| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
426
|
Sneaky Peek
(0)
|
|
06-24-12 08:47am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd say on average between 10 and 50 a month. Depends if I've just joined a new site or not, then I do a lot more downloading because of their archive stuff.
If I haven't joined any new sites that month I'm just downloading updates I like so it's a lot less.
|
06-23-12 04:03am
|
Reply
428
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I've been getting the same message on a different site and I use Firefox. It did put me off a bit.
|
06-21-12 08:45am
|
Reply
429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked "other" because whilst I enjoy them, I find these days the free ones can do some great shows, but the private ones haven't adapted their prices to suit. Some are still charging dollars per minute - an escort would charge less!
I think there's a market for a private show at more reasonable rates.
|
06-21-12 08:25am
|
Reply
430
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Sounds an unusual site - well reviewed too. It's good to see all niches catered for!
|
06-20-12 09:51am
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Doubt it - they'd have to provide enough evidence in the preview to convince me before I handed over those magic credit card numbers!
|
06-20-12 09:46am
|
Reply
432
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
All of the above and more, but I think the better-written reviews here are superior to "professional" reviews - even ones on TBP, sorry!
They simply manage to get a better idea of what a site is like from a porn users perspective than other sites.
|
06-17-12 12:30pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yep, used it a couple of times - it's a great function. I find that the site info is accurate at the time of the review, but obviously things do change.
I did it recently for the site "Rob and Jill" which was showing at the old price at $12.95 but was $17.95 when I joined, so it's a useful amendment.
|
06-15-12 09:08am
|
Reply
434
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
Just because what?!
|
06-13-12 11:20am
|
Reply
435
|
TS Seduction
(0)
|
Reply of
matts83's Review
Welcome to the site - always good to see a new reviewer and this review is pretty good. You can improve future reviews with a few more technical details such as file types, resolutions etc. and perhaps a little more detail in the description of content - are there specific themes, for example.
Good to see a review of TS porn too, so I think you'll be a valuable member of the site. Hope you stick around.
|
06-13-12 11:10am
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Poses are vital but I actually think lighting is most important and much under-appreciated - poor lighting and even the best HD quality will just not show any proper detail and you're left frustrated.
|
06-13-12 10:52am
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I can give a definite "no" to this one!
|
06-12-12 06:01pm
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Always do basic organisation as I download, as that way I have the titles, site it was from, model names etc. right there and can't go wrong.
Nothing too complex, I tend to just do a different folder for each website and then it's in alphabetical order automatically inside that.
It's easy just to open up the folder I want the download to be in as I'm doing it - far better than trying to make sense of it later, and the title I pick for each file will make the most sense as I'm looking at the site there and then.
Odd I'm quite organized with porn - I'm not organized with most other things!
|
06-09-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I love em. The odd one is a bit weird but they can't all be great. I'd miss them if they went and they do generate good discussions.
|
06-07-12 04:55pm
|
Reply
440
|
Matures Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
Shakermaker's Review
Excellent review - I am also getting tired of sites ripping off EU customers. Time for us all to boycott them!
|
06-02-12 08:09pm
|
Comment
441
|
Kinky Kicks
(0)
|
|
06-02-12 03:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
442
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Arrgh this drives me nuts! Why the hell do we have to pay an extra $5 all the time? I can't see any justification for it at all on the internet with zero shipping costs, no difference in sales taxes etc. The currency conversation takes care of any cost there so the starting US dollar price should be the same. I really am going to have start boycotting sites that do this.
|
06-02-12 01:52pm
|
Review
443
|
CMNM.net
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Absolutely unique site
+ DRM free
+ Decent back catalogue
+ All exclusive, original content
+ Good variety of men
+ Some convincing straight guys
+ Latest updates getting more creative
+ Videos now available in MP4 as well as WMV |
| Cons: |
- Horribly expensive
- Ridiculous one-time joining fee on top with Verotel
- Updates are reasonably constant but slightly erratic - no definite schedule and you'll sometimes wait up to a week
- Only Verotel and Segpay available, even though they use CCBill on sister site CFNM.net
- Some later content overdoes the cheesy "comedy" element at the expense of sexiness
- Could do with some more variety in the clothed guys, though this is improving
- Feedback can be left, but they never respond directly
- Even "high quality" download is modest sized - no HD stuff here. |
| Bottom Line: |
CMNM is a unique site from the makers of CFNM.net. They've taken the increasingly popular CFNM (Clothed Female/Naked Male) concept and done it for gay men.
