Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company HVL
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 73 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Pornstar Network

1. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
50*
Wraith0711 (0) 08-30-24  08:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Best of the beautiful Canadian Girls
Photo sets
Cons: Site is an archive
Absolutely no site is updating
Site has been gutted with all but the solo girls site being removed
Only "new" videos are being added through moviez which of course is an extra charge to watch
Bottom Line: This site was once a powerhouse but sadly has aged horribly. At least 75% or more of the network has been removed, Thinking about it, I'm 100% positive that all Elegant Angel content has been removed which was the bulk of the network after they cut ties with Doghouse Digital. Now all that is left is just the solo girls sites and three other sites. There used to be like 50-60 sites here on the network, most likely more. All that's left is 14 sites. The girl sites are well worth joining if you've never seen them, Christine Young, Cherry Potter, Cute Angie, and so on. Most of it was shot in early to mid 2000's so it's extremely low definition. No updates at all and the stuff they are posting is content from moviez witch is extremely old recycled crap from the same era.

The exclusive content from Doghouse has sadly been lost to time. They never posted any of it to their own site. I was just devastated when I dropped my external drive and lost all the original content and rejoined to find all their stuff gone. (This was 2015ish BTW) A lot of the Lesbo 101 stuff was lost too when that site went belly up. Thankfully 90% of it is here on flirty pussy.

But the loss of the Elegant Angel stuff is a devastating loss to the site. This is when Cytheria and Tiana Lynn were the porn Queens of the era. That content (some of it Exclusive) is was top notch and just a horrible loss. Hopefully it's on one their sites.

Bottom line, If you have ever joined this site, move on. There is nothing new to see here, the sites here haven't updated in over 10+ years.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sapphic

2. Club Sapphic (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
OlivialikeChloe (Suspended) 09-10-15  02:25pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: There is some good lesbian stuff that's on here, great women, great scenes, the women do exercise because towards the end of the video, both were sweating and exhausted, so I was like wow, that's working it. I like this site.

The intro page was good looking but the member pages are blah, but the women in this site make up for the dull member layout, but just barely.
The women are great on this site, so its worth checking out but maybe not for the full price this site thinks its worth. The porn discount is appreciated and the videos are DRM-free.
Cons: Sign-up is tricky, I ended buying access to two other sites, moviez and something else, I cancelled those but was still initially charged for those two.

The women are great, scenes were great, haven't found any cons (bad) with the women and the scenes.

Download manager works off and on, the site changes download links so that sucked.

Lost access because when download link changed, I re-logged in but the random access key function stopped working and my access became blocked.

Easy enough, I filled out a support ticket. No response since then, I attempted the chat function but received "no webpage" or "script error" Fortunately I was able to cancel this subscription without a hitch and let the remaining time lapse
Bottom Line: There's great content on this site but tread lightly.

The sign-up is tricky, I ended up buying two other site subscriptions I wasn't interested in or wanted.

I got locked out and did a support ticket and haven't heard from them again.

I was fortunate enough to cancel my subscription without encountering any problems.

My suggestion: Sign up and watch for any additional sneaky stuff. Get your subscription ID and cancel, try it for a month and if you have no glitches you can resubscribe - but if you do encounter problems, at least you know you won't be charged for a glitch site that you can't get into. I was able download 4 DRM-free video clips so at least that was a good thing.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

3. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
51*
standard (0) 02-09-15  04:23pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 02-16-15  07:56am  (Update History)
Reason: Discovered many of the streaming videos aren't available for viewing, either.
Pros: Credit card appears to have been accepted without problems.

Edit 2-16-15- *No longer applies, score lowered to 51 upon discovery, explanation below*- Non-HD streaming available for all your lower-quality streaming needs.

Occasional HD content available for download without "upgrade".
Cons: - Very little content available for downloading without "upgrading"

- Download managers will queue multiple downloads but the links won't work for long (download links shift every few minutes).

- Most of the highest commonly-available video quality appears to be 720x408. You can possibly get higher quality by falling for the "upgrade" racket, but I don't know for sure.

- I seriously doubt the "upgrade" would suddenly make download managers work.
Bottom Line: I got a $5 promo in an email for the site and thought, "Sure, why not?"

Turns out $5 is overpriced.

Want to see an example of the site's problems for yourself? Go to the link and click "pornstars", then click "R". Go to Ryan Conner. 26 videos. Awesome. But see all those little yellow boxes that say "Moviesz" at the bottom right of the previews? That indicates those videos aren't available unless you spend more money. So none of the videos on Ryan Conner's first page are available with the membership you just bought. Click on page 2. Scroll down, and you'll see four videos without "Moviesz" on the preview. Four of 26 listed are available for download with the membership you just paid for.

"Hmm," you think, "maybe it's because they're older and she's not active anymore..." (I don't know if she is or not, but for the sake of argument let's go with it.)

"Maybe we should try a more recent actress," you think while staying in the "R"s and clicking Roxanne Hall. "Wow, 86 videos. Awesome!"

But only 13 of the 86 listed are available to you, and at least two of those are repeats.

"Hmm, that's weird. Let's try someone else."

Faye Reagan? 6 videos available out of 20 listed.
Janet Alfano? 8 videos available out of 47 listed.
Sharon Wild? 16 videos available out of 63 listed.
Julie Silver? 9 of 36.
Shawna Lenee? 6 of 25.
Nikki Rhodes? 6 of 27.
Marsh Lord? 2 of 23
Mellanie Monroe? 3 of 16
Raquel Devine? 1 of 41.
Joey Lynn? 0 of 1.

And it just keeps going like that.

Go ahead, find your favorite and check. All of the ones with "Moviesz" in the corner are unavailable for downloading unless you pay more.

(FWIW, you can view the unavailable-to-download videos in low to marginal streaming quality. You just can't download them.)

Even the videos that are available for downloading are a pain to get since download managers don't work.

In summary, only around 15% of the total videos you see offered are available for download unless you want to spend more money, and you'll have to babysit your computer to get what you want of the ones that *are* offered.

The site somehow manages to feel like a ripoff even at $5.

