Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A slice of nostalgia with more current upgrades.
As great as always if you like pretty teen models posing and especially performing softcore scenes.
Included the Slut Inspection network when I joined (2/26/23)
Not to be left in the past – there are 4K videos on newer scenes.
Photos and videos can be downloaded without limits.
Updates weekly
Cons:
The always present con of these young women are really innocent.
Even the newer scenes feel dated.
Bottom Line:
Nostalgia doesn’t sound like a word you want porn being. Edgy, risque, those are porn adjectives. But nostalgia makes this site worth joining. You can be nostalgic about your old favorite models or the days when softcore was the ruling genre of internet porn. The models are more pretty than anything.
I did not know Teen Dreams was still around and even more so, did not know, it’s still updating with new updates. There are even 4K downloads available on the newer videos.
Another angle of reminiscing is the importance of pictures and not having intercourse or men in the scenes. There was a time when this genre of porn was not only the most popular, but also was how the majority of sites were.
One major step back is the production quality. These videos are going to remind you of one camera porn days. It is how this type of porn is filmed. I won’t say if it should be that way, but I do believe the older sites and scenes (on the site) show a more creative use of cameras.
It was a lot easier to show a model as a tease when there’s not 4 cameras capturing her every side, bend, crease. The site is surprisingly simple to use despite the large size and years of back catalog mixing in the search results. This is the type of site I personally love. There’s not a lot of distractions or niches or genres. And all niches start with a pretty teen model.
There will be complaints from those used to newer porn and wanting more explicit content, but these videos and photos are more explicit than you notice. It’s just that the camera covers the more explicit parts.
The search engine and model list makes the site easy to use. The only thing I found confusing was the different picture downloads. Some of those were not accurate to their advertised resolutions, but that’s not a big deal.
The one way I wouldn’t recommend this site is if you prefer hardcore teen scenes. There are hardcore scenes on the site, but those show why Teen Dreams should never film hardcore porn. These models are not hardcore models. The scenes are at their best when it’s a pretty, young, teen model teasing everything from her panties to her hard nipples and ending with her masturbating. It’s as believable of an angle as porn has. Most young women that talk about sex and tease their bodies – then masturbate once finished teasing.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated:
03-09-1902:04am (Update History) Reason: Added more points to improve the review
Pros:
Decent niche site featuring both familiar and less well known porn models.
Some scenarios are well thought out if you are patient with the porn flow.
Rarely seen scenes from some of my personal favourites such as Sandy Caine, Cate Harrington, Jess Scotland and Isabella Kay.
Access to a mix of the good and bad of bonus sites. The Bukkake one is good!!
The Nerd Pervert has found some babes that I've not seen on other sites so he is obviously working hard finding fresh new talent so hats off for that.
Cons:
Signed up for this website as I've enjoyed the DVDs so far. However, you need to be aware of cross-selling and potential 'extra charges'as I was charged £27.25 just two days after my $9.95 charge for a one month trial was taken. This is despite me being careful to avoid any cross-selling. Is it any wonder people are wary of paying for porn when this kind of trick happens.
Too much chatter and discussion before the action takes place.
Feels like there was a system in place to ensure you couldn't download too much a day.
If I think about it there were too many chubby types on this site for my own personal tastes.
It would have been good to see N.P breaking out of the formulaic scenes, too many scenes are similar in how they play out. How about some outdoor scenes or something different.
Bottom Line:
Worth a look at for a month perhaps to see what you think and if it suits your tastes but the regular monthly price seems steep to me. Also after a while there is a good chance the very long intros will be skipped through and you will become fed up of the waffle.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- 4K available for newer videos
- Tons of content, both photos and videos
- Download managers are allowed
Cons:
- No way to mark favorite actresses that I could see
- Download files are often huge when considering the resolution
-That distinctly Russian style of recent videos
Bottom Line:
Teendreams is a huge megasite with thousands of images and videos going back well over a decade. I saw what were clearly old photo sets that had 2009 as the “last appeared” date, but I’d be surprised if they were any newer than 2005 or so. I could be wrong, of course, but that’s just an eyeball guess.
And that access to older content is a very good thing. No, the quality of the older sets might not be achingly sharp, but they can’t be compared to modern photos and videos because of the limitations of the times. Just having access to the older content is a good thing, and the site is probably worth joining for nothing else other than seeing some favorite models in the earliest days of their careers.
Irina Bruni is a good example. I’m a big fan of hers and saw some early photo sets from 2010 or so that I’d never seen anywhere else. There are lots of other examples of this kind of discovery all through the site. I’d probably recommend it just on this element alone.
Download managers work, and the site doesn’t log you off constantly and require you to re-login. Good job webmasters. That’s the kind of thing that keeps paying customers coming back to give you more money.
The new videos are offered in resolutions up to huge 4K files if that's your thing.
The not-as-good:
It’s not uncommon to find an actress with two or three different sets under different names or in a different set including another actress’ name. It's more an inconvenience than anything, but you always get the feeling that you’re probably missing some content when you find sets of a favorite actress.
The distinctly Russian style of some newer videos is off-putting at times. You know the characteristics: The guys have mullets (often buzzcuts on sides), the women will have flat bangs and/or brightly colored plastic jewelry/socks/etc., and the scenes will seem washed out or overly beige.
The sets will download to your drive with no identifying elements whatsoever, so you’ll end up with a bunch of “10101_1242” style zip files or “49387_85844_1080” video file names. Again, not a huge deal, but a definite inconvenience and something that requires extra work if you want to organize scenes by a particular actress.
