Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It plays to one of my biggest fetishes
- It also has some of the prettiest models around
- There is great softcore content including teasing and stripping
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max
- It’s similar to the old-school glam sites
- Good solo camerawork, seen most when the models’ make eye contact with the camera
Cons:
- It’s still way too quiet.
- The quietness all but ruins the production and realism for me.
Bottom Line:
I have had the dressing room fetish for a very long time. I used to stand, like most husbands, holding the bags, while their wife tried on clothes. Sometimes, my mind would drift off. I would wonder what that one woman looks like who was in the dressing room beside the dressing room my wife was in. Sure, it’s perverted but most fetishes are. I even progressed in the fetish by talking my wife and eventually,, a few future girlfriends, into sending me selfies from inside the dressing room. Yes, the girlfriends came after divorcing the first wife.
This fetish can be frustrating. Finding a dressing room where you and the other person are comfortable with sending nude or tease photos from is harder than you would expect. It can be done and be done with complete respect for anyone else in the store. That’s the biggest problem with Fitting Rooms. If these models really are in a fitting room, they must have a ton of respect for the other patrons. They’re quiet, there is little to no noise that comes with store dressing rooms, like hangers clanking, items being dropped, people chattering.
I wouldn’t have joined Fitting Room for a second time if not for their great models. Everything is there for this site to be one of my favorites, maybe even favorite. The videos can be downloaded and zipped photosets too. The scenes are reminiscent of early 2000s tease and solo scenes. The models even dance around inside the fitting room, but there’s missing noise. It lacks the ambiance of a dressing room.
I described it once before as it sounds like the models are standing inside a box.
It’s still not a complete waste. The models are still great. The site does not cater to a certain age or body type of models. You get a mix of models, ages and body types, which is exactly how a fitting room site should be. The model strips, sits down, complete quietness, slides her toy in her and lets out a huge moan. That’s not a realistic sound for someone masturbating in public. Women try to be quiet and do it quietly, which is one of the hottest parts since there will be times they can’t stop themselves from letting out a muffled moan. I can imagine all the potential problems with making the site and scenes the way I want them. I’m sure licensing fees would be needed for any copyrighted music and I’m not for sure how much money is available in the porn budget for random people chattering. That’s why I said it’s not a complete waste.
This is a fetish I have experience with and because of that, I have a standard that I believe the fetish should live up to.
I believe others could really enjoy this site. The models are some of the best I have seen and the women do seem to really enjoy the fitting room fetish. Just don’t approach it like me and expect the models to do what you want them to do. Maybe it’s better for me that the site doesn’t nail the fetish for me? Great site worth taking a look into.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
UK-based panty fetish content
Videos are downloadable up to 2160p
Over 5,000 scenes
All the models are amateurs
The navigation is good
Cons:
The price is high for a niche site
There are no pictures
There is a download limit, but I have not hit it
Bottom Line:
Panty fetish is my favourite fetish. This site should score higher for me, but there are a few glaring flaws that make it come up short. Starting with the price of nearly $30 a month. I personally don’t have a problem with paying $30 a month for my favourite fetish, but I expect premium quality and features when I pay a premium price. The videos are downloadable and the quality goes up to 4K, but there are no pictures. For me, that’s a glaring flaw. At least for me, the pictures on a panty fetish site are as important or even more important than videos. That’s just disappointing for me. That’s not even close to premium.
The landscape of porn has changed – for better or worse – is not up to me to say, but Panty Amateur is a site that does not particularly fit in with mainstream hardcore sites. The content is softcore. It’s directed towards people who like to see a young, pretty woman in her panties. There is little to no chance you’re going to see much more than you would see in a risqué R or AO movie.
The videos are sharp on a 4K monitor and nearly half of their 5,000+ videos are available to download in 4K resolution. The video action is primarily focused on showing the female in panties. It’s not masturbation or sex. There is some touching and flashing shown, but it’s very timid.
The pictures are a different story. There are no pictures and therefore, no downloadable zips. Watching Panty Fetish in pictures, is really just as effective as videos. Some would even say there’s more to see in pictures than videos. I agree with that, too. Without pictures, this is just an average site to me.
I can’t complain much about anything else. The navigation works well and the site is fast to load. You get to use CCBill for billing and everything on the site works as it should.
My final thought is this site could be much better and should be much better based on the subscription price. There is no reason for a softcore porn site to omit pictures. The videos are good, but I spend more time using VLC to take snapshots. It’s a solid site, but far from best in class.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The best of tease porn.
Also comes with the Only All network.
Softcore photos and videos.
You can download videos and photo sets. Only Tease, by itself, has over 5,000 videos and 16,000 photo sets.
Professional site with mostly amateur models.
Cons:
There’s nudity, but not so much vulgarity or hardcore.
The search needs updated.
The most important word in any or all of these sites is, “only”. They’re not just using that word for effect. If it says “only Secretaries” you’re going to get a whole lot of secretaries. It is a level of discipline you rarely see in porn. That presents one mental hurdle. There’s little room for your imagination. Even though nearly every scene leaves something to the imagination. The discipline of the sets/scenes/sites tells you nothing is going to happen other than the word following “only”.
My favorite and first fetish was panties. My name even shows it. I always liked seeing young women with hairy pussies, in panties. Only Tease is a good blend of the different niches in tease porn. Their other sites that are included with the Only All Network are even more narrowly-focused. That’s why Only Tease is my favorite of the network.
Nudity is included; but it is not a major part of the content.
Despite not being true porn, the content is presented, often, more erotically than hardcore porn sites do. Besides having a narrow-focus (secretaries, Costumes, Opaques, etc ) there is a focus on making sure nearly every photo and pose is sexually provocative. There’s not going to be the feeling of “I’ve seen this before”. The word, “formulaic” only should be used with Only Tease when saying you’re going to be teased. Only Tease’s producers will utilize any and every method to tease the viewers. It is what makes this site great. And even in a league of its own. Tease is the objective; it can be done clothed or nude or semi-nude. This becomes a major strength. It’s why there’s none of the content is formulaic. You will be teased, but you do not know how until you watch the scene. Regular porn shoves hardcore sex on the viewer in every scene. There’s no intrigue or anticipation.
Besides all the positives I’ve talked about, these sites also believe in high quality. Their videos can be downloaded are HD quality. The photo sets can be downloaded as zips. The navigation is simple and there are new, steady updates coming in.
There then is the pro no one may think about. You get to avoid all the annoying aspects of traditional porn. There are no “hard cocks” or “pounding pussies” on the site. You won’t hear every model try to convince you of how dirty she is, “I’m a naughty girl” or “I like big cocks”. These women convince you of how dirty they are by getting into your imagination which they have to use to make clothed or semi-nude porn even work.
