Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: turboshaft (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1958)  |   Threads Started (41)

551-600 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 11 Page 12 13 19 25 31 39 40 Next Page >

04-26-12  12:54am - 4624 days #30
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't think I fall in this category because I do enjoy a wide variey of comedy and some of it is crude but if I must find jokes about sexually abusing children funny then I guess I am a humorless sourpuss.


You're not, and that's not the same as finding nothing funny, ever. There are people who find absolutely no value in any humor whatsoever, and this can be seen taken to its extreme in the more repressive parts of the world.

Forgive me for thinking too deeply about this, but I do care about the freedom to enjoy finding humor in things, even those subjects that are not in "good taste" (or so we are told). And really, it's not you seeing something as unfunny, but others being so offended that they feel it's necessary to tell us what we can and cannot laugh at, and, ultimately, think.

In other words, just my typical libertarian-gone-mad . "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-24-12  10:50pm - 4625 days #9
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Hey toad glad to see ya around a bit nice to not be only one with toad in their name


Yes, glad to see our other 'toad back as well.

But, now...what happened to messmer? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-24-12  10:49pm - 4625 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


You provincials are too much. You're sounding like my 85 year old mother. No offense intended, but really, do you actually get offended or upset by this?


Couldn't agree more!

If the "proper" etiquette on wearing a hat was the only real problem left in society then I'd say we were doing pretty well. As it is not--and has never been--I could care less. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Apr 25, 2012, 12:24am (turboshaft: Spelling)

04-24-12  10:41pm - 4625 days #15
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I don't mind the high heels, RB, but I keep thinking darn they must be hard on the furniture.


If you're watching porn where the girl is wearing high heels and you keep thinking about how hard they are on furniture then you're not doing it right. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-24-12  10:25pm - 4625 days #26
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


Sorry but I don't think it's possible to truly warn anyone about the level of depravity in those jokes. The best thing anyone can do is never write them again.

I know that the kind of jokes comedians tell each other is rarely meant for the general public. I've always assumed that since they are comedian by profession and telling jokes is what they do on a daily basis then they need a certain level of shock to get their attention and that's fine. I suspecvt that if they were to do a full show using those jokes then they would quickly lose any chance of getting hired by most clubs and they could forget any chances of making it on TV.


No offense, but there's plenty of comedians saying things that are just as "shocking" as these jokes, if not much worse. Daniel Tosh has already been mentioned, as he likes to be very unforgiving in his comedy. Another example is Louis C.K., who accused Sarah Palin of having a "retard-making cunt" (in reference to her down syndrome child).

Crude? Maybe, but hardly the crime the conservatives, who were apparently so enraged they conveniently forgot about free speech or individual liberty, made it out to be in their breathless rush to defend Palin and "decency" as we know it.

There are a few types of people I have always been suspicious of, and one of these is the habitually humorless--those outraged, hyper-sensitive sourpusses who seem to be incapable of ever getting a joke, no matter how trivial or silly. Frankly, life is already too serious to not try and lighten it with some humor. And because of this I will always choose any offensive or crude comedy if it means avoiding the authoritarian dullness through which those joyless moralists would have us suffer. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-12-12  12:21am - 4638 days #23
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Stupid, stupid, stupid .. with so many (undiagnosed and angry) nut cases on the loose how can every Tom, Dick or Harry be allowed to buy something that's there for one reason only.

Forget about the "target practice" or "collector" excuses.


But what if that "one reason only" is a "collector" using the perverts who try to steal his porn collection as "target practice"?

(badandy400, I'm looking at you...)

Originally Posted by badandy400:

I wanted my AR15, I only hope I never need it.


Oh, god, I was only joking! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Apr 12, 2012, 12:28am

04-11-12  11:57pm - 4638 days #22
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by t9chome:


On a lighter note, it seems to me that teachers & administrators are more likely to be fucking their students than shooting them.


Either way, if shots are fired, there will be hell to pay!

(Though I'd think teacher-student relations would be a little more fun at first, at least until your twenty-something teacher is hauled off to court.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-11-12  11:33pm - 4638 days #7
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The victim told police that his former girlfriend, Christina Reber, stormed into his apartment as he was innocently sitting at his computer.


