| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It happens quite often that I join a site and it's not at all like I expected it to be.
Of course this can be good as well as bad.
But it's more often bad than good. Well, it used to be before I found this place.
So it doesn't happen that often anymore.
|
08-21-07 05:45am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well it's usually safer to at least keep your browsers updated.
And the players... well, like Jay G said, the saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" certainly applies imo.
Codec updates and what not can completely mess up your settings and programs.
So I'll go for the "mostly"
|
08-19-07 08:56am
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I do sort of prefer things like Verisign.
But if I really want a membership to that specific site, it doesn't really matter that much.
|
08-12-07 02:53pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
In the long run it does mess with your view on women.
But if they didn't there wouldn't be as many porn stars around as there are these days. So there'd be less choice and less variety on the internet.
But I choose the "raw" option.
|
07-30-07 09:09am
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I've had conversations about this with my friends a million times at least. I'm the only one who actually would.
Even if I wasn't as interested in the porn industry as I am, I would. It doesn't matter whether she's in the porn industry or not. It's about the person you're dating in the end. Not the job.
Of course there are limitations to that saying but a porn star or anyone in the porn industry doesn't make a bad living usually.
So in short... Yes, I would.
|
07-30-07 09:00am
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
Indeed a Limited Trial Membership is usually a waste of money. And they can get on your nerves because you never get what you think you're going to get.
So if you ever decide to go for one of those, when your incredibly drunk and bored, keep your expectations low!
Otherwise, stay as far away from these things as humanly possible.
Normal Trial Membership are sometimes a pretty good deal though.
|
07-30-07 08:51am
|
Reply
182
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thank you for that nice compliment :)
It's nice to know your reviews are appreciated.
|
07-30-07 08:46am
|
Reply
183
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
TimTams's Reply
Oh sorry for that mix up then. I was to understand that it started early 2006.
But yeah, they promise a lot of things... I for one would not be surprised if it took a while longer before the facial video will be online.
Wouldn't be surprised if it's online right now too though, I haven't checked that site for about 3 weeks now.
But the "new" BJ video is a nice change from the regular ones.
|
07-30-07 08:45am
|
Reply
184
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
nineinch's Reply
Although this is the first video of her giving a blowjob, I expected it to be better. Not much, but this was a bit disappointing.
|
07-30-07 08:38am
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thank you, I try my best :P
|
07-30-07 08:32am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Yeah, recently used it again. Definitely not as good as the real thing ;)
|
06-26-07 07:00am
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I agree with uscue. It doesn't matter who voted what. It's about sharing experiences and sharing them well.
So any sort of criticism on the reviews could be used of course.
Just voting No would be like responding to a "Why-question" with just a "Because".
|
06-26-07 06:57am
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Well... yes. I mean, it'd be very informative and it would keep websites sort of well maintained.
Of course it doesn't have to mean that but it could.
Most websites with trial memberships are usually better than the ones without, or at least that's what I noticed.
|
06-26-07 06:52am
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Oh man, this poll cracked me up! Roseman and Drooler...
Anyway, I guess for me it's the afternoon, too bad that's not an option. So I guess late at night is second best.
But flame on people!
|
06-22-07 07:25am
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lol, same here!
But I think some people don't want to read more than that.
But it would help to give more information of course.
And I too have had the same problem with spare characters. Usually I have like 10 characters left and need to shorten it until I have about 50 characters left. Kinda weird.
|
06-22-07 07:18am
|
Reply
191
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
Thank you for your compliment :)
What I meant by "hardcore" is masturbation action, girl/girl action a bit and her first blow job video will be online 4th of July.
Sorry I didn't mention that before.
|
06-22-07 07:10am
|
Reply
192
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Exactly! And I really wanted to do this site and later on most of the network because of this. Nice to find people who understand :)
|
06-19-07 01:29pm
|
Review
193
|
Diary Of A Nanny
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Very cute girls
* Funny story lines, funny niche.
* Fast growing website
* Videos available in WMV512, WMV1000, WMV2000 Mpeg, QuickTime and Ipod.
* Galleries are archived in zip-files and are High Res.
* Wiki and forum available for discussions about the websites and updates.
* Date is mentioned with every update.
* Gives access to the entire network.
