| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I totally agree with you PinkPanther and I would go a little further!
I would be disappointed when ALS would change anything in design because it's part of their identity. They are, what they are and it works.
|
02-09-10 11:29pm
|
Reply
2
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
BE Production's Reply
I am not a member anymore and just checked to see if there is something new on the site. I am sorry but the comment of the site owner doesn't convince me to join.
Are there any other users or members who can tell me if they experience the same issues or not?
|
12-13-09 12:53pm
|
Reply
3
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That's something I haven't realised yet but since you named it - it sucks! :/
|
02-07-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
4
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The video quality at all is good but the storystelling is mostly weak.
Good looking girls can never eat like normals or ending up making a mess. Another video I saw was a girl climbing on the roof, fully naked.
I think you know what I try to explain, the girls are beautiful but uncertain as long as they get instructed by someone behind the camera. Mechanic smiles and abrupted movements are routine in the videos.
Nevertheless, you should check the videos by yourself to build your own opinion. They seem to have a couple of full videos for promotional purposes online.
|
02-02-10 02:00pm
|
Reply
5
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
There is not much to complain about the quality of x-art, it's just the overall look for the most sites that sicken me.
mc-nudes.com is a good advice and a site I already know. They are one of the few that doesn't seem to care about the mainstream developments.
watch4beauty.com is too artistic for me and breath-takers too expensive for an update rate of 2 per week.
|
02-02-10 01:47pm
|
Reply
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Since 2010 they seem to have irregular HD video updates. As far I have recognized it every 9-10 day now.
The release informations are public, check the site to see for yourself.
|
02-02-10 11:42am
|
Reply
7
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Bumble B's Review
Short and clean!
|
04-28-10 08:53am
|
Reply
8
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
User1234's Reply
True, but doesn't convince me.
You find me somewhere between Widdyguy and JBDICK.
|
02-02-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
9
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
User1234's Review
50% is bullshit! Something I really don't like about your review is the additional push for a signup and the significant personal comparism with Met-Art.com. *If I could, I wouldn't give you a trust because of that.
It's right that most of the girls are natural beautiful but somehow Peter managed to create the worst galleries ever of them.
I am a big fan of Linda L aka Yvette Blance and was shocked seeing some of her sets there. Peter did this to a couple of other models too.
In technically perfect terms of Mr. Hegre's skills as a photographer I disagree with (fake) user1234 and say the images could be more in line with the natural beauty of the girls and consistant in quality.
|
02-02-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
10
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Torque's Review
I agree with any word you said Torque but for the future please include some more details to get an idea of what makes a site top notch for you or not. (I needed a - warm-up - review myself to get into PU ... just keep on doing)
|
03-07-10 12:19am
|
Reply
11
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Reply
Cool, thanks for the confirmation.
|
02-15-10 11:49am
|
Reply
12
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I've just joined MET (1 month only and it will be my last one forever!) because of this discussion.
Ok, naked girls might be a reason to join the site BUT after all MET does not stand the standards of today!
Compared to other sites the images are always mid or just low resolution, you can kick 3/5 of there archive because the images often over-sharpened, blurry or just plain boring.
In the galleries the browsing experience sucks. It's like the Ugh-factor is hitting me like a stone. Who the hell is still using the popup feature from the Stone Age? I don't want to use my browser's back button over and over again anymore.
MET finally has 3-5 top photographers that kept my head up but that's it :/
And something I nearly forgot, I never felt to be welcome in the memberzone. It's plain black and dreary and has additional promotion of other sites and that's something I can't accept as a paying customer!
|
12-13-09 12:00pm
|
Reply
13
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You're right Denner but as you said it already, the set issue is an "old" one and I was just pointing to the recent envelopments I've noticed. Hope they find their way back to their old ideals.
|
02-05-10 12:23pm
|
Reply
14
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
I agree with each of you - geo pricing sucks! I am finally back to mc-nudes.com and happy with my overall situation. A friend of mine confirmed my assumption that they don't use any geo pricing!
|
02-15-10 04:38am
|
Reply
15
|
Tori Black
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree with PinkPanther when it comes to PremiumPass at all but my review was about that particular site.
When you are one of those, who need to collect everything you can do this within a day or two - right - but you need to get through all of it for quiet longer.
|
02-05-10 12:36am
|
Reply
16
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Just keep in mind that video updates come every 14-21 days.
|
02-05-10 08:26am
|
Reply
17
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
X-art seem to trial and error anything to get more attention.
They have just started in filling their update archive with videos that are not behind the scenes scenes. They are somehow kind of artsy because of the usage of slowmotion here and there.
I am not sure if they might change things soon again. :/
|
02-05-10 08:04am
|
Reply
18
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
brummie's Review
You should become a member of other sites in the niché to create a realistic review. This one failed badly.
|
02-05-10 12:53am
|
Reply
19
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thank you and there is nothing to add from my side - you named it.
|
02-02-10 02:07pm
|