None of it is bad enough that I would discourage checking the site out if you have any interest.
Bottom line: Recommended, with a few reservations. I'd definitely re-join.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of content over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites.
Cons:
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesnt work at all for me lots of fits and starts
Despite the sites name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. Its not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule there were 13 updates in September.
Bottom Line:
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so its kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the models name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the pros section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets Ive ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I havent used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I wont be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Appear to be British porn stars and perhaps a few amateurs.
-A mixed bag of looks. Some attractive, some ordinary.
-Part of My All Access Pass network of about 30 sites
-Great discount through PU. Only $10 for a membership.
-Nice full HD1920x1080, 8000 kbps. 210 40 minute videos.
Cons:
-Undisclosed download limit of 15 GB per day. With HD videos averaging about 2GB, this is unreasonable.
-Very blabby videos with far too much talking. The sex starts approximately 20 minutes into each scene.
-No way to search
-Navigation is not easy or even intuitive. Difficult to scroll forward or back.
-Bill through Rocketpay. Not a big name biller.
-No confirmation email from the biller or the site.
-Prechecked cross sells on sign up
Bottom Line:
Recently I joined the My All Access Pass network of 30 websites. As it was only $10, I thought I had not much to lose. In going through the sites, most are of less than HD quality and therefore I felt not worth bothering with. One that had better quality was NerdPervert.
The videos have top notch stats with most being nice full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. The ones that are not at that level are at worst HD 1280x720. Not bad at all. The videos are about 40 minutes on average. However they also average about 2GB in size and the network daily download limit is a mere 15GB. I had to ask about this limit as it says nothing on the site, nor on any page that I saw when I signed up. Downloading 210 videos at about 8 per day is ridiculous. I was told most users download an average of 5GB per day. That may be ok for lesser quality, smaller sized videos, but here?
The videos come in three categories. First are 210 undated full videos at about 40 minutes each. Next are nearly as many verdict videos where the site stunt cock gives his evaluation of his experience with each woman. This is about three minutes of Paul blabbing about what he liked and did not like. Who cares?
There are also twelve videos labelled as bonus. The only difference between these and the 210 first category videos is that these cannot be downloaded.
The site features Paul Taylor as he has sex with various British women. The idea is that he pretends to be a fake porn talent agent who can get modeling work for the various women. He claims to us that he is conning these women into doing the sex. Each video has the same premise and he is the only stunt cock, except for only one video starring his friend that he lost a bet to.
In each video, he starts by endlessly talking about how he needs sex and how long it has been since his last time. You see him placing ads for models, talking to the camera woman, as well as his friends about everything imaginable. Some is about porn, sometimes other topics. Blab blab blab on and on in every video for about 20 minutes in each one. When he finally interviews the female model you see them pretending to not be the porn stars they really are. I checked and nearly every one is a pro who has made videos for years and now is making her first appearance. A few are too plain to actually be porn stars and I could not find any information on them. By the way most of his banter is about how little respect he has for the women he has sex with and how little he cares if they enjoy the scene or not. He sounds like every womanizer I have ever met.
The sex is ordinary, mostly blow jobs, some vaginal and a rare anal scene. Paul expects the women to be energetic, but he does little to make the scenes hot.
There is no search functionality of any kind, the photo sets have only a few screenshots in each, and the site navigation is not easy, not even logical or intuitive. It is hard to get around. Sometimes Paul as well as the models are difficult to understand as their British accents get in the way for Americans.
The site has prechecked cross sells when you sign up. I know for a fact that I unchecked all the boxes, I would even bet my life on it. Yet I was charged $34.95 for a site not in the network but run by the same ownership that I did not authorize or want. I saw this very same complaint on a competing review site and this may be the way they do business. As of this morning I have Amanda contacting the webmaster about a refund.
I cannot recommend this site even though it is part of a 30 site network and is only $10 a month.
I will post the results of my appeal for a refund and maybe even raise my score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Heavily discounted membership price through PU
-Part of network of 30 sites
-Female Hard Body has its latest video at full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-However Model Muscles videos are lesser quality at 1280x720, 2500kbps
-No download limits
Cons:
-The biller is Rocketgate. No confirmation email and none from the site
-Prechecked cross sells on signup
-No way to search
-Model Muscles does not have dates listed for new updates.The site may even be dormant and not updating.
-Zip downloads link does not work for photo sets on Model Muscles
-Female HardBody has only 4 updates in 2017 and may not be updating.
Bottom Line:
The My All Access Pass network includes 30 sites and is available through PU at a steep discount at only $10. Included are two similar sites, Female HardBody and Model Muscles.
Porn Users lists Model Muscles as a glamour site. Maybe there is no better description, but this is very far from what glamour usually means when describing a porn site. These two sites feature extremely muscular women.
When I go to the gym, there are always a handful of women who are serious enough to be called fitness buffs. I would describe them as athletic and well built, sometimes even muscular. I find fit bodies to be attractive, but these two sites have models who are way beyond any level I have ever seen in person.
These look like body building contest winners and therefore I would expect that the number of fans of this type of model in porn is rather small. The two sites are very similar and really I dont know why there are two different sites.
Mostly the videos are non nude, about the level of bikinis. The number of sets/videos that show breasts is few and the number that have full nudity is even less. The nudity is never explicit. The sex is close to zero as there is only a tiny number of masturbation videos/photos.
