Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Give me FTV Girls and FTV Milfs and I'm all but set on my porn needs.
– Updating 4 times a month.
– Video and picture quality is as good as you will get.
– Download picture zips and videos. Unlimited as far as I know.
– Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
– The best collection of amateur Milfs.
– Still the best navigation, too.
Cons:
– The infamous nitpick con of porn needs to establish an age range with Milfs and Matures. I'm really not complaining. Just needed a con.
Bottom Line:
The last few years of my porn collecting has seen me turn to mostly amateur models. I'm confident in saying no fully nude porn site gets better amateur models than FTV Girls and FTV Milfs.
FTV Milfs runs into the debate over the use of the Milf word, while it's true, an 18 year old model could be a Milf, by definition. The word in porn does generally signify an age range or if not a range, let's say “over 25”. I've said many times, my favorite porn models are 25-35. That was a big deal back when I said that, I joined and collected a lot of sites with teen models. That was because teens were the big focus in European porn. Things have changed now and my preferred model, body type, seems to be replacing the popularity of teen models.
FTV Milfs covers that range well, but their FTV Girls does too. I join both at the same time.
There are good reasons: Nearly all the content is solo. I like seeing the models wearing their normal clothes, being ready in said clothes and seeing how comfortable they look. There doesn't seem to be any pressure on them to do anything they're not comfortable doing and because of that, they do nearly everything imaginable to themselves. Somewhere, a male pornstar, or just a random male, is saying he can do more for the model than she can and there's me, shaking my head.
I'm even thinking women feel flattered to be on this site. Something special happens when an amateur model’s perception starts out on a positive note instead of feeling like she's just another number on the casting couch. You can see it in the content.
The only downside FTV Milfs has is it's not been around as long as FTV Girls. The site is still big. There are over 400 models and there is a great blend of body types, boob size, race and most look like women you catch yourself taking a second or third look at while shopping for produce.
Speaking of produce, nothing is off limits, bananas acting like dildos and my favorite niche of public nudity, it's all covered on FTV Milfs.
The navigation on the FTV sites continues to make me wonder why others haven't copied it. There is an off chance my years of membership makes it easier to use, but their tags are as good as I have used. I think I even admitted, at one time, I didn't notice the tags and/or just thought those were there for looks. I can't give a number on how accurate the tags are but each time I've clicked one, I've found exactly what the tag said I would find.
The picture sets are some of my favorites. I have regularly admitted I have clothing fetishes and still do. I'm starting to think I'm not going to grow out of those. I would call the pictures warm and natural. The models are also one of the bigger collections of natural Milfs. I haven't noticed a lot of tattoos or implants. Of course, tattoos don't bother me. The models look real. Years ago, I considered the FTV Girls site to be glam, but not anymore and FTV Milfs isn't necessarily glam. Some of the models do seem to feel best in pretty dresses, but it's dresses you would see women wearing at the store.
The downloads are unlimited as far as I know, but I wouldn't be close to hitting a limit. I mostly just download the new videos and picture sets. I have an entire external hard drive of FTV Girls and FTV Milfs content.
I have said this before about just a handful of sites, it feels like a premium site.
You still get 4 new updates per month and that's almost always 4 new women. I don't join enough mainstream porn sites to say all the models are amateurs but that's going to lead me to say, I believe they are. The biggest reason is a fairly simple one. The models don't act like they're just on another porn scene. I believe that could be the biggest strength of FTV Milfs. There's definitely some flattering to be one of the new four models in a month. I'm thinking back to how Playboy’s Playmates and Penthouse Pets were looked at on such an elevated level. I'm thinking these models on FTV Milfs are experiencing their chance to be like those Playmates and Pets were.
With the great navigation, fast download speeds and easy join and cancel from CCBill, there's just not much to complain about and lots to be positive about.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- Even if not a 100, FTV has been a consistent top or near top scoring site for me for 16 years now.
- The video download quality and photo download quality is some of the best you will see.
- The models, while by definition, first timers, are mostly amateur though a few established porn stars have appeared on FTV.
- Similar to Zishy on this one, I generally love the clothing choices the models wear for their videos and pictures.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Navigation and tags are great once you understand them
- Usually can also join FTV Milfs with a promo when signing up.
Cons:
- The punishment of having a site over 20 years. The older photo sets and videos need remastering and some have been remastered.
- I’ll prepare for the boos on this one, I haven’t ever liked the girl/girl scenes or boy/girl scenes on FTV. Keep it solo!
Bottom Line:
FTV is one of the few sites that I truly believe can score 100 and not hear complaints about the 100. It was one of the first solo American-based sites to enter the online porn world. The models have never been complained about by anyone. These models are usually amateur and they dress or are dressed in a way that normal, young women dress. That means you get a lot of teasing, especially in the pictures. With the addition of FTV Milfs and the ability to sign-up for both, you really could just join the two FTV sites and never pay attention to any other porn site. Or at least I could.
The choice of clothing seems like an ironic pro for porn but there’s one key word to describe the clothing, feminine. I’ve never shied away from my deep interest in women that are strong on the femininity. The FTV ladies do femininity better than any site I know of and they do so without being glam.
The videos on FTV show you a whole other side too. I once said the FTV setup of pictures and videos, is art-like. The videos retain the femininity of the photos but the ladies are more often naked and often being very kinky in the videos. You will see toy appearances from the FTV Toy, a large dildo that all the ladies used to try. That toy was more popular than any male pornstar.
There is the part that’s easy to forget about. The public nudity and flashing. The newer scenes still have some public nudity and flashing but it’s not near as noticeable as some of the older content, which is understandable. Our society has become more prudent and it’s now considered a terrible thing for a young lady to flash her boobs or even masturbate in public.
