Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : otoh (0)  

Feedback:   All (754)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (84)  |   Replies (643)

Other:   Replies Received (336)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 101-125 of 754 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
101
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Usually again for me; some are subtle, and realistic and hard to spot; alas they are the exception rather than the rule of large perfectly formed hemispheres jutting out...

09-17-12  01:43pm

Reply
102
N/A Reply of tangub's Reply

Pretty much what Tangub said - I'll keep stuff by website, and although I have seen the same model on the same site with different names, it's not something that's bothered me enough to have a policy on it. I guess if I did organise by another method it would be more likely photographer rather than model.

09-16-12  04:26pm

Reply
103
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely. It won't make me join a site that I hadn't considered - but it will definitely push one up the list, and has done a number of times.

09-13-12  06:08am

Reply
104
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Likewise, I have one by way of a PS3. I rent DVDs by post (cheaper than online!) and where the option exists, I go for the Blu-Ray... although am largely underwhelmed by it.

It's noticeably better on animated films; otherwise, although you can tell it's better if you actually go out of your way to notice it, it makes little difference in the actual enjoyment of the film.


09-11-12  01:00am

Reply
105
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

All of the above, and natural! Eyes are definitely a major draw for me; but how they are done, or not, depends on the scene. I like glam femmes-fatales as well as the girl next door...

09-10-12  12:30am

Reply
106
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What RustyJ said. Despite our gripes about prices, and regional pricing, online porn remains hugely good value, when compared either to the price of what DVDs used to cost (and still cost in some shops).

Or indeed compared to the price of mainstream media available online for streaming/downloading etc. (Although admittedly most of the films available on eg iTunes do have slightly higher production values than most porn...)


09-07-12  12:26am

Reply
107
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Er always. Why else download them? Oh, I guess you can browse directly in the zip file... but either way I unzip them.

Either way zip is really just to make the download easier; there will rarely be much difference between the size of the zip and the unzipped pics, so no space to be saved.


09-05-12  04:02am

Reply
108
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Good point - although the face is what appeals to me, I guess it's how they use it to salacious effect - so performance is perhaps better. Give me a plain girl with a glint of desire in her eye, over a beautiful one starting into the distance any day! (Of course, this is porn, so the idea is to have both...)

09-03-12  08:54am

Reply
109
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

For me, the face - specifically the eyes. Over and above any other body part, or how explicit a scene is, the sexiest thing is to see a lascivious look in a girl's eyes.

09-03-12  12:57am

Reply
110
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

"I think VOD sites are like the crack cocaine of online porn."

If VOD is the crack cocaine, I sudder to think what that makes cam sites? :)


09-02-12  06:03am

Reply
111
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I said other because it depends on the user. Some folk don't want to keep porn on their computers or external drives, and only look at it occasionally - I suspect VOD sites still beat buying DVDs etc.

Although I wouldn't join, the fact they are in business suggests it's a model that works; as long as customers know the alternatives, and there is no deceit, I think the sites are OK...


09-02-12  06:02am

Reply
112
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'd say frustrating. Some Japanese porn doesn't appeal to me at all - it seems to objectify the women (even?) more than much western porn.

But there is some material I like - and I do find the pixellation spoils it. I far prefer the slightly softer stuff that stops just short of showing the bits that need censoring - if it gets close enough, it's more exciting than just seeing the blur there.


08-30-12  07:49am

Reply
113
N/A Reply of marcdc1's Poll

I said not sure - I would join of it was subtitled. If there is talking, I want to know what is being said - even if just to be amused rather than aroused by it!

08-28-12  08:22am

Reply
114
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To a point; I'll feel more comfortable if it's CCBill or Epoch. If it's something else, then it depends how unique the material is as to whether I'll chance it.

08-26-12  01:07am

Reply
115
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

For some reason, bottom right seems the least obtrusive. But as long as it's subtle, I'm not too fussed.

08-24-12  02:09am

Reply
116
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely important, but not essential. Actually, how essential depends on how the site is built. I've joined some sites which make it almost impossible to download pics, and then the absence of zips is a big deal. OTOH recently at W4B, their max-size pics are not offered in zips, but it's daftly easy to download them all with, er, DownThemAll. In such cases, lack of zips wouldn't bother me too much.

08-22-12  02:20am

Reply
117
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

I know of one good friend who likes a little smut... we sort of hint about it, but - being blokes and all - don't get into too much detail, so I'm not quite sure of the depth of his depravity in relation to mine!

As to other friends, it's anyone's guess...


08-20-12  12:56am

Reply
118
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

If it's not too frantic or off-the-cuff, a towel underneath has been used...

08-18-12  11:56pm

Reply
119
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It's not something I often look into, but have been surprised in the same direction as tangub - I've seen a couple of models who I took to be fairly tall, and subsequently discovered them to be quite petite.

I'd like to be surprised the other way - either in spite of or because of being quite short myself, I quite like tall leggy models!


08-06-12  04:41am

Reply
120
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm another native english speaker in awe of - and humbled by - the many non-native english speakers who write such good reviews here. I'm similarly shamed by my lacking language skills when I travel un Europe - particularly in Germany and Scandinavia, where everyone speaks english so well!

08-05-12  06:42am

Reply
121
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'll go for some; it doesn't really appeal to me, but a toned body with a little defined musculature can be attractive; so perhaps just at the very lower end of the scale.

07-23-12  01:10am

Reply
122
N/A Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

GPL, how about the Borat Mankini? :D

07-21-12  10:29am

Reply
123
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not keen on thongs - I chose other because my favourite kind are boyshorts - the more figure-hugging the better!

07-21-12  02:18am

Reply
124
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I sometimes take my phone when I'm in the bath... and may then browse through some sites, looking for things to download. Alternatively I may read some racy stories... not sure if that counts :)

07-19-12  01:51am

Reply
125
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Email - for what it's worth. I've had more sites not reply than do.

07-15-12  01:43am


Shown : 101-125 of 754 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.41 seconds.