128 videos.
Constant updates every day.
Cons:
No photos
PU does not show a discount, but the site is now having a sale at $19.95 for a month.
This is very much a tease site. Mostly the scenes show well shaped nice titties and open blouses.
But there are some pantyhose views too.
The clips are mostly about a minute. Some are as much as three minutes.
Bottom Line:
I was not sure I would like a site like this, but I did. The teasing made me want the curvy models and I have no regrets. I usually join more explicit sites, but this one is so good and hot that I found myself loving it.
The models mostly do some everyday activity. Some examples of common scenes are cleaning the kitchen, the dishes or cooking. Sometimes they talk on the phone, or read a magazine, or exercise. In some scenes they are a bit drunk and notice you paying attention. The teasing do the job for me. Sometimes they tell you to stop looking but mostly they seem to like you getting off to them showing their big bouncy natural titties. No boob jobs or fakes on this site.
Most of the scenes have the women doing the activities with their blouses open. It all seem so natural and unplanned. A few scenes feature down below and show them in pantyhose. It never gets explicit, but it does make you feel that you are a perv spying where you are not supposed to. The models look real too, as some are great looking, but many are not. Having a great looking set of shapely real titties seems to be the only thing you can expect in every scene.
There are many scenes with two women but they don’t interact much physically. These scenes could be a lot better if they did. They talk to each other and sometimes give each other ideas and encouragement. I want to see them touch and rub and strip each other in some sexy way.
The models are all English and have sexy accents. My favorite model on the site is hot chocolate Kayla Louise, who has 128 videos. Some are as short as about a minute, but some are longer, maybe three minutes or so.
The site is easy to use and there is no discount listed on PU. If you click on the link to join you will see the site is running a sale for one month at one third off, which comes to $19.95.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month.
Cons:
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche.
Bottom Line:
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of teasing, Downblouse Loving is included as is Panty Loving.
- Great tagging system, will detail below in bottom line.
- There are 15,460 videos between the sites with right at 13,000 coming from Downblouse Loving.
- A clothing fetishist's paradise.
- Amateur models as far as I can tell.
- 4K Videos starting in 2018, 1080p, 720p also available. The older videos have 720p, so HD all the way back to beginning in 2009 and some of the 2009 ones have 1080p also.
- Most of the models are very attractive. You will find some you're not that attracted to but for amateur models they're consistently above-average in attractiveness.
- Some scenes go beyond tease. We will just act like those models got so turned on from teasing that they had to masturbate.
- CCBill is the biller.
- Four updates per day on Downblouse Loving and two per day on Panty Loving.
- 117 models on Panty Loving and 313 on Downblouse Loving.
Cons:
- One of my fetishes is going to show up here. I would like to see a lot more upshorts.
- It doesn't bother me but I know some are turned off by smoking scenes and there are some on here.
Bottom Line:
After my 99 on Zishy, a mostly tease, mostly non-nude site, I figured Downblouse Loving would be a site I would really like and I do.
I normally wouldn't cover the tags but I feel like it helps you get an idea of what type of content they have.
Ass, Boobs (topless), Dancing, Downblouse, Face, Masturbation, Masturbation Instruction, Non-Nude, Nude, Panties, Pantyhose, Peeing, Pussy, Revealing tops but not downblouse, Sleeping, Smoking, Toys, Up blouse, Upshorts, Upskirts and Water Pistol.
There's quite a bit more nudity here than your average non-nude/tease site. I don't know why they stopped the Water Pistol ones. They only have a few of those and they shoot a water pistol at a woman in a skimpy, see through shirt and see through panties. Maybe it's just they are fun to watch. Especially when you add the British accents.
My biggest clothing fetish is upshorts followed closely by upskirts. The downblouse is good when you see it here. I don't think I had ever really paid that much attention to the downblouse tease but they do a very good job of showing the woman doing regular, everyday tasks, and she bends over to pick something up with her shirt falling forward and you get a full view of her boobs.
This type of porn appeals to me. I have always said my favorite porn is the kind I can see happening everyday. I see women in loose shirts everyday. Now I know about what I could expect to see if I saw down their shirts. I think upskirt has the same effect.
