Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

701-750 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 14 Page 15 16 20 24 28 36 37 Next Page >

04-10-11  07:13pm - 5005 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Penthouse was doing occasional girls in groups -- and attractive ones at that -- before it turned into a den of hardcore depravity with fake tits and tats all over the place. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-07-11  02:06pm - 5008 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Wow, this could - especially - be an American problem/question (American=US). Or....?
Is there a difference in European and US-women? Maybe.
Is US women more likely to 'close the door' when somethings annoy them in their life with their partners?
Is that stupid TV-show 'Desperate Housewives' more a mirror of real life in the US than for example in Europe?
Just one answer here:
Met many girls/women in my soon 60-years old life that turned me down - but when I got them as steady gf - and sometimes living together and then those two wifes: Never have I experienced a no to sex in that/those situations ....well, lucky me.
I guess.
And BTW, a final Q here relating to this special thread:
Why be reluctant with personal issues here - no one knows who you are, anyway - except if that PornWikiLeaks-asshole is getting too close...



Denner, I wish I knew. I should visit Europe and find out. Perhaps I would be pleased with the outcome? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-06-11  06:41pm - 5009 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Drooler, great to see you actively posting.
But have you been taking your medications lately?
Lol.


Mmmm ... Am I the only person here you're going to ask?

a-hem ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-05-11  08:10pm - 5010 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


1. Preserve porn video stash in secure shelter
2. Sales spike for various "devices"
3. How about a blow job, then?
4. At least a hand job?
5. Tomorrow's stupidity takes an early holiday
6. Time to find a virtual girlfriend
7. Ho'addicts experience a budget glut
8. What about lesbians?
9. Take a walk on the "other side"
10. I'm taking you out tonight, baby ... to Burger King.
11. Married? Well, then you already know what this would be like.

And? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-05-11  07:02pm - 5010 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
So, if I'm following the line of reasoning here, you'll see a good mix of new models if you get out more often?

That sounds nice! But you know, I was out most of the day today ... and it didn't happen! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-02-11  06:38pm - 5013 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Another turd in the punchbowl of porn -- along with the pooper who leaked the AIM data and helped make it possible. I wonder how much that bit of sleaziness fetched. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-02-11  04:14pm - 5013 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Exotics, when I was last a member of 21st Sextury a few months ago, I also found the "block" thing that allows filtering of content. And I also found it by accident. And it was helpful.

But it's not keeping things simple. It's managing complexity. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-01-11  04:24pm - 5014 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Kind of reminds me of Melissa Cherry and her consecutive hits, "Down on My Knees" and "Take Me From Behind." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

04-01-11  04:00pm - 5014 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm not into the network concept. I'd rather have one site that does good updating instead of a network with sometimes this, sometimes that here or there.

21st Sextury used to just be Pix And Video and Club Sandy. I liked it that way. Simple. You can concentrate on the content without being distracted by the way the site(s) is/are set up.

DDF used to just be 1byday. I liked that, too.

I've had my fair share of network subscriptions, including Reality Pass and MyXXXpass and OnlyAllSites and the Peter Girls one and the Bikini Riot one and the Finest Models one and My Premium Pass and the Babelicious one ...

Were they worth it? Yes, for the content, obviously. Being a pain-in-the-ass network isn't going to change the appeal of the content. It's just going to make it unnecessarily difficult to navigate to and organize on the user's end.

You know, if I had 240 donuts in one big box and I put some of the donuts in each of 12 boxes, it might look as though there were more donuts, I guess, because there would be more boxes and the increased use of area would give the impression of there being more. Sure we could have "niche" donuts in different boxes, too, so everyone who only wanted cream-filled could get to them right away and get off on it.

But content can be tagged in a simpler site design and collected with one click. You don't have to have a donut network to get yer cream-filled treats together.

