| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom Veller's Reply
Good I still have a chance!!!...Well, maybe not!
|
08-26-07 02:48pm
|
Reply
1002
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
BTW, I have to say that I think the photography is rather poor at this site. It seems to be a guy with a camera saying "spread your legs honey". Too many circus poses. 1ByDay is better.
|
08-25-07 09:48pm
|
Reply
1003
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm addicted to speed----internet speed !
|
08-25-07 09:34pm
|
Comment
1004
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
|
08-25-07 08:53pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1005
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm a member here again and it struck me the other day how silly it is to give an Hungarian model an english name like Emily Jones or something like that! I guess they think we won't be able to relate to them or something.
|
08-25-07 04:49pm
|
Comment
1006
|
Diabolic Web
(0)
|
|
08-24-07 11:01pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1007
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
The Tussinee "gold site" is a ripoff...i have a few of her HC videos, and they are just fine, but the extra charge is outrageous. I've never heard of this at any other site.
|
08-23-07 11:57pm
|
Reply
1008
|
Jenna Haze - JenX Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
I was in her site 2 years ago, and at that time, it was one of those sites that is basically set up to sell stuff. But looking at the tour here, it seems completely different from what I saw 2 years ago. The nasty shot from page 2 of the tour is from "Jenna Haze Darkside". She's a real professional. BTW, don't you get access to her boyfriend's site, JulesJordanDOTcom? Wouldn't mind seeing a review of that site.
|
08-23-07 11:32pm
|
Reply
1009
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think the change in the rankings brought about by this policy shows that it seems to work quite well. The previous rankings, marred IMO by shills, seemed bizarre to me.
|
08-23-07 02:50am
|
Reply
1010
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
This is great! You'll notice that the rankings have changed RADICALLY, and now reflect reality more closely. The shills will have to do a lot of hard work now to distort the rankings!
|
08-22-07 07:49pm
|
Reply
1011
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
The thing is there is so much potential for good porn. I almost hate the HC videos nowadays. it's always the same...the cameraman (it's always a man) will pan up from the floor. Then he'll say something stupid, like "show us your tits". Then he'll cop a feel---I hate that! I wish one of these girls would tell him to fuck off. And then the cameraman will say something stupid like "show us your ass" and then it wil be a micro closeup, and he'll cop another feel. Then comes the male actor, stroking himself again on camera. Then the idiot male actor acts out his rape fantasy, with the stupid hair pulling and the stupid ass slapping, and the disgusting spitting. And the circus positions, and the scene always ending with the jerk masturbating himself, as if we must see that. Blah! And all the companies do it exactly this way. John Root and Suze Randall are outstanding erotic photographers, but most of the rest are just some schmo with a digital camera. Don't get me wrong---the girls are great, and actually understand the concept of relating to the viewer. But the idiotes running most of these sites don't have a clue. Not a clue!
|
08-22-07 07:36pm
|
Reply
1012
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
User's Review
Down with DRM sites !!!!
|
08-21-07 08:23pm
|
Reply
1013
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To be honest, most porn isn't very good, because the guys making it don't have an inkling of what's erotic, this includes the porn valley people as well as websites.With hardcore video, it seems to be made for the male actor's pleasure, which ruins the effect. They're always ruining the shot, and who here really enjoys watching these guys pull their own puds????? And yet it's in every damn HC video. As for the "softcore" photo sites, how many gynecological closeups do you need in a single set?? Sometimes there are are like 20! And all the circus poses! I don't want to see a contortionest, i want to see a hot girl! My point? They all copy one another, and when i take material from a site, i always have to edit it. Most sites don't deliver very well, IMO.
|
08-21-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
1014
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
The photos at Babelicious are much better
|
08-20-07 09:08pm
|
Reply
1015
|
High Def Ass Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
User's Comment
It might be spyware
|
08-20-07 09:00pm
|
Reply
1016
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's why I always wait a few months to update....wait for the inevitable patches, especially the dreaded IE !
|
08-19-07 10:57pm
|
Reply
1017
|
Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Until now, I have never heard of a site using rar files. You would think they would have a link to winrar on their site, like other sites will have the various video player links. Sounds like a shoddy site!
|
08-19-07 10:49pm
|
Reply
1018
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
pole12345's Comment
They replied to an earlier comment that they were still in the process of removing all DRM protection.
|
08-18-07 07:33pm
|
Reply
1019
|
Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Well, if you still care, you can open them with winrar. Just google it, and download it for free.
|
08-18-07 07:31pm
|
Reply
1020
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I just checked it out----it's Flirt4Free. Do you know it generally costs more to chat with a webcam whore than it does to......never mind!
|
08-17-07 10:11pm
|
Reply
1021
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Silvia Tomcalova is sort of semi-retired nowadays. I think she got married. She has a lot of great sets over at Suze Randall.
|
08-15-07 07:05pm
|
Reply
1022
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
What...don't you like midget videos? :)
|
08-15-07 07:01pm
|
Reply
1023
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
If you look on the 2nd or 3rd page there is a girl named "Mina" that is a set from W4B.
|
08-15-07 07:00pm
|
Reply
1024
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If Videobox charged premium prices, my rating for them would be about 75. So the cheap price is a factor in giving them a higher score.
|
08-13-07 07:47pm
|
Reply
1025
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LarryL's Reply
The more you respond, the more shillish you look. thanks for keeping this alive!
|
08-12-07 08:54pm
|