The biggest con I see Is attempting to convince incredulous others that yes, nudity is part of porn, but it’s really not required.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
My darkhorse, sleeper site from an entire group of darkhorse sleeper sites.
Cute, gorgeous, stunning, slim, curvy, blondes, brunettes, redheads, all showing off their panties.
Videos are downloadable in 4K and include smaller resolutions for those wanting smaller.
There are nearly 3,000 video scenes and over 1,000 photo sets. All are downloadable, but be wary of the daily download limit (6 GB)
Most of the models are British and have British accents.
Many of the models keep some pubic hair to help the imagination see what’s below the panties.
Cons:
I really wish the company that owns this site, S-A-Web, would make a network with all their sites on it. It’s only a con because you are going to have to join multiple sites to see all their content.
The price, considering it’s not a network, is too high for the average fan.
Bottom Line:
If ever there was a company that’s avoided the spotlight it’s S-A-Web. They have nearly 20 sites that cover every type of tease porn possible. Upskirts, panties, panty peeks, here’s one for your perverted consciousness – a site where the women are stripped by others.
My single complaint is I have to join multiple sites just to see all of their content. That complaint shouldn’t be viewed as not important. I feel like these sites are dropping in value as standalone sites and it’s a real shame just because they have such a unique and interesting model/view of porn. I think we all have accepted that tease is a major and integral part of all porn and sex. We haven’t accepted that tease truly is its own genre.
It's a darkhorse site and company because I have never heard anyone else mention these sites. The sites are mostly all UK-based and the models, while “amateur” are frequent models on all the tease sites.
The videos and photo sets can be downloaded, but there is a daily download limit of 6GB. Now, you may be seeing why having multiple sites instead of one network is frustrating. If they had a network and had a network-wide daily download limit, you could still bounce around and see content from each site. As it is, if you hit the limit, you will be looking at nothing for 24 hours. The videos are downloadable in 4K on all of the newer scenes and the photos are downloaded in high resolution zip files.
The simplest panty tease scene is more erotic to me than a 20 minute hardcore sex scene. It’s not much different than our earliest arousals of seeing upskirts (in school) and seeing the different color of the panties from the outfit. You then get to look and see what all you can see. Possibly a swollen clitoris and/or labia. Likely, a little bit of pubic hair. That is enough for me.
The women are also of all types and backgrounds. You will see every hair color and body type just on this site. It’s a site that I have been a member of more than 10 times over the years and it’s easy to call it one of my favorites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This old, small network used to be a diamond in the rough for fetishists even though the content doesn’t look like it.
- The old content is still on the network. Anything else said will make this not a pro.
- Some videos have 1080p, nothing higher and most are lower but are downloadable and unlimited.
- With a name like Monster Pimps one isn’t likely to assume pictures are the main focus but pictures are. With five times as many downloadable photosets as videos this is a photocentric network.
- Download speeds are good (75% my max).
- Do we give points for making me feel nostalgic?
Cons:
- Oh boy, just go look at it. It looks like a site from 2002 that I once used dial-up internet to access. Which is probably why it was more photos than videos.
- The price. I accept that a site has seen its better days. Hell, its better decade. The price is still $29.95. The positive is they use Epoch.
- Being a fetishist continues to become more difficult. It’s why (and the only reason) you would consider this network.
Bottom Line:
I joined Monster Pimps somewhere around 2005, maybe 2006, maybe 2008. It fit that era of porn. There was Lightspeed University as example. This network covered five of my favorite niches or fetishes. Those are: Panty Jobs – Not to be confused with the Evil Angel series, Panty Pops, which is what Panty Pops is. Panty Jobs was probably the first site to ever combine tease with handjob and teasing panties with sex. The premise is simple. The female, usually very young and cute, gets the man aroused and sits on his lap in her panties or a pulled up skirt. She slides his dick into her panties and grinds and uses sexual motions and groans. One of my all-time favorite niches. One of the sexiest niches.
Exploited Secretaries – Who doesn’t like secretary, office clothes, teacher porn? This is the fetish for young straight men. It could have been a teacher. It could have been a school nurse or secretary. Even if you’re older, it could have been that sweet temporary receptionist you hired. It’s just a good all-around niche. There’s not a lot that can go wrong with it.
Lipstick BJ – This wasn’t one I had a lot of interest in. I really didn’t like lipstick BJs. It’s not easy to explain how you got rose-colored lips on your underwear. This was the really reaching niche of the network. It even reminds me of smoking fetish. I’m sure there are people that like seeing a blowjob with the performing woman having on bright lipstick. What is important with this site’s inclusion is you can see how heavy this network was on fetish. They were basing entire sites on one niche. That also is a problem on this network. Similar to handjob porn that never does anything except handjob. It’s the same thing scene after scene. It never changed on this site.
Cheer Girls – Ding, ding, ding, the forever winner in teen porn, cheerleaders! I never liked cheerleaders. I was a jock. I still didn’t like them but in porn, yeah, I liked them. Those cheer outfits fit so many fetishes. Upskirts, panties, hose, bouncing boobs and I will say the cheerleading outfit may have been the first outfit that made me realize some women look better in clothes than naked. The site and fetish, to me, had no expiration date. This fetish should be a winner in porn at all times. Even with that said, there was one more fetish that topped all for me.
Sport Babes – Could you have made a more perfect network for me? This is a site featuring real, sporty, girls. They tease, they get naked, there’s some masturbation, some lesbian activity and it was the cherry on top of this once expected to be great network.
That was a sigh you heard. There are maybe some updates. I don’t think so. I don’t see updates for the last 5 years or more. What you are joining for if you do join is the old content. They do have some 1080p videos and their photosets are very good. Those could be in higher resolution but other than that, you can see how much potential this network once had. Which is why there is no way the price should be $29.95. It’s at best, a $9.95 network for those wanting to see tease and fun porn. Some of the things we used to complain about with porn are now things that kind of make me laugh. Like the Lipstick BJs. Not only does the model make sure she has fresh lipstick on she has to make sure she leaves a lipstick imprint on the man.
There is still something good about this type of porn. I think it’s the feeling of nostalgia. A lot of guys maybe went through the same things these scenes show. It’s hard to give it a high score but it’s not hard to not give it a terrible score. If you liked porn before 2007-08, somewhere in there and there is a promo for the network, it’s worth joining for under $10. I would bump the score up if it was cheaper. The network also is not big, nearly half or maybe more than half of the scenes are on Panty Jobs and that is my favorite site on the network. I don’t mind that. Others probably would mind it. Based on my numbers, if you wanted to call this a live network that is still operating, they have averaged about 50 updates (counting photosets) per year since the network started 15 years ago. I think my score is fair and shows how in-between I was on this long overdue return to an old favorite.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Zipped and downloadable photo sets.
