Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

1101-1150 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 22 Page 23 24 26 28 30 36 37 Next Page >

01-23-10  04:19pm - 5447 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
If it were me, I just wouldn't be thinking either:

1. "Ohh, my cutest, sweetest Fido! I'm gonna get you in some photos with Anya! Lots of them!" (as at MPL)

or

2. "I know what we'll do to add some variety here. Let's put the CAT in with the model! We'll have it sit on her back, stand on her head, and generally stare out in bewilderment as we take 300 shots of them together. Yes! I'm sure our subscribers will LOVE it!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-23-10  03:19pm - 5447 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Now, don't get me wrong. I like the doggies and the kitties and the gerbils and hey, why not throw in boa constrictors and hermit crabs?

But I don't think they have a place in softcore photography, (nor hardcore porn for that matter).

Sure, a couple of pics of the girl holding up a cute little puttytat is no problem, but when the little animal friend is left in there to play a continual supporting role, and even worse, is seen standing on the girl's back above her protruding ass, etc., it think it wrecks the mood, and that's when I say:

"No pets allowed!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-20-10  01:08pm - 5450 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I was appalled when I realized that despite the repression of free speech in China, Google decided to stay put there. And that was a year or two ago, if memory serves. I don't buy their PR slogans that falsely elevate them on moral grounds any more than I buy into any other corporation's charm offensive.

But the finger also points at any of us who use Google products or services. Or who use "Google" as a verb synonym for "search the web" for that matter. Are we really in its inescapable embrace, or are we simply passively complicit and throwing stones through the walls of our own glass houses? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-17-10  01:09pm - 5453 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by justme:


There is already enough negativity around this website

Porn is to be enjoyed, and many take their reviewing "duties" too seriously. Remember when porn used to be $100 for one poor quality VHS tape? Now it's $20 for a downloadable archive of 1,000 scenes, and such sites still get hammered left and right. Not enough content, not enough speed, too big of a watermark, if the site is off-line just one day out of the 30, etc.

I don't know


I agree that porn is to be enjoyed. Can't say that's much of a revelation.

While things do sometimes get petty, most the criticism here is constructive, and it has lead to improvements in some of the sites that get listed. And getting back to that "enjoyment" concept, better quality content does help. If you've never seen an oversized watermark, well, lucky you.

And you don't have to take seriously that some people here take their reviewing "'duties'" seriously, either. But I'm sure you meant to sound "positive" by saying that, even though you didn't. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-17-10  11:28am - 5453 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
"Even Cheeks"
(parody of "Evenflow" by Pearl Jam)

Peelin’, off that thong as she’s turning to the right, again
Oh, feelin' maybe it’ll be better in the set ahead, ooh yeah
Oh, strike out, poses that I see time again are too familiar, oh yeah
Oh, dark grin, I can't help, photographer makes 20 sets look the same, oh yeah

Even cheeks, are like talking butterflies
Oh, I don't know, what is keeping them away
Someday yet, I’ll find even cheeks again
Even cheeks, even cheeks ...


Kitchen, that used to be a place to get those good even cheek shots, ooh yeah
Oh, prayin', now even cheeks are showin’ but it’s always in the closeup
No smiling, and offering them even cheeks in any way
Oh, seems that, few and far between are in the Cheek Shot Hall of Fame, yeah

Even cheeks, are like talking butterflies
Oh, I don't know, what is keeping them away
Someday yet, I’ll find even cheeks again
Clenching hands, put that web site away
Put away, kept away...
Yeah!
Woo...ah yeah...fucked it up... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-17-10  01:57am - 5453 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Here are two more deserving a relook: Daniella Rush, with her exquisite petite body and beautiful face, and Helena Hemanova -- staggeringly beautiful! The last new material I'd seen of her was at MC Nudes a few years ago.

Oh wait! Sanja Matice! Captivating! She made a definite decision to quit modeling and do charity work. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-16-10  11:41am - 5454 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Sarah has a web site - and definitely got a boob job:

http://www.sarahblake.com/

She got one around the same time as Nella and just said, "I've never been happy with my boobs and wanted bigger ones." Too bad because she had perfect naturals.


Yes, she did. I don't even want to look. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-16-10  05:36am - 5454 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
What exotics said brought to my own mind another model who has made a comeback and whose appearance has been radically altered: Breanne, or now known as Breanne Benson. I've got a large collection of her from a few years ago when she had flowing black hair and was all sweetness. Now, have a look: short blonded hair and this AWFUL tattoo all over her back. YECH! And now she's doing hardcore. (See George Carlin quote below.)

