Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I hate their network setup, unbelievably confusing to no end... but I know all the content on playfulhands is duplicated on 21sextury.com and I think so too the content on peepeebabes. Not sure about fassinating but it might be as well.
|
08-18-10 08:39am
|
Reply
127
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Their tour pages come up very fast for me at the current moment, and my maximum internet connection speed doesn't come close to even 600kbps, I would *love* to have that speed ;)
As always, check you have the most current versions of Adobe Flash & Java installed on your computer - and with Flash there is an install for IE and a separate install that covers all other browsers.
|
08-16-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
128
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I don't think the site is so bad. I'm currently in the middle of a full-year subscription with them & I'm still liking the site. They put out 13 scenes a month, some of them are amazing, some of them average, some are poor. Plus the huge archive going back many years.
As for canceling, even if one forgets, there are just four options try one & if you're not listed there, then try the next.
http://memberssupport.net/support/index....le&kbarticleid=3
I've subscribed on & off over the years, never had a problem canceling. It's all done through established 3rd party billing companies, Sapphic Erotica is not using in-house billing.
|
08-13-10 09:46am
|
Reply
129
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Hardy214's Review
They began encoding in 1280x720@4mbps back early in 2007
|
08-12-10 11:16pm
|
Reply
130
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Probably a false positive. Kaspersky says no virus.
Besides, that site you sign up through verotel, is it bongum or verotel you think has the problem?
|
07-25-10 09:45am
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I never understood the aversion towards sites that no longer update, and especially the users who then jump on this board and give it a review score of 50 solely for no longer updating. Thankfully I haven't seen one in a long while.
Okay, a site that has a backlog of 500 sets available but no new updates, does it really piss people off having access to _only_ 500 sets instead of 500 plus 5?
And sometimes you get lucky, last month I joined a site that I new had a short life & hadn't updated in a year, but I still wanted the content. Got in, immediately downloaded the sets I wanted, two days later the site goes offline forever... and I get a full refund from ccbill! Would be surprising for many, I was actually contemplating not asking for a refund, because I know the guy put out a lot of his own money to create the sets I wanted, he deserves the money... but then I figured with this chance spend the money on someone else who is still producing new sets with my fav girl!
|
07-20-10 10:50am
|
Reply
132
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Darrow's Reply
Their new options for $32/month & $40/month seem to indicate they are "all you can download" options. I don't know.
Actually, looking at it seems it's an "all you can download" from the scenes marked as "eromaxx" with all others being extra pay.
Confusing would be a gross understatement...
|
07-14-10 07:39pm
|
Reply
133
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I would say, describe the facts about what the trial membership provides, though leave it up to others to make up their minds on the site.
I would look at your story and say, good thing they offered the trial and you are out only 3 euros and not 30. Sounds like a very crappy trial for sure, but was it really a scam?
|
07-14-10 12:18pm
|
Reply
134
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
Most trials are limited access, that should be expected.
|
07-14-10 08:48am
|
Reply
135
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Porn industry is larger in the U.S. versus Europe, which gives the photographers the wider range of girls who are entering the adult business.
|
07-13-10 03:05pm
|
Reply
136
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Darrow's Review
I've been curious about the extremely vague join options, and how the site actually works. Their joining options are completely different now than the last time I looked at it. Are you capable of providing any more details?
I like an occasional scene from them, what would that be, $7.50 per individual scene? That's actually not all that bad considering the going rate for fetish clips elsewhere is still $1/minute. Course everyone likes cheaper, but in the grand scheme of things...
|
07-13-10 09:01am
|
Reply
137
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Private Collection = European girls
Hometown Amateurs = American girls
|
07-11-10 09:57pm
|
Reply
138
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
They still do good work when they put out an original new scene, and if you know their numbering scheme you can tell what is what - for instance tomorrow's update with Aneta is a brand new original production. But ummm, I think they never really regained focus ever since they realized they could not continue pushing out two brand new scenes each day on 1by-day.
DDF seems to be putting most of their effort in their EveAngelOfficial site.
|
07-05-10 10:23am
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Would call up the credit card company and report the charge as fraudulent first.
CCBill / epoch / vxsbill they are reputable never a problem ever - if I want something from a site that uses any other billing method I check all reviews I can, and if they all check out fine I make damn sure to use a virtual credit card number and cancel that number immediately after - this way no matter if they want to screw me with a rebill or not they cannot charge me again for anything.
|
06-30-10 09:07pm
|
Reply
140
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Here are their official preview galleries for this site, check it out for yourself:
http://www.goldinaraw.com/?p=1
|
06-29-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
141
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Yes'em, currently. Not sure what precisely you prefer - most of the photosets focus more on slowly taking off clothes. It's definitely not a site that focuses on full nudity nor closeups of the naughty bits.
I don't know, every photoset is different, some the girl is full nude from the start, and others the girl still has some article of clothing still on at the end.
Just two quirks with the site, there is a wealth of back-material, the new updates come about 7 or 8 per month but they are for some reason are bunched up so updates come quicker near the end of each calendar month and scarcer at the beginnings. Then, the preview image of what the next update will be, often it turns out to be a different set released - the preview will eventually be released, just not always the next one out.
|
06-29-10 02:20pm
|
Reply
142
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
I never understood what their grand plan was with their dozens of websites...
All content on magicblondes, flexypussy, dirty101, it all is doubled on either pix & video or club sandy. Everything.
Cuties Galore is a whole separate site from the rest, focusing on Russian girls, and their content is *not* found on pix & video or club sandy.
|
06-28-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
143
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
They state that price in their tour, but as far as I'm aware it's never actually offered when joining.
This site purchases videos every now & then from standard content producers, many of the videos are found on other sites as teendreams, teenpinkvideos, mysexykittens. At least lezboland has better encoding that the others, 640x480@4mbps with no watermark.
|
06-28-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
144
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
My take is that Brazzers truly is sleazy, while 21Sextury created a complex network of sites far too large for them to effectively handle. Both situations suck, but I don't get the impression those who run 21Sextury wake up each morning and think of new possibilities on how to screw us over. I could be wrong, who knows?
|
06-27-10 04:05pm
|
Reply
145
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
There is still a very significant difference between 21Sextury & Brazzers, in that Brazzers is shitty by (1) operating many piracy & tube websites, and (2) screwing subscribers over with unwanted up-sells. While I'm not excusing 21Sextury, inconsistent updates just is not in the same league as Brazzers.
|
06-27-10 01:03pm
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the content. If the site produces the best content out there, then what the fuck do I care if they make a few extra bucks with ads? More money in their hands is more that could go towards new material.
But if the site's content sucks ass, then the ads piss me off.
Suppose I'm saying content is king, ads who cares?
|
06-24-10 06:45pm
|
Reply
147
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I did not say it is perfectly reasonable not to get access to a site for days.
What I say is it is not reasonable to condemn a site for being down for a day.
|
06-18-10 10:59am
|
Reply
148
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Then ask the billing company for a refund and drop the dramatics.
Every site has hosting issues at some point in their life, and your sensationalized comment gives very little of actual value except just to add another negative mark on some site.
How am I able to determine whether they deserve the negative mark, or if you are just an incredibly impatient surfer? Was the site down for just one day? Two? A week? Intermittently? Were you denied a refund?
|
06-18-10 12:46am
|
Reply
149
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Give it a few days, see if the site comes back. If not, contact the billing company for a refund.
|
06-17-10 08:50pm
|
Comment
150
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
|
06-12-10 06:26pm
Replies (2)
|