Can't imagine what this guy did, but I certainly have never been sitting "innocently" at my computer! (I guess my ex would prefer to smash my computer before giving my gonads a try...) This story also reminds me why I think handjobs can be dependent on a lot more trust then we may think.

Still, even with the the hundreds of ridiculous puns and double entendres I'm tempted to write, my thoughts keep returning to "Gee, poor guy." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-11-12  11:19pm - 4638 days #6
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm really curious to know what he did to her for her to decide on the punishment.

Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Pat,
Probably found his membership to PU, as you know what unsavory people we all are .


You're not kidding! I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few women out there who'd only just met me and they probably had something similar in mind.

Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


But seriously, what is with women and getting mad at guys
and damaging the boys down south.
I mean guys do not get mad at women and do something to their boobies or hoo haw ! *( yes I said hoo haw ).
Imagine the horror if a man did that, my thoughts are would it be more serious a crime. It seems like attempted murder or
something more then felony assault.
Felony assault should be when a weapon is involved, when mutilation and the intent to do so is clearly involved it should be a much higher crime.


To be fair, there are men in less civilized parts of the world who legally commit some pretty vicious horrors against women. And this can be for a range of alleged social crimes, from adultery to the misfortune of being born a woman in any of the more conservative interpretations of the various religions currently being practiced.

But if the guy's lucky, and assuming this ever makes it to trial, he will have a male judge, in the same way a female rape victim would hope to have a female judge in a trial of her attacker. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-07-12  08:07pm - 4642 days #8
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


For me, its not the point so far as why do they need to.
My point is why are you saying a legal trained person can not.


No offense, but a lot of gun rights advocates seem to have an issue with the word "trained"--sort of like how the 2nd Amendment starts with "A well regulated Militia," but everyone is obsessed with "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" part.

And frankly, it's kind of hard to see a pressing need to fully legalize packing heat in schools. Violence in schools, including gun violence, has been going down in the last few decades, despite the hyperbolic attention now given to shootings. And even if shootings were becoming more frequent, I'm not sure how concealed weapons would do much immediate good outside of one-room schools.

Don't get me wrong, I hate kids as much as the next person, but I don't think only being able to enter a school unarmed is the second coming of Stalinism. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-06-12  09:15pm - 4643 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Not to go all activist, but to again prove a point. Not one case on anyone that had a concealed license and committed a crime in a school can be found in my state. However they want to take that right away. WHY ?
Sure if teachers and professors were shooting up the place that would make sense but not one case on any time of school ground by any teachers or professors.


How dangerous are your state's schools that people need to carry concealed weapons, or any weapons for that matter?!

Just kidding, but still people tend to not get injured or killed by citizens' personal porn collections (excluding, of course, the inevitable number of accidents caused by auto erotic asphyxiation or whatever else people dream up in their spare time... ).

BTW, is it just me or does "take a bite outta porn" sound incredibly filthy? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-06-12  03:23pm - 4643 days #2
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Came across an interesting article that actually attempts to calculate the size of the internet porn world by actual usage, not just dollars spent (click here for the article). In a nutshell, the article claims that as much as 30% of the worlds total web traffic is taken up by us pervs looking at porn.


Considering the bandwidth demands of streaming or downloading videos I wouldn't be surprised if the numbers are even higher.

I remember reading last year about the amount of bandwidth Netflix's Instant Watch service uses--and that's just a single site with no porn (I've looked )--and the percentage was well into the double digits in the U.S. at peak usage times.

Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Other statistics in the article show that despite some PUer's having porn stashes in the 20 terabyte range that there's still plenty of content out there waiting to be collected.


Hmm, still less than badandy400's numbers.

Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Admittedly, some of the mind boggling numbers in the article are extrapolations based more on guessing than true data


I'm betting this is because the researchers ended up wasting a lot of time looking at porn rather than actual facts and figures. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-29-12  07:08pm - 4651 days #804
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


As teachers and parents grapple with America's bullying crisis, the students do what they can to survive a school day.


"America's bullying crisis"?

Is the situation really that dire? Sorry, but this kind of knee-jerk persecution complex over what is, sadly but truly, a big part of growing up in a world full of assholes who may not get along with one another. It's also political correctness that taken to its extreme gets people in serious legal trouble, like the recent conviction of Dharun Ravi for spying on his roommate.