The numbers are very high with over 15,000 videos and adding 6 per day between Downblouse Loving and Panty Loving. The videos are short. I have seen a few that are 5-6 minutes. Some are as short as 1-2 minutes. I think the short length of these videos adds to how much I like them. If you see an upskirt video that lasts 17 minutes you're going to lose the feeling that you're seeing something you're not supposed to see. If you see one that's 2 minutes and the upskirt is only fully exposed for 1 minute of it that's much more realistic.
My main complaint is they need more upshorts. Between the two sites they have 40 upshorts videos. In comparison, they have almost 2,000 upskirt videos.
The first time I ever used a TGP site it was to look up upshorts pictures and that was back in probably 2000.
I joined this site after reading mbaya's review and knowing that I usually like tease more than he does. I also used the method he talked about. There are no pictures but you can watch the videos in VLC and have it take snapshots. It's just like with any exhibitionism or teasing site. Sometimes having the still photo shows what you missed in the video.
I do think this type of site(s) has a broader audience than potential members realize. I would guess most of us started our interest in the female body when we saw up a woman's skirt or short or down her shirt.
Having the scenes with models doing everyday activities makes it even better.
One thing to notice is the model number to scene number ratio. Between the sites they have 430 models and over 15,000 videos. That means there are a lot of models on here with 30+ videos.
The video quality is impressive too. To have 15,000+ scenes with the worst maximum resolution being 720p tells they really go for the quality. Even though I don't have a 4K monitor anymore, the 4K scenes make for really great screenshots/stills.
They have another site called Only Looking and it says it was their first site. You can add access to it for $2.95 for a year. It also says the Only Looking Archives will soon be included with the membership to Downblouse Loving. They have a section of bonus videos also that are ones they decided not to use on their site.
It's a very good tease, some nudity, some masturbation site that lets your mind remember all those times you almost saw up a skirt or down a blouse. Add it to my list of sites to rejoin, especially considering how often they update.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills through CCBill, trusted and reliable
-All videos at least HD, the best quality is 4K
-313 models and nearly 13,000 updates
-Comes with Panty Loving, 106 models, 2450 updates
-Promote the models with links to other sites they are on, including their names there.
-Tags used for search
-Sexy and seductive English accents
-Excellent use of tease to create heat.
Cons:
-No photos. I used VLC Media Player which lets you keep a photo from a scene.
-Clips range from under a minute up to five minutes.The site recommends you play them in a loop.
-There is a download limit of 50GB
-Excellent customer service, even on the weekend.
-PU does not have a discounted join price
Bottom Line:
This site is listed as nonnude, but really it is more than that. I don’t know what actually is an accurate tag for it, but I do know I like it more than I expected.
Downblouse Loving has a huge archive of nearly 13, 000 updates and it is added to every day, or recently about 30 a week.
It comes with a similar site, Panty Loving. The archive there is not as big at over 2300 updates, which are added daily. The titles do not explain the differences as they somewhat overlap.
Some DBL videos are focused on panties. Some are topless, but many are open blouse. A few are nude head to toe. These sites kind of remind me of when Forrest Gump talks about his box of chocolates.
On both sites the models generally are doing some activity like talking on the phone, cleaning, reading a magazine, or exercising and seemingly are not paying attention. In some scenes they are bit drunk, and notice you paying attention. Sometimes they tell you to stop looking, but give in. In others they are turned on by your looking and give you JOI, jerk off instruction.
When you start a video you don’t know if you are getting a woman dancing and stripping, a handstand that shows full upskirt, a scene that is two women competing at teasing you or even a scene that starts out nude and then they put on and take off panties after a shopping spree.
Most of the better scenes are tease. I will use an example. You see a model sitting with a dress on, but the camera starts off to the side. Gradually it moves to full frontal. She opens for a slight peek at her panties and does this several times. Then you see her legs wide, dress up.
I loved the sexy English accents and they turned me on by listening to them. Some models are gorgeous, well known professionals, like three of my UK favorite models, Cherry Blush, Kayla Louise and Natalia Forrest. These three are consummate pros and are worthy of appearing on any site. Many others look ordinary, some a little large and some a bit too thin and generally not so perfect. They might be someone you may know. In some they say they are getting ready for their date with you. Some have large breasts, but many are average size, but perfectly shaped. All have nice legs too.
I can easily imagine a heterosexual woman joining this site as they can find many models that they can feel are a lot like them. Women know the power of teasing men and would feel at home joining this site. I know several who would love it.