The navigation on FTV is one of my favorite parts but have known quite a few people who didn’t like it. You go through pages of models. You can filter them down to ages to hair color, however you want. You have to remember there are models from over 20 years. It’s a huge list. That’s why the tags are helpful. The tags will lead you to “most” of what you’re looking for. I say “most” because some of the newer scenes don’t seem to have as much care put into if the tags are all there.
One of the longtime cons for fans was the splitting of videos. When I scored FTV a 100, I listed the splitting of videos as not bothering me any longer and it still doesn’t. I guess I have watched the videos enough times that I realized the splitting is often for effect. I know when we hear of porn scenes being split, we think about a scene showing a woman getting into her masturbation, then the video stopping and leaving us to wait on our computer to download part 2 but that’s not how the FTV scenes are split. The masturbation part will be a full scene before cutting. After the cut, it may be the woman masturbating again but the type of toy, her outfit, the setting, will be different. I just don’t see it being a negative in the same vein as cutting scenes halfway through.
The list of pros is far more important to me. You will have a difficult time finding a site with this many attractive and maybe more importantly, kinky models. FTV shows the true strength of solo porn. The model is on her own. I will even mention Danielle (Blonde curly hair), one of the hottest models anyone has ever seen on a pornsite. But, even after trying multiple takes and even bringing her back to the site, she just struggled with giving a performance that matched her incredible looks. There are other models that might not jump out at you with their looks but then put on a near-perfect masturbation show and you see the similarity between real-life and porn. It’s not always just about looks. It may be about something different for every person that watches the scenes. And that is FTV’s strength. The scenes are authentic and even in the most kinky ones, it’s attractive and not just in a lustful way.
At least for me, I have found I look at the models differently when I see them on FTV. You see the real person not an actress. That is the selling point. These models whether a 10 or a 6, are going to either win fans over with their performance or fail no matter how hot they are.
I am going to score it similar to how I have in the past. A 96 and the 4 points deduction is for the lesser amount of public nudity and teasing.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy
Cons:
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos
Bottom Line:
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others.
Cons:
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons.
Bottom Line:
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.
Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.
Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)
Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.
Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.
Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.
Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model.
Cons:
Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.
The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.
If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.
Filenames could be better.
Bottom Line:
I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.
My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.
The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.
The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.
You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.
One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.
They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.
I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge Archive
Steady Player
Easy Navigation
Advanced Tagging System
Category Selections
Cons:
Bad Download Features
Shoots are not natural
Unnecessarily Split Video Shoots
Bottom Line:
FTV Girls is a very old and a very good amateur porn site. They have been around since 2002. They have a huge archive to get lost into.
Coming from their name First Time Videos, you will find a lot of first-time shoots. There is an explanation for each model and also for shoots.
They have as much as photos as they have videos, and they are beautifully shot.
Even though they have a huge archive, and they did not need to, they split the shots into unnecessary number of scenes and you can only download the videos scene by scene.
They are one of the best amateur sites out there, but when it comes to naturality, they are not good at it. They have beautiful models, shots are beautiful, but not natural. Their great photo archive covers this negative aspect though. You may like their photos more.
Their tagging system is pretty advanced in addition to be able to select the videos from categories. Great archive comes with great selection and they do have it.
They are $30 a month. They have a huge archive so the price is worth it, but downloading system sucks.
They do a very good job with explanations of shoots. It is more than satisfactory. Public Nudity and Masturbation Videos are their main categories. Also, they have Extreme and Fetish Categories. Always different locations of shootings is another positive feature.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite sites, but have lowered score a few points since my last review of it.
- Follows a similar format and style as FTV Girls.
- Nearly impossible to find a flaw with any of the technical aspects.
- Excellent tagging system that carries over from FTV Girls and works even better here with less models than FTV Girls.
- 240 models currently, the site has slowly but surely started building up a good sized archive with a new model added each week.
- One I really like, models originally starting on FTV Girls years ago are starting to show up on FTV MILFs, 5-10 years after first appearing on FTV Girls. The most recent was Trinity St. Clair.
- A potential pro or con, there's a higher percentage of hardcore male/female sets on FTV MILFs than FTV Girls.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max) and the site runs smooth with multiple navigation positives.
Cons:
- One that might not go over well with those used to FTV Girls, more pornstars are showing up here than FTV Girls.
- Would like more updates as there are months with 2-3 pornstars being in updates, with only 4 updates per month, it lowers the percentage of new first time models.
- No longer a con for me but I know it is for some, the videos are split into actions/parts.
Bottom Line:
The FTV sites have been in my top 5 sites for the last 5 years. FTV Girls still is and I would go as far as saying it's my #1 site after nearly 4 years of constant memberships. I still see FTV MILFs as a top site, it's just not quite as good as FTV Girls.
I'm going to be straight to the point with the newer models part. Of the last 7 models, 4 have been pornstars and I know it must be hard to find MILFs that are First Time Experiences but this slight problem also includes more hardcore scenes. Some sites can pull off the switch between solo site to hardcore but with the established FTV style, hardcore just doesn't work for me.
One of the biggest strengths of FTV MILFs are the models that are first time models but they project a confidence of an older woman who maybe has always wanted to get naked on camera. I think most men in their 30s and up have met at least one woman like this in their life. You meet her and she seems nice and you notice she likes to wear skimpy clothes. The next thing you know, she's showing you upskirts and you're having trouble keeping up with her sexual drive that you know she didn't have when she was younger.
I think the pornstars take away from that strength. I think the hardcore scenes take away from that style. Even the hardcore scenes with women that haven't been on camera before. It's like adding the guy, usually her real-life boyfriend or husband, makes it less porn.
All that explanation for removing 2 points.
Everything else is good. For example, the two newest updates are first time experiences and they're two of the better scenes on the entire site. It takes a skilled pornstar to shoot this style and make it feel like a FTV set. I use her a lot when talking about FTV MILFs, Aaliyah Love, she is very capable of being a tried and true pornstar that can make you think she's a first time on video model.
