| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Once again as a fan of fetish (latex) I must say that larger cup sizes are better. There is nothing worse than a model with very small breasts wearing latex as it just doesn't look tight like a second skin. Ideally a model should be at least a C cup (B verging on C would also be acceptable). If there is one thing that I don't like it's small breasts, as it can make a model look very young and in some circumstance almost like a boy.
|
06-05-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Most certainly a case of fantasy fulfilment.
I think that for the most part people subscribe to sites because of the fantasy element.
I could also have gone with other - given the fact that at least for younger guys watching porn has become a rite of passage into adulthood and for me at first it probably was too. Of course now it's all about the fantasy element, and maybe because I'm a perv anyway.
|
05-30-12 12:22pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Although I voted over-eating, I don't have any real experience of this, but it relates to me in that I used to be incredibly lazy, rarely taking exercise - that is a hard thing to break as my mind still wants to just sit around and do nothing.
Of course I'm still pretty lazy but in a different way, I take a lot more exercise now, and feel far better for it, but given the chance I'd gladly stay in bed most of the day.
|
05-20-12 05:11pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Voted depends, but by that it means what type of work I'd be doing. In an ideal world, one that means lots of latex, but that ain't ever gonna happen.
|
05-20-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've got 4 installed;
Chrome (which is the one I use the most)
Firefox (handy for things that Chrome can't handle - which is very rare)
Internet Explorer (back-up for both Chrome and Firefox)
Opera (back-up for the back-up)
|
05-20-12 08:54am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have done a couple of times, I've even emailed the model of a certain site to let her know my views of her recent sets after I was ignored by the webmaster. Said model got a bit upset at me saying that as a member I didn't appreciate a couple of her recent sets and thought that they were somewhat poor. That leaves me wondering if there is any point in sending it to either the models or the webmasters as more often than not they ignore what I have to say.
|
05-20-12 08:41am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My enjoyment of pissing depends upon the circumstances. My exposure to pissing in porn has mostly come from The Rubber Clinic & Video Eva - both sites courtesy of RE Productions.
I only find that pissing appeals to me when it is combined with latex/rubber with normal pissing leaving me feel indifferent.
|
05-20-12 08:37am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Strong maybe from me, of course it depends on the girl. If she did H/C at the time, I'd request that she move to only softcore or get me in the adult entertainment industry with her so that I'm the only one doing the dirty deed with her.
|
05-20-12 08:18am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
As a man who likes latex, I enjoy it most when they start fully dressed and removed as little of the latex as possible,
|
05-20-12 08:16am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What captures my attention most of the time is what the model is wearing, as I'm always looking for more good quality Latex content
|
05-20-12 07:31am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Media Player Classic Home Cinema with the combined community codec pack. I originally used VLC but after having trouble watch some non-porn content I switched to MPC-HC never looked back since.
|
05-20-12 07:30am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Got my trusty laptop, couple years old now but still going strong.
|
05-20-12 07:08am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm quite open when it comes to this sort of thing and although I identify as straight, I have been curious as to what it would be like to be with another guy and as for what makes a guy sexy, I couldn't honestly say as I haven't ever actively sought a relationship of that kind with another man, yet.
|
05-18-12 08:00pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I would say it's getting better. Decent camera equipment is becoming cheaper and cheaper and video editing software can come cheap and some are fairly easy to use too, as a result standards of production increase.
|
05-18-12 07:56pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I have found that it varies, you get some who chose an alternate name, some who use a variation on their name, some who use their name as is and then there are those who have names asigned to them.
A good example that I can think of was Latexotica, as it had a mixture of all 4. There were girls who had names chosen for them but the majority either used their real first name or a variation of it.
|
05-18-12 07:53pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Porn will always be stigmatised, I'm 20 and within my generation, porn is seen by most guys as a rite of passage, and that viewing it is perfectly healthy and normal.