If anything this documentary seems to point to problems that are much greater than just bullying alone, but larger social and political issues. One of the kids in the film is a girl who was mocked by teachers and students after coming out. Is that just bullying or the symptom of a society where a large proportion of people still defend and masquerade their homophobia as a traditional "value?"

As usual, sounds like the adults need more help than the kids. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-29-12  04:11am - 4652 days #801
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


^Thanks for the correction. I guess I'm still living in the past. I'm not sure how the rating system works when the movie gets released on dvd or Blu-Ray because I've always been old enough to buy whichever movie I wanted and i never look at what rating is on the packaging.

I know that movies that aren't rated tend to have a hard time getting shown in many theaters simply because the theater is affraid of the bad publicity they might get if a movie meant for an older audience is seen by a younger one. Another reason is that instead of bad publicity they could get sued by the parenst of those kids. Parents tend to look at the rating before allowing their child to see the movie so an unrated movie means that they really don't know if it's appropriate or not.


I haven't looked at a rating in a while either, except to wonder why they went with a lower given the subject material (answer: make more money with a younger audience, see "The Hunger Games," rated PG-13 while telling a story that's basically about kids murdering each other for a TV show).

I doubt parents would take their kids to see any unrated film anyway, but I also doubt they would sue either. Though last year a woman actually sued over a "misleading" trailer to the film Drive--and why not? What else are the courts there for?--people tend to get out the pitchforks and torches when a film rustles their fragile sensibilities.

Religion generally seems to be the most volatile topic a film can address, except apparently when it goes for the over-the-top approach, like Mel Gibson did with his anti-Semitic snuff feature "The Passion of the Christ." But the less grisly, though generally more sexual, religious films earn a healthy platter of death threats, protests, and outright bans on their own.

I guess some people should just avoid seeing movies altogether--they anger up the blood. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-28-12  12:13am - 4653 days #23
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


You are inserting a forign object in a very crucial part of the body and that object is made of non compatible materials

Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Hmm if you had stopped there it would represent every sex toy on the planet


If he had stopped there I would have thought he was talking about the excuse for why some women won't sleep with me! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-28-12  12:04am - 4653 days #798
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't know why he should worry because the slaughter of underage kids whether it be ultra violent or not is still not something that could be called glamorous. The simple fact is that Hunger Games could never have been made if the studio had chosen to go the ultra violent route. The studio would know that showing too much violence would get it an R rating or worse the dreaded X. An R pretty much guarantees crappy box office profits but an X is paramount to box office death. This would especially be true with what a movie that is essentially targeteing teens.

You get an X rating for your movie and you might as well send it straight to video. You'll lose less money that way.


You get an X rating and you might want to double check what year it is.

NC-17 replaced X in 1990, though it's still basically a box office death sentence, minus small independent films that don't need a certain rating to earn back their minimal budgets.

With the rise of disc and aftermarket sales and rentals the need for NC-17 sounds pointless. Might as well say "unrated" and let audiences know the filmmakers didn't have to get the MPAA's meaningless moral approval. I generally prefer director's cuts myself as I figure the farther you get away from the creative forces behind a film (ratings boards, "family-friendly" review sites, government censors) the less weight their judgement really carries.

I'm an adult, I do not need anyone telling me how to think. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-27-12  11:45pm - 4653 days #15
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by slutty:


I think turboshaft has it right, I'm sure he has a huge stash of porn, and most likely gay porn.


Thanks, but I was thinking more along the lines of a Ted Haggard-style scandal. Because of his creativity in how to spend your free time there's a new bar to pass when it comes to the hypocritical gulf between what you say in public and what you actually do behind closed motel doors.

Far be if for me to judge what you put in your body, or hookers' bodies for that matter, just don't go about telling everyone else it's so wrong. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-27-12  11:34pm - 4653 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by t9chome:


The contest is privately owned by The Donald. They/He can make any rules they want to, IMO. It ain't anyone else's right to claim they have a right to compete in the contest.


If Trump gets to say that this contestant isn't a woman then I get to say that whatever that thing is on his head isn't hair!

Originally Posted by Micha:

He had more money and hair than most of us and he is famous for being famous. He has popularized the phrase "you're fired !"


He still has more money than most of us, while the "hair" remains an enigma.