Sometimes the scenes surprised me with how explicit they became. Sometimes they surprised me with how well the tease works without being explicit.
The archives sound huge but they are mostly videos of five minutes or less. Many are similar and seem to be only from a different viewpoint. Some are before or after other scenes. Each has a narrow focus and seems to be long enough, but downloading is tedious.
If you find a model who interests you, I would love a way to easily download all of her scenes instead of one at a time, for say fifty clips.
There is something else here I have never seen before. When you click a link for a model, they have links for their scenes on other similar sites. Not only that, they give their names there.
There is a download limit of 50GB per day. With clips as short as these that takes a LOT of downloading.
Besides Downblouse Loving and Panty Tease, you get a section called Bonus Videos with 84 videos. Onlylookingarchives which has more than 10, 500 videos will soon be included under DBL. Some of those are in HD, but not all.
I liked nearly all the nearly 16,000 scenes and am happy to highly recommend these sites. This are some of the best sites to join in its niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-27-2007:30pm (Update History) Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
Pros:
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent.
Cons:
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too.
Bottom Line:
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- All content is 1080p, even the oldest videos dating back to 2016.
- Clips are edited well, sometimes they're slowed down to increase run time but its never distracting.
Cons:
- Expensive! Compared to network sites, you're getting very little content for what you pay for. A clip is uploaded every couple days but they vary in length, often they are only 2 or 3 minutes long.
- Despite listing 'Beachsome' content on the main page, you're only getting the latest 25 videos and archived content from 2016 and 2017.
- Website is cumbersome to navigate. 5 of the 7 categories outside of City and Beach (Extra, Welcome To, Events, Interviews, and Paparazzi) have very little content and are updated once a month, or every couple months.
Bottom Line:
- I do NOT recommend this website. I don't plan to reactivate my account after my first month because there simply isn't enough content to justify the price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 238 videos, large for a specialty site
-Has both a photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1346 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Frequent updates, about once a week.
Cons:
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount
Bottom Line:
Thanks to KaytBuffs for her excellent review of this site. I would not have joined without your recommendation.
This site is certainly different. In a world where porn sites are often virtual clones with same old, same old sex this, is most definitely not your standard porn site.
The site itself is easy to navigate with no advertising or other distractions. The porn stars are mostly very beautiful and British, with some actual amateurs. Their accents are hot and sexy. The clothes and makeup are both very classy. The word Lady in the total is exactly what you see here.
As far as Voyeurs, the basic premise is that the women love to see naked men masturbate. Sometimes the women also are explicit, but mostly they just show panties and/or bras in an effort to turn on the men, who are portrayed as sex objects for the women who love to see them.
The best downloads are in excellent HD, 1920x1080 8000 kbps. The video archive presently has 149 approximately 15 minute videos, which are highly creative.
Some are interviews, where the women are asked when they saw their first penis and what they thought about that experience, if they check out men they see in their personal lives, what kinds of penises they like to see and how much do they want to see men masturbate. I know many women like to see men masturbate. I know of no other site with this theme.
Many scenes are highly creative and seem real enough, although of course they are staged. In most scenes the woman shows her man her bra and panties, encourages him to cum for her, but there never is any actual physical contact. It is all fantasy that requires a bit of imagination for the male viewer to get off.
There is hardly any interaction between the male and female in some scenes. Some of the women seem to be much more into it than others and I think that it hurts the site. I watched two scenes where the woman is nearly nude, flashing the masturbating guy, then the next woman just sits there and does very little. It makes those little interaction scenes seem like total wastes. Usually, it's the hottest women that aren't really into it.
At this point I would expect that you are wondering why my score Is not higher. The site sort of kind of works, but seems it is not as hot as most heterosexual males would like. I could see it as a site for women.
The focus is too much on the males. I see the fantasy aspect, but the screen is filled with the man masturbating. I don’t watch the men, I watch the women, who seem to be secondary to the action. For example, in one scene the female strips down and is masturbating to what she is seeing. Fine, this works for me. But, you can’t see much as there is a table in the way down there. Most of what you do get is a paunchy guy stroking his penis.
I really wish this site worked for me, but it does not live up to its potential. At least it is part of a network of six sites, which have a total video count of 1346.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment.
Cons:
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake.