The navigation is one of the parts that keeps me around. My favorite niche in porn, these days, is exhibitionism. It doesn't have to be fully explicit. It can be teasing an upskirt and it works with these older models. Concerns about lesser exhibitionism on the FTV sites are not as high as they were a year ago. Of the last 15 updates, 14 have some level of public nudity in them and that goes even further with 19 of the last 20 updates having public nudity. Take it one step further and closer to a year, 39 of the last 40 updates have public nudity in them.
It's FTV's bread and butter or wheelhouse. They do public nudity as well as anyone.
The video quality has included 4K since January 2018 and those 4K videos have 12,000 bitrates. I don't download those but they are there for those who want them. I download the SD versions. These are 480p and they are high enough quality 480p that they're good enough for me. You also have the option of downloading 1080p if 4K is more than you want and 480p isn't enough.
My once major con of the splitting of scenes is no longer a con for me. I would even call it a pro for me. A lot of these models are best at the public nudity parts. I download the one to two clips of their public nudity but don't download the indoors masturbation videos. It's becoming a matter of efficiency for me. The quality I download also has to do with the model. If she's a model I really like, I download 1080p and usually all of her clips, not just the public nudity ones. I think that's a nice versatility to have in what you're downloading.
There are 240 models and I'll say I don't find all of them attractive. The ages vary from 24 to 54, those are more rare as you'll find the late 20s to late 30s the most common age range.
The main navigation lets you select from basics like age or breast size or alphabetical or date of release. The tagging system lets you select from Hardcore, 1st Time, Public Nudity, Fetish, Busty, Real Orgasm(s), Dildo and so on.
I do think it takes a little time to get used to the navigation as their tags don't jump out at you. They are just colored and labeled icons that you click. They all work with what looks like 100% accuracy.
Most of the scenes for the models average an hour or more of videos and 4-5 different photo sets with each photo set featuring a different outfit and location. It makes the one update per week easier to accept.
And while I complained about the hardcore scenes there are only 21 or about 10% of their scenes. Maybe that's a complaint that's really a compliment? I like their regular solo content so much that those small amount of hardcore scenes are standing out much more than they should.
As with any FTV content the photography and camerawork on videos is as good as any site on the internet, maybe In the Crack could put an argument for the best but both are nearly perfect in their filming.
I look forward to seeing this site about 5-10 years from now. Hopefully, not much has changed by then. It's still the best MILF site despite my 2 point deduction.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Website is easy to navigate.
Each model has been explained with total length of videos, total number of photos, and tags.
You can use tags to make a search on the whole site.
Big archive, has archives dating back to 2002.
Each shoot also have videographer’s comments, explaining the scene.
Cons:
Videos are clipped to shorter scenes and you can download them one by one.
You can also download photo scenes only by scene, not by the model.
Models are amateur, but they are not natural and they don’t act natural.
Bottom Line:
FTVGirls is a site that has been around for a long time. It is one of the best amateur sites out there. There are so many amateur models in their archives and a quite bit of of them are their first shoots.
Different models, tidy website, great archive are some positive sides of the site.
One of the other positive sides are the tags. Each scene has them, and also you can search the site with these tags.
You can find both soft masturbation to extreme fisting scenes on the site.
There are also some girl on girl scenes in the archive, but not so much.
There are so many different outdoor and indoor areas used as well as so many different toys.
It is one of the best sites for photo lovers, as there are many photos with different scenes for each model.
One of the negative parts of the site is, even though girls are amateur, they don’t act natural in the scenes. Some of them have their natural moments, but on most part of the scenes, it is acted. So, if natural is as much as important to you as well as amateur, you may be a little bit disappointed. Still, you won’t be disappointed in the usage of toys, and both soft and hard scenes.
Another negative side is downloading. You can only download scenes one by one, you cannot download the whole models photos and videos at once.
FTVGirls has been one of my favorite amateur sites over the years, and I definitely suggest it to every amateur lover.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The website is tidy and is easy to navigate.
-You can take a ‘free tour’ of the website which gives you access to some photos and sample videos before committing to membership, which is $29.95 per month, or $99.95 for 5 months.
-You can rate and add the shoots to your favourites, and comment on the shoots.
-High quality, professionally shot picture galleries accompany all shoots. The photo galleries are nicely laid out, and you can flick through each photo and there is the option to see full size and zoomed image.
-Each shoot has letters tagged on it, for example O means real orgasm, 1st means first time shoot, BB means busty, Fet means fetish, etc. Once you learn these tags, it is easy to browse to find what you want to see.
-Each shoot has an in-depth detailed description of what happens in the scene (videographers comments). It’s nice to read what the models are like, and I like that they tell you what to expect in a sexy way.
Cons:
-The website looks a little outdated in style.
-When buying membership there is a small checked box also subscribing you to ftv milfs.
-No advanced search options. You can only search by model name, use the search bar at the top, or click on tags that appear on the shoots.
-Each shoot is broken into several videos (clips) instead of one longer video. The shoot appears to be shot throughout a day, and each clip is an ‘episode’, that is filmed in a different outfit, room, with different toy or position. This may be a ‘pro’ for some, but it’s a ‘con’ for me.
-The camera work is not professional, when it moves it makes noises and jitters. But it doesn’t move often.
-Some models are not ‘all natural’, and many wear make up, which doesn’t do it for me.
-There are not many GG shoots, and no group shoots.
-Sometimes there is too much dialogue with the videographer.
Bottom Line:
Ftvgirls.com is a site that features many models in their first time on camera. The shoots are usually quite long, and contain several ‘clips’, which are like episodes of the shoot day, often including a video clip of the photoshoot. Vagina and ass spreading closeups are frequently filmed at the end of a clip.