Though I still say the Simpsons' Mr. Burns said "You're fired!" better (and earlier) than Trump. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-27-12  11:02pm - 4653 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I would let her in, trouble is in the Miss Universe constitution it states clearly that only NATURAL born women need apply!

An interesting side light. Some who commented on the subject felt it would give her an unfair advantage because of her "perfect" enhanced breasts and she should not be allowed to participate for that reason as well.


Define "natural born."

Still, if not for that rule I'd say all the other contestants have an unfair advantage because they were all born with their vaginas (who knows about their breasts and lips though... ). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-24-12  04:57pm - 4656 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Capn:


You don't tell me what I should like & I won't tell you what you should like! [Wink]

Originally Posted by messmer:


You are wrong. Even back in the seventies "natural" never meant that all areas of the body had to be hairy. In Canada and the U.S. (don't know about other countries) women always shaved their legs, many shaved their arm pits as well. This pre-occupation with leg hair especially is a relatively recent phenomenon, most likely in reaction to the totally shaved look. Some people do love extremes.




It sounds like PU'ers have misinterpreted what I meant--I was just trying to make a joke. Like if I said I was into shaved chicks (and I am! ) and people took this to mean I was only into girls who look like an Alien3-style Sigourney Weaver. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-24-12  04:39am - 4657 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane:


I wonder if ol' Rick has a guarded stash we don't know about?
Naaaah! you think?


I've heard people say about Santorum that if you think about gay sex as much as he does then you're probably gay.

If repression really does lead to obsession, then I'd keep an eye out for this repugnant asshole--he sounds like he's about to reveal some deep, dark secret or finally send his campaign crashing back down to earth. And while I'm no fan of Obama, I do really get a kick out of how laughable his competition is with this crop of GOP clowns still left in the fight. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-22-12  08:23pm - 4658 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


This discussion now has me wondering if there's any music that syncs with porn like Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon and The Wizard of Oz.

Originally Posted by t9chome:

Most likely, royalties are paid to the copyright holder and/or publisher for their use by somebody.


If a porn studio could afford to pay the royalties to use Pink Floyd then they would be doing phenomenally well.

I seem to remember hearing some punk-ish music in the intro of some Max Hardcore videos a few years ago and then reading the band name in the credits, though needless to say I had other things on my mind at the time. (The shock-and-awe of watching his videos probably negates most of the promotive value they may have.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-22-12  08:05pm - 4658 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


But too much to where all I can see is hair kinda ruins it.


This is part of the reason why I love the fully shaved ladies. People seem to frequently interpret "hairy" to mean jungle-like overgrowth. No thank you!

And I figure if you want "natural" then you have to go the whole nine yards. Yes, I mean the pits, legs, and the precious bush/hedgerow that apparently makes older porn so indescribably beautiful. You want it, you get all of it!

Call me pervert who is secretly interested in underage girls all you want (your problem, not mine), but I prefer females who know how to use a razor or some wax. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-07-12  10:29pm - 4673 days #43
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by turboshaft:

(Though to be fair, a few people could legitimately get non-racist swastikas tattooed on themselves.)

Originally Posted by pat362:


No matter how believable they might be. They couldn't do it because the Nazi party killed the possibility that anyone will associate the symbol to anything other than the massacre of millions of people in the Second World War. Even if people were open minded then you'd still have to explain that the Swastika was adopted by the Nazi but it predates them by thousands of years.


They also misappropriated the term "Aryan" to mean white-but-definitely-not-Jewish instead of Indian or Iranian (who they probably didn't like either). And to top off this Godwin's law-abiding discussion, some people find tattoos very distasteful because they were used by the Nazis to forcibly and permanently identify prisoners.

Still, I think it's all about free will, and like pretty much everything else people do to themselves, if you don't like it then don't sweat it--it isn't your body! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-06-12  11:29pm - 4674 days #38
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


On a similar note as the Celtic Rune tattoos. Can anyone explain to me the appeal in getting a tattoo writen in a foreign language that you and probably everyone you know can't read? I know that many people like to get Chinese and/or Japanese pictogram tattoos and I also know that a percentage of them completely screw up the meaning since they expected that the tattoo artist would be a better linguist them themselves.


Visual appeal, plain and simple.