Bottom Line:
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 149 videos, large for a specialty site
-Has both a photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1109 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Frequent updates, about every two days
Cons:
-Videos focus on the males
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount
Bottom Line:
This site is certainly different. In a world where porn sites are often virtual clones with same old, same old sex this is most definitely not your standard porn site.
The site itself is easy to navigate with no advertising or other distractions. The porn stars are mostly very beautiful and British, with some actual amateurs. Their accents are hot and sexy. The clothes and makeup are both very classy. The word Lady in the total is exactly what you see here.
As far as Voyeurs, the basic premise is that the women love to see naked men masturbate. Sometimes the women also are explicit, but mostly they just show panties and/or bras in an effort to turn on the men, who are portrayed as sex objects for the women who love to see them.
The best downloads are in excellent HD, 1920x1080 8000 kbps. The video archive presently has 149 approximately 15 minute videos, which are highly creative.
Some are interviews, where the women are asked when they saw their first penis and what they thought about that experience, if they check out men they see in their personal lives, what kinds of penises they like to see and how much do they want to see men masturbate. I dont know how common it is for women to be into visuals like this, but these models seem to be truthful. Either that or they are really good actresses who create an illusion that works.
Other scenes are highly creative and seem real enough, although of course they are staged. One scene is described as Brand new model Louise giggles away as she asks to see her blind date's cock! It turns out the friend that set them up told her he had a big dick and told him she had great tits - so they each decide to find out! First Ben drops his pants and she gasps at his large cock. When she stands and strips naked he can't believe how perfect her natural DD tits are. He then starts jerking off as she watches and encourages him to cum! In most scenes the woman shows her man her bra and panties, encourages him to cum for her, but there never is any actual physical contact. It is all fantasy that requires a bit of imagination for the viewer to get off.
At this point I would expect that you are wondering why my score Is not higher. The site sort of kind of works, but seems it is not as hot as most heterosexual males would like.
The focus is too much on the males. I see the fantasy aspect, but the screen is filled with the man masturbating. I dont watch the man, I watch the women, who seem to be secondary to the action. For example, in one scene the female strips down and is masturbating to what she is seeing. Fine, this works for me. But, you cant see much as there is a table in the way down there. Most of what you do get is a paunchy guy stroking his penis.
I really wish this site worked for me, but it does not live up to its potential. At least it is part of a network of six sites, which have a total video count of 1109.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hot scenes, mostly step-brother / step-sister
- Good camera work with multiple camera angles (simulates spy cameras)
- Good scene setup
- TBP Discount
- Adds one scene per week
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Small site (but growing)
Bottom Line:
The whole faux-incest theme has become both popular and common over the last couple of years and its a niche I like so I was happy to see a new site dedicated to it. My preference is step-daughter / step-father scenes so I was a bit disappointed to find that this site focuses almost exclusively on step-sister / step-brother scenes. Thats just my preference though and it doesnt really detract from the site.
The scenes are pretty standard as this niche goes. The step-siblings admit that what theyre doing is wrong but they do it anyway. One of the reasons that I like this niche is that the scene set-up is a big thing for me and this niche can often do the set-up well. Apart from the step-sibling theme these could be any mainstream porn scenes. The only minor quirk is that, as the name suggests, some of the cameras are fixed and act as sort of spy cameras catching the action.
The models are a whos who of the A-list currently in the business.
There are currently 34 scenes available and the site updates with one new scene added per week. The site started back in February 2017.
The technical elements of the scenes are all over the map. Most of the scenes are offered in multiple file types and those are usually offered in more than one resolution. But there are a few scenes that dont offer many options and it isn't clear why these would be different. Most of the scenes, however, have something for everyone: there is a WMV file in 720p, a MPG file in 480p and MP4s in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I downloaded the MP4s in a mix of the 720p and 1080p depending on the overall file size. The 1080p scenes look great and come in at 1920x1080 with bitrates that vary from 5000 to 10,000 kb/s. The 720p scenes have more variability with some coming in at 1280x720 but others at 1280x674. Bitrates here varied from 3500 to over 10,000kb/s. I claim no technical abilities but it seems odd to me to have so much variation in file specs.