Avoid.

**EDIT 2-16**

Streaming video? Some of the clips are available for viewing, and up to half of them aren't. Here's what you get:

http://i.imgur.com/tH7eKu0.jpg

It happened enough that I decided to edit this review.

Site owners: This is the kind of stuff that makes people stop visiting a *free* site, much less a pay one.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cover My Face

4. Cover My Face (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
observerone (0) 08-03-14  12:49am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: There are some well done bukakke scenes from the Cover My Face site and from other sites on the Pornstar Network. There are over 25 good scenes. There is access to a huge array of videos from the Pornstar Network. Connection and download speed is good.
Cons: Many scenes don't have more than 11 guys cumming on the girl.
Bottom Line: Worth a subscription of 1-2 months to preview and download the bukkake videos you like.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

5. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
50*
mikebarrx (Suspended) 06-18-14  08:25am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality downloads
- Customer services is responsive
- Can download streams on Moviesz+ content with the right browser
Cons: - Deceiving membership offerings with upsells everywhere. Pay $20 from one link and you only get basic access, do it from another and you get exclusive access, etc.

- Most content is older than advertised and available elsewhere

- Downloads are big and bigger, no clip options

- Several dead sites that have not been updated in YEARS! When they do "update" they retread old content.

- Updates are very infrequent across the board. This site doesn't hold a birthday candle to it's prime competitor.
Bottom Line: I have been a member 3 separate times, and 3 times I left disappointed. Never again. It doesn't live up to the ads. They are lazy and clearly want annuities without effort. It isn't worth paying 10 cents for it. I hate to be harsh, but they earned it. Even registering is a painful experience.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

6. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
50*
bluebawa (0) 01-29-14  01:07am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site downloads satisfatorily.

It was easy to cancle the membership
Cons: I am a member now 15 days & in those 15 days I have been blocked 5 times saying someone else has accesed your account.It used to take 24 hrs for a response from them to reactivate it again but I got fed up & I wrote to them a real nasty email & now scince the last 2 days the site is apperently behaving its self.

The site has a cap of 100 vids per 24 hrs.
The site will allow Qing but only the first batch that is put up is downloaded and the rest come out as errors.

If u put more than more than 6 vids together to download the download manager freezes up I use the latest verson of IDM.

Content is satisfactory though lots of stuff is common to other sites too.

I have cancelled my m,embership on the first day itself as it blocked me out for 24 hrs.
Bottom Line: WOULD NOT RECOMEND IT TO BECAUSE OF THE DOWNLOAD ISSUES
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

7. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
83*
skippy (0) 02-02-13  09:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Incredibly large collection of porn video segments. (65,000 of them!!!)
Wide variety of video types.
Just about every major porn star out there for the last decade or more. (10,000 of them!)
Navigation is not bad considering the size and nmumber of sites.
Cons: There is SO MUCH stuff that it is a challenge to sift through if you have specific tastes.
Videos are porn movie segments, so the quality of video and performacne varies a LOT.
Much of the material is standard def and really old.
Many of the videos are very poor quality.
Only a few of the videos I've seen so far are HD, making them hard to watch on a large screen. Most of these have OK quality and fair content. (You can search for 1080 in advanced search)
The videos are not dated, either for video release date or publication on the site. (But you may see the release date at the very beginning of the video....as far back as 2001!)
It is impossible to determine the quality of a video before clicking on it as there is no resolution data.
There are a lot of industry "veterans"...only a few of which still look good, if you catch my drift.
Bottom Line: OK, I have to start by saying that I am not a traditional porno movie guy. I have a huge collection of solo softcore and hardcore images and HD videos created on sites like Twisty's, Ron Harris, Digital Dream Girls, Passion HD, ALSscan, etc. Typically, videos on these sites are created especially for the sites and are studio grade and HD. I'm only trying to establish a baseline here so you know where I'm coming from.

Pornstars Network is like a day on Haulover beach, a nude beach in Miami. There is a whole lot to see, but you have to sift through a lot of really mediocre and a moderate amount of really bad stuff to find the real gems. There are some gems, though, which makes the visit worth it at least once.

The first thing that struck me about this site is the incredible volume of videos. There are 65,000 of them spread out across 52+ sites. And the different sites include almost every taste. All of the videos are segments from a DVD lasting about 10-25 minutes in length.
The 52 individual sites include niche sites like:
Tiny ass
My MILF story
Hostile Fucking
Club Smash
Black dick, round ass
My first sex video
Jizz Mouthwash
Only DP
And a bunch of sites dedicated to indivdual male or female porn stars.

Navigation is pretty good. The sites are listed by both name and type. Once in a site, the thumbnails show a few screenshots of the video and once you click on the video, you can see an entire set of screenshots before watching or downloading the movie. You can also search by pornstar name to list all of a pornstars videos. That's nice if you happen to like, say, Tori Black, and want to see all of her stuff. The site also lists, in order of popularity, every model they have. The list starts with Sasha Grey at number 1 and some girl named Krystal at number 10,057! Really! 10,057 pornstars! And, like I said before, the site lists 65,000 videos! So, if you are into porn videos, this place is a treasure trove.

OK, now for the more critical stuff. Like porn movies themselves, the vast majority of videos here just aren't that great. The video quality is marginal, direction is poor, the camera jitters or the angle is bad, the acting is awful, the performers are not appealing, etc. Pretty much ALL of these videos are not HD. Again, there are 65,000 videos! So even if 60,000 of them sucked, 5,000 would still qualify as good or better. That's way more than a lot of other sites, but the challenge is sifting through the junk to find the gems.

