Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

1551-1600 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 31 Page 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next Page >

01-06-09  05:42pm - 5829 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Big is beautiful. I like the 6000 px images at HegreArt, and I'm also pleased that MetArt, MetModels, Penthouse, and several other sites have images available past 3000 px.

I haven't joined a site that offers under 1600 px in a while. Was just looking around ClubSandy and PixAndVideo and thinking how nice the newer pics looked, but that I won't join them again until they go bigger than their 1280 size.

How big is too big? Maybe 10,000 px? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-04-09  04:45am - 5832 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Star138:


I just read a post about sologirl websites, and what everyone thought of them...

my question: has anyone here ever joined a Non-nude solo girl website? and if so, why?

I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay $30 a month for pictures of a girl (regardless of how hot she is) when she's not even nude?.. especially when there are so many other sites with so many girls, that ARE nude..

is it just me, or does that seem silly?


No, it's not just just you. A few months ago, I unwittingly signed up for eronata, and that's a girl I'd already seen all over the place sporting nothing but her natural charms. I reviewed the site, too. Was also told here in reply that the non-nude crap (my word choice) was coming to an end.

I look at sites like onlytease and see all of this exclusive stuff of these dynamite babes and think, "Why? Why stop and park at Lingerie Junction?" Never have joined it.

Oh, also know this about mypreciousvirgins. They have LOTS of non-nude stuff, along with some nice nude stuff, too. I'd recommend the site for a first timer with that caveat in mind. It's got a quite a volume of content now, even though the updates come slowly. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 04, 2009, 04:48am

01-03-09  03:40am - 5833 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
You know, I've got a question while we're on the subject: What do you pic fans do with the photos of the girl giving the finger?

These show up rather routinely at ALS Scan and ALS Angels, but sometimes at other sites, too.

I mean, I guess it's kinda cute 'n all for the girl to give the viewer (or is it the photographer?) a little what-the-fuck FU treatment, but the only place those pics live on my hard drive is in the recycle bin, all ready to be overwritten with other sub-prime smut. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-02-09  02:29am - 5834 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Well, thanks, jd. I appreciate the acknowledgement. But I'd also like to acknowledge that Snowdude is 52-0. Roseman is 50-1, and exotics4me is 49-1, those 1's certainly being negligible.

And Denner and nygiants03 have positive trust marks in the 40's, well above the 30-point badge requirement.

Certainly we've all worked hard to gain that much trust. And so we are now qualified to train as nurses, pharmacists, doctors, or high school teachers. ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-01-09  02:29am - 5835 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
After reading replies to a fairly recent poll on the subject, I realized how unhip I was using Internet Explorer. But fuck it, it works fine for me most of the time.

But not always. Every long once in a while large pics from certain sites will open as MB-devouring .bmp files. One helpful chap around here told me that Firefox doesn't have that problem, and he was right! So I keep Firefox handy for that.

Sure, I could use Firefox for everything, but I have just never gotten around to it. It's my bad. Firefox does seem to download faster than IE. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-31-08  11:14pm - 5835 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
About talking. There's a vid of very squeezable Charmane. She's getting it from the back, belly-down flat on a couch, the kind of sight that revs my reptilian brain like the gas pedal on a Cobra.

But then she and the guy kind of slow down and actually stop as they start talking, and they actually seem more interested in the conversation! I mean, that's nice and all in "real life," but what about us subscribers? It's not like we can bring in drinks and snacks and add to the repartee.

It's on one of the sites you get along with Cum Fiesta and Mike's Apartment. Sorry. Forgot which one. You wouldn't want to not miss it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-31-08  03:27pm - 5835 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Ah, notorious porn dialogue!

It can make or break a scene, turning it from cheesy to creepy to just plain bad. I don't think the worse scenes are bad solely because of terrible lines, but they definitely disappoint.


Other things: 1. The guy keeps losing his boner (do we have to watch him fiddle around?); 2. "stab" fucking, where the guy rears back and then shoves it in, out, in, out; 3. the girl isn't into it.

Anybody remember Jennifer Avalon? Certainly one of the finest looking softcore models around. But she was definitely not into doing hardcore. Saw one very brief part of a scene with her getting it, and obviously not enjoying it, at Dr Hardcore. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-31-08  10:17am - 5835 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Yeah, "No Shellac at In the Crack." Hey, that's kinda catchy.