You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads.
Uses a tag system for searching.
Pretty UK women with sexy accents
The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill
The site has 168 videos and photosets.
Cons:
Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos.
Nude, but not as explicit as I might like.
Bottom Line:
The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way.
I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually.
You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me.
I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo?
There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site.
The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very fetish-related content, but does deviate from the fetish.
There are 145 scenes.
Beautiful models that fit the fetish with mostly plump butts.
POV-filmed and I think this fetish has to be.
Should interest panty lovers, leg lovers and some scenes stick with that fetish.
Newer videos have up to 1080p, but make note of the first con.
Cons:
If you are really into this fetish the older scenes stick with the fetish, but their highest quality download is 480p. It looks like the site was maybe sold and taken into a different direction.
Some of the scenes don't even go into the fetish of the site. They are good sex scenes, but I would like to see more of the fetish.
No longer updating.
Bottom Line:
A Panty Pop fetish is unique since it combines multiple genres of porn. Panty Pops include the female wearing a pretty pair of panties, bending over in front of the camera, taking the guy's dick and rubbing it against her panties. The progression adds sticking the dick inside the panties with the pussy rubbing against the dick or rubbing the dick between the panty covered butt crack. The pop is the finale of the cum shot. In the truest sense of the fetish the panties never come off.
In the newer scenes on this site the panties are off very early in most of the scenes. It just becomes a regular POV hardcore sex scene with no fetish involved. The older scenes do the fetish as well as any site. The combination of genres includes handjobs, panties, cum on clothes (panties). When done properly, it is a very erotic handjob. I don't know enough about when the site was sold, but the earliest scenes are from 2007. The newest are 2018. You can watch the older scenes and tell a distinct difference in them and the newer scenes. It looks like tease was a big deal in 2007, but not in 2018.
The does hurt the site a little since the ones sticking to the fetish top out at 480p quality. I don't see that as a major damning point, but it is too bad they haven't remastered those old scenes. The style of the scenes also changes the length. The earlier scenes are shorter with most of them being under 10 minutes, while the newer ones that stray from the fetish are often in the 20 plus minute range. I find that interesting. When the models were teasing the guys and being more creative then just having sex the guys finished faster.
The models are all professionals except possibly some of the first ones. I do not recognize the models from the older scenes. The newer ones include Liza Rowe, Ashley Fires, Harley Dean and Richelle Ryan. These scenes and fetish are made for the curvier bottom-half models. I may be a little critical of the newer scenes, but none of the newer scenes stay with the fetish. There are a few that use the fetish to begin with, but the scenes quickly turn into standard sex. It's an interesting fetish if you are new to it especially. The older scenes are where you should start. The models are not as pretty as the models in the newer ones, but you do get to see the fetish.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best tease sites on the internet. Also can be accessed through the Only All network.
- I think most of the models are amateurs but I do not guarantee it. I am rarely familiar with models on these sites.
- The people that run this site know what they are doing and they do these niches as good as anyone.
- The videos are better than I would normally expect from a tease site.
- The photos are very high quality, nearing 6000 long end and they have a nice flow to their sets, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are fast (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
- The Only All network is a must join at least once for those that like softcore content.
- Clean site layout, one small ad at the bottom of the pages.
- Three updates per day, three photo sets one day, two photo sets and a video the next.
- Nearly 1,000 models on Only Tease.
Cons:
- Navigation could be better. Will explain in BL.
- The sites live up to their names, there are some known hardcore models on here like Zafira, she shows a little more than other models but it is still "tease". Not a problem for me but could be for others.
Bottom Line:
I have a review of Only Tease here on Porn Users from 2008. Back then, I don't remember them having a full network like now. I will also review the network separately.
The navigation is my only real complaint. I was trying to put together a count of the models and noticed it isn't as easy to do as I expected. In the model list, you can select each letter of the alphabet, it lists all the models of that letter. This is a common problem with large sites. If you do not know who you are looking for you are going to have a lot of clicking to do. This part takes on an even worse twist. I don't know how you could fix that problem. I was always told you can't complain about something unless you know how to fix it. There also is the compliment of this con. It was the only complaint I had.
Sites like these are rare. They do what they are supposed to do and you will rarely see a set that breaks their system or flow. I talked about the flow of their photo sets. The first 30 photos are usually not sexually provocative. They can make them seem to be by focusing on the model's butt or boobs but they are fully dressed and doing daily tasks. It is like people watching. The next 30 show the model being more "aware" that you are looking at her. She will give you a little extra bend across the desk or counter or chair. The next 30 the clothes start to come unbuttoned and so on. There are sets that show everything but not in a wide open spread way.
Almost all sets, at the very least, end with the model topless and in her panties/hose. The interest for me is often the first 60 pictures. There's a voyeuristic nature to those. Like when you go to the bank to get a loan and find yourself checking the loan officer out.
The quality of the photos is about as high as you find. You also will get roughly 130 photos per set. Only Tease is a little different than the other Only All sites because it is not a specific type of clothes/outfit/costume. You could say it is like a compilation of all the Only All sites.
Sites like these usually leave a lot to be desired in the videos but Only Tease's videos are better than most art/tease videos. They are usually sexually provocative. A lot of artsy sites just have the model standing around naked or teasing. Only tease goes more into the bending over, on all fours (in clothes often).
One thing you will realize with Only Tease and the Only All sites in general is there are models that are made for this type of "porn". You can even see it in the number of sets they have of certain models. Porchia W is one of those made for this type of porn. She has 119 photo sets, 24 videos that's a total of almost 12,000 pictures just of her. One of my favorites is Amelie, she only has 6 photo sets and 2 videos. Nearly all models have multiple sets and just glancing over the models I would say more than 50 have at least 20 sets.
This is one of those sites that should brag about their numbers! The site is also nice and clean with one little banner ad at the bottom. They also have features to make using their site more customized. You can click on any photo set "add to customized set". A box shows up on each picture. You click the pictures you want to put in your set. It's a very in-depth feature that photo collectors like to see. I would also think fetishists that maybe just like upskirts with (color) panties.
Those are the people a site like this appeals to. While a site like Kink appeals to your nude fetishes, penetration fetishes, a site like Only Tease appeals to your clothing, daily situation fetishes.