As the models are very amateur, it is endearing to see how they interact on camera, and I like that they talk about what happens, including mistakes. They have a genuinity that is sexy. I love seeing their different personalities, and finding what works for one model is quite different for another. I saw some clips where models were trying things for the first time, eg fisting, and mfvgirls has an extensive sex toy collection, which the models are able to explore.
Although I enjoyed that there was dialogue with the videographer, and there was a relaxedness about the conversations, sometimes it was a turn off when the videographer would interrupt the scene. I would rather the models get lost in the moment and for things to stop or change because it felt natural. Many of the shoots seemed directed by the videographer, and the shoots I enjoyed the most were the undirected ones. In a clip, generally the model/s just do one thing in one position eg. masturbate with vibrator lying on back. It felt like things were ‘decided on’ before shooting the clip, and the models did no more than that. This is not to say that the models weren’t having a good time. Sometimes the models still tried (pre-planned) new things, and often the clips end in orgasm. However, this is a difference from other websites I frequent as I prefer a more fluid scene where models naturally move between different desires, instead of stopping and starting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Cute girls on their first time in first adult experience
Excellent Videos/pics
Some top names in adult have first scenes here
good navigation
Most in HD with newest available in 4k Older material is of course in Sd)
Good download speeds with no limit and available in multiple formats.
Cons:
Dated site design
No tag search
photo shoots could be longer
Stand alone site with no bonus sites included
Bottom Line:
I joined this site a few years ago and am a repeat customer. Site was still the same but that is a minor con as it is still functional. A tag/category or keyword search would be awesome. I went page by page looking through all the models, this is very mush recommended as some big names started here and are under either their real names or first alias. Some are listed as "now pornstar or glamour model (name)" But most of the ones I did recognized weren't updated.
The content is great. Some very shy new comers appearing for their first time ever. Some went on to become pornstars so these are their real first experiences in front of a camera. Examples: Nina North, Goldie Glock(Ortiz), Uma Jolie, Brittany Bliss, And Moka Mora started here.
The Pics look great but wish the photo shoots were a bit longer, but being amateurs they most likely get more nervous and start shutting down if it gets too long. The videos are just amazing! Some of the public nudity is just down right brazen! Goldie Ortiz (Here known as Violet) walks out buckass naked onto an occupied tennis court! The masturbation videos are pretty amazing too, ranging from shy newbs to girls wanting to explore their own limits with various toys and veggies.
Final thoughts: As this site has been around for almost 2 decades their older stuff is of course in sd. Whats there is there, I don't think anything shot on tape can be remastered.
Bottom line: I would most definitely recommend at least a months membership to this site if only to see the now famous pornstars first scenes. Also the just flat out innocence of the one and done girls trying something new.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive teen to twenties models
High Quality pics and vids
Great toy action
Fun to see younger models experience intense toys
Lesbian scenes are quality!
Cons:
Not enough audition pics
Not enough selfies
Could use a little more groupsex content
Bottom Line:
Fun models, great erotic photos and vids. Join now; you won't regret it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Unique public nudity still goes on which is what I love
- Natural and fun scenes with intimate interviews to find out more of the model
- Wide choice of models to suit all tastes
- Good makeup and attire
Cons:
- Slow downloads I found this time around with 90% of the ones I downloaded
- Less girls I fancied this time around
- Navigation maybe still a bit dated
- Can be a chore finding out what is worthy of a download
- Quite Pricey
Bottom Line:
Sadly for me the spark didnt seem to be there for the site this time around, it had been since September 2015 since I was last a member so was looking forward to joining again. Have to say first though I wanted to be joining the FTVX site really, which is the new site from these guys involving the girls from FTVgirls having sex with Rob the owner (lucky git I know). Rob now says this site should, no promises but has said it should be September this year as he wanted to not just release a site without much for people to see, so hopes to have lots of scenes from the get go. Anyway so as this site never opened at the end of last year and I had hoped it might be the beginning of 2017 which sadly it never happened I decided to join FTVgirls again and see what new cuties I liked this time around.
Yeah the videos are still all broken up into segments here which most modern sites dont do, I think its good and bad thing if that makes sense, the reason behind it is each girl will do certain scenes there will be of course the masturbation, or she might be doing a nude dance, or some public nudity in a shopping mall, you get the picture its kind of random things so wouldnt really make sense on one video file and like me you can pick the scenes that interest you, I for one dont bother with the masturbation, never have been into it really unless she is really my type of girl or she is using a big dildo which luckily is something FTV do lots. But I join here for the lesbian and public nudity, if it was just the masturbation I would never join.
So yeah thats the good side of the videos being split the bad side is, it can be slightly hard work going through videos to see if its your bag, there is lots of non nudity stuff you might have to trawl through and you got make the decision if you want this 1GB of mainly non nude stuff apart from a quick flash of the models tits near the end, you see what I mean sometimes that can be a mind chore deciding. Also you might see some awesome public nudity stuff from a girl and you want that to carry on as this is perfect and a huge turn on then you see she has two more vids left and you hope they carry this on only to find they dont and shes moved on to doing something youre not into and the moods gone.
The lesbian content I ended up getting were Alex Grey and Nina North, Lana Rhodes and Stella Cox, Leah Gotti (Fiona) and Brook. Out of these I think I enjoyed the Leah Gotti and Brook as they seemed to really dig each other and it came across good on camera. It always makes for a better scene if the two models look like they want each other badly and not just for a pay cheque. FTV girls has good form for picking girls that work well together and often are good friends already.
Stand Out girls this time around were as follows, these were the girls that made me go wow.
Scarlett Now this is the type of girl that makes joining the site worthwhile, amazing fun and innocent mix with bags of awesome personality that I find attractive as well as being drop dead gorgeous.