There are some other annoyances, too, but some of them are more about my tastes than the site. A LOT of these videos are really old by Internet standards. Number 1 on the pornstar list is Sasha Grey. Damn, she is hot, but she stopped doing porn in 2009. Jenna Haze, #4, has videos from 2001. I can understand how several of the top 20 can be, um, veteran porn starts, but none of this material is in HD, making it really hard to watch on a computer or bigscreen.
Much of the material is very, very raw. I realize that is the point in some cases, but many of the pornstars that are goddesses on sites like Twisty's or Digital Dreamgirls are just kind of cute at best in these videos. Tori Black, for example, does some terrific stuff on Twisty's and looks about as badass as any girl I've ever seen on that site. In the videos here, she's almost plain. That's more than a little dissapointing.
And then there are the European models that show up in niches like "Auditions" and "First time Videos". You've seen a lot of them on other sites and many are beautiful enough to stop a 747 in mid-flight. One of the reasons I sometimes prefer images to videos is because many of these girls are ungodly beautiful until they move, walk, talk or act. Some European and latin women tend to exagerate their expression as part of the culture. This site is the best example of this that I've ever seen. Some of these girls acting is so hideous that it is actually embarrasing to watch! I never thought that was possible before.... (Exception: Bambi)
There is a lot of other schlocky stuff too.
I know anal sex has been popular in porn for many years, but does it have to be included in almost every sex scene?
It also seems like, although they have nearly every pornstar out there, they DO NOT have those pornstars best work. Instead its the star's early work or off-beat or fetish stuff. There are 57 Sasha Grey videos on this site. Sasha was a pretty kinky pornstar but I KNOW she did some really nice one-on-one stuff as I've seen it elsewhere. Not here. Most of her videos here are gangbangs with 5+ guys, group sex scenes where she gets totally creamed or odd fetish scenes. Not a single straight sex scene with her on the whole site. Too bad.

OK, I'm out of space...
Bottom line: If you are into porn videos, you simply must visit this site, but be prepared to do a lot of sifting to find the stuff that really floats your boat.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Brain Pass

8. Brain Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
60*
JoeM (0) 11-01-12  08:08pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of content. Some from good studios like Elegant Angel. You can download and have lots of choices for resolutions.
Cons: Most content is over a year old. The site is not updating much. Once you join to get to the new content you have to buy a "premium" membership at a substantial cost. Overall this site looks like it is a has been ghost town. I would not recommend it... steer clear.
Bottom Line: There are plenty of better, more honest choices out there. Steer clear.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

9. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
90*
rearadmiral (0) 10-31-12  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 175 studios (some major, some niche)
- 9000+ DVDs
- Many individual scenes independent of DVDs
- Some exclusive sites
- Updates daily
- Adds new studios
- Supports download managers (IDM for me)
- No obvious time-outs for files
- TBP / PU special membership makes it really worthwhile
Cons: - Not all sites update
- Like other DVD mega-sites, there is a lot of crap to sort through while looking for the gems
Bottom Line: I wrote a review of this site about a year ago after my first membership here and after re-reading that I can say that it all still applies. I know that I’m not the only PU member who regularly visits the same sites so my perspective in this second review is to give some thoughts about whether it is worth joining a second or later time. I’ll cut to the chase, the answer to that is certainly yes, but it isn’t as easy a decision to make as with some other sites.

PSN suffers from a similar problem to other DVD sites, namely the availability of new material to keep updating the site. Like Videobox, PSN uploads five DVD titles per day. Unlike VB though, PSN doesn’t put the complete title up at once. You may see a DVD that you really want only to find that the scene you really want is due to be posted later. The good news is that you usually won’t have to wait more than a few days to get all the scenes in that DVD. The problem with that uploading schedule for both PSN and VB is that they have to upload a lot of crap to keep to it. The good news is that, in my opinion, PSN uploads less crap than VB.

The site is large, with over 9000 DVDs already posted from 175 studios. The studios range from the biggest of the big names like Elegant Angel and Private to more niche oriented studios. In short, there is likely something here for everyone. It appears that PSN continues to add studios because, as I noted in a comment a few weeks ago, they are now the only site I’m aware of that has Max Hardcore DVDs available for download. Yes, Max is polarizing, but I still think it reflects well on PSN to licence and make available these titles, even if they are the edited American versions.

The site continues to offer downloads in multiple formats, with AVI, H.264 and MPEG being the most common. The H.264 files come in at 720x540 and look decent so only true ‘size queens’ will miss higher definition scenes.

I use Internet Download Manager and had no problems. The links didn’t time out in the time it took to download them and download speeds were as fast as I see with most porn sites.

One problem that I perceived (and am open to being corrected on if I’m wrong) is that there is some overlap within the sites themselves. Take the site Sperm Cocktail which offers a lot of Brandon Iron’s material including his series “A Good Source of Iron.” Sorting the site by DVDs gives you all the DVDs obviously, which you can then click on and download the individual scenes from each. You can also sort by scene which appears to includes a lot that isn’t on the DVDs but that is mixed in with the same scenes that are on the DVDs which means that you will likely end up downloading some stuff twice. This is no big deal if you don’t care to associate a scene with the DVD it is from, but for those of us who like to organize by DVD it can be an issue.

While this likely won’t happen if you join, I will point out that both times I did I had initial problems and I’ve read of others having similar problems. The first time I joined they had just started offering the full access to TBP/PU members and I got missed. This time after paying my fee I was given limited trial access. The good news is that on both occasions customer service was helpful and resolved the problems quickly.

One advantage to a rejoin is that during your first time through you’ve likely downloaded all the material you wanted from the several sites that no longer update. Most of these are solo model sites where the model has left the business. This is an advantage on a rejoin because PSN still has a download limit of 100 files per 24 hour period and many of the files on the older sites are small so you can hit the limit. I’m no fan of limits but I have to admit that the one here is pretty reasonable. It would have to be a rainy, hung-over Sunday to hit the limit.

One point that bears mentioning even though it is a repeat of what I said in my original review is that if you want to join this site it is very important to join through TBP / PU. Joining through TBP / PU makes what might be a decent membership and makes it a great one. The difference is that joining through here gets you access to the otherwise-optional Moviez material which is really the bulk of the good material on the site.