It is an example of how experience pays off. You just one see much on here that makes you think "what were they thinking?" The models are nearly all attractive in a "she could work in my office" kind of way. The only sets I do not like that much on Only Tease are the bedroom ones. Having it in the bedroom, a private room, takes away the "oh she is getting my file out of the cabinet". I am mostly saying once in the privacy of a bedroom our minds change about what we are looking at.
It still is an excellent site. You can still join these Only All sites as standalone sites for $24.95 each or you can join the entire network for $34.95 thanks to the TBP/PU price.
Overall, you can build an entire porn photo collection with Only Tease or the network. And also have yourself a nice collection of tease based videos. Recommended for those that like panties, hose, downblouse, upskirt, believable office and tease content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The first site I've known of that covers the "dressing room" fetish.
- The quality is very high, maybe the highest I've seen as an overall site but there's a con about this too.
- Some well-known models like Lil' Caprice but there are a few models here that I've never heard of and you'll see the big con but these particular "new" models to me were worth joining for.
- You're going to get three main fetishes here: Dressing Room, panties and a combination of tease/explicit masturbation that is kind of rare these days.
- Very good download speeds, thanks to my cable company, hitting 80% of my new 400M internet connection.
- One day this will be part of a network and it will be worth joining that network for.
- CCBill is the biller and they tried a cross sale for Sex Art.
- If you like the models and the fetishes, I think it's a good price for this site.
- Updates twice a week
Cons:
- The site is small. As of today, 9/11/2018, they have 58 videos, 58 photo sets and 30 "extras" photo sets that look to be fairly genuine in being true self-shot photos.
- I would like to see them do more with the dressing room fetish. At times it feels like I could be watching a common solo video of a model without even noticing the setting.
- The lost fetish, bottom line will explain.
Bottom Line:
I don't know if it's an age thing or if maybe it's more of a more recent trend (thanks, smartphones) but I have this strange, unusual fetish of women undressing in dressing rooms and doing more to themselves while in there. I say strange even though I think it's much more common these days. I have dated a few women recently who liked sending pictures from the dressing room. You know the way that goes, "Do you like this outfit? Is this cute on me? Am I too old to be wearing this?" Then 376 pictures later, "How about this?" And the clothes magically disappeared.
Maybe that's the appeal of this site to me, the tease lasts about half of the video (20-25 minutes long scenes). You know you're getting old when a woman is sending you pictures and you're replying, "I'm getting hungry! And no, not in a sexual way!"
This site is in one way, very basic. The navigation is very simple and works as it should. The technical quality is the best I've seen when it comes to 100% of the content having these specs:
The videos are downloadable in 3 sizes, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I still don't have a 4K monitor so I can't say how crisp or clear those are but the 720p are very crisp and clear to me.
The pictures are downloadable and start with the model dressed, some of the outfits are very pretty, almost like it's what the model chose to wear or like they have a wardrobe specialist. The pictures are nearly 6000 long end.
The site is almost painfully exclusive feeling. What I mean by that, it's like they have very serious standards for their models. They have 58 scenes (videos and photos) but only 20 models. Which is good if you're like me and found a few you hadn't seen before, most have multiple shoots and outfits. At this point, it looks like this site should be rated very high unless removing points for the small size of it.
But ... why make a niche site that is untouched for the most part and make production mistakes that all but ruin the niche? First video I watched, the model teases, she's stripping, good site for those into panties, she starts masturbating and starts moaning loudly and groaning and squealing. A woman wouldn't masturbate in a store dressing room and moan and groan loudly! It's like writing a classic novel only to forget to proofread it.
That moaning is annoying enough but the scenes are dead silent. This isn't really a dressing room, is it? It's a box on the set? Where's the soft background music we would hear in stores? What about people randomly talking? This niche has a ton of potential but hearing a model's heels echo in a hollow room isn't part of the potential. That's sad to me.
I once watched an amateur that recorded herself masturbating in a dressing room. She was nearly biting her lip off to stop from moaning but someone bumped the door or went in the dressing room beside her and it aroused her, so a small moan slipped out. There's the potential. Something that makes this content look like it's a horny woman but not porn. Maybe I'm asking too much but anything to make scenes more than just basic masturbation scenes that are shot in the same room. I love to use my imagination when viewing porn but these production errors do make it almost too hard to imagine.
What saves them, besides the technical quality, are the models. I downloaded the content of 17 of the 20 models. Even found one model I'm not familiar with that I am going to have to look for, Apolonia Lapiedra, anyone that knows of more content of her let me know. She's engagement ring level.
I will also give them credit for not fudging the model's ages. Not that I know their ages but as mentioned, Lil' Caprice is here and instead of like most sites, she's not listed as 19, she's listed as 29. The youngest model on the site is 22, the oldest is 31. There is anal, vaginal masturbation but no sex, not even girl-girl. It's a girl and her toy in a box. Jill-in-the-box? Joking aside, I like this site for a one month join. They are updating twice a week but given that the videos are not that long, you will download most everything you want in a week (max). It's a very good, solo, panties, tease, masturbation site but every scene is in the box so I can't get the dressing room part out of my head.
I would recommend it for those who stand outside a dressing room and see a pretty woman walk in and start ignoring their wife asking them to get her a bigger size. If you're into "she would be that loud in public" (not your wife) then you'll love the content. I think panty fetishists also would enjoy this site. The scenes have roughly 10 minutes of tease at the beginning (formulaic?). For me the models made the site above average but that's really as far as I can go. Check the models out before joining and decide from there. Last, I did a similar of review of Fitness Rooms, with similar "problems" of the content just not being believable enough but it doesn't look like the sites are related.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
--The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).
--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.
--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.
--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys
--The flash player gets the job done.
--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons:
--One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.
--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.
--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).
--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.
--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line:
As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.
This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).
I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.
The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.
The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.
The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.
Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.
As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.
About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.
With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.
Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A huge site with an archive going back 10 years featuring 792 models in 9900+ photo sets (almost 1.2 million images) and 2300+ videos.
A huge array of outfits, costumes, lingerie, leg and footwear.
Exclusive content
Bonus sites Only Carla and Only Melanie included.
Photos in choice of 3 sizes, 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048 and 2000 x 3000px
Zip download for each size.
Video download options are HD 1280 x 720 and High Res 640 x 360 wmv, HD and High Res streaming options plus an m4v download for ipod.
At least 3 updates every day of the week, some days can be up to 6.
All content date stamped right back to 2002.
All file sizes shown and video run times.
No apparent download limits.
Customizable browse options and excellent search engine.