I cannot find any other site apart from their sister site First Auditions which does anything like this, so that makes CMNM unique.
You can tell that it's from the same studio as CFNM.net as many of the models, studios and props used are identical, but that's no bad thing as they are hot!
Since all the models are men, they've made it different by having mainly straight and the odd bisexual man as the naked guy being humiliated and put through his paces by the clothed gay men. The site remains absolutely true to the concept the clothed men stayed fully clothed throughout.
The naked models used are hot - usually between about 18 and 35 and convincingly straight in most cases. There's a decent range of body types and I found the vast majority of them attractive.
The site follows a fairly standard formula - the guy is stripped off naked in the first video, then penetrated with a dildo in the next, and finally wanked off until his cums in the last.
This did get a little repetitive after a while but lately they've spiced up the formula a bit with a welcome dose of creativity, using more themes and stories such as prisoners violated in police custody, footballers used by the managers of their team etc.
The costumes and uniforms for these are generally good and the acting is generally convincing enough for you to suspend disbelief.
I would say though that they still aren't quite as creative in the way they humiliate and use the guys as they are at CFNM.net and one or two of the storylines attempted to introduce humour - bad idea as it was just incredibly cheesy and unfunny and once was absolutely unsexy, when they were rimming a guy and then discussing which brown sandwich spread his ass tasted like! Weird and a real turnoff!
Still, overall CMNM is a totally unique and very well done site.
As usual with this studio the letdown comes from technical issues and value. Until recently only WMV was available. They have now improved this with MP4 files, but even the higher-quality of the two download options is a modest 360x640 - no HD here! Sound quality is decent, though.
The streaming is acceptable but just flash-based so not always easy to jump around. Search is basic, as is the site layout.
At an eye-watering $39.95 for the 1st month, plus a further $1.95 one-off joining fee if you use Verotel, which I do as I've never even heard of the alternative SegPay, you'll need to hand over $41.90 to join this site, and a further $34.95 a month recurring, it makes it all the more disappointing that it updates only on average about twice a week and that's sporadic - sometimes you'll wait a week or more without explanation between updates. Bizarrely, CCBill is not an option even though sister site CFNM.net lets you use it.
I find the content is good enough, and unique enough, to justify the price occasionally but I never feel I get enough to justify recurring billing even at the slight discounted rate, so I tend to join the site every six months or so. I wish there were rival CMNM sites as I feel they know you have nowhere else to go and so feel they can charge what they like.
If this site was better value and updated more often and more consistently, it would easily get into the high 90s for me. As it is 81 is a generous score considering the issues but I feel it deserves it for the uniqueness and quality of the concept, if not the technical execution of it. This site is good, but it could be great - so typical of this studio! |
|
06-02-12 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
444
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan appreciate it. I'll update or post a new comment when the second issue with CCBill is sorted out too.
|
06-02-12 08:10am
|
Reply
445
|
Top Heavy Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Excellent review, it's good to read reviews warning people off poor quality sites and as TBP has yet to review it, yours is particularly helpful.
|
06-02-12 07:56am
|
Comment
446
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
|
06-02-12 07:38am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
447
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
Be careful - there's a notice on the site saying you're not supposed to use download managers at all and if you do they can cancel your membership and report you to CCBill.
That may be why you're having problems?
|
06-02-12 07:34am
|
Reply
448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd say it's a fantasy thing - I can see things I probably wouldn't in my real sex life, and I enjoy being a voyeur legally and safely!
|
05-30-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
449
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Superb review, welcome to the site!
|
05-27-12 06:53pm
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
What's GGG?!
|
05-27-12 06:49pm
|