And at SimonScans, the girls aren't shellacked, but boy, do they spend a lot of time shellacking the inside of their pussies! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-31-08  10:03am - 5835 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by ramscrota:


But in the close-ups, you could see flies buzzing around the girl's butt-hole!


And flies were going, "Great. Shaken and stirred!"

I can't recall if it's the worst, but this one scene really put me off. It was Jodi Moore, who I always thought was a hot babe. But in the scene, she went on and on and on and on with "Fuck that pussy, baby!" and "Fuck that ass, baby!" Was it the writing? Was she improvising? I'll never know, but jeez!

Pics don't do that shit. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-31-08  01:37am - 5836 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
AvErotica, rigin-studio (but no zips), beautifulnude.biz -- you might check those out. I think they meet the criteria for low photoediting effects -- high natural presentation. And the girls rarely if ever have fake tits, either.

BTW, the "Master Shellacker" might just possibly be Majoly at MetArt. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 31, 2008, 01:44am

12-29-08  03:29pm - 5837 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


In my opinion post production is where a lot of the quality is lost. Either through bad cropping, bad picture selection (too many posts of the same basic shot or angle for example), too much photoshopping, or too much reduction in photo size a lot gets "lost" in this stage.


Well said. These are all very common problems.

One site that seemed to have a pretty good (though not perfect) solution to them is SnapGirls, with only 25 pics per set, but well-selected. But they stopped updating quite a while ago. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-29-08  10:49am - 5837 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm also a fan more of solo photosets, especially ones without sex toys, than any other variety in porn (though some seem to think that solo posing sets aren't really porn).

There have been other threads that have delved into one or more of the issues that you've discussed. Recently, one on photosets indoors or out yielded an interesting string of comments, including some from Toadsith, who has experience in photography.

We also had a poll about number of pics in a photoset. 45% agreed with your number of 100.

Poses, posture, angles, lighting, clothing and most of all the personal appeal of a model of course benefit or dimish the quality of a photoset. I must say that there are no sites I've ever been to that "get it right" in all of those ways very often according to my own increasingly stringent standards.

By now I've gotten to be so picky that when I look through my archives of stuff collected a few years ago, I'm suprised sometimes at what I used to consider "good enough."

In other words, I'm part of the problem. It's the downside of refining over the years what one likes and finds acceptable. But I least know for sure what I like! ;)

All things considered, it doesn't surprise me that I'm finding less and less of it.

Off the top of my head, photographers who generally -- certainly not always! -- do work I especially appreciate are Russ T, Fred, and Tim Fox. And I tend to like the outdoor EroticDestinations stuff by Martin Krake better than the indoor EuropeanGlamourGirls mostly because he doesn't often have enough light indoors.

I used to be a big fan of Peter Hegre (HegreArt). Every once in a while he'll still put something out I'll score a "10" on his site. Anyway, I think again it's mostly me getting pickier.

Well, we can discuss this and who knows if maybe something might improve somewhere because of it. And then maybe we could find that something. But there are so many variables involved, taste being chief among them, that the hope will at best glimmer and not glow. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 29, 2008, 10:52am

12-28-08  11:37am - 5838 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Spitting into the mouth is how birds mate. I think it's way out of place. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-27-08  02:19am - 5840 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I think it also detracts a bit from the fantasy aspect of porn. It basically detracts from the whole 'innocent and tight' fantasy when you know the young starlet can stick her whole freakin' arm into her privates. As for the s+m angle, that just doesn't do it for me either.

So, for me, the less I come across it is fine by me.


I'm with Wittyguy on this point. "Tight makes right," to turn the phrase ...

Now, fisting might well have some practical purposes. Vaginal fisting for an eventual vaginal delivery, though I think these girls are a bit too eagerly forward-thinking in this regard. And anal fisting, that's practicing up before dining at one of those all-you-can-eat restaurants.

Or maybe it's just "because it's there." I mean, it's a challenge, like climbing a mountain or going deep-sea diving.

Perhaps it just can't be helped. I've long considered many a porn star and/or model to have what in multiple intelligence theory is called a high bodily-kinesthetic intelligence. So fisting from that standpoint is just plain fucking smart.

So I've thought about it. But I still just don't get it. It doesn't do a thing for me. Many an ALS Scan gallery I've downloaded has been completely shorn of its fisting shots. I have other interests. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 27, 2008, 02:22am

12-27-08  01:17am - 5840 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Dude, what the heck are you doing watching tubervision when you should be downloading? Don't become obsolete, join the porn revolution ;) Shouldn't this really become the PU motto?