In the typical porn photo set, the emphasis is on showcasing the models as sexual. In contrast that is not really true here. The photos and videos mostly showcase muscles and posing, somewhat like what you expect to see at a body building contest. In all fairness there are also a few models that could be on any site and are hotly erotic. Specifically, Charlotte McKenna comes to mind. She has four videos on Female Hard Body that are over the top. Most of the other models have to be a matter of taste. Muscles per se are not really my thing.
Added together there are presently 289 photo sets with 30 to 40 photos in each. There are 81 videos of about five minutes at length. You could easily download all the videos in an afternoon.Both Rabbits and TBP show higher counts in their past reviews. If anyone knows the reason might be for that, please feel free to respond.
The two sites may not be updating any longer.
Model Muscles does not show dates for its updates, but the best quality videos are low level HD 1280x720. Female HardBody is a bit better with full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. However there are only four updates in 2017. Muscle Nudes has photo sets, but the link to zip download them does not work. Female Hard Body has larger photo sets and the zip download function works.
The member pages were uncomplicated without any advertising. The navigation could have been a bit easier to figure out as it was unnecessarily complicated to go forward or back. There was no search engine and no broken links.
The network has about thirty sites, representing many niches. Porn Users has a great discount price of $10 for a monthly membership. The biller is RocketGate, an ok biller, but not CCbill or Epoch.
I never got a confirmation email from either the site or the biller, but had no trouble canceling. On the sign up page there were two prechecked cross sells, so be careful.
Was it worth joining? There was not enough quality erotic content to satisfy my fussy taste, but it was cheap and maybe the rest of the network will have some better porn. $10 for a network is a price that is very enticing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
-Not a popular billing company
-few low resolution images for newer sets
-okay site navigation
-slow navigation
Bottom Line:
First of all this was a pretty good site a few years ago, but now they haven't given the same effort as before. The site has an okay navigation with very poor loading times at certain times of the day. I like the favorite and rating system on the site, but when you have to dislike something it takes you back to the main members page and then you have to go back to the favs page.
There are about 2000 models on the site with an update weekly. They update at three times a week with about three or four new content every update. The download speed is quite fast including a download of a 500MB video. Now the billing company is Pure Web Power, but I haven't contacted them yet but when I do I'll add to my review. You do have access to their bonus sites using your TeenDreams login, but I think the majority is the same content on TDs
For the videos they do offer HD for NEW content. They only offer MP4 with no other type of media. The sizes they offer vary between old to new, the new offers 1080 (Full HD), 720 HD), 360 (med) and 180 (mobile) with the old videos vary but most of them only have the medium size. The videos download pretty quick with an average of 200MB for HD videos. There are about 1800 videos on the site.
For the galleries, there are about 7000+ sets ranging from solo, lesbian to boy/girl. The quality of most of the images are quite good ranging from 2013 to 2006. For the sizes, they do vary from year to year, but for recent sets their largest I've seen is 2040 for tall images and for long there is 1360x907 which is a huge disappointment; although, the quality of them are great. Most of the older images are usually 1728px and sometimes 2046px or 2000px from 2007 to 2012. Images in 2005 are usually 1752px. As for the zips they only offer Large size with no other sizes to select and when you also select an image it gives you the large without any other size.
Bottom line, this is a good mega site with tons of content with great quality, but is very slow at times and is a little bit hard to navigate. Overall this is a site I would recommend.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lori is a slim, tanned girl catering for most tastes
- Huge amount of content, generally very easy to navigate
- Caters well for BJs/handjobs, but also fetishes too
- All content is downloadable without apparent restriction
- ZIPs of photos available and 2 different video formats
- Lots of extra content such as camshows and messageboard
- Solo site but seems very professionally run
- Well-established site, and still updating
- Many shoots taking place outside adding to the excitement
Cons:
- Limited angles video-wise - normally POV or fixed view
- Lori and her husband are quite vocal and theatrical*
(* Only a con depending on your POV)
- Sometimes too much time spent looking at the guy
- Older updates have videos split into 3-or-so parts
- A lot of the photos are only video screengrabs
Bottom Line:
This is a huge solo amateur website for Lori Anderson. I think her blowjobs are probably the main draw, but theres plenty of other content such as handjobs, hardcore and girl-girl action. Shes a very slim, slightly-older-than-average natural model with most videos filmed with her husband.
The members homepage is very graphical with a collage of Polaroid-style photos from her scenes with a list of categories down the side. It goes far beyond being just the usual pictures, movies, camshows that youd expect from a solo site and includes:
Updates: a simple page with a link to her latest update, her latest featured girl and the archives unfortunately its not a chronological, dated list of updates.
Messageboard: A basic message board. Lori is always posting but not too much discussion going on. More active than some though.
My Bedroom: You can book camshow or phone sex sessions with Lori. Solo camshows range from $35 to $90, guy and girl from $75 to $150.
Free Shows: Link to Loris Camz Shows page with a timetable of forthcoming shows. At the moment shes in Florida so none forthcoming but will update this review if that changes.
Theres also links to Members Store (an online pharmacy?!), Free Live Feeds (links to Camz Shows), Featured Girls (links and preview content from other sites including Kelly Madison, Club Sandy, Bryci etc), Canadian Girls (18 galleries from Canadian Girls), My Store (downloadable amateur videos featuring Lori for around $25), Bonus Content (another link to Camz Girls), Submit Your Pics (member submitted pictures including... um... how can I put this... members members!)
At the top of all the pages is a drop down menu bar where you can filter by content type (videos or photos) and then by niche (blowjobs, handjobs etc). It makes finding the niches you like pretty easy.