ALS Angels started to update her galleries with more pics at larger sizes, but they ought to get a move on do more. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-16-10  12:29am - 5455 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I took a look at my Sarah Blake collection. Have loads of her from 12 different sites, including the long-gone Lust Circus, which wasn't that good, but Sarah was too sweet 'n naughty to pass up on.

She's one of those earlier-in-the-"oughts" girls for whom the image and video quality of today came too late. I mean, she never needed a boob job, but I read at the ALS blog that she got one. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-14-10  02:14am - 5456 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


The problem is several fold: First, no one can read anything longer than a twitter feed without becoming hopelessly bored or stupified. Second, there just isn't enough time in the day to search the blogs/sites that might actually produce quality erotica (never mind finding them amidst the raft of shit written by teenage spank monsters). Third, we're mostly guys here ... we want visual stimulation, not the Harlequinn Romance version of what happend.


Yeah, the Harlequin Romance about how the tatted stud spent 20 minutes pile-driving the heroine's corn hole until he topped it off with a cream pie is something that I could live without. But then, that's because I'm a guy. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-13-10  12:30pm - 5457 days #17
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Fisting has never been illegal, nor entirely legal, in the U.S. As others have noted, the obscenity laws in the US are pretty vague and it's not entirely clear when the line is crossed until someone gets prosecuted and even then it depends on where the prosecution takes place (the Bible Belt likes to chase these types of cases).


Yeah, they'd rather stick their own fists up our butts. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-13-10  12:28pm - 5457 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I don't read erotic stories. I am utterly illiterate in that respect. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-11-10  02:48pm - 5459 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Parody of "Round and Round" by Ratt

What’s this I see? It’s somethin’ sweet
Could make my day, I always like a find
But memory, comes back to me
And I say, “Hey, isn’t this already on my shelf?”
Another name, redone some way
I’m gonna look, think I’m seeing it again
I've had enough, we've had enough
Redux in vain, I say

I thought at just the beginning
That I would end up right-clickin’
I thought right at the start
But it’s already been in my cart

Round and round
With time you’ll find a way to post it twice
Round and round
What came around comes around
You tell me why

We are not fools, here on PU
What you redo, you know it's easy to see
The light of truth’s on you tonight
I've got a way, and I can prove it all right
So go ahead, your site’s gone dead
Reborrowed time, but it will not be mine
I've had enough, we've had enough
It's just the same, I said

I thought at just the beginning
That I would end up right-clickin’
I thought right at the start
But it’s already been in my cart

Round and round
With time you’ll find a way to post it twice
Round and round
What came around comes around
You tell me why

Yeah!

What’s this I see? Not new to me
It’s version three, of Vicky in that cowgirl hat
My memory, it’s serving me
And I say, “Hey, you posted that in spite of yourself.”

Round and round
With time you’ll find a way to post it twice, twice, twice, twice
Round and round
What came around comes around
You tell me why, why, why, why
Round and round I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 11, 2010, 03:23pm

01-10-10  05:26pm - 5460 days #51
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I wonder if it's indicative of the society we now live in.
It's now to the point where people can't even go to the bathroom without taking their cellphone with them if fear of missing a call. WTF is that, if not really demented?
It's possible that the photographer simply wnatsa to represent that in the photo-set. Of course it could also be that he's a lazy ass.


I've recently -- well, not that recently -- identified a species of tree from which grow lazy-ass photographers, so your second suggestion is plausible. And that's an understatement.

BTW, what's wnatsa? I'm too lazy to look it up. Thx. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-10-10  03:45pm - 5460 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


All I got yesterday morning when I booted up was the initial screen and, after that, nothing. The technician I talked to suspected a hard drive failure but now I'm nervous about external drives till someone reassures me that they don't damage the operating system. This may sound stupid but I know more about software than the actual workings of a computer.


Hi Messmer,
I just got a 1TB hard drive a couple of weeks ago and had a similar problem on a reboot. It was plugged into a USB port (so was my 500BGB in another). Came back to find a blue screen and a flickering cursor icon, nothing more. Seemed my computer was having a seizure.

Unplugged the new 1TB and shut the system down (power button "hold down"), waited, pushed "on," and was back to normal.

Now I don't use the 1TB except for occasional data backup. Power cord is always plugged in, but not USB. Fine by me at this point -- it's only for my videos.

