| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
ALS Scan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+++ daily updates
+++ great models + primilary teens
+++ big archive for movies and galleries
++ newer videos in hdv quality (16:9) older ones are in 4:3 format
++ no DRM or download limitations
+ easy navigation
+ good price |
| Cons: |
--- inconsistant design
--- outmoded technologies in use e.g.popups (without scrollbars when needed)
-- some girls wear braces
-- the repetitivness of content is obvious but part of the concept |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS Scan is a good blast from the past till the present. They were part of the porn history online and had formed their own unique style.
ALS Scan has shaved girls only. You'll find them often in solo, girl girl, oiled up, toy, pee, speculum and veggie action or in combination of those.
They offer exactly what they promise and that makes ALS Scan a perfect match for those who seek for flexible teens, small tits, spread legs and other kinky stuff. |
|
02-09-10 01:56am
Replies (3)
|
Review
2
|
MC Nudes
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# 3D galleries (NEW)
# great girls / good mixture of babes and woman
# HDV Videos with big archive *1
# galleries with big archive
# modelvoting
# bonus stuff
*1 they seem to spend more effort in cutting scenes and give everything a more gentle and artistic touch (I like that, you maybe not) |
| Cons: |
~ little more variance in settings would be good
~ more exotic girls
~ modelnames in videos are missing |
| Bottom Line: |
I have just went into my 2nd month membership on mc-nudes and was really surprised about the feature upgrade.
The new 3D galleries are top notch and something I haven't seen anywhere else before. The girls seem really to pop out of my monitor and the archive grows fast (nearly 1 per day).
Beside that everything stay is as good as it was before. Daily updates, good erotic content and since some time they shoot more girls in lingerie.
The site is nothing for people who seek for hardcore except for those who want settle down and a bit to see their favorite hc model's sensual side ;)
They have known girls and unqiues ...
MCN is softcore at it's best. |
|
11-27-09 12:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Tori Black
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ Tori Black
+++ Live Chat Cam Session
++ Galleries & Videos
+ Bonus Stuff
+ Store |
| Cons: |
None, it's a solosite! |
| Bottom Line: |
I just stumbled upon the site of Tori Black and was blown away by this young cutie. Whatever you expect from a solo site, it's available.
The site is filled with videos and galleries full of solo / girl girl / girl boy and group action.
Tori has a hot wire to her fans and offer live cam sessions on a very personal level, answering questions, playing with the camera.
Conclusion: it's a close to perfect solosite but as a solosite it's a very small path you can go with it.
You get the temporarily distraction from daily routine by one of the most fascinating babes in the porn industry today with enough material to keep you busy for a month or maybe more. |
|
02-04-10 09:30am
Replies (6)
|
Review
4
|
Femjoy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible |
| Cons: |
--- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money |
| Bottom Line: |
After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.
Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.
They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.
Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.
Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.
Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't! |
|
02-02-10 07:00am
Replies (8)
|
Review
5
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ nice girls / primilary teens
+ images and video in great detail
+ great o-sounds in the videos (love the birdies in the background)
+ some tight fisting |
| Cons: |
- shaved only
- the girls always overact in any direction (a real turn-off!)
- the sets are not creative but repetitive
- looks like they think the more girls at the same time the better *its definetly not working! |
| Bottom Line: |
Sapphic is something for a rush but not more. The site offers not much variance, just plain girl girl or girl girl girl girl action in an repetitive manner.
This site might become pretty boring to you in a short period of time but as long as you find a girl you like, get in and enjoy.
Sapphic is for gg hardcore lovers and those who seek for young girls in action the straight way... all others should check other sites! |
|
12-08-09 02:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
6
|
X-Art
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
# nice girls
# good quality
# HDV videos
# partial HC content
# functional design |
| Cons: |
# HIGH PRICE
# 1 update every 4th day
# small archive
# no bonus contents |
| Bottom Line: |
X-art aka Beauty Is Divine was always a great source for inspiration full of angelic looking babes.
I see the change from BID to X-Art with mixed feelings. The additional hc content stays in total contrast to the "old" days and unique contents and make it just another teensite.
I totally disagree with majestix opinion because the price is way to high for a site that updates only every 4th day and offers a small archive.