Each category shows updates as 16 thumbnails per page, and the title of the update. Click on the thumbnail, and you get a very comprehensive description of the update and various options listed at the bottom for downloading. On newer updates this is a Flash Video, or a Windows Media Player file in either 640x480 or 320x240. On older updates the videos are split into three-or-so parts. It doesnt give file sizes or running times. You can save everything, most videos are around 10-15 minutes and the quality isnt bad. Videos are normally from a fixed position or POV.
Photo-wise its disappointing in some respects as most pictures are just screenshots from her video updates. But you can use this to your advantage and use the galleries as a storyboard for the video updates so you can see in detail whether you wish to download the video. The photo/video galleries are linked, so there is a button to skip from photos to videos (or vice versa) at the top of each page.
There are proper photos of her softer updates though (flashing on beaches etc); in this case the images are 1440px on their longest side. In all galleries, you can change the thumbnail sizes and download ZIPs.
Update-wise it seems fair in the amount of updates. It seems to be around once a week, although I cant say how consistent updates are because none are dated. There is a massive amount of content to be enjoyed, though, and I can imagine as a first-time member her site will definitely keep you occupied throughout your whole membership term.
Most updates are blowjobs and handjobs, but theres also a lot of hardcore scenes. Lori is quite theatrical in her delivery and her husband is quite vocal too, so thats definitely worth bearing in mind. Most seem to take place at home, but a refreshing amount outside, whether on boats or in a garden etc. I must admit I do enjoy the feeling of jeopardy with hardcore being done outside so this is great to see.
The fetish section is large. Her fetishes include peeing, bound and gagged, footjobs and more besides. Theres also a trend (not only in fetishes) to show off her hairier than average forearms. I dont see the appeal, and Im not sure Ive ever met anyone who does, but if it is, youre well catered for.
One complaint is theres a bit too much man-time on her site. In some updates for example, her husband will often be reclined back, hes cum, but itd go over his stomach, then thered be long and lingering shots of his dick and the mess. There are quite a few examples of this scattered throughout the website, too, and it just seemed a bit odd in those minority of examples. I can imagine its an easy mistake for webmasters to make, but it kinda ruined some of the updates.
Overall Loris site is very impressive. There is a lot of content to enjoy with the option to enjoy a lot more Lori through things like camshows. Definitely worth joining if you like the look of the previews.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+An extraordinary amount of vids and pix sets
+Almost 2700 vids (of various kind and quality and size)
+The top pros: almost 11.000 pix sets (ditto as above)
+Material goes back many years - great
+Daily updates - vids or pix - but only on weekdays!
+Relatively easy navigation
+Fast and reliable feedback from webmaster Andrea
+You can get around regional billing - mailing Andrea
+Ok quality for a lot of sets
+Ok quality for SOME vids
+Zip for sets
+Download manager allowed
+FINE variation of models
+Top site for older material
+Ok streaming
Cons:
-Non exclusive - maybe some older stuff could be exclusive - hard to tell.
-Too many "NEW" vids in updates are OLD
-The same goes for pix sets
-Very unstable browsing speed and download ditto (better, a little better with download manager)
-Models names are confusing - some appears under different names.
-Only one choice of vids format
-Some newer vids with black frames (see below)
-Generally too many updates seen elsewhere
-HC material is older DVDs - mostly
Bottom Line:
If you have never been at this site before - go there at once. You'll get - not exclusive material - but probably the best site getting hours and hours or day after day of browsing fine models.
The general deal with the site is the amount and the possibility to find models, sets and vids in thousands - and in ONE place.
First joined this site back in 2004/2005 - and still keep some of my most favorite vids/sets from here. Later made two reviews here in 2007 and 2009..
And the site has kept updating and updating every day for years and years (except weekends).
But the quality of those updates - lately - is so and so - compared to the thrill I got in earlier years.
Now it's way too much licensed material from newer sites going for - again - easteuro models.
A lot here are easteuro models and that's just fine - but I see more and more older material placed as updates.
Some newer vids now have ugly broad/black frames - which means: no full screen - quite weird.
There's quite a difference even for newer vids concerning quality - some are too lousy for a site like this - put in as updates in 2011.
Normally wmv but they still put up older vids in mpg.
The sets are as varied as everything else in quality - some tops, some medium ect.:
2000x1338
2400x1600
1600x1000.....ect.
I'm at this new membership generally a bit disappointed in especially:
Some of the quality of the later updates - and a bit of the variation too. At the end of this membership term I've downloaded very little - most was some of the older material I never got around to earlier...
Still this site deserves the 80 and subjective (of course) score from this user.......because bottom line:
You cannot avoid to find and download some really great vids and sets
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good price through TBP discount
-Many attractive ladies
-Huge site, and archives go back quite far
-Download speeds are good much of the time, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Updates are frequent, I count 24 in the last week - 9 movies and 15 photosets
-Nice variety of content, softcore-hardcore
-Photosets are generally well shot
-Zip downloads of photosets
-No DRM and download managers work (I used DTA)
-Didn't experience any login timeouts
-Helpful and reasonably active forum
-Have search function, model index, and model ratings
-Newer photos generally good, about 2600 long end was typical, older photos get a bit worse (1024 in 2006)
-Video quality is acceptable on newer videos (3000 kbps, 960x540 was the best I saw).