One other thing: Once I empty "trash" from the 1TB, I unplug it as it causes trash emptying to take a lot longer. Every time you empty trash, the system looks for trash from all of your volumes, so the more you have, the longer it seems to to take.

But I'm using a Dell bought 4 years ago with XP on it and just 1 GB of ram, which these days must look like a joke. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-09-10  11:28pm - 5461 days #48
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Cell phones have been a major blessing and also a not-so-minor curse. I don't know how many times I've been part of an unwilling audience to one side of a loud conversation that filled the air on a sidewalk, at a restaurant, or on a train.

But it's really getting out of hand when you're perusing a photo set and there are shots of the girl taking a call right then and there. And these are not "BTS" material, either.

Usually they don't come off as part of the "story" in the set. Instead, they're interruptions. Why on earth do the photo editors include this stuff?

I feed such pics to my recycle bin. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-08-10  03:51pm - 5462 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Lol Drooler, or maybe "You're beautiful when you put me in a gooseneck wrist lock." :) Of course "hard to get" pretty much applies to most of the stuff I see going on in porn, so that's a given. "Hard to manage" probably applies as well.


Well, suffice it to say that should you or I ever, by chance, run into Georgia or Faye, we know we'll have to stay on our best behavior. ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-08-10  05:41am - 5462 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I would not be too surprised if Georgia really does have a temper and/or a fondness for fighting as I have never found her very likable or just as sweet as other girls out there. I love her looks but an oversized ego can usually ruin even the hottest of girls for me.


Remembering the line, "You're beautiful when you're angry." Georgia has a coolness about her in a lot of her photosets, but hearing that she's got a short fuse just helps to complete the package for me. "Hard to get" and "hard to manage" are challenges that are fun to think about in porn, though the second one is more trouble than it's worth in real life. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-07-10  07:12pm - 5463 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Well, fists are certainly OK, aren't they? I mean, showing a woman being beaten black and blue is not considered "obscene." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-07-10  04:06pm - 5463 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
There's loads of vaginal fisting at ALS Scans and ALS Angels, too. Anal, I don't recall, as fisting doesn't interest me (nor does it interest the writers of the Firefox spell checker, as I have just found out).

If there are laws specifically written to outlaw fisting, they might be local ordinances or state statutes. Kinda like cell phone laws.

Especially when the cell phones are set to "vibrate." ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-07-10  07:02am - 5463 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
BTW, I've just discovered that Nata D at MetArt, aka Natasha at avErotica is also Mickey at MyPreciousVirgins, where they have several nice photosets of her. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-06-10  04:33pm - 5464 days #36
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lespaul76:


Totally agree and one thing that got old real quick is how every damn movie seems to end with the guy jacking himself off at the end. I mean, HELLO, there's a hot chick on her knees in front of you and you can't cum unless you jack yourself off. Totally kills the scene(s) for me.


It makes it look as though porn is about autoeroticism not only for the viewer, but for the male performer as well. It's like, "I fucked this girl just so I'd have the chance to jack myself off!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-06-10  05:05am - 5464 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
There are more sites hanging on but posting fewer updates than they used to. Pretty4Ever, Babelicious, SexyBabes, JustTeenSite, ATK Galleria, ATK Premium, and the "Twistys network" come to mind.

Some are still posting regularly. MetArt was mentioned. Add in HegreArt, MetModels, Nubiles, and TeenDreams. And some of these sites offer pretty good prices, especially if you join through a review site like TBP or Rabbit's. I don't know how some of them do it.

I know how TeenDreams does it, in part. Some of their content also shows up at Xisty, though at even larger photo sizes. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-05-10  11:09am - 5465 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Denner, your "Rio" is also "Rose" at avErotica. Sometimes girls with buck teeth can be really cute!

I'll gladly add Milla, who is absolutely stunning! I only wish that Volkov would learn to FOCUS HIS CAMERA!

Then there's Nata D at MetArt, aka Natasha at avErotica. Sweetness and playfulness! She's really a top find! And whoa! She does hardcore, too. Shit!

AND Nastya (with a bunch of other names). She really burst onto the scene in '09. Very sexy!

Surely, there's more ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 10, 2010, 02:54pm

01-03-10  03:10pm - 5467 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Maybe you've noticed at this or that site there is what could be called a "dangling corner," the top right animated to look as if the page is waiting to be turned.

Mousing up to it makes it move and reveal info and/or some kind of offer or upsell.

Eveangelofficial has one. JustTeenSite used to have one. Babelicious did, too; funny, I complained about theirs (like, 2 years ago) and, in response, they took it out!