Cadie Again amazing girl, she opened up really well and I loved her wackiness and honesty, its what I want really from FTV, girls that are super cute and have good senses of humor, Cadey shines above most girls on the site.
Mackenzie was awesome and really the kind of girl I like here, she has an innocent look but really knows how to let go and get all into being the exhibitionist
Then also worth a mention were Lanah, Blaire, Kelly and Elena. All of these updates Ill be keeping.
Little less impressed with scenes than I have been in the past have to say, but still a great site and lots to keep you busy with an update a week, its one of those sites I keep an eye on to see what updates have been added.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Amazing models. Young girls with a lot of bubble butts. Large archive.
Cons:
Older photo shoots lacking. As a photo lover not a lot of imagination used here and the always stressing of insertion at the end is just plain lazy.
Bottom Line:
I prefer a softcore site more explicit then the excellent Only Tease (like Digital Desire) but I easily prefer Only Tease and their sister sites to FTV girls. I'm not a fan of glamour videos so I'm just talking about photos and I grow weary of the last third of the shoot devoted to uninspired insertion pics that also suffer from very little variation to the previous photo. The best looking young girls with great asses are for the most part semi-wasted.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly early version of FTV's take on the MILF genre. Content is being added by the week.
- Same FTV quality as expected. The videos all have 1080p option, picture sets top out at 4000 long end and are downloadable.
- Here's a big plus, there's some models here that are over 30, who I've never seen or heard of.
- Navigation works perfectly, it's the same as FTV's navigation on their other sites and because there's not a lot of content, it's really easy to get around to the content there is.
- Download speeds are in my excellent range. I download in my 90% of top speed range.
- Bills through CCBill
- Very good and limited tagging system, also used on FTV Girls.
- Very happy with the photo sets, most of the models have 3-4 different photo sets (different clothes/location) and in total they are 200-400 pictures of each model.
- Last pro, mainly because I think it will need to be mentioned in cons too. There's hardcore here, meaning boy/girl sets...
Cons:
- There's hardcore here. I don't consider this a con, but I've known a lot of members through the years who believe these solo-type sites shouldn't have men in them, so I thought I would mention it.
- And if you don't like FTV Girl's split video scenes, you're not going to be happy to hear that feature is on FTV MILFs too.
- A small amount of the content is from FTV Girls
Bottom Line:
I think many of us have waited patiently for the new FTV sites to be launched and this is one of them. Here's the good things:
I'm a huge FTV fan. I love the public exhibitionism, the amateur feel of the models, the way FTV sets up photography sets, the quality of the videos. I've also preferred models 25-35 for nearly my entire PU-life. So this site could be everything I've been looking for in a porn site.
The split videos are here. Yes, I've argued, debated and complained about them on FTV Girls, but their webmaster is set on them and he produces content I like so I'm adjusting. I'm still taking 5 points off for it, but if that doesn't bother you, go ahead and add 5 points to the score. Think I took 8-10 for it on my last FTV Girls review. The other "problem" is the filename system. It goes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 in each and every set. So, here is my fix that I've been using:
Create a folder of the model's name. In that folder make new folders for the number of sets/scenes the model has. For example, model name, set one, set two, set three, etc... Then use a download manager that allows you to save roughly 20 videos at a time and adjust the folder they are saved in to correspond with the set folder they belong in. By doing this, you offset the filename problem since there's only one 01, 02, 03, 04 in each folder.
One of the best changes the FTV sites have made in recent years is the tagging system. I personally think it's the most useful tagging system I've used. Why? Because it's very simple. The tags are:
1st - Never been in adult before.
Nu! - Public nudity
O - Real orgasms
Dil - Dildo play
Fet - Unique, fetish content
Ex - Extreme content
BB - Naturally busty girl
HC - Hardcore content, boy/girl
SpG - Sporty Girl, includes athletic content.
To top off this handy tagging system, they then list what fetishes, how far the model goes, what act of public nudity, etc...
I think every site should go to a similar tagging system.
Overall, there's a good selection/percentage of 1st time models. By my count, there's 75 models and 23 are 1st time models. There's a fairly decent mixture of body types, but there's not a lot in the way of different ethnicity. I still think finding 23 "MILFs" who have never filmed porn is an impressive number and here's the advantage. The MILFs are more confident than the teens. A lot of the 1st time teens are shy, even backwards and you can tell they have to really push/pull the models to get them to even be comfortable on camera, let alone to be confident on camera. You don't see that as much in this content. Most of the models look like/act like they want to be naked and want people looking at them.
I usually won't do this, but a model that just blew me away on FTV MILFs is Lexi. She is one of the younger models on this site at 28, but she's 5'9" 34E (natural), 26 waist, 34 hips with long, blonde hair. She's one of the few models I've ever seen that I would call stunning. And it's her 1st time on video. Maybe that's where we're at in porn these days. Used to I wanted to see a young model do her first masturbation scene or hardcore scene. Now, I kind of like the idea of the model being late 20s, who has never tried nude modeling, doing her first ever adult video. There's a believable anticipation from these older 1st time models, as if they've wanted to do it all their lives, but are just now getting around to it.
That, to me, is the strongest part of this content. There's something more genuine to it than most porn. Not to write off the teens, but I think even when they're genuine it's just to tease us old men. It makes you wonder how many of these models were told by an ex that they weren't sexual enough or weren't as sexy as the teens their exes watched in porn.
Having said that, there's still not a ton of content here ... yet. But the potential is higher than any site I've been on in a long time.
By my count, based on removing the FTV Girls content that somehow made its way onto this site, there are:
65 sets from FTV MILFs
10 sets carried over from FTV Girls (most of these are 1st time models)
Each set has 200-400 pictures and 1-2 hours of videos.
Of the 65 sets, 13 have hardcore (b/g) parts.