I cant say that this offer will be around forever, but the parent site made me an offer I couldnt refuse and other members here at PU report similar offers. I joined Passion HD last fall and within a short time I had an offer to get an annual non-recurring membership that included access to several other sites. My recollection is that this was a one-time cost of $69 USD and that gave me access to Casting Couch X, Lubed, POVD, My Very First Time, Exotic 4K, Fantasy HD, Tiny 4K and Pure Mature. Soon after that Holed was added, and I was very happy. A couple of months ago Spy Fam was added. From other comments made here at PU that deal (or one similar to it) may still be offered.
Even if there is no deal available the site does has a discount here at TBP/PU which makes this a pretty good value in this niche.
The site supports download managers and I had no problems using one. I didnt hit any download limits on this or any of the other sites that this company has.
The bottom line is that while the site is still relatively small (ooooo a bad pun!) it offers some great porn at a discounted price. My preference would be for some variety in the form of more step-daughter / step-father scenes but I wont hold that against them since many people probably prefer the step-sibling thing. If youre into this niche, or even if you arent but can look past it to get some decent porn, then you should take a serious look at this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
07-02-1708:14am (Update History) Reason: Dropped the score. The panty shots shouldn't outnumber the downblouse shots
Pros:
+ Multiple updates Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays
+ 1080p and 720p video options (newer video)
+ Streaming video
+ Tag search
+ Access to OnlyLooking archives and PantyLoving sites
+ Stellar customer service
Cons:
- TURNING INTO A PANTY LOVING SITE???
- Weird navigation
- Not download manager friendly
- Repetitive and obviously staged content
- Only one small thumbnail to preview each scene
- No pictures
Bottom Line:
I really hate that I have to rate this site as low as I did. I'd signed up here a couple of times in the past and really enjoyed the "voyeur fantasy" even though, as I said above, the content is somewhat repetitive and staged. My biggest gripe is that it appears that the DOWNBLOUSE part of DownblouseLoving has turned into UPSKIRTLOVING. Roughly a third of all the updates in the last few months are about looking up skirts. Not what I signed up for! Of the rest, there seem to be more cleavage than actual flash and "oops" shots. Again, not what I'd seen in the past.
The navigation and file names were always a bit weird here when compared to what you'd find on other sites. Click on an update and it takes you to that model's page with all her videos. Within a models page there are videos from the AlwaysLooking site, Downblouse and what they call BoobLoving which means topless or fully nude and (mostly on the oldest videos) WatchingYouWank which generally meant something more explicit (no hardcore). Somewhere along the line, they changed how they numbered the files in regards to which site the file is from. People who are anal about renaming files might understand what all that means when I say that it's weird.
The tag search is a new feature here and appears to be broken. The links don't go to the file, instead downloading either a 300 some kilobyte file or a useless html file. But, as the webmaster told me when I emailed about the issue, it's a work in progress. Since I mentioned the webmaster, I do have to say that Adam is very quick to respond to concerns. As in the past, it's usually only a matter of hours before I get a reply. There is a very generous 35 gig download limit, after which you're blocked for six hours. I'd found myself blocked after 18 gigs, emailed about it and within two hours got a reply that said my limit had been doubled. A big thumbs up to THAT!
More on the positive side of things, the update schedule is pretty good. To make up for the three times a week schedule, each update is around a dozen videos. They've also gone back and updated the videos to the more universally playable mp4 format, although I did notice a few wmv files still exists here and there. The video quality and camerawork are more than satisfactory, especially since this is basically an amateur site. Considering they have all their content online, going back to 2009 - and despite the rating I gave it - there's still a lot of boobage to be seen for anyone who has never been on the site or haven't been there in a while. I'll go back when I see them get back to their roots - BOOBAGE! And I WILL be checking in from time to time to see if it happens.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated:
07-02-1403:11pm (Update History) Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
Pros:
Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.
Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.
Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here.
Cons:
Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.
Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.
Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?
Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago!
Bottom Line:
If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Has a few decent photo sets of original content.
Cons:
Majority of the sites content is ripped from other sites (the low res free sample content versions), such as beachhunters, beachvoy, joypicz as well as others for sure.
In terms of site format, its pretty horrible. It doesnt have optional zip files for pics, nor does it even provide a forward/backward buttons to navigate within its pages!
Regarding its dismal limited in quantity of original content, pic and vid quality ranges from decent to awfully tiny. Lastly videos are only available to stream on site WTF!!!
Also original content videos is peppered with large, cheesy unnecessary captions and comments, which is a superb reflection of the overall quality and character of the website.