Well, it's like this. You're trying to concentrate. You move your mouse on your monitor and -- as a result -- things happen that distract you. The dangling corner is one of those. It's annoying, if you ask me.

I hate it when sites add all of this extra crap to their pages that pop up and/or animate and really do nothing more than irritate. I find myself developing spatial/motor memory on return visits in order to recall where on the screen matrix I should move the mouse so that this shit can be avoided. Which wastes cycles on my own internal "processor."

Web pages can be done well without this code "goop" clogging up the pathways of algorithmic elegance.

But what do you think? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 03, 2010, 03:17pm

01-03-10  12:12pm - 5467 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
The above are all good info on getting Firefox to remember passwords. It's a feature that I really love. (Of course, you have to make it forget them, too, if you return later to most sites.)

There is one glitch that I've run into sometimes, but I have a workaround for it.

The glitch is when you get a live url to the member's area from the signup confirmation, such as at ccbill. Sometimes I've clicked to go to member's from there and had Firefox "remember," but it wouldn't "remember" when I returned to the site from its own login page.

The solution is probably obvious: Log in, from the first time, at the site itself. So I always keep the site's homepage waiting in a separate tab or window for that first, delicious login.

Mind you, that won't always be enough at every site. Some have multiple layers of logins: one for the site, one for galleries, one for videos, etc. OnlyTease (actually, all of the bloody "Only" sites) and MyPreciousVirgins are two examples. But just have Firefox "remember" each time and you'll probably only have to cut/paste the logins those times. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 03, 2010, 02:30pm

01-02-10  03:47pm - 5468 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I believe that's what I wrote in my comment, using different words. The better PU reviews will give you an idea of a site's value to you, but that's only an idea or approximation: You have to join the site itself to get the specific value of the site to you, and then you can know whether the membership was a worthwhile purchase or a disappointment.

But you should be able to cross off the list many sites as not worth joining by reading the reviews. Maybe a few of the sites might be borderline acceptable, but why bother with them when you are looking for good-to-great sites?

As for personal taste, it differs. But surely you've found some PU members that write reviews that agree with your basic opinion of different sites. You've joined a huge number of different sites, I assume you've read the reviews posted at PU on most of those sites, so you've gotten an idea of how well some PU members agree with your personal tastes of porn. I'm not saying we are all clones of each other, or that there are only a few prototypes for personal taste, but when you read the reviews of at least a few PU members that you share a similar taste with, even though you might not agree with every detail of their review, you do find some common ground, and that increases the value of their site review, because you can use their review as a very approximate guide to what your own opinion will be. Just a guide, not an exact value, you still have to form your own opinion on the site.

But even the people with similar tastes will still form their own opinion of the exact value of a site.

That's my viewpoint, anyway.


I was just speaking for myself, not for anyone else. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-02-10  01:37am - 5468 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


You still need to join a site to determine its real value to you, but after reading a review, you should have a pretty good idea whether the site is worth your while.


Actually, I haven't found that to be true in any general sense. There are sites that some people here review highly, and these aren't shill reviewers, but I find them lacking.

And it isn't just the overall opinion of a site; it's also whether they include the necessary details. You can "read the review" and still wonder.

So I use reviews as guidelines and know that I'm always taking some risk no matter what. My own preferences and peeves are now at a point where I'll reject a lot of things that I used to accept. No one else can know what another person really wants. I've been on the other side of that, too, singing high praises of a site and then getting flack from other users because -- surprise! -- they see it differently. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-01-10  12:08pm - 5469 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Yeah, I have a resolution: Stick with the tried and true. For me, that's MetArt, FemJoy, MPL Studios and maybe HegreArt. And forget the rest for 2010. Those can all wait a year. Besides, I've got a helluva collection now anyway.

I'll probably drop in the rankings this year and I might not win the raffle at all. Which is all OK with me. But I'll keep hanging around. I'll never run out of stupid comments to make. LOL. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-30-09  12:32pm - 5471 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
It's kinda like "being in the world but not of ..."

Oh, why don't I let you finish that? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-30-09  02:23am - 5471 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


And in every field of human endeavor!


Messmer, you got the point I was making. ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-28-09  11:31pm - 5473 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Religion, like art, is the great excuse.

Why aren't every leader of the Catholic Church in the US and Ireland (at least) in jail for running a conspiracy to commit massive child abuse? Because they're religious leaders.

When I was in the art scene, people treated each other horribly - ripped each other off right and left, broke any written or oral agreement they made, broke whatever laws they cared to - and their excuse was always - hey, I'm an artist!

