| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks. I'd never joined any of the networks that make up Adult Time before, so I didn't know it was a standard feature for them.
A decade is a long time on the interwebs. I remember those days. But I also remember downloading individual pictures from sites before zipfiles were common, too.
|
03-29-19 11:03pm
|
Comment
52
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
|
03-29-19 07:19am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
53
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I loved Amateur Allure, and have been hoping to join Swallow Salon soon. But with the price hike (yeah, they upped the price $10/mo) I will probably never join now.
|
03-26-19 10:07am
|
Reply
54
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
In The Crack used to be one of my very favorite sites, but a while back I noticed that I would be auto logged out by the site every 20 minutes. I went to customer service and asked what was going on. ITC responded that it was a security feature that couldn't be bypassed and was no big deal. I strongly disagree.
I don't use a download manager. So I typically sit at the computer and download a few dozen sets at a time. This will take a few hours. Having to re-enter my login credentials after downloading one video ad nauseum was so infuriating, I gave up on the site despite the fact that it is one of my absolute favorites.
I would still rank ITC very high in score, but would lop off probably 5-10 points from a score for the hassles of having to constantly having to re-enter my credentials.
|
03-06-19 12:59pm
|
Reply
55
|
AT Kingdom Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the review. I've been a member of AT Kingdom Network a few times. It has nice content, but the lack of an overarching software platform for the individual six networks is a huge disappointment. You outline the problem well.
AT Kingdom Network is ridiculously overpriced for what you get. It's cheaper to join four sites individually. There's also so much content that you can't really get your money's worth in one month.
I respectfully disagree about ATK Natural & Hairy, as I find pubic hair extremely sexy, but to each their own.
|
03-04-19 05:36pm
|
Reply
56
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
PJGirls is a one-trick pony. It focuses on very explicit gynecological views. I rated it based on how well it does on that basis. You come at the site with different criteria and explained your rating well. I liked your review a lot, and the differing criteria we use to judge the same site is what makes PU so valuable. You pointed out some really cogent points in your review that I hadn't thought about (like the camera angles), and I value seeing other opinions.
You wrote a good review. You might differ with me on how good PJGirls is, but that's what makes horse races, politics, and porn reviews. :)
|
03-03-19 08:32pm
|
Reply
57
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I just spent a few minutes reviewing the webmaster rules for PU. I hadn't looked at them for the simple reason that I don't have any affiliation with any website.
It appears that there are two infractions meriting suspension, (1) that no incentives be given for reviews, and (2) any added text to a site must not ask or influence users to submit a review or comment with a specific agenda.
If PJGirls' webmaster violated either of these, they merit suspension, as without honest, impartial reviews PU is useless.
|
03-03-19 06:44pm
|
Reply
58
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
I'm a big fan of pubic hair on girls, and Love Hairy is a decent site for that. But most of the models have a pretty sparse bush. It's a matter of degree I guess.
I do think that your suggestion for a MetArt site devoted to tanlines is a fantastic idea. I'd certainly check it out.
|
03-03-19 06:33pm
|
Reply
59
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
mbaya, thanks for the review. I too noticed the new download limit at PJGirls. I'm not terribly thrilled with it, but don't find it restrictive at all because I never use a download manager. It's not a limit on how much content you can download, but rather on how many connections you can make to the PJGirls servers in an hour. If you rely on a download manager, you'll find it restrictive, but if not, you'll literally never notice.
PJGirls staff wrote a post to all members explaining the issue, and laid out that too many connections from users were overloading the servers. They implemented the policy of 100 downloads in a hour to balance server usage for everyone on the site. I give kudos to PJGirls for good communications.
I don't have a very fast internet connection, and have never experienced timing out on PJGirls. It has at times been slow, but since the implementation of the download limit, it has been less likely to be slow.
I find it unusual that their webmaster was suspended from PU. Can anyone clarify why this occurred? I'm not familiar for what offences you can be suspended. They were suspended, but the site is still listed. Is that a reasonable reason to criticize the site? You obviously think so, but I cannot say because of lack of information.