These overly complicated networks are just a deception. 1byday all by itself had content every day. Now it's some sites update often and others less and you wonder what this DDF BFD is all about. Reality Pass has a schedule of when each of its sites updates, so you have to check that if you want to know when the next episode of Mike's Apartment will air. See, it's more complicated. And you're not getting more. You're just spending more time trying to figure out how to get the same as you would with a simpler site.

Yeah, I don't care for that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 01, 2011, 04:18pm

03-31-11  05:09pm - 5015 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Jenna Haze in "Once a Cheater Always a Cheater," scene 5. Jenna looks delicious. Her body is flawless. Watching her take it from the back face down on that black couch or bed or whatever it is is just mesmerizing. The camera work is excellent. There's no lingering closeup on the face or ass or anything. It's the way a scene like that should be done. It should be discussed in every "how to make great porn" textbook.

And she first has the guy rub his cock on her ass, which she moves to make it bounce up and down on it until it's almost comical.

Yes, I've mentioned this scene before. It bears repeating. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-31-11  04:35am - 5015 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Marcelus:


The best girl that i will for ever dream at is Bree olson! And let me tell you why! She has great boobs , ass , legs ,pussy! Everything that a man needs!


[Spam Link Removed by Admin]


I think the first hardcore scene of Bree Olson I ever saw was on myxxxpass (can't remember which sub site). She was so into it, "belly down flat" as I like to say. Very HOT! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited by Staff on Mar 31, 2011, 06:05am

03-29-11  04:53pm - 5017 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by nostromo:


Boy, i really wished that porn websites would settle for a name for the girls . When i subscribe to a site featuring eastern european girls i end up classifying the files as follows: "Home Toy Teens, Vanda", Nubiles, Kleopatra"; a few weeks later browsing my files i realize that Vanda and Kleopatra bear an uncanny resemblance to one another. Alas, such is the ominous fate of the porn junkie.


Yeah, you said it. Today at FemJoy, "Vic E" was looking a hell of a lot like someone I'd downloaded before. Maybe from MetArt? MetModels? Other? Skokoff, maybe? I just couldn't bear to deal with another detective job.

The "who again?" item of the day ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-28-11  03:47pm - 5018 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


That's a though one - but, ok: On the softcore deal more and more sites are "experimenting" (uploading more material) with some easteuro, newer models like:
Alice: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/betty_3.html
Monchi/Anina:
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/anina.html
Not sure how much attention they draw except for users looking for newer things - and saying: Well, got my favorites...but!

And then: Ferrara Gomez (soft AND hc)

On the hardcore scene there is one who is just EVERYWHERE - and new vids just keep rolling in like a thunderstorm at both US and Euro sites:
Aletta Ocean - (not a big fan, but a lot seems to be fan of her big (fake)ones)...


Alice/Betty/Nomi etc. is a draw factor chick, I'd venture to say. She's got amazing sex appeal. First saw her at TeenDreams and went "WOW!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-28-11  03:44pm - 5018 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by nostromo:


I am Monchi fan too because she has great legs and feet. More often than not directors do their best to try to conceal her feet and avoid at all costs full body shots where you can see her legs in all their glory. Their tenacity in frustrating my fantasies regarding legs and feet has me in awe of their inventive.

As for the model with the biggest draw two names spring to mind: Shione Cooper and Mandy Dee.


When I first saw Monchi, I immediately thought "plain Jane." I've since come around to her exquisite charms, and I'd even say that she stands above many as a "draw factor." And she does well in both softcore and hardcore. She's quite healthy!

Anyway, I picked "Irishka" as her name for my own collection, though "Monchi" is pretty unique, too. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-28-11  01:35am - 5018 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Who do you think is currently the model who causes the biggest draw to a site? I mean more specifically that by having the model on the site, there are more subscribers in response.

I'm tempted to say that right now it's Marina/Euphrat. She seems to be "everywhere." And she's got such amazing appeal, it's easy to understand why!

There are others who also come to mind: Little Caprice, Dominika C, Tiffany Thompson, Lola/Dido, and, of course, Piper Fawn.