The peer pressure! It's just overwhelming! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-26-08  03:53pm - 5840 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The proper answer to "Who is buried in Grant's tomb?" is "No one". No one is buried in the tomb. (It's a tomb, not a hole in the ground where you bury somebody.) But both Grant and his favorite ride are supposed to be inside the tomb.


I watched a TV show today that explained how Grant's Tomb was modeled after the tomb of Mausolus, a governor in the ancient Persian empire, and from whom we get the term "mausoleum."

Sure, it's trivia, but hey, why not? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-25-08  03:11pm - 5841 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Don't have a lot of customer service experiences, but I will say that rigin-studio and hegre-art have been responsive and helpful. And they're not native speakers of English, either, though they do quite well considering that.

Rigin recently stopped posting zips and I asked about it and got a response within less than 24 hours. (Too much piracy to deal with.)

I'd better post a comment about that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-24-08  10:55am - 5842 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


lol, hyperbole? But I saw the reflections of the torches in my window! Honestly, though, I don't know if it is the holiday fervor, or whatnot, but people have been jumping on people a bit the past few days and I didn't want to scare off a new user just because they were a bit vague. You are right, I don't have any method of knowing for sure (yet) if this post is spam or not - but I can point out there isn't any affiliate data in the URL - it is a just a basic auto created URL that Porn Users does to whatever you add a dot com to. Even if it is canadianmarsupialseatingplaybillsfrom1985.com (I wonder if that site really exists...).

I just don't think there is any reason to force a new user to defend their actions - if they never reply to this thread, then it would become apparent that it was probably spam. We don't need to suggest that they are posting spam for that idea to be floating around. If it is real obvious that it is spam, we can report it and Khan removes it in a flash. Granted there has been a lot of that going around. I've reported so many that I've moved on from writing references to the Monty Python Spam skit to writing Spam oriented limericks in the Report text. I'm not sure what will be next, maybe an epic ballad.

So long story short, I understand the need to defend our turf from Spam. I too help in that crusade, but I think we should minimize collateral damage as much as possible. It could be spam, it could not be spam, but outright stating that it is possibly a sneaky, subversive spam attack and it turns out it isn't will simply start bad blood and possibly send a user running away. If it really is spam, reporting it as such would have been the only effective thing to do to it - stating it is rather unnecessary because I'm sure it crosses everyone's mind when we see any link to a freebie porn site.

So sure, it isn't paranoia, we all know I like to write in a bit of drama in my little quips. Everybody has doubts about these links and my point is that there is little benefit in expressing them and possible harm; especially in the event of a potential new member. I like to think this is friendly, welcoming community of porn users, but we've got people being weirdly grumpy to an upstart webmaster over in another thread (especially considering he came to us for advice) and now we are suspicious of a user after one harmless post. I'm not saying you had ill intentions, I just want make sure newbies get at least a little bit of a grace period - unless it is freakishly obvious they are spamelicious shill.

Of course it is your right to express thy doubts - freedom of speech and so on, its your choice. I just think we should try to give newbies some slack. In truth, I might not have come to the user's defense so quickly had people not been being a bit rough on that new webmaster so recently - I know you've always done a bit of the tough love style on the forums in the past, but I felt like you could have at least given a suggestion as to whom the mystery porn star might have been. Given that we know the guy is from Jersey and is big, I'm currently betting on Gandhi. I don't know why though...


Wow. You've certainly had your say on the matter.

Sorry, though, that I still can't place that "Joisey Guy," da one dat got dis whole ting started. I'll keep troiying! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-23-08  11:49pm - 5843 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


The site isn't listed on TBP because it is a freebie site - let's not go scaring off new users with pitch forks and torches calling them spammers :-P

Anyway, spammers are never subtle, so we shouldn't go feeding our paranoia.


Toadsith, with all due respect, this pitchforks and torches business is hyperbole. You don't know if this is a spammer or not. I've already allowed that I could be wrong, but I'm not yet convinced that it isn't. There's no link to the video of the person in question, so why is that? Just wondering. It doesn't make it "paranoia" to have doubts and to express them.

Reading the post doesn't make me think "Aha! I knew they were coming after me!" ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-23-08  09:15pm - 5843 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by JDMagic99:


Hey everyone. First post. Glad to join the community.