Thanks for the good review. We differ in regards to the site's quality and you make a good case for your point of view in your review. Good job.
|
03-03-19 06:15pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
This poll has made me think about Trust Ratings on PU. I initially pretty much ignored the whole thing, with the rationale that individuals could make up their own minds about other users based on reviews and comments. I think this was a mistake. PU has a great community, and mutual respect has been a hallmark of this site. If Trust Ratings is the method that PU members can show appreciation to others, I have a long way to go to show my esteem for the members of this site.
|
03-03-19 04:59pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Nice to know I'm not the only one thinking about stuff like this. :)
|
03-01-19 09:05am
|
Reply
62
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
tangub, yeah, I noticed this feature too. You go to the Adult Time site and the only thing on the page is a "become a member" link in a field of color. No tour or preview available. I had been wanting to join a lot of the subnetworks that comprise Adult Time for some time now, and when collected into one network, I didn't even hesitate.
The point still stands though that there currently is no tour or preview function on the site.
|
03-01-19 09:00am
|
Review
63
|
Adult Time
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
04-02-19 01:00pm (Update History)
Reason: Changed score based on features I didn't know about at the time of review
|
| Pros: |
+massive, massive network of sites in one place (49,5493 videos; 33,876 picture sets)
+massive archive of popular models
+fast download speeds
+hi res videos and picture sets (up to 4K and 1920 x 1080 pics)
+intuitive site design
+excellent search features (a site this vast needs it)
+separate sliders to hide, show or exclusively show lesbian, bisexual, trans, and gay porn
+adult time community feature
+live cam available
+previews of upcoming features
+regular update schedule for each network listed |
| Cons: |
-videos and pictures are separate subheadings, limiting cross-searching
-some very old content in low res formats (the best they had at the time)
-most picture sets are screencaps of the videos
-so massive it's almost paralyzingly hard to decide what to look at first |
| Bottom Line: |
Adult Time is like the opening shot over the bow of the porn industry. It's exactly what the porn collecting community has wanted for years. It's got massive amounts of content, from dozens of previously stand-alone networks, all collected into one network that is well designed, easily searchable, easy to download, fun to browse, and is the porn equivalent of Wikipedia--you'll find yourself dragged down the rabbit hole of linking content that you can literally find hours have passed. It's also affordable. This site, in Beta mode right now, could be a game changer. It appears more like a competitor to free tube sites that have massive content than a site to distribute studio content.
Let's talk about content. Adult Time collects several networks into one place:
21 Bonus
21 Naturals
21 Sextreme
21 Sextury
Adult Time Originals
Burning Angel
Devil's Film
Fame Digital
Fantasy Massage
Girlsway
Jays Pov
Pretty Dirty
Pure Taboo
Rocco Siffredi
Vivid
This is a massive amount of content. Tens of thousands of videos, pictures, performers, niches all in one place and probably more importantly, layered with search features that allow you easily find exactly what you want.
There's several ways of organizing this, and you can search it all in each of these ways, or combine them. You can search videos, pictures, channels, DVDs, pornstars, each listed atop the site. You can further narrow your search by sexual orientation of content, channels you want to search, categories (both "main" and "all"), scene quality, scene length, or pornstar. Or all of the above at once. It's a major feat, and they pulled it off.
Unlike most reviews, it's kind of hard to talk about the porn in Adult Time's site. It has a little for just about everything, so you will probably find something you like no matter your tastes. Just put in your criteria and let the algorithm search and deliver the content you want. It's also fast. Hardly a delay for even the most complicated searches.
I cannot speak to their community or cams. I see the options, but haven't had time to look at them as you could look at one video a minute, and literally take you more than a month to just bring up every one. This leads to the biggest problem. The site is so massive, it can be paralyzingly difficult to decide what to look at first. First World problem, indeed. LOL
I personally think nothing is perfect, as perfect is a concept and not an achievable thing. A PU score of 100 is "perfect" so I can only give Adult Time a 99.
I don't like this site as much as some others, but I honestly think this is exactly what the porn collecting community has been clamoring for for years.