My favorite manifestation of this was when 2 female friends of mine were arrested for spray-painting stencils of one of my friend's initials all over town - on the public library, on the walls outside clubs they frequented - and they were arrested when a pissed-off club manager took the keys out of their car while they were spray-painting again a week after they had done his club. They tried to make a "get-away" by pushing their car down the street- lol.

They continued the performance in court wearing severe men's suits to their court appearance - one of my friends shaved her head and wore ball-and chain earings. When their lawyer was going on about what responsible people they really were and how much his client's father cared about her well-being, the judge just erupted - "How old are these people anyway?!" It was priceless!


You make a good point about art. It's another one of those blank checks for being a total asshole. I've seen that myself.

And then there's the world of business ...

... and government ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-28-09  02:00am - 5473 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


At the risk of being unpopular, getting negative trust votes, and a whole bunch of angry responses, I would recommend against the church-going route.

Frankly, it is simply going from one vice to another, and one that could still take your money and friends if they work you long enough. Like exotics4me suggested, try and take up an activity that doesn't really require a credit card or cash, or your unquestioned worship and devotion for that matter. You could meet new friends without having to think exactly as they do, give them your money, and hopefully build genuine relationships in the process.

Personally I would not recommend counseling either but that's really more exotics' department...plus he's probably a lot bigger than me, so listen to him! Hope things get better for you in the new year, and drop that fucking site!


I wouldn't hold it against you at all. My experience with people at or from churches has been pretty negative. They seem to be great places for cultivating a churlish narrowmindedness that is enabled by the belief that the Almighty is theirs for the taking and remaking according to whatever selfish whim they have. I've heard people say that God was on their side in causing trouble for other people they didn't like. Sometimes those people were members of the same church. I'll say it: They're a bunch of religious nuts.

The only kind of church I'd ever be interested in would be a black church where they spend a lot of time singing gospel music. I'm not a religious person (obviously), and I'm not black, but I love the music. I probably wouldn't last too long, once they'd figure out that I'm just this weird white atheist. But I doubt I'd have any hard feelings about being kicked out. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-24-09  02:08pm - 5477 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
It's kind of sad when a Content Management System can't manage to produce file names that are unique to each file and user-friendly in their naming patterns. It may not seem like a big deal, but when the user wants to store files in the same directory and has to rename them, even via automation such as with DownloadThemAll, it's an added chore for every photoset or video segment set.

The user winds up managing the content!

It's a turn-off that makes this user think twice about coming back for more fiddling around with little stuff like that.

One site that is annoying with photo file names is Photodromm. Photoshoots come split up piecemeal in 2-3 zips over several days or weeks. Then you can't put it all in one folder because every file of every segment begins with 01l.jpg and so on!

Doesn't have to be that way! Digital Desire, TorridArt, and BeautifulNude all do split-up zips, but the file names are made in some way continuous from one segment to the next.

Of course, split-up zips are a pain, anyway. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-24-09  12:57am - 5478 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


As far as I can tell they are the same girl. EBI says that Olga is 28yrs old so it's possible that she started her career in soft-core a few years ago and then chose to go hardcore. I found what appear to be older photosets of Olga and I compared those to a couple of images I was able to get from the different sites under the only Tease banner. Although one of the images of Debra shows her with darker hair color. You can clearly see that in some of the others that her hair is far more reddish which just happens to be Olga's natural hair color. The eyes also appear to be of the same color and the way her hair is split is the same. They have a similar beauty spot just below the right breast.


Thanks for putting effort into helping me answer my question. They really do look similar except for the hair color, which seems very much like a heavy dye job, and the affectation -- much more subdued at the "Only" sites. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-22-09  10:55pm - 5479 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Is Debra K Olga Bartz? Olga has done some pretty naughty hardcore, but she's also been at softcore sites such as Rigin Studio and MetArt. So I wonder if that black hair and ultra-glamming are the only things that keep me from easily recognizing her at Only Opaques or the other "Only" sites.

And BTW, I thought I saw her at Karupspc but under a different name. Or was it Karupsha?

Any Olga-savvy people out there who can help me? Thanks. Olga has tremendous magnetism and she's gotten under my skin lately. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-22-09  12:08am - 5480 days #30
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Capn:


Sorry to go OT, but I just had to say D's 'Opportunity' quote always raises a smile here!

Cap'n. :0)


Thanks. And it's an original, one of those things that pops into one's head while doing something else. I was staring into the refrigerator.

