| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
nice review. I'm glad somebody else is speaking out about the annoying camera work and excessive closeups on these European sites.
I have a question - have they improved their camera angles in their newer videos? I was a member a while ago and have been wondering if they improved since I last joined. I recently checked out their new scenes on their tour page, and the camera angles seem to be a bit better based on the preview clips I watched, but it's hard to tell from just a 30 second preview clip.
|
08-21-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
i don't usually talk to people about porn...it would be nice if people were laid back enough to openly discuss porn, but it's still a taboo topic.
|
08-21-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
28
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review. I have been thinking about checking this network out for a while. Maybe I will get around to it some day.
|
08-12-12 08:19pm
|
Reply
29
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I often wonder if any of the European sites have truly exclusive content...they all just re-use the same scenes from what I have seen - all of the Euro porn seems to come from the same creator who just leases out the same scenes to different sites. i have seen the same scenes duplicated on so many different Euro sites and networks it's not even funny.
|
08-12-12 07:07am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
depends on how forceful it is....i don't like gagging and "face fucking"...but a slow sensual deep-throat is good.
|
08-12-12 07:02am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i don't really care to be honest. i'm into petite white girls, and there are plenty of those in porn so i'm happy. i suppose there are enough specialty sites out there to satisfy anyone's tastes.
|
08-10-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I HATE pov scenes because you never really get good camera angles...it's just the same repetitive shot over and over again...looking down at the girl's pussy with no view of the rest of her. I don't even bother downloading pov scenes.
|
07-31-12 05:27pm
|
Reply
33
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks for responding, Dieselman. I do have a complaint about the scenes on the site, however. Like I mentioned, the camera angles on all of the scenes are too focused on closeups of the girl, but I'd rather see her whole body at once. It is very frustrating watching the scenes when all I can see is her breasts, or her face. Please zoom the camera out and just show her whole body for most of the scene. I assume that the camera man is doing the closeups to try make the scene more "interesting", but closeups aren't interesting - they're frustrating. seeing the girl's body is interesting. Her body is enough to keep me interested. Just zoom out, leave the camera alone and let her do her thing.
|
07-05-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
34
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Reply
I agree. I really don't like many of the girls in American porn anymore - too many tattoos, breast implants, lip injections, fat asses, and women in their mid 30's.
I have moved to mostly European sites like Try Teens. These Euro sites have beautiful, natural looking girls who are 18-20 years old.
|
06-30-12 10:20pm
|
Comment
35
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
|
06-30-12 09:56pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
The main problem with sites today is bad camera angles. This is a problem that plagues so many sites. They don't know what people want to see. I hate when they waste so much time on closeups of a girl's face. In real life I can see a girl's face any time I want - I watch porn because I want to see a girl's body. I hate that whenever the girl gives a blowjob, they zoom in real close and just show her head - how about you zoom out and show me her face AND her body at the same time?...what a novel idea. I also hate when they feel the need to zoom in on just her vagina during penetration - you don't need to be 2 inches from her vag to show me the penetration - you can zoom out to show me the penetration AND her whole body at the same time!!!...let me SEE the whole girl, not just parts of her - it's not rocket science, but most sites get it wrong.
Try Teens spoiled me. Their camera angles are just so right. Once I saw their scenes, every other site started to annoy me with all the worthless closeup shots.
|
06-27-12 04:43pm
|
Comment
37
|
Casual Teen Sex
(0)
|
|
06-24-12 02:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
38
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I actually liked the "formulaic" nature of the videos. They choose sexual positions and camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body. So I don't mind that it's repetitive, because I know that for each girl I'm going to get some excellent full-body angles of her that really show off her figure.
I also like the "static" camera work. For me there's nothing worse than when a girl is stripping and the camera man zooms in really close on just her face, or just on her ass. I can't appreciate a girl's figure when the camera is two inches from her butt cheeks and is looking up at her. There is a benefit to just having the camera sit still for a while so you can take in a girl's body. Most sites spend so much time zooming in on ass cracks that by the end of the scene I could barely even tell you what the girl looks like other than her ass crack. In scenes from other producers I often feel like the camera man is on crack and has A.D.D., like he can't sit still and let the camera linger for a bit. When I watch porn, I want to see a lot of long shots to get a feel for the girl's entire figure. Anyway, to each his own...but some of things you considered negatives are actually positives for me.
|
05-18-12 04:09pm
|
Reply
39
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Despite the lack of new content, this is still my favorite network on the internet. I have only joined this network once so far (and that was through tryteens.com, so I only had access to some of the sites)...so I still haven't seen a lot of the content, even from the dead sites. I will probably join a couple of more times to get all of the stuff I don't have yet. For me, the camera angles from this network are the best of any site, because they keep the camera zoomed out to show the girl's whole body - they don't waste too much time on extreme closeups, which is a major problem on every other site I've seen. Almost every porn scene these days just focuses on extreme closeups of the penetration for 90 percent of the scene...so on most sites, you barely even get a good look at the girl's body due to the closeup-heavy camera work. To me, Teen Core Club's nice zoomed out camera angles make up for any shortcomings. This is one of the only networks on the web that knows how to use a damn camera. The only sites I have seen that have good zoomed out camera angles are Teen Core Club and Fucked Hard 18.
|
04-19-12 04:38pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's all about the preview. The problem with a lot of sites is that you can't really get a good idea of what their videos are like because they don't provide video trailers and previews of their scenes. If the site would just put up a 20 second trailer for each scene, I would be able to see how they shoot their scenes. But if they don't provide trailers, then I'm left guessing and I will be reluctant to join their site.
|
03-19-12 03:21pm
|
Reply
41
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Review
I agree with your views on porn camera work. I really wish they would learn to zoom out and let us see the girl's whole body from head to toe. It's a shame that in most porn scenes these days the camera man is always zooming up close on just one part of the girl's body (just her face, just her ass, just her tits)...you can't appreciate a girl's body if you can only see one part of her at a time...this philosophy that "closer is better" seems to have infected every studio and website these days...such bad camera work.
|
01-15-12 10:58am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i don't like large file sizes...a medium-sized file is big enough to see everything clearly...so it's pointless to download a gigantic file which takes up tons of HD space. medium to just-under-medium files are good for me. i prefer files to be about 500-600 MB...and a size of around 960x540 is good for me.
|
01-08-12 08:15pm
|
Reply
43
|
White Teens Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
no problem...I have joined a few different networks by now, and Teen Core Club is my favorite...their camera angles are simply the best...they choose smart camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body, and like i said, they zoom out so you can really see the girl's body...i find it hard to watch any other porn after getting used to their superior camera angles.
|
01-02-12 08:05pm
|
Reply
44
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
Sorry, I didn't realize that. I have joined other Eurpean sites (like firstanalquest.com and hardcoreyouth.com) and their scenes were 29 fps. If you watch a 29 fps scene and a 25 fps scene back to back you can notice a difference in the smoothness of the movement...believe me, I can see a difference.
|
12-30-11 03:52pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i actually prefer smaller files...they take up less space on the hard drive. As long as the picture is clear and the frame rate is 29-30 frames per second, I'm fine with a small video file.
|
12-04-11 01:29pm
|
Reply
46
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'm pretty sure Double View Casting offers a photo set for each scene...but I can't really remember, to be honest. I don't really have an interest in photos, so I didn't pay much attention. I know for sure First Anal Quest has photo sets for each scene, and that site is the same set up as this one, so I would assume Double View Casting has photo sets as well.
|
09-28-11 07:16pm
|
Reply
47
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
yeah, you are right. I just wish they featured more younger girls who fit in the "teen" category.
|
09-26-11 07:22pm
|