Same reason people have their names written in a font they like, though I'm assuming yours wouldn't actually read "pat362." And it's generally safer than going with some risky symbol and saying "Oh, I just liked the way that swastika looked, I didn't know it meant something offensive." (Though to be fair, a few people could legitimately get non-racist swastikas tattooed on themselves.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-06-12  11:14pm - 4674 days #37
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:

How about corporate sponsorship? Tattoos on women like the logos on NASCAR race cars. "Model X - brought to you by Budweiser"

Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I'm sure it's only a matter of time!


Yeah, and then when they no longer want to sponsor you they lase that shit right off!

There's got to be a less painful way to be sponsored. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-06-12  11:03pm - 4674 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Khan:


So that leaves you with me.

I'd wager I'm "here" far more than even our most active user. I read every single forum post, comment, review and reply.


Good lord! Oh, and I'm sorry.

I can only imagine what having to read all of our nonsense would do to a person. How you haven't quit and started living your life as a celibate monk is beyond me. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

03-06-12  10:56pm - 4674 days #758
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


American Reunion Was there really a need to revisit thes eguys 13 years after American Pie?


I wish Kevin Smith had taken this question more seriously before he made the dreadful Clerks II. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-24-12  01:52am - 4686 days #22
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Micha:


When the famblyvalue folks finally prevail and outlaw naked girls, I'll be set for life.


To once again perversely misappropriate the Charleton Heston quote (originally referring to gun ownership rights)--"From my cold dead hands!"

Of course I'll be fucked if the family value fascists are all armed...which they will almost certainly be.

But I figure a slightly shortened life with porn is better than a longer, cold, humorless, sexless existence without. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-17-12  11:16pm - 4692 days #28
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


Stalin was an asshat. Not because he was an atheist but because he was an amoral sociopath. Someone like Ted Haggard was an asshat, not because of his Christian beliefs but because he was a hypocrite.


True, but Haggard never had any of his parishioners, or whatever they're called in a megachurch, hauled off to a gulag (that we know of... ). He was really just more of an insufferable hypocrite who, surprise surprise, wound up in a motel doing crystal meth with a male masseuse/escort/sex partner--but who's to judge what one chooses to do in their free time?

But I will concede that I count myself as extremely lucky in that not only am I living in a part of the world where I can safely choose to abstain from all the religious nonsense but also living in a time when most of my serious religious enemies are televangelists with creepy smiles and expensive suits instead of pope/dictators in charge of my entire existence until the day I die (they would probably also be in charge of the funeral, come to think of it).

And even on their worst days and in their most bigoted sermons, the modern Christian megachurchers and moral majoritarians are minor league compared to the crazier Muslims around who seem to be obsessed with destroying any culture or population that doesn't like to spend its time either beating up women or mutilating their genitals. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-17-12  10:48pm - 4692 days #27
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I do, and it scares me. The U.S. is still a super power and the thought that you might end up with some religious extreme right-winger at the helm of Government really frightens me.


I thought we already tried that with George W. Bush.

Originally Posted by messmer:


I was talking about the world in general. Look at how many people Stalin alone killed under state sponsored atheism.


This is a frequent go-to argument against atheism (surprised you didn't drop Nazism in there as well), but true, Stalin was an atheist as was the state officially. However it was also a totalitarian government where Stalin was supreme leader. In other words, no gods in any spiritual sense but Stalin was certainly substituted as one.

Sorry, but unquestionable submission to any authority figure--whether it's some bearded genocidal nutcase in the sky or a mustachioed one on earth--just ain't my cup of tea, and it shouldn't be for any self-respecting atheist either. A good modern example is North Korea, an officially atheist state where its sole, unelected leader is the son and grandson of the previous two "atheist" dictators, who people are still forced to worship as some sort of divinely empowered beings.

Really, what exactly is the difference between a crazy dictatorship and some creepy religious cult with an authoritarian leader? You can't call yourself an atheist and then expect everybody to believe you are god instead, and I don't endorse nor do I wish for any person to claim to be a god any more than I wish to change my complete lack of belief in any imaginary one. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 17, 2012, 11:18pm

02-17-12  12:37am - 4693 days #18
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


Since I despise religion because it tends to destroy spirituality I won't argue about its ill effects on some but I think you don't give enough credit to agnostic or atheist humanity which is in ascendancy in the West, with the possible exception of the U.S. (just going by the Republican candidates who seem to do their utmost to woo the extreme religious right)!