In my opinion, PSN is definitely worth a re-join. They continue to expand and even add new studios. They offer a great collection of mainstream American porn along with a good mix of lesser known European material and even some niche stuff. I’ll definitely be back again too.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

10. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
65*
namenick (0) 01-30-12  12:51pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: navigation setup
frequency of updates
system to favorite certain stars / scenes
Cons: content feels outdated / old
much of updated content is old movies / DVD's
much of updated content is from studios I personally don't care for
Bottom Line: Bottom line is that VideosZ and Xmovies are pretty much the same and I thought updated content was of higher quality. I'm not just talking about the actual video quality, but the content of the videos. For the month I was a member they kept updating from the same lame supposed amateur series.

I think trying to be too broad and fill too many niches waters the whole thing down
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sapphic

11. Club Sapphic (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
spacenick (0) 09-10-11  09:29pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Doubt if this is a pro but this site is part of a larger site, called "Pornstarnetwork.com," and a niche part of that site is this one and its called "lesbonetwork.com" yet it is titled "clubsapphic," as are the watermarks.

The videos & pictures all appear to be part of a studio called "Sweetheart Films." The content is mostly lesbian (there is some guy listed as an actor or model, but he is an brief extra in a few scenes) Agewise its older women with younger girls (considering younger as late twenties/early thirties)

Pro 1, there are some exclusive content only found on "lesbonetwork.com" e.g. Misty Stone, Mina Meow, etc,.

Pro 2, the video files, range from older content in small MP4, WMV to newer content in large Gigabyte MP4 files (touted as 1080p HD) small watermarks in video and no DRM
Cons: What you see in the preview and tour page does not reflect the real members site, that layout is much different, the search feature isnt complete.

Con 1, I was having downloading issues, I was signed-out and when I signed-in again, I was sent to a page that accused me to stop sharing my username and password.

Tip 1: Use one browser window when viewing this site, if your browser opens a separate browser or tab, it will count as "another person" Firefox seems to be Clubsapphic friendly.

Con 2, I received a "name and password has been reset, call our customer service number" I was.. like whoa, I pay legitimate bills by calling them but to call about porn, why not be more discrete as in a email or a webchat, but to call them and dicuss credit card details, yeah I dont think so.

Con 3, Website and downloading is a problematic as in a delusional man who can believe that he can make a hard-core lesbain fall in love with him, that kind of problematic with this site
Bottom Line: There is some content, not a whole lot but a decent amount. There some content that seems to be exclusive to this site.

There are some good scenes, great women and lots of great content to be found but for me the website has major downloading issues and major disconnection Issues.

I use a download manager, set at one download at a time, my connection is fast but not that fast and so did that help with downloading a scene here and there?
Nope.

The file moved, The file is no longer available.
Incomplete file at 96%, at 91%, at 98%, etc.
I understand protecting your content, I understand hacks like to "mess up stuff," I understand people do bad things just to do bad tings.
Yeah, I know there are guys who are trying to archive a whole damn website, they're downloading everything. Its like "The greedy kid in the candy store whose stealing everything to build his own candy store in his basement."

But I also seen other sites address these issues and have done well. They do good when they seperate those "porn hoarders" from casual users.

So, would I suggest this site?

No. Site has does have some good content but it seems like this site doesn't want anyone to download or stream it

Videos are DRM-free, newer stuff in 1080p HD MP4 but I'm sticking to the smaller files in MP4 or WMV, oddly I didn't find any AVI files types.

Limited content, most good and some not so good and then some content is .. not really good at all
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

12. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
92*
messmer (Disabled) 06-08-11  03:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-29-11  04:18pm  (Update History)
Reason: Speed is generally much better than first experienced. And the longer I am with this site the more I discover its depth and how much I like it!
Pros: + 7250 DVDs, 62000 Videos (Scenes).

+ 1080p HD Videos (251 at present).

+ 59 Extra Sites.

+ Good Navigation.

+ Speed is good for me most of the time but tends to fluctuate.

+ Zipped Picture sets.
Cons: - Very unfriendly when it comes to my Firefox DTA, speed tends to be blazing at around 4MB/s but will shut down every 20 seconds or so and report a server error until I click on resume.

This forces me to stay with the download all the way. Downloads are fine with the ordinary Browser Downloader. At first I experienced much slower speeds but this must have been a fluke because now they do approach my maximum speed.

- Many videos are only available in avi, or mpg format but wmv is also available, except for the HD content which is in mp4.

- Talking about HD, I think most people would not even be aware that there is such a thing. I stumbled across them by hitting the "advanced search" link and seeing 1080p HD listed right beside the small window listing "videos" on the new page.

- Had to sign back into the site twice in the space of an hour.
Bottom Line: I like this site. It has plenty of good stuff, some of it previously unseen by me and that's unusual for what is primarily a DVD (Video) site. Especially a site so closely related to Videosz.

HD videos are of nice quality!

Their ordinary videos are not bad but could stand an upgrade. By comparison to other DVD sites and this, strangely enough, includes Videosz, they don't appear to be quite as sharp and clear.

But I am only a couple of days into my subscription so maybe I have just looked at the wrong videos so far.

It requires a bit of time to get used to the basic lay-out of the site but what's wrong with clicking a few buttons to see what's behind them.

Picture sets are generally small and taken from the beginning of a video shoot. They are, however downloadable in High Resolution at 1600x1200p size. In other words better than the general vidcaps.

All in all a good subscription at a fair price through TBP. Recommended.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Network

13. Pornstar Network (0)

Network
Newbie
90*
rearadmiral (0) 01-31-11  03:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - When you join through TBP/PU you get full access to the entire site
- Huge archive of material
- Large volume of DVD porn
- Large volume of semi-exclusive stuff
- A lot less overlap with other DVD sites that you might expect
- Wide range of genres covered
- Decent collection of 1990s porn
- Good download speeds (not extremely fast, but slightly better than average)
- Excellent customer service
- new scenes added daily
Cons: - Navigation can be confusing
- Search function doesn’t work well
- Many DVD scenes are listed under a created title that can be confusing (instead of listing it as Taylor Rain in Taylor Rain Gets Fucked in the Ass Volume 74, the scene might be listed as “hot teen brunette fucked in the ass.)
- Download limit of 100 files per day (which for most people isn’t too bad, but some of the older scenes are broken down into smaller files so that might cause more of a problem
- No HD options on even the newer stuff
- Some of the exclusive sites aren’t updating (I can’t and won’t fault PSN for this since the most likely cause is that the model has left the business)
Bottom Line: In the past when I’ve had friends ask me how they can turf their collection of 1980s Hustler mags and join the new world of internet porn, I steered them to Videobox. I’ll still do that, but I’ll also tell them to get a membership at PornStar Network too. This is a great site with access to a great mix of DVD porn and some seemingly exclusive stuff too. Many of the best models from Quebec are here. (The site is run out of Quebec, so that makes sense.)