Bottom Line:
It would appear the majority of the site's content consists of random low res pics and vids that were farmed from other sites (legitimately? who's to say). In short, stay clear from this site; its simply not worth the money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
--This site certainly appears to be the real deal. It is a hidden camera site focusing on videos of nude women in places such as locker rooms and showers.
--The women, at least some of them, are reasonably attractive.
--It is very realistic. Most of the women give no indication that they know they are being filmed in the nude.
--Videos are fairly long and show everything and the technical quality is quite high.
--There is a certain amount of breast action as women fondle their own breasts while washing.
--Updates are fairly frequent and the varying appearances of the women--with some being quite attractive and others not so much--give the site a very realistic feel.
Cons:
--One of the site's big "pros"--the fact that it realistically shows ordinary women--is of course also its biggest "con". The women are ordinary in appearance, meaning that a very few might be really hot, most are quite average, and there are certainly many overweight aging women in granny panties. But, of course, that is what you would expect to find in a real locker room spying on real women.
--The locker room and shower sections are the best--the other sections, which include dressing room, beach house, and "upskirt" shots, just didn't work as well for me.
--Another small drawback is that the videos need to be downloaded, which takes time--there is no way to stream the videos.
Bottom Line:
With a hidden camera site such as this one, there is obviously no way to be absolutely sure whether the videos are real spy videos of nude women, or simply posed by models. However the very realistic appearance of the women certainly leads me to believe that this site is what it purports to be--real videos of women showering or dressing in the nude while being filmed by hidden cameras.
As such sites go, this one is of quite high quality. Moreover, the videos are ordered by date, and it is clear that the quality of the videos has been increasing, so we may continue to expect excellent work from this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Occasional videos of real amateurs, really aroused.
- Amusing random clips (but these are rare): clit piercing, wild parties, girl pissing on beach fire, sex on a trampoline, etc.
- Low price: $20 for 4 months.
Cons:
- Not much good content -- fair number of clips but most very short and horrible quality.
- Mostly very short videos. Most of the minority that show any excitement end before anyone has a climax.
- Mostly horrible resolution, like an old cell phone video. ALL uniformly small format (about 360 x 400 pixels), and no "full screen" display option.
- Often very amateurish jerky camera work, usually POV.
- Often very poor light -- some so dark you can't see anything.
- The majority of amateur videos are just blowjobs. Next most common is solo girl masturbation but often not to climax. Next is just girls undressing or prancing around, often not even nude. There are a small number of boy-girl fucking scenes.
- Some members have uploaded commercial porn clip that you may well have seen on free sites.
- The video player has no time scale.
- Streaming only, no downloads. You cannot right-click and download the video.
- No search mechanism. No organization for videos.
Bottom Line:
The guy who apparently runs this site, "SandFly", takes spy voyeur videos of girls and couples on the beach. Most of these are just women with bare breasts, sometimes nude, sunbathing. Low resolution, jerky, telephoto from a long way away. There are only a handful showing man-woman couples or groups having sex, and most of those end before anything much happens. Actually, you'll find better voyeur spy vids of amateurs on xhamster. There are roughly 110 of these videos.
The other side of this site is user-uploaded videos. You can earn access to the site by uploading videos so a lot of boring or duplicate stuff is uploaded.
There are about 120 "big clips" (a few minutes long instead of less than a minute). And there are more than 1,000 short clips uploaded by users. Both categories suffer from the "cons" listed above. And there are quite a few duplicates within these counts.
There are also still picture sets but I didn't bother to look at them.
Bottom line: for such a cheap price one can hardly complain or expect more, but not worth the time I spent looking thru the videos.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site is dedicated to peeing videos, no photos.
- Full nudity is often included.
- One new video every week.
- The most recent videos are
- a girl takes her clothes off in a bath tub and pees in the tub
- girl takes her clothes off indoors and pees on the floor or into a container.
- Some videos are of one or more girls doing a quick pee outdoors.
- A few involve some male-female interaction
- Some other scenarios.
- Currently 233 videos, a couple of them are corrupt and vere never fixed.
Cons:
- Videos are not unique to this site, many can be found elsewhere.
- Videos are not high quality.
Bottom Line:
Among sites in this niche this appears to be an average site; few, if any, have real HD video.
After my current membership lapses, I don't know if I will come back
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