10 free Fast Track credits provided allowing you to view forthcoming releases of your choice before they are officially released.
Choice of Epoch or CCBill for credit card payments.
Cons:
The site is very softcore, any nudity is fairly tame and many models dont go any further than just topless, some not even that far.
Some repetition of outfits and shoot locations.
Oldest videos poor quality.
Videos quite short averaging 5-6 minutes.
If you prefer your HD videos in a format other than wmv you will be disappointed.
The most irritating thing for me were the zip downloads of the older photo sets (released up until about 2008 I think), after downloading and extracting the zips you have to click your way through 7-8 folders before arriving at the photos, really annoying.
Poor file naming, seemingly random meaningless numbers and letters so renaming required.
Ads in members area
Minimum 4 months subscription required to access VIP members area
Regional pricing with both CCBill and Epoch.
Bottom Line:
For anyone considering a membership at Only Tease the main thing to consider is that it is a very softcore site containing very little explicit nudity. The site is all about the clothing, costumes, lingerie and hosiery being worn by the models, teasing and tantalising you with that flash of stocking top or suspender belt, catching a glimpse of their panties up their short skirts or a view of their cleavage down that tight blouse before she slowly removes the items of clothing one by one. You will find almost every type of outfit you could possibly think of from casual wear to business suits, glamorous evening gowns to clubbing wear, various uniforms like college girl, cheerleader, nurse, French maid to sports outfits and even some fictional characters such as Snow White and Alice in wonderland.
Amongst the near 800 models you will find some well known US and Euro models but what I really liked was the amazing collection of British models. Despite being from the UK I dont buy magazines or patronise the sleazy tabloid press so most of these page three models were completely unknown to me. I was planning to just stick around for 1 month and try to be selective about what I downloaded but there are so many gorgeous models I found it almost impossible to deny most of them space on my hard drive so as a result Im already well in to my 2nd month. Some of the more popular models have a huge amount of content, in some cases well over a hundred updates, almost like having several solo sites within the site. I loved the collection of Hayley-Marie here with a whopping 171 updates. Bryoni-Kate was another favourite of mine with 90 updates.
With such a huge amount of content you need to be able to navigate around it easily and they do provide plenty of browse and search tools. You can browse either photos or videos by a month and year listing or use the A-Z model index. They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search for any type of outfit with several filters to refine your search. For example a basic search for miniskirt will bring up over 4000 results and you can then narrow your search by adding various filters such as the type and colour of stockings, tights or socks you want to go with it and also the type of lingerie required and then add in some model criteria like hair colour and breast size and whether you require nudity or just topless.
In addition they also have several features in the browse options like behind the scenes, model of the year and model of the month. Theres also a prestige tease section where you will find some of the top name models in slightly more glam and photo shopped galleries than the regular OT galleries although theyve not updated that section since May of this year. Theres also a feature called Tease at Home which allegedly features the model being shot in her own home and being allowed to choose her own outfits. You also have the ability to rate the models, outfits and tease factor of every shoot and they have Top lists showing the highest rated in each category. Other extras include Wallpapers and theres a very active forum where members can discuss models and outfits.
Im not particularly interested in the videos, I did however find the videos here slightly more interesting than those on their sister site Art-Lingerie that I reviewed recently mainly because the videos here start fully clothed so you at least have a bit of anticipation and build up with some teasing and a striptease. They did however suffer from the same flaws IMO, having that awkward silence again with no back ground music and rarely any chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start. I just find it really irritating and amateurish when you can hear every little background noise. Some models do have separate interview videos where they talk about themselvesyawn.boring.
In addition to the regular daily updates, every Tuesday and Thursday they add an additional update which is designated as a VIP Members update. Clicking on these tells me I am not eligible to view them until the 1st day of my 4th month of membership so clearly these extra updates are designed to try and incentivize members to stick around longer and spend more money. The VIP updates look to have started around September 2011 so youd be looking at around an extra 90 updates if you stick around long enough. Im not sure these extra updates are enough incentive for me to stick around, after nearly 2 months of softcore teasing Im ready to move on for some naked pussy. A highly recommended site though if you love softcore stripping, teasing, stockings and lingerie as I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content. You get around 3 updates every day and the archives go back all the way to 2002. According to their specs they have over 1 million images... pretty crazy. They started adding high quality images at the end of 2007 and now all sets are available as 1,066px 711, 2,048px 1,365 or 3,000px 2,000px
- They also offer videos (although they are around 5 minutes each and I wouldn't call them the highlight of the site)
- Tons and tons of models and an incredible amount of outfits (anything from Halloween costumes to secretary, nurse and night gowns) Tons of stockings and any type of underwear or stocking that you can think off.
- A pretty active forum with many members and wembasters posting all sorts of behind the scenes info.
- Pretty decent search function that lets you find several per-selected categories quickly (want to find all girls with petite breasts, or all girls in a Dorothy costume?)
- If you get onlyallsites you have a network with a few similar sites.
Cons:
- This is a very softcore site. If I had to compare it with anything mainstream I'd say it's Maxim with a bit more boob.
- Videos are rather awkward (they don't have any sound and many of the girls look very nervous as they stare at the camera. In one video I watched you can hear some crows in the background, another one some car sounds... the whole thing just felt amateurish and awkward )
- Some photo sets are mislabeled and the girls don't even get nude/ show their breasts.
- They have pretty big ads on the main page and there seems to be no way to get rid of them. Also they have a bunch of "interactive" ads to their live camera shows which can get frustrating.
- They have a few shots with two girls, but they never really touch each other or kiss. It just feels like a bit of a waste.
- More model related search options would be nice. I'd like to see all models in a certain age range or of a certain ethnicity/ hair color etc.
- Some inconsistencies in how sets are saved
Bottom Line:
First of all don't join this site expecting hardcore action. In fact don't even expect to see every model fully nude. This site is one of the most softcore ones I have ever joined (including playboy and met-art).
Another huge downside is that the videos are not up to modern standards. They are all very short (under 10 minutes)often not very high quality and I found them to be rather awkward.
Let me explain what I mean about awkward videos. Most of the scenes I watched featured the model introducing herself then trying to dance to nonexistent music. You can hear noises from the outside (as well as camera noises) and most of the girls seem confused as to what they should do. They rub themselves, but don't really play with their breasts or vagina. They try to dance and pull their hair up, but somehow it just feels like they were given no direction past "look sexy"
The scenes are not helped by the fact that the camera usually just sits in one position, instead of doing some panning or close ups. This site is all about stockings and costumes, so why the heck not zoom onto the girls feet or pan on their buts. Also I understand that the site is softcore, but I think it would be just fine to show the girls slowly let their hands go towards their vagina, you know, imply that they are sexual and willing to pleasure themselves... just saying.