The site also features access to over 130 porn studios, some major, some smaller. Some studios have almost 600 DVDs here. The smaller ones less. What surprised me was that there was not as much overlap with Videobox as I expected. Even in the studios that both have, there were titles here that I couldn’t get elsewhere.

One factor that could have been a serious negative has been turned into a positive and is a reward for those of us who hang out at TBP/PU. The membership for those who stumble in from the open web is tiered: your basic membership excludes access to “MovieZ” files that make up about 50% of what is on the site. That sucks, unless you join through TBP/PU. Doing so gives you full access to the entire site, and there is a lot of material here.

All the extra material that you get is accessed through PSN but it is all watermarked as VideosZ. I can’t say for sure that PSN gets you access to all of VideosZ stuff, but it must be close. If you’re considering a VideosZ membership this might be the better value.

Many of the files have some options for download, though the premium stuff through MovieZ is only available as AVI files.

Download speeds average about 650MB/sec, though that can get higher on occasion. One problem I encountered several times was that while download speeds remained the same, the navigation speed dropped off to the point where it was frustrating to use. That didn’t happen often, but it was annoying when it did.

Pictures are available on most of the exclusive sites, but I don’t download those so I don’t have a lot of detail. Zips are available.

Search and navigation functions aren’t up to standard, but once you figure it out you can muck about. Sometimes DVD scenes can be catalogued using a description that makes it harder to find if you’re looking for a star or a title.

This probably isn’t relevant now, but when I joined they were in the process of giving PU members full access and I was missed somehow. The customer service was excellent and fast. (Two thumbs up to the TBP staff for their help with this too!)

The bottom line is that not only will I recommend this site to porn buddies, I already have. The video quality and navigation are about industry standard, but the sheer volume of porn here makes this an excellent value whether you’re just starting out or whether (like me) you have enough titles to rival the best porn store in the country. To top it off, the material is a good mix of DVD and more exclusive.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sapphic

14. Club Sapphic (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
Goldfish (0) 01-26-11  07:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + A storyline is incorporated into the scenes that is easy to buy into and sexy.
+ Decent video quality: 720 x 408/4mbps
+ TBP discount
+ Some great regular models that appear in scenes with varying themes.
Cons: - Somewhat misleading depiction of the content from the non-member Home page and tour pages
- Older video content of poorer quality.
- Some of the models looking a little ragged.
Bottom Line: This is my second time back to Club Sapphic. My previous subscription was about ten months ago. At the time I gave them a fairly positive review. Unfortunately my return to the site hasn’t been as positive.

The biggest issue I have is a change in the content provided. The site is sold as a general lesbian site with young, attractive models. When I joined previously there was some variation in the model body types -- some were more amateur looking with a few imperfections, some were more modelesque, some were older, some were younger, etc. but generally there seemed to be no theme around bodytype or age.

When I returned to the site recently there appeared to be A LOT of MILF type models in younger/older scenarios. Also, there was generally more women with tattoos and bad boobs jobs (of any age).

With the decision to take the site in the MILF/younger-older direction, They should really consider re-branding the site. I still found some good clips but overall it was a disappointment because it isn't my favorite niche.

I was also a little annoyed because the splash page when you first visit the site displays all younger, pretty models with no mention or reference to the large amount of MILF content coming out in recent updates. (About three pages into the tour you start seeing some screen shots of more recent videos.)

Doing a younger/older site is fine, just sell it that way!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Load My Mouth

15. Load My Mouth (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
dracken (0) 11-08-10  09:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 616 videos and 53 picture sets, most of the videos are from 320x240 MPGs to 720x480 WMV (the images are 1600x1200 and most scenes have screencaps which are pretty crappy)

- A lot of variance in the scenes, although the focus is on oral and cumshots . Most scenes are POV with some quick interviews followed by hardcore action which ends in a cumshot.

- Some of the actions are a little more interesting with girls licking their feet, giving footjobs (including a nice footjob from Sandy Sweet) and there are some threesomes and anal scenes.

- Very quick downloads

- Streaming worked flawlessly

-The navigation and the whole network are easy to access and it's easy to look for specific scenes.

-None of the girls seem abused or humiliated, although the sex is a bit rough. Most of the girls seem to have a good time and the site feels pretty professional yet fun.
Cons: - The models could be cuter, there are many girls that look a bit on the trashy side and occasionally the make-up and lighting doesn't help. It's interesting that the same model on other sites in this network looks better (the close-up POV might be to blame as it gives a pretty amateur, close-up and personal feel)

-The site loads a pop-up in the back for a review network.

- There are three levels of membership, be careful when joining that you select the one membership level that you want. The moviez+ should give you everything you want, but it could be a bit pricey. Unfortunately it sucks when you have a lower level membership and you see a video you really want that is only moviez+

-The whole site feels a bit more amateurish than the rest of the network, which can be a bonus or a downside, for me it was more of a downside, the light in many scenes was disappointing, but maybe it was just me...
Bottom Line: Overall the site is a decent collection of oral sex, although many scenes also have some sex or at least the girl stripping and playing with herself.
Most models look very natural, with little make-up to the point where it was almost too minimal for me. The natural look of the Pierre woodman network, but with somewhat less cute models.

This doesn't mean the site doesn't have some cute girls like Kara Mynor and Sandy Sweet. Overall the feel was similar to teenyboppers, where the girl comes in and after a quick interview is blowing the guy, pretty standard although the footjob scenes break the mold.