And I don't think you give enough credit to the near-theocratic religiosity of a huge number of Americans. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-17-12  12:33am - 4693 days #17
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


[...]and some may look at us and thing we have lost our minds.


Hey, sometimes I worry that my own neighbors think this about me.

Still, I admit religion going after kids makes sense--hook 'em young and you've got a paying customer for life. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-17-12  12:27am - 4693 days #23
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


In terms of popular labels, I guess I would have been classified as a hardcore liberal in my days of youth. Always voted Dem across the board. Today, I would classify myself as a socially liberal, fiscaly conservative, independant voter.


What's depressing is that people like you (using your current views) don't really have a serious choice among major political candidates. Instead we can only seem to lump everything into very polarized camps of idiocracy. You are probably too fiscally conservative to like Democrats but the Republicans ain't exactly socially liberal. And frankly, neither party really satisfies either of those basic views.

Both are responsible for massive amounts of spending, and any socially progressive legislation is only passed at a snail's pace while most citizens wonder why they're represented by out-of-touch dinosaurs (except for the ones from their own districts, of course! )

If we're getting personal here, I would call myself a civil libertarian, since "liberal" is practically a slur now, while "libertarian" alone sounds only slightly less depressing than Jonestown at this point (with nitwits like Ron Paul and his followers reminding me why I hate the label). More specifically I wish Democrats would grow some balls, or at least come up with some principle views, while Republicans need to tone down the rage a little.

Yeah, I'll keep dreaming. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-17-12  12:12am - 4693 days #22
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


Yeah, there is a lot of underhanded activity on the part of some corporations. Greed, however, is a human fault, not a corporate one.


But what if corporations are people?

My problem with no-holds-barred capitalism is that it can take on something that is far from what anybody should be able to call "free" with a straight face. How is massive data collecting, litigation protection, and financial muscle beyond what any average citizen could muster, an integral part of a "free society"?

I guess if you don't mind being perpetually beholden to corporate interests--profits above everything else--or can simply afford to have them work in your favor, than the concept of unregulated free markets sounds nice. Unfortunately the vast majority of us don't really live in a world where we can simply turn to a private solution for any and every issue we face in living in a complex society.

What I'm trying to say is, while its nice to make profits and have private innovation and progress, I don't think a "fuck you, I got mine first" attitude is necessary. We can, for example, have profitable private energy companies exist while also not dumping toxins into our water supplies or turning into Enron-style shitstorms in the process. It's not exactly as if our only two choices are some sort of Soviet police state or an Ayn Rand plutocracy. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-16-12  12:29am - 4694 days #14
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


But it is not only the religious that pose a threat. We have a secular (albeit right-wing) Government and at this moment we face a huge threat to our privacy and freedom in Canada with a Bill coming up that would allow Police to obtain all the information from your ISP as to your browsing habits, which web sites you subscribe to, the real name behind your handle, the contents of your emails etc. WITHOUT a warrant.

This is done in the name of protecting children from sexual predators.


If you really want to protect children may I suggest keeping them away from religion. What else lets otherwise seemingly rational people do what amounts to physical and emotional abuse to children? Try justifying things like circumcision, confession, or faith healing outside the authoritarian confines of religion and you'd be rightly considered a criminal suspect or at the very least a serious nutcase.

Sorry, I still get angry every time I think of the phrase "Born and raised ______," as if religion is something that can only be acquired by simply being born and raised that way--a poor excuse for terrible parenting. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 17, 2012, 12:35am (turboshaft: Spelling mistake)

02-14-12  10:24pm - 4695 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


Most of the criticism and responses were the usual fare. In fact, the only novel or interesting anti-industry criticism or pro-industry rebuttals came from the audience. One in particular stands out --'How is being paid $1,000 for a couple of hours performing on a set any more exploitive than a single mother of three working for $7.20 flipping burgers at McDonalds?'.


This is a good question, but you have to remember we're in a country where thoughts seem to matter more than actions. This is why the values crowd will always view a flash of Janet Jackson's bare nipple as more immoral than the level of infant mortality, say, or the very idea of gay marriage as somehow more offensive than continuing to maintain the world's highest known rate of incarceration. I mean really, who cares about children's healthcare or poverty levels when people are fucking on camera for money and nobody's stopping them?!