EDIT--There is no gay porn on Adult Time despite their being a slider to choose such content. Also, the price jumps after the first month. Changed my score from 99 to 94. |
|
02-28-19 07:11pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I'm of mixed mind about trust votes. I think any of the long-term members have a good idea whom among us is a trustworthy user, based on reviews and posts. It's more a shortcut for newer users to "grade" the reviewers (I don't know X as a reviewer, so what does the community think of X?). But why have this? If you read the review or comment, surely you don't need to know what other people think of the user and can make up your own mind on it's usefulness or validity. I kind of see both sides. A new member might want to kind of suss the user's validity with some trust score, and it kind of does that. But I inherently don't really care what other people think of a user, I'll make up my own mind based on their posts.
On the whole, I'd like to see anonymous trust scores eliminated.
|
02-28-19 04:54pm
|
Reply
65
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Honest discussion about porn is why I'm here.
I know several of the photographers used by ATK over the years also photograph for other sites. AllOver30 and WeAreHairy come to mind immediately. Maybe you might want to avoid those sites as well if that style of photography irks you.
|
11-28-18 05:16pm
|
Reply
66
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I've always liked the photographic style of ATK sites. I'm sure it's not to everyone's tastes, but I'm sure there are plenty of people like me who do like it. Partly it's because they have lots of spread shots, and few really artsy poses.
To each their own.
|
11-27-18 05:56pm
|
Reply
67
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
Pussyinsider's Reply
PJGirls is one of my favorite sites. Check out the review I did of them for more.
|
11-14-18 07:11pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
No. I just couldn't bear her shaven pubes. It was awkward.
|
10-31-18 06:15pm
|
Review
69
|
Teeny Black
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+really hot young black girls in hardcore action
+part of the Team Skeet network; membership in Teeny Black gets you access to the whole network
+each set has pics, screencaps, a trailer, and is streamable or downloadable in up to 1080 resolution
+intro to each scene gives details about the action in the scene
+excellent tag system with lots of tags based on content
+voting and commenting allowed |
| Cons: |
-small site, currently only 93 videos
-no 4K
-pre-checked cross sales and advertisements on the main login page
-scenes generally start with an interview, so it may take a while to get to the action
-slow updates (about once a month); a one month membership will give you access to the current archive, but don't expect a lot of new material in your month there |
| Bottom Line: |
Being a fan of "exotics" I naturally checked out this site first when I joined Team Skeet. I was thrilled to find a lot of really hot young black girls on Teeny Black. The features of the site are nice, standard for Team Skeet, and other than the ads for upgrading your membership, I really don't have any technical issues. The site is well-designed, pleasing in layout and function, and generally first class.
But let's talk about content. The girls are hot. But the scenes seem to be interview first and then hardcore action. I think it's a site for first time models to do an audition for Team Skeet. The scenes are hot when the action gets going. The interviews can be interesting (or not) depending on how much you like to just getting down to the action. One thing is that the action seems all interracial--a black girl and a white guy.
I gravitated here to see hot young black girls. I was less thrilled that there were long interviews, but the action is hot when it gets going. I wish the site updated more, but for it's niche it's pretty good. Definitely more of a video site than a picture site, as though they have pictures and screencaps, there aren't a ton of pictures of the models alone (most are just taken during the scene I suppose).
--Conclusion--
A nice niche site for fans of young black girls doing hardcore with white guys. Small site, but nice content. |
|
10-29-18 02:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I appreciate hearing a sexy voice, whether or not I understand the language or not. It's kind of like John Cleese's bit in "A Fish Called Wanda" where he talks in Russian to turn on Jamie Curtis. The words aren't important, but more the tone and inflection.
|
10-25-18 09:36pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I once was making love to a woman, and found out through the course of events that she had shaven pubes. I couldn't make love to her, and ended up leaving. I don't find pubic hair not just pleasing, but really a necessity.
|
10-25-18 09:34pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Shaved pussies.
|
10-19-18 11:21am
|
Reply
73
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Your excellent review made me give this site another look. I'm awed by the quality and eroticism of the site. Thanks.
|
09-22-18 11:23pm
|
Reply
74
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
@mbaya, you mentioned that you like speculum scenes. Have you looked at PJGirls? They do a lot of vids and photosets with speculums.
|
09-20-18 08:21pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I had a "shower surprise" scene in real life.
|
09-20-18 09:55am
|
|