Hmm, I am noticing that almost every paragraph I write contains a positive and a con, which is probably the best way to describe the site, some people will love the natural, amateur feel, but unless you love oral and have a thing for feet it might leave you disappointed.

On it's own I don't think it would stand, but as part of the larger pornstarnetwork it's a pretty decent deal. What is also nice is that the network is very well designed so very soon you can find yourself on a completely different part of the site browsing some obscure model. I wish more sites would use this kind of powerful cross-site integration, beats the model where you have to log into each site individually.

Either way, the bottom line of the whole review is that this site doesn't make this network, but ads some spice and matches the feel of sites like Firstsexvideos and Bruno B Reloaded. If you like amateurs and natural looking girls give this network a chance and if you get the premium moviez+ membership you will have a pleasant experience.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Deep In Cream

16. Deep In Cream (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
dracken (0) 10-19-10  07:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 98 videos and 44 photo sets (the videos are available as WMV and the more recent ones are also available as MPEG, most videos are available as 720x480, although the MPEG is a little smaller) each video has screencaps which are rather fuzzy and not worth it IMO

- Those 44 photo sets are separate photos available at 1600x1200 in zip files. They are very good clarity and you get about 100 or so per set.

- About 30 anal scenes, 3 ass to mouth, 7 DP... and I can tell because of the nice filter system which allows you to see each scene by category. Also each video tells you what model is in it and you can find her anywhere on the network or on DVD's (which you need to buy)

- Pretty energetic action and the creampies don't look fake. You don't get any story or interview just a chick who gets fucked, but it's pretty satisfying.

- A few cute girls and the network is a great bonus, I could find several cute girls on other sites.

- Steaming, download, canceling membership,
Cons: - Like I said most scenes can be a bit too standard, most girls look like average porn stars and in my opinion the best content is in other places on the network.

- The site loads another page in the background when you log in. It's just a porn review page, but it was a bit annoying. No trojans or viruses yet.

- Some videos didn't stream for me, but not sure if that was my issue or the site.
Bottom Line: Overall the site is decent, however I don't know if it's the best cumshot or creampie site out there or even close, in fact most of the scenes are kinda average, the girls look okay, but they could have better make-up or more interesting clothes or something...I just felt like other parts of the network were more interesting. After about 5 minutes of looking at girls on this site I found myself navigating away to first sex video or the hardcore site.

That being said if you like hardcore and cumshots you should probably check out this network, they have a surprising amount of anal and deep throat and most of their girls look very amateur, although there are a few professional beauties like Kara Mynor or Haley Paige.

Oh, before I leave two minor issues with the site are that after you have 3 videos downloading it slows down to a crawl and each video saves under the same name so you have to go back and re-name stuff. On the other hand the streaming works flawlessly.

Also the tour page is pretty reflective of what the network has to offer. A solid set of sites, with decent navigation, clear update schedule and solid tech side, although the content itself could be a bit better.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Sperm Cocktail

17. Sperm Cocktail (0)

Pay
Newbie
81*
Fullsack (0) 08-20-10  11:34am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: I love the cum drinking movies! Very hot and the best western cum drinking scenes I think. The girls are happy and some of them are very attractive. The film quality is also usually high.
Cons: Some girls not so attractive.
Bottom Line: Excellent cum swallowing website! I would recommend this site for swallowing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sapphic

18. Club Sapphic (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
Goldfish (0) 04-19-10  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Great lesbian sex. I can't say it's "authentic" as I'm neither a woman nor lesbian but it's good!
+ Videos have a simple storyline and some build up to the main event. (In most cases not too much.)
+ TBP discount.
+ Can browse content in thumbnail or detail view.
+ A few really great regulars in the videos including Elexis Monroe and Samantha Ryan.
+ Models of different ages and varying body types gives some good variety.
+ Videos offered in segments or full download in a few different file types.
Cons: - Awkward and somewhat misleading site design.
- Confusing/non-functional rating system.
- Little used site functionality. (i.e. tags, blog)
- Mediocre video quality compared to the file size.
Bottom Line: With a little fine tuning Club Sapphic could be a really great site. The storyline and passion the models put into the sex scene is something overlooked on many porn sites these days. If you compare the acting to another popular lesbian site like Sapphic Erotica it's like day and night.

The producers of the videos are creative in how they build the sexual tension between the models. There is cheating, straight girls going lesbian for the first time and cat fights as a few examples that I enjoyed.

There are currently around 120 videos that you can browse on a fairly simple page with a detail/thumbnail option. One peeve I have is the release date of the update is not displayed on the thumbnail view. Otherwise it's easy to navigate with some different filtering options.

The site itself has a network feel to it though there really is no network. (Which is a disappointment after you learn the reality.) I'm guessing the webmaster has visions of a network someday but it ain't here yet! I'd suggest removing the network references until there are at least two sites.

Another confusing piece of functionality is the rating system. There is a 5 star user rating for each video, each girl and each site (LOL). There is also an "LN" rating, which I suppose is the webmaster's rating -- i.e. LN = Lesbo Network. When I tried to add my own ratings the mouse over effect over the stars made them fill in or empty as I went back and forth over them but when I clicked on a star it didn't save my rating.

There is also a "Like" rating for each video. I don't know if this is different from the 5 star rating but I basically gave up on rating stuff after a while.

When I started downloading from the site there was always an HD file type label but none of the movies actually had an HD video. (Another tease!) To their credit it appears that label has been removed as of today.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sperm Cocktail

19. Sperm Cocktail (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
pornwatcher (Suspended) 02-15-10  08:05am
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Original content.

2. This site offers rare video of porn stars drinking cum from a cocktail glass. You will see scenes with men masturbating and ejaculating their cum into a cocktail glass held by the women. After the glass is about half or nearly full, the women would drink all their cum, right in front of your eyes!

They really drink all the cum without any hesitation and they don't spit.