With my Parent's generation it's a pretty different story. Both my parents know I look at porn, they accept that and don't really bother me over it, sadly my mother (as much as I love her) has a pre-conceived notion that any woman doing porn must be on drugs or at least attempting to fund a drug habit and that 'normal' people don't do things like oral/anal etc.
So in short, yes whilst there are right wing conservatives and people who have pre-conceived notions, porn will be stigmatised. 10 or 15 years from now, people will be a lot more open when it comes to talking about sex and other important things like that.
|
05-18-12 07:47pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If the girl is in Latex then it's most certainly a start. I tend more to go for solo than lez, as for some bizarre reason some studios seem to think that if a girls tongue touches another then it must be lesbian kissing and therefore it is lesbian porn. If the girls are actually going at it then I'll consider watching it, but I mostly go for solo.
|
05-18-12 07:39pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ads should not be in a members area unless it's a small banner promoting another related site and it's out of the way.
|
05-18-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most certainly at least 2 updates a week, so really you're talking about an update once every 3 days at the least.
In terms of sites I have joined, I've joined several sites advertising at least weekly updates and been a member for a single billing period without a single update Lilly Roma and her personal site fell victim to that at one point although it now looks to be back to weekly updates.
I'm fairly certain that I wouldn't join a site if it only updated once a month, unless it was dirt cheap.
Fortnightly updates I feel push the boundaries a little bit, unless of course it's a very big update in which case I might be swayed.
|
05-17-12 02:56pm
|
Reply
20
|
66 Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
They are indeed separate subscriptions, although I'd perhaps like to see and offer where by if you are a member of one site then you can get a discount on the subscription cost to another site.
The plain backgrounds are a bit uninspiring, but sometimes there are props, however the background is still plain. For the most part though, I find that I tend to focus more on what the model is doing.
If they did provide slightly more interesting settings then this site would be incredible.
|
03-02-12 07:06am
|
Review
21
|
66 Latex
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-High resolution images
-Regular Updates
-Good looking European models
-Zip download of galleries
-Multiple resolution choices |
| Cons: |
-No videos
-Photoshoot backgrounds are rather simple |
| Bottom Line: |
This site sets out to give us young, sexy models, wearing a variety of latex outfits, and it delivers and does so well.
The site updates regularly, but I have noticed that the site may not update with new sets for more than 4 days at some point, but this is made up for by having a number of sets posted on consecutive days.
The sets are offered in a couple different resolutions, the highest being 2000x3000, the photos are always crystal clear and are of a very high standard of quality.
The back catalogue isn't the biggest but there are still plenty of updates to be had.
Some sets give a more pornographic edge than others, but for the most part the outfits the models wear are transparent to an extent and when they're not the outfits often barely conceal that most precious of parts.
The sets that are pornographic range from simple pussy showing to playing with toys, with one model, Katja, having a fondness for anal play with said toys.
Things that let this site down are the fact that there are no videos, if they had videos that were even just behind the scenes type shoots, then I'd be pleased.
The backgrounds for photoshoots are often fairly simplistic, a simple monochrome background. I suspect that for most though, that is a minor concern, as the models are what this site is all about.
In short, if you like young, innocent looking girls wearing latex and getting naughty in said latex, then I advise you join this site.
I give this site a solid 80, the site sticks to an idea, runs with it and does it well, it may not have the fanciest settings, but in most cases it is secondary to what the model is doing.
If they offered videos this site would be a good 85, simple but solid. |
|
03-01-12 06:15am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
22
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
I've actually found that most Latex/Fetish sites are actually quite competitively priced and often you don't pay much more than you would for a standard porn site.
I think that part of the reason for the high prices at Latex Lair are due in part to the fact that Bianca is one of the most well known fetish models. Whilst it's a very good site and the production values are fantastic, I think that paying nearly $40 as an initial price is a bit steep, but I can understand as to why they would put it so high.
As I've said in the review, there are often periods where membership prices are reduced and that it's far better value for money when you join during these periods.