I've seen a lot of youporn.com vids of this one big guy with some type of a jersey accent shooting "point of view" vids w these sexy girls. I was curious who he is and what the name of his site was.

Thanks


The name of his site? Reminds me of that riddle, "Who's buried in Grant's Tomb?"

The site you link to isn't listed at the best porn. And I'm not yet ruling out that this is just some sly attempt to post spam here. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-23-08  06:42am - 5844 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Yes, congrats to Exotics! (That's my nickname for 'im. ;) He's written tons of helpful reviews, and he's a nice guy, too. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-22-08  06:16pm - 5844 days #33
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I appreciate Rick (reply #16) and Khan (esp. reply #28) going to the trouble of explaining how "The List" would just be a big can of Death Worms.

It's enough that the facts speak for themselves and that user opinions be taken as such.

And even if we had "The List," people would still join sites, feel burned, and resent it.

One more thing to consider: Imagine the "The List" coming into being, being legally challenged (the pitfalls already having been sufficiently explained by others), and then lawyer's costs and a settlement wiping TBP and PU off the web.

Would it really have been worth it then? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 22, 2008, 06:23pm

12-22-08  05:56pm - 5844 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
FYI, we had a related poll on this a while ago.

In the poll, to date 45% of the respondents said that a $30 per month site should have 50 galleries and vids on launch. Another 45% answered 30 or 40 (most of these said 30). 51 respondents so far. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 22, 2008, 06:00pm

12-22-08  02:57am - 5845 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I agree with what BadAndy400 said. We don't need an official blacklist anyway. What we have is good enough. We get warnings from TBP, which has itself improved quite a bit in this regard, and we get warnings at PU from individual users. Adding extra layers to this wouldn't serve the purpose any better. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-08  08:09am - 5846 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
What Denner is saying reminds me of my response to FM-Teens after I ended my membership there. The stuff that followed, at least for some time, was nearly all being done outdoors, and that was one reason I decided to hold off on rejoining, the high price being another. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-08  05:18am - 5846 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I do agree with Denner that MetArt's been doing too much outdoor stuff lately, though I did like the most recent sets of Susie Carina and Euphrat. The sand was kept off Euphrat enough that I could enjoy, and Susie was on a rocky "beach." But those girls can carry a scene so well you kinda forget about where it is.

But even the MetArt indoor scenes can be a bummer sometimes. Enough with the girl in a big dark puddle of water on the floor and light shining through the spray and all that. Jeez! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-21-08  02:26am - 5846 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I like that term "distressed sets." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-20-08  04:14pm - 5846 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I would imagine that scheduling outdoor shoots that have good light is a logistical challenge. The models have to be scheduled probably before the actual weather conditions are really known. Clouds move and the light changes constantly before, during, and after a shoot.

I don't like it when heavy shadows show up on the models being shot outdoors. This happens at HegreArt sometimes, but he seems to like the interaction of shadow on the girl's curves anyway.

I must say that I'm generally more satisfied with the way they're done at MPL Studios and the stuff that shows up at TeenDreams and Babelicious.

But even so, sets shot at dusk are a turn off because of all of the shadow, lack of light, and loss of color. I love a gorgeous sunset just as much as anyone, but not when it makes it hard to enjoy Peaches' peaches.

And then we can add other factors: sand, mud, dirt, grass, and "critters." I don't care for pics of girls dipped in sand batter as if they're some kind of porn tempura, but I do remember once when Linda O'Neil's site was active and she'd fulfilled a request for a pic of herself wearing a coating of the stuff on her lovely backside.

Grass is OK, but not when a big shaft of it is upstaging the girl's ass. I hate that, and I've seen it more times than I care to remember. But I've not seen it much recently. I'm pretty sure we had a discussion about this before in response to a poll question, but I couldn't find the poll (did several searches). Maybe someone was reading? ;)

OK, so tall grass is not OK.

Getting back to MPL, they do "at dusk" sets sometimes; I usually skip them. And one recent one of Anya got pared down real good by yours truly once I'd dissed all of the ones of her wearing pieces of seaweed. Eccchh!

And then there's "critters." Flies know where the goodies are. I've had to discard pics thanks to our little 6-legged friends posing along the crack of delightful babes such as Evelyn Lory (if memory serves me).