Model ages range from: 24-45, there's one 24, one 26, nearly all the rest are 28-45.
I've long struggled with most porn content. The model is the focus to me and I like models who can arouse with more than their natural, born-with body. Some might call it seduction. Eve Angel stayed my favorite for nearly a decade because of how she looked into the camera. Most of the models here also have that strength. Most of the teen models look at the camera like, "What are you going to do to me?" The models here look at the camera like, "You'll never believe what I'm going to do to you."
I took 5 points off for the split videos and 7 points off for value since it's a small site. Having said that, I can see this becoming my favorite site and a potential high 90s site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Alison Angel is one of the most beautiful girls on the net.She is Young and has a body of a goddess.She is playful and enjoys flashing her body in exotic locations.Everything about her body is near perfection.I just can't get enough of her.I love when she's posing near cars,stripping in public,on the beach or in the desert.
Cons:
Alison has stopped modeling about a decade ago so the updates aren't really new,just old stuff in rotation.Some of the conversations between Alison and her photograph aren't really interesting.Some of her dresses are a bit dull.I dislike when she's licking her breasts or showing her pierced tongue.The videos while still pretty good aren't in HD.
Bottom Line:
While i like FTVGIRLS(the site where Alison probably made her first apparence),here you don't have to search and dismiss a bunch of girls to get
to the delicious ones.It's all Alison and she's all delicious.With Alisonangel,it's more a question of quality than quantity since there isn't an enormous amount of updates each month
(just old stuff rotation)so if your budget is tight,you really don't need more than a month to look at all the videos.Still if you really appreciate Alison's beauty,it's totally Worth the price.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site that has returned more to its amateur roots.
- In my opinion, the best site for those who like public flashing, touching, as these once favorites have now returned in nearly every new update.
- Models are starting to become more varied in appearance. There's been several busty-type models added recently (Darcie is a favorite). Also seeing more dark haired models, there was a time when it seemed like 90% of new models on here were blonde.
- Video and photo quality are both excellent, zips for downloading photo sets.
- Lots of sporty girls, flexible, working out, dancing.
- Site navigation has improved greatly.
Cons:
- The days of the more extreme FTV seem to be over. You rarely see the giant dildos or the FTV Toy, but it's not a con for me, could be for others.
- Webmaster or whoever programs the site goes a little overboard with the use of tags, really, it's not public nudity just because the model gets nude in a private backyard in Arizona.
- And the big one, the videos are still split into parts. I don't know how many times I've reviewed FTV or commented about it, but despite all the reasoning I've heard, "The different clips show the progression of the scene" was one, and another was, "Some people don't like masturbation, others don't like teasing, the clips allow users to pick just the ones they like". So does the fast-forward and rewind button.
Bottom Line:
FTV has always been an up and down site for me. Many times as a member, the up and down status happened from day to day. I admit, one of my favorite niches in porn is public nudity/flashing and even better if the model slips a little masturbation in too.
I like the combination of danger/excitement/arousal you see from the models in the public nudity scenes. And one really big plus for FTV is the models, at least to me, are becoming more and more amateur. I'm sure it's no different than it used to be where someone like Eva Angelina appeared here early in her career then went on to be one of the most prolific porn actresses of all-time.
FTV to me is the best public nudity site available that is still updating. So if public, exhibitionism is your thing, you should try it out just for those scenes.
The site's navigation has improved thanks to a new design in the member's area. New might not be the right word, but it was new to me when I joined 3 months ago. I had been away from this site since roughly 2010. It could still be improved by better tagging. All scenes now have tags across the top of their description. These are nicely done bold and bright tags that make it easy to see if a scene has something in it you might like. Some examples:
Nu! = Public Nudity, O = Real Orgasm, Ex = Extreme Scene and so on. These are very useful except for one thing. Since adding this tagging system they've went back and tagged every scene on their entire site. I will give them credit for not just throwing every tag possible on every scene, but there's the occasional misused tag that can be frustrating.
The frustration is made worse by the videos being cut into parts. Instead of just downloading one big file then scanning through it for the part you're most interested in, you have to download 4-10 parts then open each one and look for the part you're interested in.
If that's not enough frustration, the videos here are such high quality that it makes you wonder if they realize stopping to load another video is breaking up the continuity of the scenes? An example: Cayton Cayley (Candice) has a scene where she's flashing in a car repair garage. There's men all around and she's getting more aroused by each one that look at her. Then ... the video stops. Load the next one, watch the FTV logo for 2-5 seconds, video starts and she's walking to a room in the back where men are going to watch her masturbate. That's not only senseless, but it's illogical. One of the few believable things I've heard behind the reasoning of breaking the scene up is "Videos are shot in different locations". While I'm sure video editing software could piece those together still, I can at least see how one moment the model is nude in public, the next she's in a bed getting ready to masturbate, could also make the videos less natural-feeling, but the one I used above was in the same building. As are many others.
My guess is it will never change. It's been this way for over 10 years. Outside of that fairly big problem, the site delivers. The change from some extreme scenes to hardly no extreme scenes didn't bother me.
The size of the site can be overwhelming. I don't have near as much time to view/download porn as I used to so I've ended up staying at FTV for 3 straight months trying to rebuild my collection of their content. Updates are once a week and include videos and photos of one model. It's also still a great site for collectors since a lot of well-known porn stars including hardcore, extreme ones, were here on FTV early in their careers, showing some innocence and playfulness, you don't see from them in their newer work.
The interviews are often funny and show the model's personality away from being a model. I would even wonder how many models have helped/hurt themselves with these interviews?
I know there's been reviews and comments about the download speed being poor, but I haven't experienced any problems over the 3 months. My download speed on here is roughly 90% or higher of what it should be. Just tested it again before writing this review.