I will admit that it can be rather hard to be subjective when you really enjoy a site or really like a model but of course sometimes it's by not being subjective that we learn the most about a site.
|
05-20-12 02:40pm
|
Review
23
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Plenty of content to choose from (395 sets available in various categories)
Pics are very good quality and very well shot. Latest sets all feature High Resolution images.
Decent selection of videos.
Sets always show a great deal of creativity.
Frequent updates (3 new set/month, split to 4/5 parts)
Visible update schedule
Good mix of heavy and glamour-type latex shoots
Relatively easy and straightforward to navigate |
| Cons: |
Expensive
Only 74 video clips (small when compared to number of sets available)
Videos generally quite short.
No download options for sets |
| Bottom Line: |
First off I'd like to say that site is a bit over priced normally, however from time to time there are periods when initial membership fee is lower.
Every time I have joined I have been sure to join during one of these periods. The current period has been ongoing since January at least (last time I signed up, prior to this time).
So when considering singing up for this site, do not be immediately put off by the information provided with regards to the first charge, check the join page and see if there is a reduction in price.
Now as for the actual bottom line, I'll say this, this site is very good, especially when you get cut-price membership, the sets are incredible and often very sexy, very creative and each has a story behind it.
Sets have on average 100 pics, some sets might have more, others less but you will get at least 80 pics with each set.
There are unfortunately no download options for the sets so you are probably going to have to go through each set downloading each pic individually.
There are videos, more than 70 of them, however they are mostly just clips and aren't particularly long. Most of the videos available are about 640x480 in terms of resolution with a small number being bigger or smaller overall resolution. Videos can vary in terms of length with most recent videos rarely being longer than 5 minutes.
With regards to videos there is no apparent standard, and only one file type on offer for each one, with MPG, AVI, WMV and MP4 all making appearances.
So, Bianca's Latex Lair gets a respectable 85.
This is a good site that could be improved upon by reducing the price of membership as it is currently too high for most to consider.
Improvement could also be had with regards to videos, featuring videos more often (every couple of months would be perfect), making those videos at least 5 minutes long and standardising the video format and upgrading them to at least 720p HDV.
I'd also like to see a zip download option for each set as that would mean that users don't have to spend a large amount of time downloading each pic individually or have to rely on programs such as Bulk Image Downloader to do all the leg work instead. |
|
05-17-12 04:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
24
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I think that the owners understand the latex fetish to an extent, but not to the extent that someone who was serious about latex and latex fetishism. However they haven't really thought some of the decisions through carefully enough and that has resulted in a lack of creativity which is killing the site.
They've chosen to rely on pretty much a single designer and one with a rather limited selection of products, rather than looking around to find a variety of different outfits from a variety of different suppliers/designers.
When it comes to latex fetishism one of the first things people think of is of a catsuit. Whilst I appreciate that people want to showcase that there is a fashion side to latex, to focus completely on that to the detriment of more traditional fetish style outfits.
I have yet to see any negative or constructive feedback on any of the site's social networking pages, I don't know whether this is as a result of admins removing negative comments from the page or simply because no one has spoken up yet.
|
05-19-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
25
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
This site has no affiliation with either the old Latexotica or the new Latexotica. I don't know what the plan was, but I feel that this was an attempt to produce a spiritual successor to Latexotica (of course we now have a true successor with the re-opening later this year).
I personally never got the feeling that it was mass produced nor that it was generic. In fact I feel that it was as far flung from being mass-produced and generic as you can possibly get.
Latexotica was probably the first genuine multi-model latex site and after it's second revamp (the first being the change of name from Amateurlatex to Latexotica) it carved out a very specific niche, non-nude latex photography with a more adult edge, something which Latex Heaven has tried and - in my opinion - failed to do.
Latex Heaven feels far more mass produced than Latexotica ever was.
|
05-19-12 02:51pm
|