The regular howls from the anti-porn prudes always remind me of the classic H.L. Mencken quote: "Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-14-12  10:01pm - 4695 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I'm sure there's an audience for those type of debate but I find them a waste of time because you have 2 groups with diametrically opposed points of view using the same old arguments and each has it's own merrit and neither is going to sway one person to their point of view.


I agree, and these types of debates are probably more about attracting crowds than settling any argument (whether such a thing really exists outside of the "experts").

That and I'm not taking anything too seriously from a school that graduated George W. Bush (or John Kerry, if you like). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-13-12  11:30pm - 4696 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


They are actually on the stomach. They're two little balls about the same level as the navel but further over on the right of her body. I'm not sure how they're held there (I'm no expert on body piercing!) but I assume there is some sort of a hook with a smaller ball threaded on to hold it in place.

Originally Posted by pat362:

I don't think those are little balls but the studs at the end of a steel shaft that passes through the skin of her stomach. You can see an identical type of piercing on her belly button.


pat362 is probably right. It sounds like some sort of elaborate surface piercing (since I have only seen photos of her with a pretty standard navel piercing). This is basically a piercing that is just under the surface of the skin and usually curved somewhat to make it easier to put a stud on each end. Think of it like a really big splinter but made out of some sort of implant grade alloy and it's not supposed to be removed!

These piercings are pretty common actually, because this is what all navel and eyebrow piercings are, though the skin is curved in these places making it easier than say some random surface piercing like the nape of your neck, or, hell, just the side of it, which I can only assume is to help ward off vampires with certain metal allergies.

As for the more female-oriented piercings, Tanner may have a hip piercing, which sounds similar to what is being described. But frankly that's got nothing on the Christina piercing (fairly common in porn since you can see it in all of its glory) or the no-holds-barred Neferti.

A girl with a Neferti ain't fooling around, is she? Ouch! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-12-12  11:23pm - 4697 days #6
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I agree that the model's comfort with the scene is a big plus. I've seen several scenes with models who clearly weren't comfortable and it doesn't make for an enjoyable scene. Several of Teagan Presley's anal scenes come to mind.


To me that's true of any type of content, and the main reason I could never get into most of Max Hardcore's material, or that of any of his idiotic imitators. Though I do enjoy watching much of the same type of stuff when the women are clearly enjoying it--occasionally so much so that they are too hard even for me!

Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


The new stomach piercings don't really bother me much because they're so small that they don't really stick out. But they do seem to be in a pretty unusual spot.


I hope you're talking about a navel piercing, because a stomach piercing sounds really painful! Though I don't think they look too bad on women, less silly than a nose ring, or even most nose studs (similar to a jeweled earring). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 12, 2012, 11:27pm

02-12-12  11:11pm - 4697 days #5
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


That name rang a bell but couldn't remember where . Then I remembered seeing an industry article a while back where she was listed as a handfull to work with. Remembered a video too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlGUrvfk7...youtube_gdata_player


I would think that's how a lot of women would respond to having to do an anal scene, and I'm frankly surprised she hasn't done one until recently (at least on camera). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-09-12  11:15pm - 4700 days #23
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Some of these posts have reminded me of the short story by Chuck Palahniuk (author of "Fight Club") appropriately titled "Guts." Without giving away too much of the plot, it's basically about a teenage boy--I think you can see part of the problem already--who has discovered a unique way to masturbate using the suction vent on the bottom of his parents' pool, until something goes horribly wrong of course.

Supposedly audiences have thrown up at a number of his book readings and his stories are generally not for the faint of heart, much less the easily offended, and this one is no exception. (You can read it here on his website if you're still interested. Don't say I didn't warn you. ) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-08-12  09:08pm - 4701 days #19
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by graymane:


Wouldn't hurt to create some of'm that uses AC power.... I'm guessin' the reason that hasn't come to fruition is because of a fear of law suites piling up from fried cocks.


Actually that sounds like it would hurt, and we're not even using the 220 to 240v found in much of Europe! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-07-12  02:36am - 4703 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Glad the card was in my name, guess that was a charge the IRS wont let me deduct. OH maybe for stress reduction


If only...