The photographer probably just didn't notice the fly, or flies, messing up the shot. But if they are noticed, I suppose they could bring out fly swatters and then things would get kinda kinky. ;)

Outdoor sets are OK, but sometimes the "creativity" needs more careful consideration. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 20, 2008, 04:21pm

12-19-08  06:09pm - 5847 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lawless:


Precisely, clits fit with almost sex actions : lick pussies by insisting on the clits (how many sites dedicated to oral sex with cunniligus between boys & girls ?!!), masturbation with or without sex toys, vacuum pumped clits and pussies to enlarge clits & pussies, cockes rubing on stood out clits just before enter inside the pussies.


Wow, this is starting to look like draft copy for the visitor's pages of a clit site! "Vacuum pumped clits" got several big laughs out of me. (I think ALS Scan has some of that.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-16-08  04:06am - 5851 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Wittyguy, if you're not a professional comedy writer, you should be one. Now, if I can only (zap!) owww!! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-14-08  04:21am - 5853 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I don't know why it seems to be so difficult to make a good video, whether it's subject is spanking or anything else.

But it just seems so much easier to make an attractive photoset. Because there are so many more good photosets of just about everything available. While the videos available have different qualities that can irritate each of us, whether it's jerky picture quality, poor music track, bad coloring, and lots of other qualities that detract from the video.

That's why I mainly stick to photos instead of videos, as well as smaller storage requirements, etc.


Ditto on what you've said in comparing photosets to videos. I just don't feel like waiting longer, for a video, just to go through it in a matter of a few minutes, just to say, "Great. Another piece of crap for the bin."

With photosets, you can preview them pretty quickly and know whether they're worth it.

At least with PU I can get a good idea of video quality at certain sites from certain fellow users. They've saved me time, money, and frustration. Hats off! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-14-08  04:15am - 5853 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I will also vote for Drooler's avatar, the one he had before the current avatar. I thought Drooler as a nickname was cool, and the lovely dog was a great-looking avatar. I never really thought about whether the dog was male or female, tho. Maybe that added to the mystery/glamour.

On a side note, I really liked the avatars of a few other PU members before they changed them to reflect the Christmas season. Call me conservative, or resistant to change.


Fear not! My darling, drooling attack dog will be back for the new year. By that I mean "the original."

I was actually resisting the temptation to change mine for the holidays, but somehow one day the spirit of the season got to me just enough that I hopped on the bandwagon/sleigh. And think the ones from other members are really great.

I didn't want to go to the trouble layering a hat and snowflakes on my standard avatar, me being both too lazy and too artistically challenged. (Even thought about just putting a Santa hat in its drooling mouth.) Oh, well ...

And Drooler's still the nick. That's never going to change. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-13-08  01:57am - 5854 days #30
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by IKnoPorn:


For example, what if Cybertoad is really Raquel Darrian? Who knows who anybody is?


It would be cool if one of our pornusers was really Annette Haven. You know, I've wondered about HeatherMcXxx. When she said that she thought Silvia Saint was like a mannequin, that seemed to me to be a kind of competitive opinion. Or maybe she's really Asia Carrera? Anyway, seems like someone with a high IQ along with a good sense of fun. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-12-08  02:38am - 5855 days #29
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I nominate Walter for the "Attack of the Shill Award."

Just read the reply section of my review of Jenni's Secrets. Funny! Well, almost.

(Sorry, I've tried all kinds of things to make the link work, but it will only default link to a different site.)

Added by admin: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14051 I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 12, 2008, 02:43am Edited by Staff on Dec 12, 2008, 05:09am (Khan: added url)

12-11-08  02:02am - 5856 days #62
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


She gets shot twice and still comes back. She should be in a Clint Eastwood movie.


May as well. She's already been in a few "Clit Eatswood" movies. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-09-08  03:50am - 5858 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Recently I've noticed what seems to be a growing trend of one website posting content from another:

An ALS Scan gallery showing up at 1byday
A Pretty4Ever gallery showing up at AmourAngels
A Watch4Beauty gallery showing up at Pretty4Ever (of course, they're the same company)

This seems to me to be a cooperative marketing ploy to get members (and sometimes even visitors) of one site interested in another.

I wonder how well it works? To me, it's a letdown when content from a different site takes the place of what could have been fresh, new, exclusive content. One example is the Iveta B gallery that has shown up at Pretty4Ever. And that gallery is better than the average on offer at Watch4Beauty, meaning in my opinion that it doesn't really represent Watch4Beauty, which I think is overall a pretty boring site.

This is of course different from what, say, MetArt does with content from errotica-archives. MetArt posts Errotica content, but it's always unique and exclusive to MetArt and doesn't show up at Errotica. That I don't mind a bit.