The camera never takes its lens out of the scene so you know the women drink REAL cum.
Cons: 1. Only about 1 out of 4 women drink cum from a cocktail glass. The rest are regular bukkake.
2. Video quality could be improved. Sharper picture and larger dimension, bigger than 720x480, would be great. The quality, compares to most other sites, aren't bad though.
3. Some scenes begin with the women taking too much time with sucking and masturbating the men before they start depositing their seed. I would prefer them to get right to the money shot right away. You may need a video editor to cut unwanted part.
Bottom Line: Not a bad site if you are into cum drinking fetish, especially from a glass. I haven't seen any other site that offers scenes of women drinking fresh cum from a glass.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brain Pass

20. Brain Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
86*
slutty (0) 10-24-09  12:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good collection of videos
Decent download speeds, I have been almost maxing my 7MB connection. I am not sure what the problem was with the guy that commented he was only getting 80kb/sec
Good price for the quantity of content
The site has a good organization concept, I liked being able to search by nationality. I don't think I've seen that anywhere before.
No DRM on videos
Cons: Not many photos, if that is your thing. and most are screen caps.
Video quality is not always great. Most is 720x480, the older stuff is 480x360 or worse.
I don't think a lot of the content is exclusive, as most is pulled from DVDs or other old websites (BrunoB for example)
Some of the star facts are flat out wrong, but that isn't such a big deal I guess.
Bottom Line: Overall I think it is a really good site. It had some hardcore stuff by Sophie Moon, Aneta Keys, Mia Stone and Eve Angel I hadn't seen before. Has a pretty good collection of porn stars from all over.
They could use some work on organizing it right, some stars info and nationalities are wrong. But I think (especially with euro stars) there is a lot of conflicting info out there.
I believe if you go to pornstarnetwork.com you can preview the whole site before joining (like videobox).
Definitely worth joining for a month, especially for $19.99
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Sapphic

21. Club Sapphic (0)

Pay
Newbie
91*
Chipster (0) 09-16-09  10:56pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great Cast Including Mae Victoria, India Summer, Michelle Lay, Annabel Lee
Lots of aggressive seduction
Great makeout scenes
Some catfighting turning into lovemaking
6 formats , from wmv 720x480 to mpeg 160x120 (ipod)
Director Nica Noelle appears in multiple scenes
At least one update per week
Great TPB discount !
Movie list for each model
Nice clothes
Older actresses are very sincere
Some great full figured asian actresses as well
Cons: Scenes are cut from Sweetheart videos, supply limited
Some intros are too long
Some of the scenarios are lame
Some scenes have some crossover of the spanish track
Almost all scenes move to the bed, no floor or kitchen sex
Bottom Line: The scenes each provide an introduction of a woman into the lesbian world. One of the women is usually convinced or seduced by the other. Especially Hot is Michelle Lay seduced by Zoe Britton. Especially hot is India Summer waking up next to Michelle Lay. Her lesbian scene is equally hot to any of her hetero scenes. This site was a great find. Would love to bust in on one of these scenes and turn it into a 3 way !
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brain Pass

22. Brain Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
100*
pffer (0) 06-14-09  09:43pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great niche sites
-Decent download speed
-Search by model feature
-Main page tells what the most recent updates are
-Frequent updates
-Option to bookmark your favourite scenes, stars and sites
-Decent price
Cons: -Video quality isn't amazing by any stretch of the imagination.
-Some scenes don't have the full download option
-The odd hiccup here and there (cannot delete certain scenes from my favourites)
Bottom Line: Honestly, I can't find much to complain about. I tend to enjoy these multi-site networks and while I have certainly really enjoyed others (Naughty America is FANTASTIC and Brazzers is really good as well), this one just stands out above the rest. Admittedly, I think I mainly like the range of niche sites, the sheer amount of content available and, of course, the content itself is smokin' hot.

I am admittedly a huge cumshot/facial fan, so having Sperm Glazed, Load in My Mouth and the UNBELIEVABLE Cover My Face here was worth the money...and then some. If you like cumshots/facials/bukkake, Cover My Face is worth it alone.

Honestly? I love this site so much, I don't ever want to leave and that's the highest compliment I can give.


If you like cumshots/facials, join just for Cover My Face—the content there is worth the membership. Grab a big bottle of lub, a box of tissues, and happy jerkin!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Brain Pass