* Update every 5-7 days. |
| Cons: |
* Not all the videos are available in "DVD" or WMV2000.
* Acting could use some work
* Could use some variation in the videos, they're all the same, sort of.
* Some girls have more videos, it would be nice to have a link on those pages to the other episodes by those models.
* If it gets to be the size of the other Naughty America sites, it could use a search feature.
* Need to log in for every site |
| Bottom Line: |
DiaryofaNanny.com is a website that features videos of nannies writing in their diaries and later on they end up in a sex scene.
The website launched the end of February, 2007. Since then it's been growing a lot, like most sites by Naughty America. It's now offering more than 20 videos.
The videos are pretty high quality, especially the latest ones which are available in WMV2000. The acting however is below par and could get annoying. Also the videos are all kind of the same. They are however available in a broad range of formats. They're downloadable in split scenes but also as a full movie.
The galleries are available in Low res. and High res. and are fully downloadable as zip archives.
The website is easy to navigate through, this due to the fact that there are only 20+ videos at the moment. Also it's easy to navigate through the whole network. But you have to keep logging in which can get annoying.
The updates are a very big plus to this website as they update every 5 to 7 days. With a video with every update.
All in all, the website has great potential. It was just a matter of time before they would add this niche to their collection.
At the moment it's not worth getting a membership over. But if you're really into the nanny-niche it might be worth it in a while. When the site has grown a bit.
Compared to the other sites offer by NA, this is not interesting, YET. But certainly could be very soon. |
|
06-19-07 01:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
194
|
Diary Of A MILF
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* A lot of different models
* Funny story lines
* Most of the models are real MILFs
* Dates with all updates from 06-21-06
* Videos are available in MPEG, QuickTime, "Normal" WMV512k, "High" WMV1000k, "DVD" WMV2000k and iPod.
* High res. galleries can be downloaded as a zipped archive.
* Websites is attached to a vastly growing network.
* Weekly updates that are actually weekly. |
| Cons: |
* No dates with the older videos
* Not many high quality videos yet
* Only a couple of videos have iPod and DVD format.
* Some models are more MILF-like than others.
* It could be easier when you click on a model it would open in a new window, as it could take a while to load the main page on a lower connection.
* Acting of the models could use some more work. |
| Bottom Line: |
DiaryofaMilf.com is a website that features videos of MILFs writing in their diaries which results in a sex scene.
The website launched beginning of 2006 and has grown considerably. Since then it's a home to over 80 different videos and galleries.
The models in the videos are in comparison to other MILF featuring websites very believable MILFs. This is pretty rare, but Naughty America has been specializing in this niche over the past couple of years.
The latest videos are high quality as opposed to the older videos which are pretty low quality.
Also they are offering way more video formats than before. They now offer iPod and WMV2000k too.
The story lines are funny and add a lot to the videos although the acting leaves some things to be desired of course. But that is to be expected of adult entertainment I guess.
The galleries are like the videos, fully downloadable. The galleries are archived in zip files and are High res.
The website is easy to navigate through but be sure to open the model pages individually because loading the main page can take a while on a lower connection.
Updates are regular and contain at least a new video every week.
All in all the website offers a vast collection of exclusive MILF videos that keeps growing rapidly. Especially now all of the websites have been combined into one big network.
The site is fun and the network will keep you entertained for a while. |
|
06-19-07 12:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I went for the 341 deal.
Got the butt, mouth, and "lady".
I got it in a dry spell a year or two ago. Thought about the STU too but I was a bit skeptical about it. Even more than I was about the other ones.
|
06-19-07 11:37am
|
Comment
196
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
|
06-19-07 11:14am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
197
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
|
06-19-07 11:09am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
198
|
Wife Switch
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
Sorry about the late response but that is indeed pretty cool!
I'm definitely gonna check out those reviews now.
And Caballero Classic/Caballero VIP is one of those sites I'm waiting for too. Seems very interesting.
|
06-19-07 11:05am
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
And yet, a lot of webmasters don't get that. :P
|
06-19-07 10:59am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Well yeah, if it was published like half a year ago they may have changed some stuff.
But it kind of bothers me when you write a review you can't add whether you were a member before or not. Of course you can put it in the bottom line part but that would take up a lot of space.
|
06-19-07 10:56am
|