Of course, I don't have any statistical data on this, but who is the biggest draw for you? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-23-11  05:20pm - 5023 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
One thing I liked about Liz Taylor was that although she took her acting seriously, she didn't take herself too seriously. And she was a genuinely caring person. That means a lot. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-21-11  04:45pm - 5025 days #34
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by BadMrFrosty:


Nice idea but I don't think it could work. When you consider a premium membership to a file sharing site costs, what, $10 a month? For that $10 the user can download not only porn but also games, movies, music, TV shows basically anything that can be digitally distributed can be digitally distributed illegally. Add to that the fact that any smart "pirate" is not going to be paying for a file sharing account anyway. How can a legit site compete with that?

At the risk of over simplifying the issue, I think people fall into 3 groups. The pirates that would never pay for it anyway, the guys that would never consider pirating and buy all their porn and the people in the middle who will download some for free and pay for some. Spending time, money and energy pursuing the hardcore pirates I think is totally counter intuitive. They would never have bought your stuff so you have not lost a single penny by them downloading it for free.

I personally think that the best way to solve this is to focus on the people in the middle and make it as easy as possible for them to get the content they pay for. Why, when they can very quickly download the entire contents of a pay site in a couple of clicks via illicit means would a user sign up for a pay site? Sites put all sorts of barriers up to protect their content, download limits, speed limits, banning download managers, drm, not providing zipped pictures, making you go through 20 clicks to download a single scene etc. When a user has to go through all that to get their legitimately paid for porn is it any wonder so many say screw it and download illegally?


First off, nice Frank Zappa quote in the tag line.

The point you make about those who wouldn't pay a red penny for any of it isn't relevant.

We're only talking those who would pay something. Since there are plenty of pay-to-use file sharing services out there, it's clear enough that such people exist.

You do make a good point that not only porn but other stuff is also available to people who sign up for a file sharing service.

So my idea would only work for those who would sign up principally for the porn.

If the porn content creators had even a blog-style site to which they'd upload their content and charge $10 per month for it as a flat fee, the question would be if that's better for a user than the boards that have the shitty malware and image hosts and annoying pop-ups and window-closing scripts and so on. I think it would be.

But it might well not work anyway because the content creators wouldn't want to charge less than they already do. I can understand that. And then, effectively nothing will change.

You're certainly right that pay sites shouldn't be shooting themselves in the foot, if I may paraphrase, by putting in hurdles themselves (drm, no zips, screwy clicky naviation, etc.). And I'll add advertising as well. Not many do that, fortunately, but those that do put themselves at a disadvantage when the ads are done intrusively. Even MetArt does that occasionally. You log in and right away get this popup thing asking you to "upgrade." Fuck that interruption of what you're doing there. They should stick to spam, if anything, for making such offers. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-19-11  08:53pm - 5027 days #30
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


You are so right! Trouble is I have no idea how to grow a thicker skin. Ah well, it's not as if the no trust vote is bugging me on a daily basis. I simply wonder on and off what in my comments or reviews made someone decide I couldn't be trusted. So during my years with PU I have been baffled in connection with this rather than hurt.

And with the no trust vote being anonymous and I am only guessing that it must have been in connection with my AW comment. Could have been anything, I suppose. Sometimes someone just doesn't like you or your style.

PS. After that last paragraph I just went back for the first time since I got the no trust and found that it was in connection with a review, months after my AW comment. No mention which review he found "not good" .. I think a couple of pointers would have been helpful. But I am glad that that no one thought I was a shill, so that helps.


I don't really know how one can learn to grow a thicker skin. I used to be a lot more sensitive when I was younger, but I got enough pounding over the years that the thickening process just took care of itself.

It's like a callous. With enough abuse, the skin responds defensively until you just don't feel the pain any more.

So Messmer, what you really needed were MORE no trust votes! LOL

But that one you got was kinda of funny. What was the comment, "not a good revue"? What, were you supposed to travel North America, with key stops in Vegas and Atlantic City, with an entourage performing Doo Wop hits or something? Or Broadway show tunes?