X-art is for people who do not need a daily update and don't want to miss nicely shaped and flexible teens in quality scenes. |
|
02-01-10 02:11am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
7
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Bumble B's Review
Short and clean!
|
04-28-10 08:53am
|
Reply
8
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Torque's Review
I agree with any word you said Torque but for the future please include some more details to get an idea of what makes a site top notch for you or not. (I needed a - warm-up - review myself to get into PU ... just keep on doing)
|
03-07-10 12:19am
|
Reply
9
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Reply
Cool, thanks for the confirmation.
|
02-15-10 11:49am
|
Comment
10
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
|
02-15-10 04:45am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
11
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
I agree with each of you - geo pricing sucks! I am finally back to mc-nudes.com and happy with my overall situation. A friend of mine confirmed my assumption that they don't use any geo pricing!
|
02-15-10 04:38am
|
Reply
12
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I totally agree with you PinkPanther and I would go a little further!
I would be disappointed when ALS would change anything in design because it's part of their identity. They are, what they are and it works.
|
02-09-10 11:29pm
|
Reply
13
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That's something I haven't realised yet but since you named it - it sucks! :/
|
02-07-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
14
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You're right Denner but as you said it already, the set issue is an "old" one and I was just pointing to the recent envelopments I've noticed. Hope they find their way back to their old ideals.
|
02-05-10 12:23pm
|
Reply
15
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Just keep in mind that video updates come every 14-21 days.
|
02-05-10 08:26am
|
Comment
16
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
02-05-10 08:19am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
17
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
X-art seem to trial and error anything to get more attention.
They have just started in filling their update archive with videos that are not behind the scenes scenes. They are somehow kind of artsy because of the usage of slowmotion here and there.
I am not sure if they might change things soon again. :/
|
02-05-10 08:04am
|
Reply
18
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
brummie's Review
You should become a member of other sites in the niché to create a realistic review. This one failed badly.
|
02-05-10 12:53am
|
Reply
19
|
Tori Black
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree with PinkPanther when it comes to PremiumPass at all but my review was about that particular site.
When you are one of those, who need to collect everything you can do this within a day or two - right - but you need to get through all of it for quiet longer.
|
02-05-10 12:36am
|
Reply
20
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
User1234's Reply
True, but doesn't convince me.
You find me somewhere between Widdyguy and JBDICK.
|
02-02-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
21
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
User1234's Review
50% is bullshit! Something I really don't like about your review is the additional push for a signup and the significant personal comparism with Met-Art.com. *If I could, I wouldn't give you a trust because of that.
It's right that most of the girls are natural beautiful but somehow Peter managed to create the worst galleries ever of them.
I am a big fan of Linda L aka Yvette Blance and was shocked seeing some of her sets there. Peter did this to a couple of other models too.
In technically perfect terms of Mr. Hegre's skills as a photographer I disagree with (fake) user1234 and say the images could be more in line with the natural beauty of the girls and consistant in quality.
|
02-02-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
22
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thank you and there is nothing to add from my side - you named it.
|
02-02-10 02:07pm
|
Reply
23
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The video quality at all is good but the storystelling is mostly weak.
Good looking girls can never eat like normals or ending up making a mess. Another video I saw was a girl climbing on the roof, fully naked.
I think you know what I try to explain, the girls are beautiful but uncertain as long as they get instructed by someone behind the camera. Mechanic smiles and abrupted movements are routine in the videos.
Nevertheless, you should check the videos by yourself to build your own opinion. They seem to have a couple of full videos for promotional purposes online.
|
02-02-10 02:00pm
|
Reply
24
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
There is not much to complain about the quality of x-art, it's just the overall look for the most sites that sicken me.
mc-nudes.com is a good advice and a site I already know. They are one of the few that doesn't seem to care about the mainstream developments.
watch4beauty.com is too artistic for me and breath-takers too expensive for an update rate of 2 per week.
|
02-02-10 01:47pm
|
Reply
25
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Since 2010 they seem to have irregular HD video updates. As far I have recognized it every 9-10 day now.
The release informations are public, check the site to see for yourself.
|
02-02-10 11:42am
|