So what do others think about this trend that seems to be emerging? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 09, 2008, 03:54am

12-07-08  01:34pm - 5859 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I don't think its a huge surprise. If you're not going out, you're sitting at home and for less than the price of pizza delivery you can be downloading porn. Sort of like how "comfort food" comes back in down times, I think porn at least holds its own or has a small bump because it is a somewhat inexpensive fantasy escape.

It doesn't hurt that for just a little money you can buy some crap, through it up on the web and hope that you'll sucker some people into paying money for it. Yet another reason for the masses to flock to PU/TBP - you're investment protection source against the speculators.


"Independence is the spirit that drives America's most successful porn addicts." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-07-08  10:50am - 5859 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
You know, this thread was started a month and a half ago, and I was just looking through the new listings at TBP. You know, there have been scads of new listings over the past 30 days -- 181 that have a "site birth" within the past 2 months.

Kinda weird how so many businesses are in huge trouble and how much people are cutting back on holiday spending, yet porn just seems to keep growing, with new offerings, at what would seem to be a wildly "speculative" rate. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 07, 2008, 10:58am

12-07-08  05:54am - 5860 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I don't think they're interested in learning. They just want to put their grubby mitts on the girls' asses.

I agree that it kills the scene. And it's in EVERY trailer. Whew.

Other sites have gotten me bored pretty quick with all of the pawing, too. And wiggling the girls' cheeks like kids playing with Jello. When are these guys going to start acting like gentlemen for a change? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-07-08  03:23am - 5860 days #27
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I nominate Pinche Kankun for the "Extreme Code Switching Award of the Year."

The same person who says:
YOU WILL SEE SUM LINEZ UNDER THOSE ASSCHEEKS THAT WILL HARDEN UR KNOB ALMOST 2 TITANIUM STATUS!!

and:
PHUCK DAT!!! She ain't gotta talk!!! All she gotta do is moan!!! HA HA HA HA :D!

and:
HA HA HA HA HA HA... U MUTHAPHUCKAS IZ HILARIOUS!!! :D

Also says:
One thing does concern me, though... Why would anyone give anyone a negative trust rating and not comment to explain why?

And:
The only way that we will get our point across to these industries is to attend siminars like the La Erotica and voice our opinions, or actually submit comments and suggestions to the actual company and/or website!!


These are probably not the best examples to show the contrasts, but suffice it to say that Pinche has quite a range of expression. I always enjoy his posts. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-06-08  04:57pm - 5860 days #57
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I just realised there's one I've always wondered about called "Freshgirls.tv." Does anyone know what this site is? I have never joined, as it has never been listed here.


I'd never heard of it, but I had a look around. It's non-exclusive stuff. Some of it looks rather dated (a young Tiffany Diamond vid). I've seen a few of the ones there at CrystalClearMovies (which was having technical difficulties today). But there seem to be relatively newer things, too. One was of Faye Runaway, who I read had a short hardcore career. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-06-08  03:42pm - 5860 days #55
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Here's one: kissak.com

"Well designed means quicker access to content."
Right. I suppose that dovetails nicely with it having NO zip files and thumbs that don't match the images on expansion. Or your having to click the little "1000" circle and then click "OK" to get images to expand at 1600px (not that I'm complaining about the dimensions, it's just that the site seems to be a proverbial camel, a horse designed by a committee).

"Continuosly updated with the freshest original content."
Right. There haven't been any updates for the past week. They did "announce" as their December issue a gallery of Jenni (the Czech girl with the bubble butt) which they'd already posted.

The number of models is 17. The number of photo galleries is 22. No, they're not exactly posting at a breakneck pace.

But photo quality is very high and the models are a select group of Czech babes that I personally never get tired of: Marina/Euphrat, Andi, Misa (Michaela Kaplanova), Bijou, Vendula, Tereza Ilova, Susana Spears ...

I'd just prefer that what they say on their front pages is actually true or, better yet, that they have zips and that whoever does the posting of the galleries bothers to take the trouble to make sure that it's done right.

It's not too much to ask.

So this might look like a review, but really it's just info for anyone who might have seen this site listed at erohtica. Don't expect much for your $20.

And I'm not trying to encourage its being listed at the TBP. It needs to be a better site before that happens, IMHO. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited by Staff on Aug 08, 2012, 10:24am (Khan: edited direct link url)

12-05-08  04:38pm - 5861 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Yes, I'd ask, "How do you want to find this content?" Then choose what's most agreeable to your own way of thinking.