Maybe it was a case of mistaken identity. Not just of you, but of the appropriate web site. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-19-11  09:34am - 5027 days #32
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Here's an idea for the paysites if they want to beat the free sites at their own game: pool resources and offer a site (or sites) that cost no more than a subscription to one of the file sharing services and keep such sites free of annoying advertising.

In other words, offer the same kind of thing, but better for the user than the free sites can.

I think you'd then see the free sites getting less traffic and the sharing services fewer subscriptions. The revenues could be shared by the pay sites that post their material there.

It wouldn't generate as much revenue as a regular pay site would, of course, but it would be better than none at all. And that way, they might not have to bother themselves as much with legal action, which is also expensive. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-19-11  09:17am - 5027 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Jabba the Hut/Jabba the Butt I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-14-11  05:57pm - 5032 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


It's a good, honorable and fine thread.
In my wildest dreams I cannot image what these people close to the epic center/that coast are going through - it's just horrible.
This is a time where THE WORLD should stand together and those countries with means should help fellow human beings...

BTW: In some medias in Europe some assholes from some facebook things are quoted for things like: "This is payback for the Japanese attack on Pearl Habour...."...ect.
What a lot of NONSENSE!
Not only should we donate - but our countries should send all the help possible....


That's really a weird idea that it would be "payback" for Pearl Harbor. I'd think the napalm bombings and seige-induced starvation topped off with the A-bombings of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have been payback enough. And that was all over a half century ago.

No, I don't think we're in the business of drumming up 8.9 magnitude quakes, nuclear reactor explosions and now a volcanic eruption in order to inflict some kind of "payback." That would be some applied science and some nasty, nasty grudge!

Denner, I commend your humanitarianism. Yes, we need to show our support for the people of Japan and help them through this extremely difficult time.

And as for the yahoos, well, close your eyes, spin the globe, put your finger down on it, and chances are, ya got some there! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-13-11  08:23pm - 5033 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pinkerton:


I've been a subscriber and watcher of hardcore porn for over 8 years now and have found my tastes becoming increasingly narrower and I've found that as time goes on I'm getting fussier about what I watch. For quite a while my preference is for brunettes in dark stockings, who are attractive without being too glamourous, and if they're tall/leggy wihout being too skinny, then all the better. I guess my profile pic reflects my taste.

This means that my porn collection is going to greatly shrink as I start trimming the stuff I'm no longer interested in, as opposed to growing and growing as other PU'ers collections seem to have done.

Am I in the minority here or do any others of you find yourselves trimming your collection of content?

Just wondering...


My tastes certainly have changed over the years, and I'll look at the stuff that I used really like and some if it just doesn't do it for me anymore. The "Playboy" approach pretty much sums it up. Besides, some of that older stuff is dodgy in quality, technically speaking. Even some of the old Mac&Bumble stuff I used to cherish leaves me with a flat (or is that flaccid?) feeling.

So I've deleted stuff that I know I won't miss. Still, I'm a collector and the gigabytes get used up a lot faster than they used to.

I think it's normal for your tastes or at least preferences to "narrow" with time. Mine haven't as far has the focus of interest is concerned, that being beautiful women with really nice asses. But I'm a lot pickier than I used to be about what content I'll accept. So I reject at least 50% of what I come across.

And part of the reason is, paradoxically, the growth of my collection. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-13-11  08:07pm - 5033 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
There are nude models that I don't think are likely to do hardcore porn, though I can't clearly say why I have that impression of them: Gwen/Pia, Amelie (at FemJoy, MPL, Querro, etc.), Sasha (also at FemJoy, MPL, Querro, etc.), and Monica/Stasha/Anastasia, etc. (FemJoy, Hegre, AlpGirls, WetAndPuffy, etc. etc.).

Actually, most of the girls at MPL just don't seem likely to "do it" on camera with a guy or guys.