Some of the better videos featured the girls changing outfits or answering fan questions. Both of these types of scenes are much, much better. If the girl is actually doing something (like putting on new stockings or laughing over "sexy" questions) the video actually becomes interesting. Otherwise I feel it's just an exercise in awkward silence.
I wish that instead of the silent stripping scenes we have now they would give us some behind the scenes videos of the photo-shoots. I think that would end up being much sexier than seeing a girl twirl to the sound of a camera recording.
Anyhow this site is not about the videos, it's all about gorgeous photos and they truly deliver when it comes to images. The site offers some pretty impressive high resolution images along with tons and tons of good looking models in many varied outfits. You can find any type of stocking, underwear and skirt combo you can think of. They even have a pretty large selection of Halloween themed costumes.
Uniforms, secretary, cheerleaders, tennis, ballet, gym outfits, all kinds of socks... you get the idea.
Unfortunately they don't have a lot of variation in the locations they shoot and almost all sets are extremely brightly lit. I would have liked some more outdoors scenes as well as more mood light (a fireplace or a bathtub with candles or what not) After browsing the site for a few hours I could recognize the setting for the secretary scene and there seems to be a snow white outfit that at least 7 models use, also don't even get me started on the red riding hood or the hooters girls.
More cosplay outfits, more corsets and shoes, more locations for the scenes and more focus on mood would help.
Now don't get me wrong, I am listing all my cons here, but in the end I saved thousands of images from this network. The models they have are exclusive and extremely hot. Also they usually have more than five sets with each model so if you really like a girl you can see her in multiple outfits and often with multiple hair styles as well.
Another nice thing is that they focus a lot on the girls faces and some of the models are incredibly cute.
I do wish they had a better model index though. Right now the model page has one image for each models and the photo is not always very clear. Also it's almost always a full body shot, which makes it hard to see the girls face.
So the bottom line is that the site is great if you want softcore glamor shots of girls. As a bonus you get some videos and access to a pretty active community that discusses the girls, talks about upcoming features and, as far as I can tell webmasters who actually listen to the users.
There are some downsides and they need to do some more work, add more navigation options (maybe a quick way to sort the top rated models, or an improved thumbnail system). Better directed and edited videos and a few less ads in the member section would also be nice.
Nonetheless overall this is a great glamor site. If the girls played with toys or with themselves more this would be an incredible place. Right now I'd say it's great for anyone very interested in different outfits and stockings and okay for the great majority. A solid 80 for their target market, a 60 or so if you want more nudity and hardcore action.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The content comes tick and fast. I am a member of onlyallsites, which includes the main site, onlytease, as well as onlsecetaries, onlyopaques and onlysilkandsatin. The main site has three new sets every day and the others one per day.
Given the volume, there is usually something every day to enjoy. For this site to appeal, though, you really have to like pretty clothes on pretty girls, and if you do, then there is going to be something there for you. Given the wide range of taste out there though, not every set will press your buttons.
Secondly, the models are often very, very pretty. OT is a British site, and they look for the kind of girl-next-door, fresh-faced models so beloved of 'Page 3' in the UK. That is not to everyone'#s taste, but if you like slim, pretty girls, 22-28, often with larger than average breasts, then you will not be dissapointed.
OT encourages and responds to member input. There's a well-attended forum and the site owners monitor and respond to user requests.
Cons:
Video quality is occasionally iffy. Sometimes, shots go out of focus, and the direction is often samey and uninspired, as if the cameraman has a standard script of shots to get through during the session.
Image quality is better, but sometimes sufffers from the same lack of imagination.
Finally, the classification of which sets go where is sometimes bizarre. Onlyopaques has more non-opaque sets than opaque ones, which often seem to end up in onlytease.
Bottom Line:
This is a huge, well-run, original site. It does what it says on the tin - tease. 99% of sets have no nudity. Some don't even go topless. You really have to like girls clothed to be in their target market.
If you do though, then you are in luck.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-19-1010:50am (Update History) Reason: This site is starting to seriously annoy me. Today's video update was at an unacceptable 640x480px at 1469 total bitrate. Lousy picture!
Pros:
At present 657 models, 913.663 images and 1854 videos according to their tour .. that's a lot.
Mostly beautiful girls. Sexy lingerie and hosiery.
Frequent updates.
Excellent picture quality offered in three different resolutions (largest 2000x3000px).
Zipped downloads.
Easy navigation and elaborate search engine.
Most recent videos are in 720p HD with a bitrate over 10000.
Cons:
The most disappointing con: I found a real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos and her most recent video, published as recently as August 2010, is in 640x480 AVI format (approx 50MB) and of horrible quality.
In general the older videos, and you don't have to go back far, are just terrible. I have watched plenty of videos with the same technical specifications on other sites that were much better in clarity and quality.
Catering to a younger crowd only. There are tons of picture sets featuring thongs and stay ups but very few featuring full back panties or camisoles etc. There is not one mature face in the crowd.
Picture sets in general spend too much time on the fully clothed.
Bottom Line:
Quite frankly the eighty I gave this site is for the technical quality of its picture sets and for its elaborate search features.
The high resolution picture sets are great even though most did not appeal to me because they are too "young" for my taste when it comes to lingerie. See above.
I am managing to get my money's worth from the recent HD movies because, even though they might not exactly feature the lingerie I was craving to see, I love the girls and their British accents!
A good tease only site for softcore lovers, especially younger ones who grew up with thongs and stay-ups and pantyhose. For me it is a disappointment. Too bad I really had high hopes!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# I have been a member for about ten times and still am excited enough about it; taken my breath away enough to do another review.
# Only Tease is one of the most erotic brands of softcore I have seen; a must see database for softcore and panty, hosiery, and foot and shoe fetish lovers.
#Prestige section which is premium quality glamour
#711 x 1066; 1365x2048; 2000x3000 photos
# enormous amount of photos over 850,000
#collection of models and overall photo quality
#price: only 24.95 a month
# offers fastrcks that members can use to see future updates Each membership starts with about 10 to see 10 future shoots or vids
# I look at all of the updates; just a solid amount of models-
Cons:
# the same set is usually the same for a lot of the photo shoots
# this is not a hardcore site. Its a niche site dedicated to softcore, hosiery, and foot fetish.
videos are outnumbered about 4 or 5 to one
Bottom Line:
The power of Only Tease- I've done so many reviews; even redoing and updating a review for the main site Only Tease; and I have spent a lot of time doing so.
