| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I must say that with your new policy of not including price as a factor in reviewing that your Videobox score is WAY too high seeing that you cite the cheap price as a plus.
|
12-29-07 08:34pm
|
Reply
627
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Review
This site appears to be offline?? Have you had any access problems?
|
12-29-07 08:29pm
|
Reply
628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I think it might be a good idea to have a separate price rating. For instance, a recent site entry looked very nice, but for $29.95 offered a small handfull of videos. The content grade would be high, but the price grade very low.
|
12-29-07 09:41am
|
Reply
629
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Google "Crap Cleaner" Mr. Smut and scrub out that cache---this site shows updates till the end of the year.
|
12-28-07 07:27pm
|
Reply
630
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Mr. Smut, the photos come in 3 different sizes.
|
12-28-07 07:22pm
|
Reply
631
|
Unique Sexy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
Thanks---It does look like an AWFUL site. It's only $9.99 now. Thanks to your warning, I wouldn't join it for 99 cents.
|
12-28-07 07:19pm
|
Reply
632
|
Nikki Rhodes
(0)
|
Reply of
eyeda1's Comment
When you shill for a site, make it seem like a genuine critique. For instance: don't give a site you're shilling for a 100. Give it a 94, and then say with some improvement it could be one of the greatest sites out there.
|
12-28-07 09:02am
|
Reply
633
|
Absolute Skinny
(0)
|
Reply of
section31's Comment
I'm wondering if a little photo shop was used here.
|
12-27-07 08:36pm
|
Reply
634
|
Ultimate Sex Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Pinche...what is the color of the sky in your universe?
|
12-27-07 07:20pm
|
Comment
635
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
|
12-27-07 10:10am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
636
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I've traded from time to time, and even given away for free. Liberate porn!!!
|
12-27-07 04:23am
|
Reply
637
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
They certainly don't take money, if they did they wouldn't allow our negative reviews. It's all about the "clicks"!
|
12-27-07 04:20am
|
Reply
638
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Reply
I'm not here to correct your reviews, your review is just fine. I'm just pointing out that DDF is a professional model company that's all.
|
12-26-07 06:27pm
|
Reply
639
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
How can "no amateur content" in a professional site be a negative. Besides, any girl appearing in a paysite is no longer an amateur.
|
12-26-07 02:43pm
|
Reply
640
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Anyone can do it if they want to take the time. They're not geniuses, they just load data they share with other hackers. They find the combinations, and the website usually shuts it down in a day. But really, I don't even worry about it, I would just get another password. One time though I noticed a whole bunch of "favorites" in my folder at a side that I didn't put there, so I alerted the site and got a new pass.
|
12-26-07 02:40pm
|
Reply
641
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
No, they have computer generated usernames and passwords. They count on people using the same username over and over to make it easier. Then they let the software do the work. It's not a result of someone hijacking....that would be for your banking records LOL! I just make a notepad for my use/pass, and keep it on my desktop. The only computer a website hacker is going to break into is the website's. But that is very time consuming. They have software where they feed in massive lists of use/pass.
|
12-26-07 11:24am
|
Reply
642
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I wouldn't worry about security too much, these sites are hacked on a daily basis. Remember to try to use different USERNAMES, the hackers use usernames to generate passwords.
|
12-26-07 09:57am
|
Review
643
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- 4 Video Options Including HD
- Lots Of Exclusive Material
- Handy Index Of Hot Models - Niche Index
- Updated Daily |
| Cons: |
- Expensive
- Some Of The Updates Are Republished Material |
| Bottom Line: |
FFM, MMF, B/G, Anal "Sex", Gang Bang etc. HOHC is a library of XXX hardcore photos and videos. A true photo site, and a true video site wrapped in one, this premium site does charge a premium price. The photos are available in 3 sizes, up to 2000px. They look fabulous, well photographed, well posed, the models very attractive and made up. These can be downloaded in zip files. The DDF photos have a style that is distinguishable from other sites. The videos are also high quality, available in 4 formats: Streaming flash (720 x 405), HD wmv (1280 x 720), with a smaller size, HD divx (1280 x 720), quicktime (960 x 540) and the ol' mpeg (448 x 256). The HD files are huge in size. If you want to D/L them all (and you may) you will have to make arrangements to store them. The model index is easy to use, with listings of all sets for everyone, with a chance to rate the girls. Niches are also indexed, as are the updates. I have noticed that some updates are sets that have previously been published, since I have been a member before, but I do notice that the videos of these sets have been updated. There is a wealth of exclusive porn here that other sites are hard pressed to match in quantity and quality. All in the DDF style. |
|
12-25-07 06:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
644
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
PerfectGonzo's Reply
I have an idea. Keep the microphone away from the director.
|
12-24-07 12:07pm
|
Review
645
|
Digital Desire
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Hi Res Photos
-Zip Files
-Lots Of Material
-Some HD Video, NO DRM
-Decent Price |
| Cons: |
-Below Average D/L Speed
-Some Very Dated Material
-Fake Body Parts |
| Bottom Line: |
There's just something missing with this site, I can't put my finger on it. They have plenty of hi-res photos (up to 3000px) with a wide and varied collection available in zip files. Some of the material is very dated, it would be OK in a retro site, but is totally out of place here. All the fake breasts made me think I was in the 1990's again...yecch! So ugly. Shay Laren has a very extensive collection here though that is worth downloading, and some of her videos are nice. There are some HD vids, but mostly they are in the 480x360 range, and available in wmv, divx quicktime. I can't prove it, but I swear their servers are rigged for slow downloads. The speed is below average at any rate. The price is good, but I think this site needs a complete overhaul, a new look, and they need to get rid of a lot of material that is pretty amateurish looking. When I quit, they begged me to stay, but, although I don't think the site is a rip off by any means, I just couldn't think of a good reason why I would stay beyond a month. |
|
12-24-07 11:49am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
646
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Me too. But I'm glad for TBP getting the exposure.
|
12-22-07 07:41am
|
Reply
647
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm glad it's working for you again. I'm also glad we have our forum to share information about these sites.
|
12-21-07 04:16am
|
Comment
648
|
Met Angels
(0)
|
|
12-20-07 07:13pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
649
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sorry to hear that. I was seriously thinking of joining, but now...no way.
|
12-20-07 02:05pm
|
Reply
650
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Bela's Reply
That would depend on who the teachers were !
|
12-19-07 07:49pm
|