Cons:
-Site is a bit disorganized, many models appear under multiple listings
-Content is semi-exclusive at best, there is a good amount of material that isn't "exlusif"
-Older photo and video quality is not the best
-Only one download option for videos (newer videos are all wmv, older are mpg), plus a flash player
-Only bonus content is some Viv Thomas videos, but it is pretty low quality (640x480 780 kbps wmv) and cam sites, although I didn't really check them out
-Per exotics comment, some of their advertising can be misleading
-Some videos are from DVDs
-Site can be slow during peak hours
Bottom Line:
I think this is a very good site, and definitely one worth joining if you are into young ladies. While their content is not all exclusive, they do have plenty of quality material.
It would be nice if the site were a little better organized, and they could at least put all the sets for one model in the same location. The search function, and the search by category ability are nice, but I didnt find them to be particularly effective. Perhaps that is because the site is so large. In general the navigation of the site just seems a bit outdated compared with their competition. The content is not all unique, and if you have been a member at sites like youngporn and smackmybitch I am sure you will see some scenes you recognize.
There is a good variety of content, from softcore to hardcore. I would say their content is not particularly ethnically diverse. However, with 13,500+ sets I'm sure most anyone could find something they would like here. There is also a refreshing lack of ridiculous fake breasts, I'm sure there are some, but I didn't see much.
I didn't have any experience with customer service, so I can't comment on that.
Overall, I think this is an excellent site, and definitely one worth joining. Particularly for someone who hasn't joined many sites in this niche, and even more so for those that are fans of photosets. While they do have videos, I still consider the photosets to be the best part of this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Access to 25 other sites.
+There are 421 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. Most sets have over 100 pics.
+Resolution varies from set to set but 898x1440 seems to be the lowest one. Many of them are 1000x1333.
+A nice selection of asian models.
+They have 76 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 640x480.
Cons:
-The bulk of their content is not exclusif.
-The bulk of their content is solo models only.
-The majority of the models are unidentified.
-The majority of the content is quite old.
Bottom Line:
*The only major advantage for this site is the multiple site access because I can't imagine that any asian fan will find sufficient content to satisafy his or her needs. Not too mention that the content is pretty old and more than likely available elsewhere. Add the fact that most models aren't identified so you will never if you have that pic set or not.
*There are a couple of other nice sites within the network but they aren't asian based so might not appeal to someone looking for that type of content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating.
Cons:
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens.
Bottom Line:
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
Cons:
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution.
Bottom Line:
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Katie is a super cute teen model. Her looks remind me a lot of Stoya, Sasha Grey and Sasha rose.
-She has a couple of midcore/hardcore solo vidoes.
-You get access to 25 other sites.
Cons:
-The site is slow to surf. It takes 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon.
-There are only 50 photosets and to make things worse. You can't even download them as a single zip file.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 59 pic sets)
-There are only 37 videos and most of them are softcore to midcore in nature.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 46 videos).
-None of the content is dated so there's no way of knowing if the site is still updating or what kind of schedule she uses.
Bottom Line:
-Katie has the perfect body for my taste and if she was really seriuous about porn and there was decent content then I'd have a hard staying away. As it is this site is not worth visiting let alone paying to access the measly amount of content.
-My score is based purely on this site as a stand alone since the content on the other sites in the network might not appeal to the people looking at this site.
**The only great thing about this site is that
I got access to the network for 13$ less than if I'd joined through another site. The trick is to visit this site and once you click to leave then a pop up screen appears with the special offer.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Dee is a gorgeous red head milf who loves sex in all it's varied form from a simple BJ to a G/G shoot followed by B/G vaginal and then to the more intense anal, DP's and gang bangs.
-It's all exclusif content.
-There are 144 videos which can be viewed online or downloaded.
-All videos can be downloaded as wmv files and they now also offer flash for some videos. The resolution on the wmv is 640x480.
-99% of all the videos come with a derscription of the action.
-You get access to 25 other sites with your membership.
Cons:
The site is slow to surf. I counted 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon. That's more frustrating than anything else.
-Dee is an older woman and some might consider her a little chubbier than your average porn girl.
-You have 210 photosets but they don't offer the option of downloading as a complete zip file. You'd have to be a pretty patient fan to want to download each pic one at a time.
-The content on some of the other sites is leased and not necessarily of great quality.
-Some of the other sites offered might not appeal to most people
-I can't confirm that the site is till updating with new content except to say that some of the stuff was dated 2010.(on a side note: TBP says that the site was launched in 2010 but there is content going back to 2006)
Bottom Line:
-Dee is an amazing woman with a voracious sexual appetite who seems to really like IR performers and definetly enjoys it when there is more than one person at a time. She really gets off during her shoots because you can clearly see her have orgasms. I'm not sure who films her videos but he's good enough that the camera is often in the right place at the right time.
-This site should appeal to anyone looking for a 30 to 40yrs old woman who loves to have sex in front of a camera.
-To be avoided by anyone looking for waif thin teen girls having sex.
**I got access to the network for 17$ instead of 30$ by joining katie reynolds site. You simply visit Katie's site and once you click to leave then you get a pop up offer for the special price** Although I undertand why sites don't offer it upfront. I still think they'd get more business by offering it right away.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Deep archives, especially photos
- Nice collection of classic sets
- Recently added Flash Player
Cons:
- Recent updates are stale
- Presentation issues galore
- Models less and less attractive
- Download speeds are slow
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying I used to love this site. It takes a good long time to go through the deep archives of photo sets on this site and there you will find some of those classic ones from days gone by.
This site was a true player at one time but they have taken a nose dive of late. Material seems recycled and the updates while frequent are just plain lame for my tastes.
You used to see a lot of new models on the site, cute ones, but now some look rather homely as if the photographers are clueless as to how to add a nice hair do or make up -- raw. When surfing there of late, it feels late 90's.