23. Brain Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
80*
Tree Rodent (0) 05-28-09  04:48pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great value for money, a lot of content for a low price with a $10 discount for TBP users, resulting in a $19.95 a month sign up fee.
A lot of exclusive content.
No DRM.
No download limits.
No regional discrimination, meaning those of us in Europe are treated equally and do not get ripped off.
Good download speed.
Newer videos are of good quality and can be downloaded whole, rather than small segments. But you can choose between either whole or segments.
A variety of download speeds and therefore quality.
A good variety of vanilla porn sites.
There are pics which can be zip downloaded, although they are not of great quality.
There are quite a few daily updates overall. It's just some sites are basically dead, with no new updates at all.
Once you sign in you do not have to resign in to each separate site, although there is a series of 5 letters you have to fill in every time you visit the site.
Quite good camerawork in that there aren't too many gynaecological close ups.
Cons: Some really large and irritating watermarks.
The only real amateur site "BrunoB Reloaded" uses condoms for every scene.
Some of the sites are very small.
Some of the sites have little or no updates, nor state when the last update was.
Some of the videos do not have all the scenes available so are not really complete videos.
Some of the older videos do not have complete scene downloads, so they have to be downloaded in 5 minute segments.
Some of the sites are just single model sites.
Some of the sites are just multi sites of the same porn star. For instance Lex Steel.
Some of the material is very samey and there is nothing particularly high class and outstanding.
The photos are low quality, and just vid caps but can be downloaded in zip form. Some of them are very blurred and of low quality. What's more I found some did not unzip totally so I had to download manually. I really do not think the site would appeal to photo fans.
A few too many tattoos and fake breasts.
Bottom Line: IMO, this isn't really a network, more a series of videos, of which there are plenty. According to BrainPass the figure is 8420 videos and 912 photo sets. I haven't counted them personally but have no reason to dispute their figures.
There is a lot to see and download here, but some of the sites can't even be called sites.
For instance, at the count I made today (my last day of membership - 28 May 2009) "Silverstone Video" only has 107 videos,"The Lucky Man" only has 15, and "Doghouse Digital" only has 41. If that constitutes a "site," then I'm a gay Dutchman, and Drooler is my bitch. It's a bit like going to one of those DVD sites, and instead of referring to them as DVD's or videos, they call them sites instead.
There are WMV streaming segments at 700 kb/sec. I tried these and found them to be reasonable quality.
There are low quality WMV videos at 56 or 128 kb/sec, and MPG videos of 350 kb/sec for iphone and ipod. I have not tried these.
High quality WMV downloads are at dimensions of 720x480 and a bit rate of between 2000 and even up to 5000 kb/sec.
High quality MPG downloads are between 600 and 1000 kb/sec, depending on the site.
Pic dimensions are 720x480.
Although there is a lot of content, the standard and look is very much of a muchness. There is no real high class or outstanding content.
There is no real fetish material, but I don't expect it on this sort of site, so I don't put that down as a "con."
For me the outstanding site is "FirstSexVideo." This may not appeal to some, because the review I read by mbaya is totally accurate. There is a lot of talk leading up to the sex scene, which is not particularly high quality given today's standards. But for me it's a really unusual site in that these are genuine first time models being interviewed, and having sex on camera for the first time.
"The Lucky Man" only has 15 videos but they are at least in the "group sex" category. The one drawback is that most of the girls really do look like veteran porn performers.
With most sites it's usually 3 to 5 minutes of build up, then it's clothes off followed by, as expected, oral, then straight sex, and sometimes anal. OutdoorBackdoor obviously specialises more in anal. They have the cum in mouth type sites too. The main thing is, apart from FirstSexVideo, most of the material is what you would expect. Apart from a few videos where the girls start off totally naked, you mostly have the usual 3 to 5 minutes for a build up. It's then down to action. The girls are generally reasonable looking, not necessarily first division, but maybe second.
Even though I have listed a number of negatives, I really quite liked this site overall. The pros and cons are very similar to a number of other networks. Nothing outstanding but nothing really negative. A lot of reasonable and enjoyable porn, which is quite good fun and gives you hours of viewing, and tons to choose from at a bargain basement pric
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Jizz Mouth Wash

24. Jizz Mouth Wash (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
mbaya (Disabled) 05-12-09  07:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Supports download managers.
-Part of huge brainpass network.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-No DRM, download limits, or broken links.
-Videos are 720x480, many at 3100 kbps, I found one over 8000. Currently 77 videos
-Two high speed video download options, WMV and Quicktime. One low speed option for ipod. Can download clips at low speed quality.
Cons: -No streaming option.
-Screenshots are 720x480, but are zipdownloadable. One set for each video-77 sets.
-Well known pornstars. Not a plus for me.
-No easy way to search on the site. The network has a search engine though.
Bottom Line: All scenes here end with a guy or several guys cumming in a girl's mouth and she then swallows. Scenes start with a few words with the girl and some have some anal or vaginal sex, but the focus is on blowjobs with a swallowing finish.

Many scenes involve just one guy, but the ones I found most interesting were the ones with multiple guys. It reminded me of cumforcover in its style, but this site has a lot more of a feeling that the girls are having fun. There is some apparently spontaneous light hearted joking around both before and during the sex scenes. I felt this added a bit of energy and interest that many sites lack. A sense of humour is an unexpected plus.

The only downside I saw was the use of pornstars. They tend to be plastic and many tend to look like clones. However, some plusses are that many of the girls are quite attractive and at least a few acted like they enjoyed the action.

All in all, not a bad site. Certainly it is better than a lot of dull ordinary porn. What I feel would be a plus would be some true amateurs for a little variety.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brain Pass

25. Brain Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
70*
mbaya (Disabled) 04-15-09  07:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Supports download managers.
-Newest videos are 720x480, 2750kbps.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Easy navigation and search from the network site.
-Very big, you can even call it huge. I didn't see any numbers about exactly how much.
Cons: -Many videos are clips only, with no whole movie downloads. No streaming option. Newest videos do have whole video downloads.
-States that all material is exclusive. See my review of the silverstonedvd.com site which has many of the same videos. I would love to hear an explanation.
-Updates are not dated. When looking at a site, you don't know how often you will get new material. The network has a listing of upcoming updates though. Most upcoming updates go to pornstarnetwork, another name for the brainpass network, not any individual site within the network.
-States voted best adult network. Takes the comment "Definitely one of my favorite networks out there for the exclusive content and great-looking sites" from Spencers review, then states the score was 10/10. Spencer gave it a 90.0. I didn't see any review by TBP that was 10/10.
I would really love to hear an explanation.
Bottom Line: I see a lot of high scoring reviews, but my feelings about the network are more like Denner's than any other reviewer. There are a lot of sites, but many could easily be combined as they are about the same topic. Take silverstonevideo. The latest updates are on another site iwantlatina. There are several sites that are basically dead and have not updated in years. My impression of the videos is that although they have some interesting niches, such as tiny asses, you feel that you have seen all of this before. On the network a LOT of the material, maybe half overall, is not even from this decade. The navigation is simple and I really like the network's ability to search. However, within each site you cannot; there isn't even a list of the models. While many of the models are attractive, they are not so outstanding as to be a significant plus because many other video sites do as well or better. Overall this network is about quantity, not creativity. I didn't feel any of the individual sites was all that outstanding. I would even go further and say that many were below the levels of their competitions' comparable sites. While many videos had very good quality, I saw no HD or DVD level material on even the newest updates. The best you get is 720x480 2750 kbps. Nice, but not cutting edge. By the way, a nice plus is that the network does have lots of updates daily. Today there are 6 videos. On the other hand I saw not even one site that had outstanding quality photos-just screencaps. If you are a fan of Peter North, who has been around for years, or of Lexington Steele, who has also been around for years, you will like what they have here. However, does Lexington need 7 sites? Does North need 2? Do you need 7 sites for facial cumshots? My overall impression is that the network needs some new more creative concepts for their sites and better quality videos and photos. A real makeover could make this site much better. Overall I would rate this as an ok network, but not a strongly recommended one.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 73 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.