I hope that softcore lover geared towards erotic softcore photos and videos won't miss out on such a fine database of gorgeous and mostly uk models. For only 24.95- its a great buy. I hope people won't miss out- but some will because they may think that softcore is too soft to be erotic but OT has proven to be the opposite of that Its taken my breath away just as much as some of my prior fav site reviews.
I have spent around 24.95 x 10 months for Only Tease member ships or about $250
without thinking much about it and probably will keep the 24.95 a month going though I should join the multi month or only all sites to save a little.
plenty of panty and bum closeups, uniform; tennis, ballerina, cheerleader; hosiery; premium prestige section shich is where they have the models pose in the nice sets. Vids are done both inside and outside and usually consist of the model primping and stripping their clothes off
but I would suggest Only Tease membership for any softcore lover- its really a reliable site in terms of overall quality and I have still yet to see all of the updates- more than I have time to look at.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots and lots of great looking girls, simply spoilt for choice.
Mega sexy outfits, these girls are very well dressed.
Shed loads of content, thousands of photosets and in choice of sizes too.
Good value for money (for a month, maybe not on an ongoing basis).
Easy to navigate and find what you want.
Cons:
Many of the videos are a bit naff.
The photos although good big size, can be blurry a lot of the time.
For a British site there seem to be too many non-british girls here.
Bottom Line:
Wasn't sure if this site was going to do it for me what with it being very soft core, but I was very pleasantly surprised. I do like my British girl sites and this one is up there as the best of them when it comes to the quality of the girls, there is babe after babe after babe, there really is a glut of great looking girls here and more often than not they are well presented in sexy feminine outfits. My only complaint with the girls is that there seems to be rather a lot of non-british girls which isn't necessarily a problem but when you consider this is supposed to be a british girl site you do feel just slightly cheated, they are however gorgeous so maybe I'm just being picky.
The photosets are great with a choice of sizes and very big pictures, but there's a lot of blurry pictures and not sure why this is, is it the compression or the standard of photography I'm not expert enough to know. The sets can be very repetitive and boring when they needn't be, it's like you get photosets with well over 100 photos and so many shots for a set where the girl is only getting topless or mild nude means a lot of very samey shots, it's almost as if they they are doing all they can to go for quantity over quality at times, several shots of the same pose for every pose just to bump up the figures and boast how many images the site offers.
One thing that gets right up my nose, is the fact they deceive and rate a set as nude when infact the model doesn't get nude, maybe that's intentional as part of the whole 'tease' thing but I'm not convinced, if they don't get nude then don't call it nude as it's misleading.
The videos are ok, but for a site of this size and standing I must admit to expecting better. I surprisingly prefer getting off to these great looking sexily dressed girls teasing and stripping slowly more so than the usual rude straight to it porn, but the general picture quality is lacking somewhat for a site as big as this.
Anyway am running out of characters so better sum up and say that this site is one of the best I've seen despite it's few negative points, it is well well worth a months subscription to as you get lots for your money and the girls are awesome, but although there appears to be plentiful updates I'm not sure they would justify a permanent recurring sub (that's not me anyway unless I win the lotto). You won't regret joining this site, so if you haven't already then go do it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
amazing pictures
amazing models
nice site layout
updated daily
and amazing models again, lol because they are so sexy
Cons:
bad videos
needs to be a bit more sexual, ie more nude instead of mainly tease and topless
Bottom Line:
onlytease is an amazing site with possibly the best pictures around but what really lets this site down is the movies, the lighting is poor and does not match the pictures whatsoever, also once the video is better it would be great to see more video updates like the same amount of picture updates.
The girls are amazing but the site needs to push past the PG a little bit more than it is. This is a site I join once every 2-3 months, sometimes a little longer
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content.
Large amount of great and average looking british models.
Fine updates - daily. Either photosets or videos - MOSTLY photosets.
Good mix in styles of different outfits - well, this is a SOFTCORE FETISH-KIND of site.
Zip for photosets.
Photos in ok quality/size.
Ok navigation and layout.
Fair/average price-level.
Cons:
NOT 2009 kind of videos.
Generally low/average video-quality.
Too few videos compared to photosets.
Very softcore - but ok, you can see that from the previews - that's the style of this site.
Marketing-promiss of HD-videos do NOT stick.
Some scenes are a bit stereotype - with re-use of same outfits too many times.
Some models do not even go topless.
Too many videos are photo-shoot-style.
Anoying password repeat when you download.
Bottom Line:
This site sure does a lot for marketing the product.
Wish they'd do the same for the videos and especially the quality os those videos.
At the latest PR-mail I got in March, they claimed:
"Now HD-videos".
Empty words!
Because the new videos are no more viewing-HD or even in bigger file-size or bottomline NOWHERE near HD. BTW the size of those newer files are the same as it's been for the last couple of years.
For a major 2009-site their videos sucks - I normally do not use words like that in a review - but with this site: it's the case.
It's a pity with the whole video-deal at Only Tease, because the concept is/could be very good.
Those videos:
Average file-size: 50-60 Mb.
640x480 (that ought to say it).
Only avi.
But ok, apart from the frustrations about videos in 2009 at this site, the photosets are way better.
Three sizes of zip-download: Standard, Extra and Ultra. From aproxx. 10 Mb over 35 Mb and up to 100 Mb (2048x1056).
And even the standard photo-sizes are ok.
NB: When writing this review and scanning the site again, I now see ONE new video placed today (17th of april 2009) where the size suddenly is more like it: 285 MB - and NOW: wmv. Cheers! - ONE out of 1500.
The video is with one Ashley Massey and the viewing-quality is decent - not more. (and this one is quite boring).
But, ok - if Only Tease - finally - does videos this quality, I'd sneak my score up to 80 - next time. If I ever be back after 3-4 terms - doubt it, though.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-USA porn stars trying on panties but rarely having sex.
-Cumshot always on panties/ass/back of model.
-100% exclusive original unique content.
-Some big names, like Courtney Cummz or Jenna Haze (2 scenes).
-Some attempts at reality porn: simple scripts and locations.
-60+ videos. WMV or Quicktime in various resolutions.
-Max resolution: 65% 854x480 2000kbps; 35% 640x480 1000kbps.
-Video length varies a lot: from 4 up to 30 minutes.
-18 photo galleries: 75% 1200x800; 25% 600x400.
-100 pictures on average per set; 50% landscape, 50% portrait.
-Full access to other sites from this company (not updating).
-Free tour lists all updates with release date and trailer.
-ccbill.