Sometimes cute models are masked by a deplorable head shot making one think they are not worth a look. This is the weakness of Teen Dreams, their presentation.
The content itself are average at best videos, and several picture sets featuring solo, hardcore, straight and lesbian. They also have a chat area similar to the many out there meaning it is not for everyone. A lot of their sets appear elsewhere like Paul Markham and it appears as if they will no longer shoot their own stuff.
They have worked on some of the needed changes and they are on the right track but work remains. Decent search features help but even they could be improved upon.
The site also has some stuff from Viv Thomas which is a plus, but many of those sets are old and the quality of the picture sets is quite average.
The site can be time consuming. You get a picture of the video box instead of the actual scene with video updates. That means a user must click each box to see the actual scene with no "real or acceptable" preview. I ended up avoiding the clicks after realizing how clunky the set up was. They would be doing themselves a favor separating the videos from pictures.
Search features as mentioned are good, but several models have two names and the webmaster needs to combined them for the sake of seekers.
I'm afraid Teen Dreams is going about it with smoke and mirrors these days of late They seem to be one of many former mainstay sites on the brink of becoming stale.
Download speeds are very slow for me and the picture sets have way too many photos, some of them being pretty much the same. Almost all their content seems to be coming from a certain place I will not mention, so take that for what it's worth.
Despite my negative feelings towards their demise of late, I would still recommend you join Teen Dreams at least one time for their vast archives. While most of the content you will download will be a tad dated, there is some good stuff to be had. You will however, need to be patient, for it takes time to turn up the good stuff but vasious search features once mastered should help. Picture resolution varies, but most are very good at least in sets the past five years or so..
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fresh new faces
Original content
Sharp pictures
Good slideshow set-up for pictures.
Lots of updates.
Free access to Viv Thomas videos.
Cons:
Limited video download options.
Streaming videos are of poor quality when compared with other sites.
Site can be slow at times.
Bottom Line:
Not a bad site; but not a great site. Video options are very limited and streaming quality sucks! This is not a top tier site for video quality when compared with sites such as Videobox or Nubiles. However, the young fresh faces and original content are good. If you are into new young models, original content and good quality pictures this may be the site for you. If you are looking for top notch video quality this may not be the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Search and navigation functions are fairly good, and I like the "Add to Favorites" feature. Lots of cute models.
Cons:
Not that much hardcore in relation to solo and lesbo. Seems like the updates are really from shoots that took place a few years ago. Difficult to tell which shoots are hc, solo, lesbo etc.
Bottom Line:
For a big, well-established site, I was a bit disappointed. Models and shoots seem a bit dated, with the best models being ones that were hot a few years ago. For the money, I think I prefer Nubiles.net.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
BACK ON THE TRACK - what else can I say.
My original review was from March 2007 with a score of 83 - and I've been a member on and off since then.
But a lot has happend - Ups and Downs.
Today Teendreams is back with more strenght: better quality in updates, better videos, better photosets and models I've not seen anywhere else - exclusive for Teendreams or not.
The content is very huge - with some great archives for the porn- and nudelover - mostly soft.
The updates are all together more than one video and a couple of photosets a day (including no updates on weekends).
+ Nice price
+ Aproxx. 1400 video-clips
+ Vast amout of photosets (can't count them)
+ Still a better and more varied selection of models
+ Navigation and design is still improving
+ Some of the best/varied solo-videos around.
+ Fast and helpfull respons from webmaster
+ Preview for updates (exept live video-clips)
+ Zip for photosets
Cons:
Unstable downloadspeed (in Europe) - using download manager.
I (mostly)get about 320-350 kb/sec - even with d-manager.
Models names - I mean there is like 25 Lisa - 20 or more Caroline ect. - confusing.
A little video-problems: no sound in a few clips, a few corrupt files, some Mp4 almost unplayable - (But webmaster seems to repair alonmg the way).
No videoclips availible in preview.
Hardcore-content is not worth joining for.
Bottom Line:
I've been pretty ambivalent about the site the last half year or so (not schizophrenic, as Wittyguy mentioned - I think that's more a medical term of something completely different). Teendreams has had it's ups and downs - but which site has not.
But after browsing the preview for some time, the updates and variation of models has improved - a lot.
Names like Aina, Mina, Adrienne and Bea - never seen those models anywhere else - Bea has only one sets by now - but maybe the finest natural tits...
And then Lisa- the latest - a rare brunette beuaty - and the sweetest videoclip, only one for now - look forward to more!!
Newer photoset improving: 2452x1635
Videos: wmv or mp4 (some older in mpg): 1280x720 wmv - size: between 200-600 Mb. Teendreams still has Viv Thomas as bonussite - and thats a fine deal. Videos can be downloaded in parts or full - BUT only ujsing a download manager - guess the propuse here is viewing only, but...
You can also download photos - but no zips for Viv Thomas.
If I have to compare other sites it's first Nubiles - and then maybe Twistys.
Both Teendreams and Nubiles stand very strong in their archives - videos and photosets - at this moment I tend to Teendreams - but that's the problem too. Maybe like your favorite sportteams - it's up and down - and then up again.
Right now Teendreams is back at the top - to this user...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-20 dollar coupon
- lots of content
- decent movies
Cons:
-Lousy Nagivation
-Cluttered galleries
-Low quality movies and pictures
-Unoriginal content
Bottom Line:
I joined this website almost 9 years ago. Back then it was mostly picture zip files with pics at 800 px. Today I decided to come back because of the hype of other good reviews and the impression it left on me going thru the tour. After plucking my 20 dollars a lot has changed and stayed the same namely some of the old pics and movies that lost its quality over the years. I am rather disappointed after going thru this website. What hurts this site the most is the navigation, and how unorganize this website. The whole site feels very cluttered. Usually I start on downloading pics and movies from A to Z.