Overall, this is how I see this site: There's high-quality photos and videos. Decent download options on the videos and zips for the photos. The improved navigation (since 2010) makes the site much easier to use. Even the types of models have improved over the last year or so (subjective). But there's always that one but revolving around the split videos. I can say I took off 6-8 points for the split videos. It creates too much of a frustration situation. I can either download the clips I know I'll like and skip the others, which will make me wonder what I missed or I can just download them all, which is what I end up doing.
Even with the frustration, it's the best at public nudity and at finding very attractive amateur models.
-files are named 01, 02, 03 and so on
-horrendous download speeds
-no tech support
Bottom Line:
this site is great as far as content goes. however my download speeds are at 275 kb/s. i have no problems with any other site. ive contacted tech support, they ignored me. i have given the lowest score possible because if you cant download the video whats the point of even joining?
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Great video quality and options
Decent pictures
No download limit
Exclusive content
Attractive models
Cons:
Not a lot of variety
Slow updates
Not much direction to the videos
Bottom Line:
FTV Girls is a site that focuses on young, thin, and attractive models.
With a couple of minor exceptions all videos are solo scenes that tend to fall into either masturbation or exhibition categories. The videos are of high quality but I found myself getting bored of this site much faster than most, but tastes will vary on this.
I think the reason why I didn't like the site as much as I thought I would was because there doesn't appear that any real direction is given to the models. Basically the "director" doing the filming places the girl somewhere and just lets her do whatever she feels like. Sometimes this works out but other times it ends up being kind of boring.
There is also always a lot of talking going on between the director and model which you may or may not like. There's not a lot of variety to the model or scene type so you need to really like both.
One thing I did find interesting is that occasionally some of the models performed dance routines. I haven't really seen that done before on other sites so I thought that was kind of novel.
The layout of the site is pretty well done. The scenes are pretty well tagged and organized. The shoots are cut up into small clips of maybe 4-11 minutes. Normally I'd dislike this and want a single complete video but for this site I actually really appreciated being able to pick and choose what parts to see and what ones to skip.
Download speeds were always good and DL managers work fine.
If you like the content there's a good amount of it but I feel the one update a week is too infrequent. It seems to be a one man show so perhaps that's simply the volume one person can handle. I do recommend a join but can't say that I'd want to be a recurring member.
I don't regret my membership but I didn't like it as much as I thought I would and got tired of the site very quickly. It is worth noting though that I generally prefer more hardcore sites and I'm sure that did impact my feelings about this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge site with exclusive videos
- Site well laid out
- High production values
- Beautiful models
- Lots of public nudity
- Lots of solo masturbation
- Some girl/girl
- Some (but not a lot) hardcore
- A chance to see some A-listers before they were stars
- Supports download managers
- Excellent video quality
- Downlaod options available
- Early adopters of HD
- High resolution photos available
- Photos available in zips
Cons:
- If you dont like the typical FTV model then youll likely not like the site
Bottom Line:
Some may disagree with me on this assessment, but I see FTV Girls as serving two completely different niches within one site. They focus on public nudity and on solo girl masturbation. There are other niches (some girl/girl and some rare hardcore) but the majority of the scenes contain the two main niches that the site serves. There is a limitation to my review in that while Im a huge fan of public nudity Im not a big fan of solo girl stuff, so most of what I downloaded was the public stuff. I think its reasonable to assume that if the public stuff is of such high quality that a prospective member who likes solo masturbation scenes would be equally happy with a membership.
The site has been around for 10 years now and continues to offer high quality exclusive scenes. Right from day one this site had high production values with good lighting, camera work and editing. The site now has 839 scenes uploaded and updates with one (sometimes two) scenes being added per week. Some may say that the update rate isnt enough, but when you consider the effort that goes into these scenes I think the once-a-week update is pretty impressive.
The site itself is well laid out and simple to use. The scenes are laid out 30 per page and each scene opens into a separate page. On that scenes page there are links for the videos (two or more) and the photos. Each of those opens into a separate page with the download options. On newer scenes there are obviously more options with the scenes being HD in both WMV and mp4, in SD in either format and in two formats for mobile devices. The file size is shown too. I downloaded the HD mp4 videos and they come in at 1920x1080, 12,000kb/s and 30fps. The older HD videos have the same specs except the bitrate is about 8,000kb/s.
You can also sort by model and there is a search function and extensive use of tags. (One great advantage of the tags is that it allows the member to do some pre-sorting. I was here for public nudity and there was a tag for that.)
The site was an early adopter of HD video bringing it in in December 2007. The SD videos offered before that come in at 720x480, 1,200kb/s and 25fps.
One thing I liked about the layout was that when you opened the page for a specific video there are thumbnails of the photos on the same page which allows a bit of a preview to help you decide if you want the scene or not.
Photos are available and look great. Obviously the photo size has grown over the years with the latest being offered as either 1600 or 4000 pixel downloads. Zips are available.
An interesting facet of the site is that since it is so high quality and has been around so long it affords an opportunity to see A-list stars before they were stars, and in many cases under different names. Amia Miley appears as Ileana, for example. Christie Lee and Kelly Wells make early appearances. There are quite a few big models who appeared here early in their careers. Something that may be unique is the 2006 shoot of Brianna Love (as Brianna) when she is 8 months pregnant.
I joined specifically for the public nudity. In my opinion, public nudity is either very good or very bad. When done wrong all the heat is removed. FTV does it right: the public parts of their shoots are really well done. I use Teasers VOD as the gold standard of public nudity due to its high risk and intense heat. FTV isnt up to that standard but it is still excellent and any fan of the genre wont be disappointed. I should also point out the flaw in comparing this site to Teasers: Teasers was so risky that the City of L.A. shut them down. Ill accept the less in-your-face public scenes in FTV as a trade-off for more scenes being shot.