Cons:
-Erratic updates: 1 in Jan/09, 1 in Feb/09, 3 in Mar/09.
-Very little pussy penetration: handjob or blowjob at most.
-For a panties site, there's too much emphasis on blowjobs.
-Very few of the models masturbate; lots of panty touching.
-Most scenes are POV; last scene had a cameraman, though.
-Always the same guy; he talks a lot.
-Guy often jerks himself off for a long time to finish scene.
-Not enough panty variety: same panties in some scenes.
-Panties not always match bra; most of the time, no bra at all.
-Regional pricing.
Bottom Line:
I came across Panty Pops while browsing the Panties niche section here. I'll try to join some of the sites but this was the first one, mainly because I knew most of the USA stars, it had a low price and network access. Scenes are always very similar: there's a model and a pile of a dozen panties; she teasingly tries on some of them, following instructions from the guy that is filming her; the guy takes out his cock and some blowjob and cock-panties interaction ensues. Absolutely no penetration except a handful of scenes.
I don't get why there's so little penetration. It's not that the site is deceiving since it's true to its name: the guy eventually pops on the panties and ass, with the model always lying flat on her stomach. It's the fact that all models are seasoned porn stars who have done lots of regular boy-girl scenes. It looks weird to see the guy not pull the panties apart and get down to business. That's what I was hoping to see but it happens in less than 10% of the scenes. On the other hand, almost every scene contains some blowjob. Since this site seems to be a one man job (performing, filming, editing, etc), I couldn't help but think it is just an excuse for this guy to enjoy some quality time with a few USA porn stars. Are blowjob-only rates lower?
Another thing I found weird was the panties reuse from scene to scene. Looks like the guy buys them by the dozen at Victoria's Secret (lots have the Pink collection logo) but he makes them last for several scenes; many of them are tried on by 4 or 5 different models. It looks cheap since they are probably bought for less than 5 USD each; it also brings a sense of dja vu. Models must have some panties of their own: why not ask the models to bring them on set and try them on camera? That would bring a higher variety of panties to the scenes and they may also have matching bras.
Despite its shortcomings, I feel the content is very unique, the cast is often stellar and it's more than decently produced and packaged to recommend it to anyone interested in this niche. Don't expect much from the other sites in the network: they are no longer updating; there were also a couple more sites that have been taken down and are not accessible any more.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...
Easy navigation
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
Cons:
Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)
No photosets
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
Bottom Line:
Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez. Panty Amateur seems like a sister-site to Panty Maniacs - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the "mothersite" - PM.
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.
WMV: 960x540.
No stream.
And no photosets.
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!
Some of the models - but not the "finest" - apears on for exampel Suburban Amateurs with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar Only Tease...
Still Panty Amateur is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.
Anybody knows where - if at all?
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc.
Cons:
-Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line:
I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.
Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1 Lots of sexy looking girls young and old (not too old of coarse)
2 most pic sets of each model come in 3 sizes.
3 I found good navigation
4 daily regular updates are good in both pics and movies.
Cons:
1 password needed every time you download a movie. very enoying especially when its a computer generated user and password when you join. lots of copy and pasting if you don't have a good memory!
2 pic resolutions seem cloned in a lot of the sets. meaning its a normal size small pic then blown up in size. very grainy and washed. not all but many.
3 this site needs to find photographers who know how to take picturs and movies. if the camera person isn't standing on their heads or listing to the side the pictures appear blury and washed. kind of very enoying if i say so!tipical for a porn site to assume what the subscribers like to see.
3 movies are lame. not exciting. lots of strip tease now hard core. I like a good strip and tease myself thats why I joined. however if you are looking for panties and clothing tease, I know lots better sites.
4 types of panties, and dresses and other outfits the models all seem to where. you will see the same outfits on lots of models no veriety.
Bottom Line:
bottom line for me is, I came, I saw, I will be leaving. untill they get photographers who know how to take a good clean clear picture in real high res. I wont be back.
its a good site for the first time visitor and one who loves that sexy lady looking at you type pic.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Young attractive girls
-Good amount of content
-Good quality videos
Cons:
-Updates once every blue moon
-There's ads eventhough you pay
Bottom Line:
First off this is like an advanced manual pleasure site. That is you won't see any penetration or much else.
The cam is POV, and high quality at that and you basically watch a girl grind on the guy, give him a handjob with her panties, and simple things like that.
As far as I could tell there's no download limit. I downloaded 4 files simultaneously while browsing the site and no problems. The same can be said with daily limits.
The big downfall to this site is that there's no search feature to find a certain girl by name or anything. Not a big deal, but it would be nice to see it.
The videos are high quality, the girls are pretty attractive, there are a few screen caps, but lack of updates are can be annoying as well as a steep price just to watch a half-naked girl jack off a guy without much else.
IT goes without say that unless this is your cup of tea you'll probably pass right by without a second thought.
Rating of 74 due to the quality, background work, the girls, lack of updates, as well as a few smaller things. After a year you should have a slightly better site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I can't add too much here that hasn't been said before (that'll come later), but here goes:
Photography is excellent.
Image sizes are big, high-resolution, at least for the newer sets.
There is a very good selection of models -- essentially something for everyone.
There is just a ton of content -- you'll get your money's worth, that's for sure.
The site is well-organized, with videos easy to find and zip files for the images.
Cons:
Difficult to add much here, either, but here's my perspective:
This is really my "bottom line," but the thing you need to grasp is that this is REALLY soft-core. More about that, below.
The re-use of garments is a real downer, as some just aren't that "sexy" to begin with, and plenty of them just aren't flattering at all, especially on some models.
While most models wind up topless, some don't even do that. And I'd say that a few might even be better off if they didn't go topless, anyway.
So, the site "needs work." New/better outfits would help, as would some kind of attitude to "make every shot count," rather than just publishing thousands of ho-hum shots.
Bottom Line:
And thus, my bottom line: Again, this is just really, really, REALLY soft-core. I'm sure everyone's tastes are different, but I'd think that most folks would find easily half of the site contents to be "not sexy at all in any way" -- fully-clothed shots in not-really-very-sexy outfits. Other folks might bump that up to something like 70% or 80% -- it's just a veritable ton of stuff that, at least to me, is "tossable."
So, does the rest of the content make up for all of the tossers? "Well, only just barely." Again, there's just an overall "lack of sexiness" in a lot of it. Some sets would be great if it weren't for the ill-fitting outfits that don't flatter the models. And so on.
In the end, there is some really great content here. Probably well worth a month's subscription. But there's a TON of stuff you'll have to throw away in order to find the jewels you'll want to keep.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