As I gone thru it there were same girls with different names, DVDs lying around, to girls in a lesbian action scene not under the gallery she originally belongs to. Another thing that hurts this site is the quality of the galleries. A majority of them are rather hazy and some of the movies are good as 640-480 to less. There are some HD quality but not much. I am being really generous in giving an 80 due to the large content but despite the quantity it sorely needs a lot of love in the quality department.
In a lot of ways teendreams reminds me of a Karup cloned website. At least it tries to be. It has got definitely has the content that can rival Karup-pc but none of the organization. I would recommend this website to first time porn surfers basically someone whose practically starting his/her porn collection. This is the place to be to collect a large database of porn. For a porn surfing like me I want something better with quality and care. Anyway to first time porn surfers there are coupons available for this website. You can check out hoes.com or rabbitreview.com but the discounts will only work for one month and it will resume its regular price.
A couple of suggestions to the webmasters reading this:
1. Organizing your website is a must I can't stress that enough.
2. Either remove your old stuff or enhanced to better picture quality especially the movies
3. Those DVDs they got to go because it doesn't feel it belongs there besides your DVD collection pales in comparison to websites that cater to DVD movies (ie videobox anyone?)
Thats about it. Thanks for reading this review. I hope this is helpful in your purchase.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My original review expired yesterday, so here is a newly updated review to reflect the changes in Teen Dreams and it received a boost in the score from my 2007 review. One of the internet's biggest sites around.
- New servers deliver lightning fast downloads to me, US based as are the servers, regularly hits 100% of my max DL speed when using DownThemAll with Firefox
- The content over the last few years sees a raise in quality, pics top out in the 2500ish range and come zipped.
- Viv Thomas "bonus" content is equal to full access to the Viv Thomas video site and photo site as well. BL explains.
- Video quality is above average, 640-720 high end, 2000+ bitrates on last two years videos.
- Site forum is not only active, but has one of the funnest, most helpful and most knowledgeable groups of porn fans on it, outside of PU of course! Customer service is very responsive.
- Less than $20 price is icing on the cake
- Six updates per day, five days per week
Cons:
- Navigation has improved, but still could be hard for some to get used to. I've noticed that now when you click on a letter in the model list, the models come up alphabetically. Used to this wasn't the case, so this isn't quite the con it once was.
- Still suffers from alias problems when naming models. Sandra Shine is listed as Judith for example. I just pick a letter or two at a time and scan through them for recognizable faces.
- Videos named the same!
Bottom Line:
I have been impressed with the forward progress this site has made. Back when it seemed to be stalling in its progress, they picked up the Viv Thomas bonus content.
The Viv picture sets are not in zips, but you can download them all with DownThemAll add-on with Firefox. Also, the videos on Viv's bonus content are not as high quality as the ones you get from Viv's official video site, but they are 640 high end 750-1000 bitrate and look plenty good enough considering those come from a site that is $30 a month! His videos adds a lot of depth to this site as well. Viv has always been one of my favorites of Euro videos, hardcore, solo, girl/girl, those are all here for you to download and it comes free with Teen Dreams.
One thing I forgot to mention in the pros is the use of "guest models". This is an interesting feature that adds 25 pictures per set from other sites and lets you get a sampling of those site's content, quality and maybe even discover a new model or two.
The biggest complaint that I remember members having about TD is the speed of downloads. I've tried various download managers with the site and find that some won't work, Free Download Manager doesn't seem to work with the site, but try DownThemAll add-on for Firefox. Change the filter to download only movie and archive files, right click the page, click down them all and it will load up the videos and zip/rar files and do the work for you. Really pushes my speed limit as well, I had never seen my speed top 1,200 kb/s but it has here, 1,296 kb/s. I do limit my number of connections to 2 though.
Despite the old issues with finding models you are looking for, the site's navigation once you find the said model is really easy to work with. All the picture sets come up for the model and the movies as well, with DownThemAll, you can skip even having to click on each set to download.
Picture size is coming in at just under 2500 high end. Movies at 640-720 high end with 2000 bitrates. Pretty impressive numbers for a site that updates 30 times per week!
I want to compare it to Twistys, but I think there are a few notable differences. Like another site, Nubiles, Teen Dreams does shoot plenty of never before seen models, giving it more of an amateur feel than Twistys has. That is probably a major pro for some of you, but you all know me, I like my major glam models that I'm used to!
There is really no way for me to guess what the percentage of exclusive and non-exclusive content there is. For me, Twisty's Treat edges Teen Dreams out here. Though there is exclusive content on here, especially in the solo videos. Love the Eve Angel in the bathroom video, staring at herself in the mirror and brushing her hair obviously turns her on as much as it does me since she ends up with one foot on the sink and masturbating.
The amount of content can be overwhelming. I usually stay a member for 3 months at a time, then come back the next year. I like the changes and definitely recommend it!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Teen Dreams Network, 13 solo sites for $19.99
- Has SOME exclusive Eve content, not a lot though, overall content number isn't bad considering it is part of a network.
- 36 total videos, 50 picture sets, just going from my knowledge of Eve's content, less than 10 of the videos are exclusive and less than 10 of the picture sets are exclusive, but probably 20% of content comes from Eve's still listed as "official" site, not Teen Dreams are widely licensed content, so if you haven't been to her official site around half of the content will be new to you.