But my "impressions" have been wrong before! Monique Alexander did tons of softcore earlier in her career and now she's a hardcore queen. And even Lonnie Waters did a bit of hardcore. And Bambi has even done some.

I didn't think I'd see Lucie Lee (the Czech, of course) doing hardcore when I first saw her, but that was not to be the case for sure. And then there's Natasha Marley, who's gotten into it.

Regarding more recent cuties, there's Dido/Lola (has done a bit), Summer Breeze (doing quite a fair share), Aimee Addison, and Erica Fontes.

And Katie Jordin! THAT was a quite surprise.

I'll say that I'm glad that some of them don't get into hardcore because there's less of a chance that they're going to ruin their looks with fake tits, tatoos, and face-deforming plastic surgery. I mean, beauty should count for SOMETHING. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Mar 13, 2011, 08:38pm

03-12-11  03:26pm - 5034 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Some other names I'd like to add to the question Denner has posed: Sophie Paris, Peaches, Laura Craft (new material, that is), Lucy Stratilova, the killer-cute Russian Sandra (Moni?), and I'm sure I'll think of more.

But at least some girls who've been "away" have made some nice recent comebacks: Aliona (Danae?) and Czech supercutie Terri, to name two.

But at least Eve Angel is still actively modeling, and so are the dazzling Marina/Euphrat and Dominika C. And Sophie Moone!

And that Denner/Drooler favorite, blond Viktoriya at FM-Teens.

And Erica Fontes is now doing hardcore!

So I miss some of my favorites, but life is still good. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Mar 13, 2011, 07:49am

03-12-11  02:43am - 5034 days #160
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Put her fake boobs on her back? You guys remind me of that warped kid Sid in the first Toy Story movie. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-10-11  02:34am - 5036 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
With all due respect to Henry Miller, I prefer visual media ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

03-06-11  03:17am - 5040 days #148
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Another fine Euro model turned to implants:
The rather lovely Nataly:
http://www.pornteengirl.com/model/barbora-2.html

(NB: I use pornteengirl as link and not EBI - for the first time - love it - and thanks again to our fellow PU: pat 362):

Now the very sexy Nataly with cute natural and fine sized breasts has "gone over" - at least recently shown in the French movie: "The Filles de la Campagne".

Still sexy and cute - but those scars under are not nice and will they ever be???

Wonder who's next.


That's a real cryin' shame about Nataly. Wow, such lovely NATURAL tits ruined!

And Monique Alexander has "gone over," too! Waaaahhhhhhh!

I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Mar 06, 2011, 04:59am

02-28-11  12:20pm - 5046 days #280
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Here's one: Southern Legs. The emphasis is on pantyhose. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-28-11  02:35am - 5046 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Smoking ... the gateway to STD's. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-26-11  01:53pm - 5048 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
It was called Ultimate Asian. Cost $9.95 for a year. That was 10 years ago. After a few months, there were others: Sung Hee Lee, Deanna Brooks, Mac&Bumble, Danni.com, Digital Dreamgirls (as it was then called), etc. all in 2001 or 2002.

The first one with hardcore content was Suze.net, in 2002. I didn't even bother with videos in those days. Had dialup.

Things sure have improved, overall at least. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-22-11  02:03pm - 5052 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Let's not forget SportyOne, which has nothing to do with sports. Well, indoor sports, yes ...

There are enough American girls in that index to knock a buzzard off a shitwagon, if you'll pardon the expression. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-12-11  07:26am - 5062 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
"The price of porn has just gone up, and your old lady has just gone down."

I wonder if Frank Zappa would have said that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-07-11  04:05pm - 5067 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
It's weird how so many of those "popular-with-the-ladies" guys are just plain butt-ugly. And this dude's no exception.