If you ever see it on a T-shirt, you'll know I didn't cop from the shirt. It's the other way around. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  01:39pm - 5480 days #27
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


I'm not too much into photosets - but even for these eyes it's obvious, that things have been 'mingeled' at Pier 999.... do not know how, not an expert.
But what's really annoying, too - is the fact that they now (or for some time) have placed sets/videos stated as 'exclusive' - even if a lot are older material from countless easteuro-sites.
Yes - they are obviously lying, Drooler.

Too bad with this change, because some of the 2008-videos at Pier 999 are just top, in quality, editing, model-performance, model-appearence ect.....


Here's their join page, freshly linked. Just read the first paragraph. That's what I call bullshit piled high on a platter.

Months ago, I'd emailed them about this, and I gave them hell. I got a very apologetic response. But nothing has changed!

You know how some people count on just their apologies to make things OK? Reminds me of such people. They really don't fucking care. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  01:27pm - 5480 days #148
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Doing some surfing, I found a site called www.zuzinka.com. It's got a "private section" at http://www.zuzinka.com/blog/private-stuff/
From the freebies on her site, she looks like a damn sweet amateur. Would love to see her listed here!


Love the blog. But in the "five lies that women tell" part, she forget to put in "No, I'm not seeing anyone else." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  01:16pm - 5480 days #24
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


My x-mas gift to all here is my two cents on the subject.

First, too many people think that Photoshop unleashed the barbaric hoarde's of bad photo editing when it's been around since the invention of the camera. In terms of basic editing (lightness/darkness, contrast, color saturation, tint, "airbrushing", etc.) all existed and were used on many pics before the digital revolution. Ansel Adams would spend days making rough prints of his pictures before deciding on the final version which often looked very different from the "original" (standard developer chemical baths). Today, even many basic point and shoot digital cameras let you add all sorts of funky effects right into the initial shot. All this means is that what once required the hand of skilled technician can now be done by a monkey randomly beating on a keyboard.

The whole "glossy feel" is done in several ways. First, some of these shots like the Nella one were most likely done using a medium format digital camera (something that probably takes 40 mb pictures). That, along with the photographer knowing what they're doing, contributes to being able to count every skin pore on the model. Then comes some of the bullshit that most of us don't like: the large scale colorshift and lighting "enhancements" that give us that canuba oil handwaxed look.

For some reason the "glossy" look has often been considered artistic when it comes to models. I think this has been around ever since the spread of color photography after WWII. If you've ever seen glamor shots from the 50's, most of those have a certain high gloss feel to them as well. For some reason people still seem to think that glossy = sexy or glossy = special when in fact anyone can make a picture of some cat's upchucked hairball super glossy and poster sized.

I will note that it seems to me anyway that some of the flat screen monitors, especially the cheapies, tend to add to the glossy look or seem to make the colors appear less natural. I have an old CRT (if it ain't broke, don't fix it) with good natural color. The higher end monitors do a better job as one would expect but I think the choice of monitor can have an effect on your viewing results.

Too many photographers feel that they have to spruce things up on the final photo in order to distinguish their work from the standard point and shoot / video still frame captures that most sites post. If you're trying to do better than the than the rest of the herd, apparently that also means you can't leave well enough alone: it ain't "art" until you fuck with it.


Thanks, Wittyguy, for your input, with its concise history of "shopping" and touching on the points of monitor effect and the "artistic impulses" of photographers.

And it's too bad that some photographers "paint" themselves into "artistic corners" by going overboard with the editing effects. It is the stuff of tragedy, in a classic sense. There must be some fable or myth that I can't remember that tells this grandly arching cautionary tale. But I'm too culturally illiterate for that.

Anyway, if you've ever seen any of the Ultra-Shopped crap by Magoo, for instance, such as the ruinous rendering of Hungarian super-cutie Cayenne into a virtual alien apparition, well, that's tragedy for sure. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 21, 2009, 01:20pm

12-21-09  01:01pm - 5480 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I still think it's from an early Lexi Belle video. I've got a longer version of the same clip, where you get a much clearer, better view of the porn model and the guy who comes along to have sex with her. In my clip, you can see what the girl looks like much better than in the clip at xvideos. You can also see the guy much more clearly. He's been around a while also, in a lot of videos with different porn models. The way I mainly recognize the guy is from his chin-beard. As for Lexi Belle, I look at her face most of all, and the face in the early Lexi Belle clip I have (which is clearly shown) is approximately the same Lexi Belle face I see in a lot of other Lexi Belle clips. The longer Lexi Belle clip I have includes the clip at xvideos, but has an introductory part where Lexi is by herself, and you get a good look at her face (and body). And then the guy shows up, and they have sex in the hallway, then go into a bedroom and have more sex.