- Viv Thomas bonus content, both picture and videos from Viv's own sites, excellent content, especially videos.
- Sizes of pictures and videos vary, will explain in BL
- Very fast DL speeds, starting to think not many people on these sites
- Nice navigation that makes downloading, especially picture sets, very easy, zipped pictures.
Cons:
- Updates are sporadic at best
- Several movies will not work, will explain in BL, to show how to know this content is not exclusive, not even to the TD family of sites.
- Viv Thomas content is hit or miss, not in quality or if it is good, but sometimes the damn things won't even download or stream. It downloads a 336 byte error file instead
- To the ultimate of cons, a solo model site of Eve Angel and one of the sets of pictures listed of course as Eve, since it is her solo site, does not have Eve in the set, instead, a young Angel Dark, who did, when younger look a little like Eve. I'm sorry but that is dreadful to see a solo site that can't even identify Eve correctly.
Bottom Line:
Will also re-review the entire network. I wanted to focus mainly on Eve's by itself since it is the largest of the sites and I know there are a lot of Eve fans who might be looking for content of her that they don't have.
This site has by my count, 8 videos that are exclusive to it. For me, those 8 videos were worth $20. Also 4 on Viv's bonus content that I don't have, including a really great g/g scene with Vivien/Wivien/Gitta.
Here is the problem, the site still claims to be exclusive and while I cannot say that they shouldn't claim sets that are on Teen Dreams as exclusive, I can tell you that not everything on here is from Teen Dreams or exclusive.
For one, there is the newer one of Eve by the pool that nearly every major site has, orange bikini. Then to add to this, there are no less than 7 sets that are from eveangel.com.
To make that even worse, 2 of the videos are STILL corrupt, just like they were on eveangel.com. You download them, click play and they play, but you cannot scan through the movie. I have both of those from Eve's site in .mov files since the .wmv they have here is still impossible to scan through. I believe I would be having a talk with that webmaster over there for licensing content out that is corrupt and has been for 2 years.
Overall, the site would be a good way to get into Eve's material and the other models, especially for a newcomer to porn. The picture sets are up to 3,000 high end, and a couple of the videos are even HD, but if you have been a member on Eve's site and the other sites that carry a lot of licensed content like Twistys, Teen Dreams, ATK, Babelicious, you've already seen most of this.
There are though the exclusive videos I mentioned earlier and the Viv bonus content too, if you can get it to work.
The varying in size and quality is always a telltale sign of licensed content and that is what happens here. I've seen videos as high as HD quality, down to 640 high end and the pictures vary from 1280 up to 3000 high end.
For me, it was worth it, but I'm an Eve collector and wanted those rare videos I hadn't seen before. A couple do look newer too. You can usually tell Eve's newer content by her slightly heavier, slightly more bustier figure.
I most likely will never change my stance that Eve is the best solo model in porn. I've watched hundreds, maybe thousands of solo porn model videos and never seen one except maybe Tianna Lynn, that is as believable as Eve. She bring seduction, beautiful long hair and face, cute smile and great body, a full package if you will.
As for the updates, your guess is as good as mine and that isn't just with this site, all the sites in the network seem to have update spurts then die off for months at a time with no updates.
Worth joining for the exclusive videos for Eve fans, Viv bonus and overall the network is a good deal too, but be forewarned that this content is far from 100% exclusive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Freakin' huge amount of content
+ Good $20 TBP monthly membership
+ 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F)
+ Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum
+ No DRM
+ Supports download managers
+ Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks
+ Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive
+ Full tour available before joining
Cons:
- Search function leaves a real nasty after taste
- More of a pic site than a video site
- Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between
- Quality varies
- "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds.
- Older material is mostly nonexclusive
Bottom Line:
I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography.
Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller.
Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around.
My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n".
The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it.
There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for.
Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot.
The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff.
This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times.
If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Great price. ($19.95 from here or you can find it for $17.95 from another site)
+Updated 2-3 times a week.
+Very helpfull members forum, where the webmaster will even reply.
+Bonus guest model section. Gives samples of other sites.
+Nice and easy navigation. By style of set, body type or even just searching for the models name.
+Good selection of solo, girl/girl & boy/girl
Cons:
-Some girls are the same one you've seen from other sites but with different names.
-Images are 1333x2000 for portrait and 1999x1333 for landscape.
-Newer Videos are 704x396, older videos are 640x480.
-Security doesn't allow me to download images using DownThemAll download manager.
-Too many images per set, where 3-4 in a row look almost identical.
Bottom Line:
For the price of under $20 a month, Teen Dreams is a very good site. And if it wasn't for economic reasons, I'd still be a member.
Compared to other websites, Teen Dreams is a bit behind on the quality of both the video and images. The images are good quality and decent size but don't compare to other sites that have 3000px and 4000px images. Both the new and older video are decent quality, however non are true HD or HD quality. I'd consider most videos to be near DVD quality.
One other nitpicking I didn't like was the fact that I couldn't use DownThemAll in Firefox for the images. It has a cool feature where you save the first image as "name" and then each following image would get a number behind it in order. The webmaster was quick to reply as to why, since they were recently hacked, it was a double security thing. Unfortunately there was no way around it, except don't use the download manager. Their suggestion was to just download the zips, unfortunately they normally have 100+ images per set. However there always seemed to be 3-4 in a row that looked almost identical and could have been left out. It just made it a bit more of a pain to download images, then other sites.
Overall Teen Dreams is a site worth checking out, you can't go wrong for $20.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