Notwithstanding the above, this is NOT just a public nudity site. Most videos have some public nudity and thats followed by an indoor scene with masturbation. While I normally prefer the option to download an entire video, the fact that the shoot is broken into segments really fits well here. I just want the public stuff and thats in a stand-alone video. Same with the solo stuff. I liked that the scenes are not sterile. The models personality is allowed to shine through. Some may not like that the cameraman interacts with the model in the scene, but I think it adds to the heat.
There is a lot of BTS material available too for those of us who like that. Its located under the Extras tab.
Download managers work on the site and I had no problem with using one.
If there is a downside to FTV it is likely that some people who like variety in their models may not be satisfied. The models are almost exclusively Caucasian, 18-22 and slim. Dont join looking for 30+ BBW black women. I like what they offer, and Im a satisfied customer.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that does a great job of offering material for different interests. The material is great and it is easy to access. I recommend a membership.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Attractive, often gorgeous models, often shot early in their careers. Upscale location(s) for the photo shoots help out too.
-Excellent video quality! The HD videos are really good!
-I really like the pussy close up videos-they are very well done.
-Many of the masturbation videos end with real orgasms and oozing girl cum.
-Most of the models have an interview video that does a good job of letting you get to know them a little better. The models can also post a comment on their experience with FTV after the shoot is done.
-They do have occasional lesbian videos which I think are well done. I really liked Malena Morgan and her gf.
Cons:
-the photo sets are almost an after-thought, and although they are pretty good in general, the one thing they lack is size (many are only 1500 px on the long dimension). This is probably my biggest gripe, especially since they have so many really hot models.
-site navigation could be improved with a better search engine. Its organized by update date, and you can search models alphabetically. Having said that, from my perspective there really are no search tags that can reliably find models I really like. You never really know until you watch their videos.
-there seems to be just a few main locations that most of the videos are shot, so you will start to recognize them again and again. One place that they use for most of the outdoor shoots is some type of office building--usually there aren't many people around, so it appears they go out there on the weekends. There is also a nice house (mansion really) that they use for the indoor shoots. Still, more variety would be nice.
Bottom Line:
FTV stands for "first time videos", and while it may not be true for every model that FTV was her first porn shoot, its probably not far off. Many of the girls still have a youthful energy and innocence that you usually don't see in your average experienced porn star.
FTV has been around for quite a while, so there is a lot of content to go through if you are a first time member. It took me 4 months to go through the most recent three years or so. The updates only come once a week (one new model, each with about 9 to 12 videos and 4 or 5 photo sets), so its not a site that I would stay joined to forever. Rather, its the type of site that you go back to once a year or so, after your initial membership.
FTV has a few themes that feature heavily in its videos: public nudity and flashing (usually 2 or 3 of a models vids will include this); masturbating with extremely large dildos, vegetables, and/or hands (fisting); and real masturbation videos that often include extreme pussy close ups. The public nudity and extreme insertions don't really do much for me, but I love their masturbation and pussy close up videos. That along with the model interviews, "freshness" of the models, and excellent video quality are what I really liked about this site.
Bottom line: there is a huge amount of quality content here. Definitely worth joining!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed.
Cons:
- My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes.
Bottom Line:
FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.
I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.
It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.
The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.
What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.
Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.
I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.
As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Consistent. Not much has changed since I was a member 2 years ago.
-The girls. If you like sexy white chicks that run the gamut from avg. to gorgeous, you'll get something out of FTV. (they have an exotic non-white girl here and there).
-Girls inserting large objects. One unique aspects of FTV is their penchant for having the girls stick massive vegetables and/or fruits inside them. Once in a while they'll shove a hand or fist in there for good measure.
-I was able to download zipfiles of pics rather quickly.
-Lots of hot videos of girls masturbating.
-Little synopsis of the scene and the director describes shooting with the model.
Cons:
-The layout is a bit cumbersome. Also, visually they could reconfigure the site so it's more intuitive to navigate instead of just scrolling down...FOREVER.
-The girls' names! It seems more often than not FTV always has the names of the girls listed differently than what they are everywhere else. This is probably a testament to their ability to locate the newest, hottest girls. However, it's a pain in the butt to us pic collectors who would like to organize all of our pics by model. Thankfully there are unaffiliated blogs on the web that list girls by their FTV name AND their porn names.
-The price. They need to lower that price a bit. In my opinion this is good for once every two years but for less than half the price I can get better content.
-The video content meanders a bit. and I'm not a big fan of how they edit by splicing right in the middle of a scene so there's a slight jump in the audio and video.
Bottom Line:
I seem to join this site every 2 years or so. I like FTV a lot, but for what it is, they should be commanding a subscription rate of $19.99. Even then, I think that's a bit too high. I give it an 83 because it is solidly a VERY GOOD site. However, there are solo glamor-shot type sites that in my opinion are slightly better, and update more frequently. With my latest stint with FTV coming to a conclusion in a matter of days, I definitely enjoyed my subscription this time around...see you in another two years FTV, maybe.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls are absolutely hot. There are lots of them.
Cons:
Though the girls are hot, the photography is only average. It's not up to today's standards. The photo-shoots are average.
The site navigation is also outdated. I'd also like to add terrible. I feel it's like it's a site from 10 years ago.
The search option need work as well. How could you miss out on this aspect when you showcase so many models. It lacks depth and is confusing.
This site is really slow. I have a high speed connection (32 mbps on speedtest.net) and loading times are slow and choppy at times.
I have nothing to say about the vids. I didn't watch many of them. I'm a pictures guy.
Bottom Line:
I've been wanting to try out this site for a long time now. Now that I've become a member, I'm very disappointed with it. I'm also disappointed that it got such a high rating considering lots of mediocre aspects. I didn't even download one set. I'm going back to my old porn collection. I'm dissatisfied with the content, site, and value praised about this site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