The problem about recognizing Lexi Belle from the xvideos clip is that you don't see her face that clearly. There are clear shots of her face, but it's too close-up which makes the face look slightly strange from the ordinary appearance. That's why it was so much easier for me to recognize Lexi Belle, because I was basing the recognition on the longer clip, where you get a much better view of the model.

As far as how Lexi Belle fucks, she is one of the many models who make a lot of fake moans and groans. It would be better if she made less noise.

But I don't have a real good handle on how she fucks, because from my viewpoint, it's mainly the male guy who is controlling the action, putting her into different positions and sticking it in where he wants to, when he wants to.

I'm basing this on memory, because even though I have the extended clip on my PC, I would really have to look for it to view it again, which would be time-consuming. But the clip I have is much better, because it has a slight introduction, and she is dressed in some clothes which are brightly colored, and you just get a sense of a slight story (almost none, but still better than just straight meaningless sex).


Some things are hard to put into words, such as "how she fucks." But I've got enough Lexi Belle fucking vids and the way Lexi opens and closes her mouth, gasping, is one clue that tells me that the babe in question is not Lexi Belle. There are just some involuntary things that people do under certain circumstances that give them away.

Besides, Lexi Belle has dark brown eyes. You don't even have to watch the vid of the other girl to see that her eye color is different. Just look at the opening still shot.

I've just looked at vids and still pics. I'm definitely sure that Babe Doe here is not Lexi Belle.

And if you ask me, every PornUser should keep their Lexi Belle stuff at hand and ready for viewing! ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  11:19am - 5480 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Sorry, but that's not Lexi Belle. Look at the nose, chin, and mouth. Lexi has a face with a lot of little features around the mouth.

Besides, Lexi's body is shaped a bit differently. She's got a better ass-to-body-mass.

And this girl doesn't fuck like Lexi Belle. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  09:44am - 5480 days #22
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


http://www.pier999.com/at-the-port/get-on-board/index.html

The Nella pic is on the top right of this page.


Oh, but have you seen that set? It's got some lovely booty shots of Nella, s01-039 asspecially. It's just the kind of pose I wish I could see in every gallery I view of every babe everywhere. Sure, it's kinda glossy, but she hardly looks like she's made out of polymethyl methacrylate. Ya know?

I'm starting to wonder if our monitors have something to do with all of this controversy. Me, I'm still using a CRT (non-flat screen) 17" monitor -- the one that came with the PC I bought 10 (that's right, TEN) years ago. Any thoughts, anyone? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  02:45am - 5480 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Some sites have a fair amount of shoots done with the model in a "plain" background, where there are few or no props and little or no furniture. You could probably throw in the watery shoots done by Rylsky.

Do you like that kind of shoot?

Some sites that do this regularly or exclusively: MetArt (which has a lot of Rylsky), MetModels, Hegre-Art, VirtuaGirlHD, MC Nudes, and Sweet and Nude. Less often, you see it at AvErotica, Pretty4Ever, and Babelicious/SexyBabes (lots of shoots from the former Matrix-Nudes site and VirtuaGirl).

I tend to like them as long as they're not too dark. But I hate it when the girl is on a black background with fairly low light and a lot of shadowing. Getting back to Rylksy, while that's not the only style coming from this photographer, the "water on the floor in cavernous darkness" shoots have almost no appeal to me.

Just interested in finding out what others think. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-09  01:46am - 5480 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I'm also getting a "This image is copyright Protected
www.pier999.com"

If this is the type of image that you're getting from a paysite, I can understand your frustration. :)


Glossed-up copyright notices -- now that's really over the top! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-20-09  11:22am - 5481 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


My first guess is that it's pure photographer talent.
I just visited the site and they have 3 photos of Nella from 2000 and each one is amazing looking. You can count the number of beauty spots she has or the number lashes in her eyes. If they use any photoshoping then I can't see it. If they do use photoshoping and this is the results they get than they can teach it to veverybody else and then I will gladly change my mind about photoshoping.