Reminds me of a line from 48 Hours, spoken by Eddie Murphy: "The generosity of women never ceases to amaze me." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-06-11  02:56pm - 5068 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Earl Miller has videos of photoshoots of both models posing and models doing naughty things with males. There's plenty of "flash" happening. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-05-11  03:54pm - 5069 days #25
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I don't think the operative word was "NEED". I asked if you HAD another term. But I guess from your response, you don't like the Act, let alone have a term for it. Sorry


I guess I could have as easily asked "Do I have a term ...?" "Need" isn't operative in the sense you have bestowed on it, no. But be honest. It wasn't off the mark. Unless you simply never "needed" to ask ... And none of us ever "needed" to come to this forum ...

The act doesn't necessarily bother me, but of course that's how it's done. I recall that I expressed objections to the term in question, btw. There's no need to "create reality" just because some small part of is not known.

And I don't have a term to replace it, any more than I'd suggest "baked Alaska" if someone asked me what alternative I would suggest for the objectionable pigeon guano on my motor vehicle. (What I might call "bird shit.")

But we're both native English speakers. I think we can get the necessary meanings across without needing metaphors for fucking and sucking at the same time. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Feb 05, 2011, 03:58pm

02-05-11  07:02am - 5069 days #22
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


^ I guess u might be correct Drooler but until I saw it used in that context I did not know how to characterize the act as such. Would you have a more acceptable term?


I need to come up with a more acceptable term than "spit-roasted"? PLLEEEASE! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-04-11  04:19pm - 5070 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Does anyone get the sense that we've been lured into a trap? Whether it was by accident or design, we're now more dependent on Internet service for so many things that bandwidth caps seem to be just another lure down the garden path to persuade us that we must spend more per unit to have them lifted.

And I feel I should mention another kind of "cap": when the government imposes limits on increases of the cost of an essential service, such as on utilities providing electricity being held to a limit on their charges per kilowatt hour. Maybe once people "get it" that Internet service has become more vital to us than television and radio were that they can persuade their "democratically elected" officials that bandwidth costs need to be kept under some kind of control.

Unless, of course, those officials are already under the control of, well, you know ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

02-04-11  03:05pm - 5070 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Frankly, my first reaction to "spit roasted" in this context is that it is an ugly and degrading term. I plan not to use it.

But thanks for the info. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-30-11  11:09am - 5075 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I don't have time! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-28-11  02:39pm - 5077 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
When I look at a calendar it's usually for a reason that is pretty much unrelated to porn. I don't really want to think about the garbage pickup schedule and one of your hot booty babes at the same time, for instance. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-26-11  01:46pm - 5079 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think you misunderstand the point I was trying to make, Drooler. And that was that many photo web sites have become too "girlish," in the sense that they feature too much attire that would be worn by under-age girls. That they cater to those who like this sort of thing rather than to the few of us who would like to see things a bit more mature.

No, I don't mean Grannies, just the typical things worn by anyone over twenty. Don't see too many over twenty wearing socks and sneakers! Well, maybe some do!

In my case nice, erotic lingerie is a definite bonus but I don't expect to see that too often because the modern woman expects comfort. As my friend graymane stated, most porn hounds are probably content with "skin," while I've seen so much of it I like to see some embellishment to it. And I have nothing against a woman stripping out of regular clothes.


I wasn't trying to understand your point. I was just making my own. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-26-11  03:10am - 5079 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Webmasters of Photo Sites to their photographers:

"Please ensure that your models look as little-girlish as possible. Give them socks, sneakers and printed little cotton panties if at all possible. We can't seem to give away real women in real women's underwear to our present subscribers!" True Or False?


For me, it's false. I actually like to see women strip out of regular clothes, the kind they'd wear for a casual day out. I pay more attention to what they are revealing than what they are removing. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-23-11  01:05am - 5082 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by otoh:


Well said - I come across this issue frequently, where folk online think they are a representative sample. Whereas we all have our own likes and opinions, the fact that we bother to write and post here, and discuss porn at all, very likely puts us in an entirely different demographic to the market at large.


You may well have a point. Fake tits probably look alright after a few cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-22-11  01:06am - 5083 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I saw this in the news yesterday. Gee, does someone have to DIE to get other people to stop this "breast enhancing" nonsense?