I'm like Toadsith. I've been organizing content from the start. I'd say organizing by content provider is OK except for one little glitch: sometimes the same content shows up at the different providers.

That's probably not a bother for Toadsith, but for me, it's one reason to organize principally by models/performers. But it's just how I think, I guess. I idolize 'em.

But there's a downside to the way I do it, too. Being mostly a pic collector, I've now got more Olga's, Nikki's (not to mention Nicky's and Niki's), Ann's, Anne's, and Anna's than I can shake a stick at. Tip of the proverbial iceberg. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-03-08  04:08pm - 5863 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Funny you should mention it, but shortly before you did here with this new thread I submitted a poll question on the subject of the number of threads that have come up.

I don't know yet whether the poll question has been accepted, so I won't jump the gun on it. It was interesting, though, to see that thoughts about how the forum is growing are floating about. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-03-08  03:25pm - 5863 days #90
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
You guys got me thinking about Zippy, and to have it (appropriately enough) juxtaposed with this train of thought on embedded linking, well, here's th' URL where you can get fresh Zippy every day.

I was reading about Zippy and even put myself through th' 6-step lesson plan on understanding it -- even better! (You'll have to click th' "Understanding Zippy" doughnut.)

It's hilarious!!! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 03, 2008, 04:11pm

12-03-08  12:13pm - 5863 days #35
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


This movie I've seen since my highschool days - then on VHS-tape and now DVD - I still enjoy speciel scenes and can see them over and over. Especially the scene where Steiger and Sidney Poitier first meet in Steigers office (and Steiger do not know Poitier is a policeman) - that dialog may be the best ever - Norman Jewison was a genious. Ever read the book (John Ball) - it's still fun, too!


It really is good. Like when Steiger suddenly brightens up and says, "Whom?" after hearing Poitier use it. It was a great device for developing the characters. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-03-08  12:09pm - 5863 days #34
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think streaming is fine when it comes to pre-viewing a video or while you are waiting for one to download and have nothing better to do, but I can't see it as the next trend.

Most of us are basically collectors and streaming only would be just as distasteful to us as DRM.


"Streaming only! Great!"

No, I don't think that's going to wind up in the "+" box of a PU review. DRM is like those tapes at the beginning of a Mission Impossible episode. (Boy, am I dating myself!). "This tape will now self-destruct in 3 seconds. SSssssssss."

Streaming would be like Phelps dialing up and listening on a secured line.

But for the sake of argument, should streaming ever become the modus operandi of Internet porn, I'll just delve into my substantial collection of already acquired, DRM-free I-porn. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-02-08  11:12pm - 5864 days #29
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Agree - Rod Steiger does a great job in that movie - I think Steiger here is at his top (remember him saying the "Okay" in that very special way?)
Anyway Rod Steiger - long live his memory - did an even better role in "In The Heat of the Night" (my all time favorite movie)...


I've seen "In The Heat of the Night" several times. It is a great movie! Funny how it was what became known later as a "buddy movie," but of course it was a lot more serious than most. Both leads were complex characters, heroes who were also fallible. And Steiger's performance was masterful. The way he would twitch and look up after rubbing his chin when confronted with the realization that he was dealing with something he didn't know how to handle -- things like that -- it was fine acting.

Sorry, I'm starting to write review of a movie. LOL. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

12-02-08  11:02pm - 5864 days #28
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm a bit late in getting into this thread, but I'll say that yes, PU is a site I visit pretty regularly (heads all nodding), and yes, it can get overwhelming.

But I'm not complaining. No, sir. Sometimes I just look to see what the latest is. Then there are echoes in my mind of all of the self-help time-management stuff I ingested in my teens and 20's. Or sometimes, I just need sleep -- hence my lateness to this thread.

But the greatest irony, of course, is that this burgeoning of reading material is being generated by we, ourselves, and us. But again: No complaints.

You know, I'm glad I wrote this. ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Dec 02, 2008, 11:14pm

12-01-08  11:33pm - 5865 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Wittyguy, you're killing me. What a fine collection! This stuff should make it into an airport bookstore someday. Or perhaps in a fine-crafted, hardbound coffee table edition.

I'm too fried in the head (work, not chemical amusement aid) to add right now. Thanks for all this. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

1551-1600 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 31 Page 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.