U.S. tax code is at times both fascinating and perplexing, and I think you're allowed to deduct medical expenses over a certain percentage of your income--however "personal use items" are not deductible (I guess the U.S. would lose too much revenue if the various arsenals of sex toys in people's homes started being claimed as deductibles ).

Fun fact: vasectomies are deductible. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-06-12  02:40am - 4704 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


It could be worse, though. If you were into fetish sites, you might get a call from the bank:

"Sir, we are just calling to verify that it was indeed you who charged $24.99 to Fisting.com."

"Yes man, that was me. it's a legit charge."




I always fear it's going to be a call from my local branch (really happened to me with some recent non-porn travel charges), and then next time I'm there to deposit a check or whatever I'm going to get to the counter and the pretty clerk is going to see my name and the pervo/creep alarm in her brain is going to go off while she quietly looks around to check and see just how high the plexiglass bullet shield is. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-04-12  03:51pm - 4705 days #3
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


I do appreciate this as it shows my bank takes my security seriously. I just was wondering if anoyne else ever had this happen?


Yes, and it's frankly the one good thing I have had from my bank and credit card accounts ("maintenance" fees, hidden charges, secretive account regulations, along with the other made-up bullshit, don't exactly make me jump for joy ). Generally it's been from traveling where I haven't informed them ahead of time, which would suck anyway because you spend 30 minutes on hold to have them somehow interpret your call as "Okay, we'll go ahead and close your account."

Sometimes it's a real pain in the ass because, even after verifying your identity, they want you to confirm the exact amount, date, and name of business. I'm not careless or that forgetful, it's just that I don't memorize my charges down to the penny and then wait by the phone with a pile of receipts hoping the credit card company rings for a friendly fraud alert chat.

Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


I think the operator new it was pretty obvious what the charges were for. It was kind of funny when she read the items for me to verify -- " We have a charge of $24.99 from BangBros help LTD"




You'd think they'd try and be a little less conspicuous in what your statement will actually say, and this is usually even a selling point for a lot of stores and sites. I'm guessing many couples share accounts and there's no chaste explanation for "BangBros" that would pass the wife test.

I'm sure it's interesting to work at a credit card company or bank and see who's the freakiest amongst your account holders. And who knows, maybe a good way to scout out new sites as well. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-01-12  09:02pm - 4708 days #30
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Denner:


And BTW: Made a little mistake when saying our friend Capn tops that list - pat362 and turboshaft, among others, are somewhat ahead.....


Congrats on the milestone; now on to 2000 posts!

Thanks for the above mention, though I'm somewhat hesitant to think back on the verbal vulgarity that comprises my growing number of posts over the last few years. I guess if I ever got married and the otherwise amazing lady put two and two together and figured out my pseudonym here it would make for a long, awkward conversation (or a disconcertingly short one... ). I'd assume it's sort of like having a list of your criminal charges read aloud in a courtroom.

And thank you Internet for providing a permanent archive of everyone's "anonymous" brain farts and idiotic rants in a convenient digital form! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 03, 2012, 09:41pm (turboshaft: Spelling issue.)

02-01-12  08:49pm - 4708 days #12
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Technology: The art of rearranging life so that you don't have to experience it.


By that logic shouldn't women being encouraging their male partners to watch facial videos in lieu of going downrange of the guy's jizz missile?

"Honey, I'm sure those women honestly do enjoy getting it right in the face, and the paycheck is just a fringe benefit, but don't even think of trying it with me."

"It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-01-12  08:38pm - 4708 days #11
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by BubbaGump:


There are only so many ways you can show a gouy popping on a woman's face before it loses its novelty and appeal.


This would explain the various creampie genres and sites out there that seem to aim for everywhere but the face (and the few that are way too specific about where on the face--those cumshot-in-the-eye/"pinkeye" videos come to mind ). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

02-01-12  08:21pm - 4708 days #10
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I'm a total failure, no one ever squealed like that for me!


Me neither, but I figure it's a double-edged sword. It would make me feel like some sort of triumphant satyr to be able to pleasure a lady so fully (because of course it's real, right? ), while at the same time hoping my neighbors don't call the police out of fear that I'm really some sort of poor man's Patrick Bateman. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Feb 01, 2012, 08:28pm

551-600 of 1958 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 11 Page 12 13 19 25 31 39 40 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.