Over the years, they've used it a lot. Sometimes the results have been pleasing (like Bambi's gallery #6 in a kitchen), and sometimes not (Lenka Horokova as Mariana #4, which makes her skin plastic-smooth, to use the words of the Raging Buddhist). Generally, I'd say that that site was overdoing it, but I've lost interest anyway since they stopped doing all-exclusive stuff, while claiming -- well, flat-out LYING -- that they still were. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-19-09  02:48pm - 5482 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Fanaticism or extremism can take many forms. I recently had a conversation with a relative who told me, in no uncertain terms, that I should never take a pain pill. I told her that if I'm in pain, and a pain pill will sometimes help reduce the pain, I was going to take the pain pill. My relative got angry and told me I was wrong, that I should just get through the pain without the pills.

I figure it's easier for her to deal with my pain since she isn't the one who's feeling it. And why she was getting angry because she believes pain pills are worthless, is a sign of intolerance or stupidity, as far as I'm concerned. I wasn't telling her I was overdosing on the pain pills; instead, I told her that I sometimes took pills because my body has physical problems, which is a problem common to many people as they get older.

Anyway, back on the topic of photoshopping, if it's done right, it can improve a picture. But there are many times when the photoshopping is overdone. Partially it's a matter of personal taste. But some photographers and some magazines/sites go in for strong use of photoshopping and that reduces the attractiveness/eroticism of the photos. Playboy tends to overuse photoshop/airbrush/whatever. But there are many other magazines/sites that overuse photoshop as well.

There is also the use of photoshopping to give an unreal appearance to the model/photo in a deliberate manner, as an expression of art or fashion. Maybe a little bit of that might be OK or interesting, but I much prefer a more natural-appearing female model instead of one with stylized, weird-appearing skin tones.


I don't like it when photoshop is used in such a way that it makes the model look unnatural. I've seen plenty of that, too, and I've complained (my favorite pastime) about it here at PU a number of times. Hey, I'm the one who came up with the term "Master Shellacker."

But it's not some evil force like fluoridated water. ;) Or pain killers. Or the Fender Stratocaster. Used properly, it doesn't change things any more than moving the slider on an adjustable light up or down a bit, or snapping a fly off a girl's ass with a well-aimed towel.

It kills me how people get MAD when you don't accept their shoving their "opinions" down your throat. When that happens, I feel like saying to the pissed-off one, "You all of those people who say that they DO agree with you? I'm sure some of them don't, but they just don't want to waste their time with your narrow-minded bullshit."

But they're not opinions. Opinions require some reasoning and weighing of pro's and con's. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-19-09  10:29am - 5482 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


We had a poll on December 16 about sites that photoshop some of their images and the results were 48% against and 30% for small alterations. In a strage coincidence, I was visiting a celebrity site and they had some of Tara Reid's recent Playboy shoot. These images are possibly the best argument as to why I cannot stand photoshoping. If it weren't for the fact that they said these were Tara's pictures then I wouldn't have been sure. The girl does resemble her but I'm almost certain that you could get the same images with CGI.


Small alterations don't make the model look as though she were a CGI creation. I know you didn't exactly say that, but you did link the Tara Reid photos to small alterations as a "coincidence." But they don't coincide.

I don't understand why some people here are on some kind of "mission" to stamp out photoshopping of any kind. It's unwarranted, zero-tolerance extremism.

Ever used a photo editor to get out red eye? Or actually make skin color look more, not less, natural? In skillful hands, it does improve the quality of an image.

And if photoshopping is that repugnant, then why not all plastic surgery, all cosmetics, and all skin care? And why not throw in vitamins and fitness training? It wouldn't be any less extreme.

Somehow I'm reminded of someone I knew in high school who was adamant in his opinion that any sounds produced by electric or electronic instruments wasn't music. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-19-09  01:17am - 5483 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


How bizarre! Where should porn performers shop? It's not that uncommon for guys shopping in big box stores in the SF Valley (porn central) to run into all kind of porn stars from newbies to Jenna Haze in Walmart, Best Buy, etc.


Wow. "Save money, live better. Walmart." If I met up with Jenna Haze in the bedding section, I'd start having much more positive thoughts about Walmart, which is probably America's Number 1 Corporate Slimeball. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-17-09  08:09pm - 5484 days #37
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I nominate Walter for the "Attack of the Shill Award."

Just read the reply section of my review of Jenni's Secrets. Funny! Well, almost.

(Sorry, I've tried all kinds of things to make the link work, but it will only default link to a different site.)

Added by admin: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14051


NB: At the Jenni's Secrets forum, there's a "Walter" on the site end of things. Coincidence? It's gotta be! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

1101-1150 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 22 Page 23 24 26 28 30 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.