Keep your tits, girls. And live! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-15-11  10:38am - 5090 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
So Evan Stone's the token male. One of the first vids I saw him in was at Jack's Playground (or was it Teen America?). The girl had a stuffed toy on her butt as she was laying on a couch. Evan seemed "angry" and batted the toy to the floor with his dick. Somehow I thought it was pretty funny.

Otherwise, not very surprised by most of the others in the list. I wonder if Emma Mae will get a slot among the elite in 2011. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-09-11  02:11pm - 5096 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Yeah, I'm pretty much with Squirrel on this. I get kind of creative with some of the photos I get, and I like large images because they give me enough raw material to work with.

If a site has only really large-sized images, I'll reduce them to different sizes depending on how much of the girl is actually in the photo.

And I'll crop some of them, too. You do have to be careful not to crop a jpg, though, unless the resulting quality loss is tolerable for you. So I convert those to tiffs before doing surgery on them.

While I'd rather have 100 images at 5600 pixels than have 100 at 1200, I don't like it when sites don't include smaller sizes as well. I think a selection of 1200 and then something between 4000 and 5600 is enough. MetModels does something pretty close to that.

Why some sites are going to 8000 pixels or more, I don't understand, but I won't complain.

Oh, and by the way, I don't understand "the point" of videos that go up to 1920x1080, for instance, but I don't see anyone raising that question. And whatever their reasons are, it's fine by me. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 09, 2011, 02:16pm

01-09-11  05:10am - 5096 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Just wanted to post that warning, in case any perverts happen to visit Texas.

I don't think California has passed any such law. But I am not a lawyer.

Maybe WittyGuy could comment, since he seems to be our resident legal expert?


Oh, he probably will comment. Just wait until this December! LOL

I can see the point of legally protecting people's cattle from potential (and possibly intentional) mislabeling or "vandalism" such that the labels the owner put on the animal are made illegible.

Now, I don't know what you'd do if the owner's name is Kilroy ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-08-11  03:00pm - 5097 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Like this example:

Anina, Monchi, Amelie ect, ect, is on my list of cute models right now, but take a look at this:

http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/anina.html

If that's not a jungle for aliases....

So to Webmasters og producers: Is it unrealistic to boil down all these aliases?

And what do PUs say?




When I saw all those names in your post, I couldn't tell who it might be. Then I went to the EBI page and had a bit of a laugh. I've decided to call her "Iriska," another name she's been given that's not even in the EBI list.

There aren't too many Irishka's around, at least not yet!

And I just realized that Ida A at MetArt is Yana at Querro.

You know, I first laid eyes on Britney when she appeared at ATK Galleria as Lulu. So she's Lulu/Britney. Well, sometimes Britney/Lulu. Or Brigi. I like that name.

I have to get used to calling her Brigi but looking her up under "Lulu" without missing a beat.

And thank God her name isn't Nikki! Jesus!

Yeah, it's a freaking hassle! I hate it when I see a girl at a site and I KNOW the name I have her filed under is not the name they're giving her ... and I can't remember which name I filed her under. That happens a lot.

Maybe this all of this memory work is good for us ...


NAAAAAAHHHHH!


Semiotics Corner: You know, I'm reminded of how the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure stated that the relation between the signifier and the signified is "arbitrary."

Boy, was he right about that! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 08, 2011, 03:24pm

01-06-11  04:11am - 5099 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
The scum-sucking vermin could be very clever with putting in a codec "upgrade" recommendation. From a porn site, that's just unusual, but that doesn't mean that some people wouldn't fall prey to the ruse.

I'd just try to view the video without the "new codec." If it really doesn't play, then go to the legitimate site and look for an upgrade there. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

01-02-11  02:12pm - 5103 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
What? No more nam-yo-ho-ren-fucking-gey-kyoo? Sure, this is it, but it still ain't right. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

701-750 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 14 Page 15 16 20 24 28 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.