Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : adrenalinrush (0)  

Feedback:   All (30)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (5)  |   Replies (19)

Other:   Replies Received (22)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-19 of 19  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)
Reply of Bumble B's Review

Short and clean!

04-28-10  08:53am

Reply
2
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(0)
Reply of Torque's Review

I agree with any word you said Torque but for the future please include some more details to get an idea of what makes a site top notch for you or not. (I needed a - warm-up - review myself to get into PU ... just keep on doing)

03-07-10  12:19am

Reply
3
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(0)
Reply of propaGhandi's Reply

Cool, thanks for the confirmation.

02-15-10  11:49am

Reply
4
Visit Only Tease

Only Tease
(0)
Reply of wildstar's Comment

I agree with each of you - geo pricing sucks! I am finally back to mc-nudes.com and happy with my overall situation. A friend of mine confirmed my assumption that they don't use any geo pricing!

02-15-10  04:38am

Reply
5
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

I totally agree with you PinkPanther and I would go a little further!
I would be disappointed when ALS would change anything in design because it's part of their identity. They are, what they are and it works.


02-09-10  11:29pm

Reply
6
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

That's something I haven't realised yet but since you named it - it sucks! :/

02-07-10  01:20pm

Reply
7
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

You're right Denner but as you said it already, the set issue is an "old" one and I was just pointing to the recent envelopments I've noticed. Hope they find their way back to their old ideals.

02-05-10  12:23pm

Reply
8
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Just keep in mind that video updates come every 14-21 days.

02-05-10  08:26am

Reply
9
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

X-art seem to trial and error anything to get more attention.

They have just started in filling their update archive with videos that are not behind the scenes scenes. They are somehow kind of artsy because of the usage of slowmotion here and there.

I am not sure if they might change things soon again. :/


02-05-10  08:04am

Reply
10
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of brummie's Review

You should become a member of other sites in the niché to create a realistic review. This one failed badly.

02-05-10  12:53am

Reply
11
Visit Tori Black

Tori Black
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

I agree with PinkPanther when it comes to PremiumPass at all but my review was about that particular site.

When you are one of those, who need to collect everything you can do this within a day or two - right - but you need to get through all of it for quiet longer.


02-05-10  12:36am

Reply
12
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)
Reply of User1234's Reply

True, but doesn't convince me.
You find me somewhere between Widdyguy and JBDICK.


02-02-10  02:59pm

Reply
13
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)
Reply of User1234's Review

50% is bullshit! Something I really don't like about your review is the additional push for a signup and the significant personal comparism with Met-Art.com. *If I could, I wouldn't give you a trust because of that.

It's right that most of the girls are natural beautiful but somehow Peter managed to create the worst galleries ever of them.

I am a big fan of Linda L aka Yvette Blance and was shocked seeing some of her sets there. Peter did this to a couple of other models too.

In technically perfect terms of Mr. Hegre's skills as a photographer I disagree with (fake) user1234 and say the images could be more in line with the natural beauty of the girls and consistant in quality.


02-02-10  02:47pm

Reply
14
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Thank you and there is nothing to add from my side - you named it.

02-02-10  02:07pm

Reply
15
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

The video quality at all is good but the storystelling is mostly weak.

Good looking girls can never eat like normals or ending up making a mess. Another video I saw was a girl climbing on the roof, fully naked.
I think you know what I try to explain, the girls are beautiful but uncertain as long as they get instructed by someone behind the camera. Mechanic smiles and abrupted movements are routine in the videos.

Nevertheless, you should check the videos by yourself to build your own opinion. They seem to have a couple of full videos for promotional purposes online.


02-02-10  02:00pm

Reply
16
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

There is not much to complain about the quality of x-art, it's just the overall look for the most sites that sicken me.

mc-nudes.com is a good advice and a site I already know. They are one of the few that doesn't seem to care about the mainstream developments.

watch4beauty.com is too artistic for me and breath-takers too expensive for an update rate of 2 per week.


02-02-10  01:47pm

Reply
17
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

Since 2010 they seem to have irregular HD video updates. As far I have recognized it every 9-10 day now.

The release informations are public, check the site to see for yourself.


02-02-10  11:42am

Reply
18
Visit Ero Berlin

Ero Berlin
(0)
Reply of BE Production's Reply

I am not a member anymore and just checked to see if there is something new on the site. I am sorry but the comment of the site owner doesn't convince me to join.

Are there any other users or members who can tell me if they experience the same issues or not?


12-13-09  12:53pm

Reply
19
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I've just joined MET (1 month only and it will be my last one forever!) because of this discussion.

Ok, naked girls might be a reason to join the site BUT after all MET does not stand the standards of today!

Compared to other sites the images are always mid or just low resolution, you can kick 3/5 of there archive because the images often over-sharpened, blurry or just plain boring.

In the galleries the browsing experience sucks. It's like the Ugh-factor is hitting me like a stone. Who the hell is still using the popup feature from the Stone Age? I don't want to use my browser's back button over and over again anymore.

MET finally has 3-5 top photographers that kept my head up but that's it :/

And something I nearly forgot, I never felt to be welcome in the memberzone. It's plain black and dreary and has additional promotion of other sites and that's something I can't accept as a paying customer!


12-13-09  12:00pm


Shown : 1-19 of 19  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.